Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis |
- Gallup Poll Suggests Private Sector Hiring Down Since April
- Crowd of Fools Cheers Obama; Tweet Irony
- Republicans Prepare to Wave White Flag Again, This Time On Debt Ceiling; "Temporary, Partial, Non-Threats"
| Gallup Poll Suggests Private Sector Hiring Down Since April Posted: 02 Jan 2013 08:20 PM PST Gallup reports U.S. Job Creation Steady in December, but hiring in the nongovernment job sector stalls. The following charts (trendlines added by me) reflect answers to Gallup's question: Based on what you know or have seen, would you say that, in general, your company or employer is 1) hiring new people and expanding the size of its workforce, 2) not changing the size of its workforce, 3) letting people go and reducing the size of its workforce. Percentage of Employers Hiring Minus Those Letting Go  click on any chart for sharper image The hiring momentum that began in early 2009 slowed in mid-2011. Momentum vanished (at best) in March or April of 2012. Slowdown in Hiring Since Mid-2011  There appears to be even less momentum from this perspective. However, the first chart is simply a subtraction of the numbers in the second chart. Factor in Government Employment and Things Look Worse  From this perspective, private hiring peaked in April of 2012 and has since been in a very slow decline. Meanwhile, states and local governments have been adding workers since the beginning of the year although it is highly doubtful they can afford such actions with private sector running at stall speed at best. Bear in mind, two things: First, the survey represents what people perceive to be happening at their employer. Actual hiring or firing may be different. Second, these charts only show direction not size. Thus, a small-sized company laying off a single person counts as much as a larger company that is hiring 40. Of course, the opposite is true as well (a small-sized company hiring a single person counts as much as a large company firing 40). However, based on the randomness of the samples, there will be more calls to those working for large-sized companies than those working for small or medium-sized companies and most people are probably aware of what their company is doing. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com |
| Crowd of Fools Cheers Obama; Tweet Irony Posted: 02 Jan 2013 11:55 AM PST Caroline Baum, one of my favorite Bloomberg columnists has an interesting article today that's worth a read. Please consider Wanted: Middle-Class Tweeters for White House Event. Who were these people, gathered on the afternoon of New Year's Eve to fete the president as a deal to avert the fiscal cliff was hanging in the balance?Tweet This Politico notes Obama's staged event, jokes draw McCain rebuke The crowd was nothing if not adoring. ("Thank you for having us!" Two standing ovations.) And the president did seem in a good mood. (Cracking jokes about showing up at an audience member's house to ring in the new year.)Tweet Irony
The fact of the matter is youth overpay for health-care as the benefits primarily go to the elderly. Obama needed a pool of fresh suckers to overpay for health-care costs to keep the system solvent for a bit longer. Since nothing was done to contain costs, Obama will be asking for more and more money in the future. Baum asked "Don't they understand that the president has done nothing to protect future generations from a crushing debt burden? Nothing about deficit reduction other than to talk about it?" Obviously not. The crowd [of fools] was adoring. Young Americans tweeted Obama and they got an invite to bow down to the person making them debt-slaves to union educators as well as debt-slaves to the ungrateful elderly. By the time they are old enough to collect benefits, the system will be bankrupt, with no benefits to be had. In the meantime, Republicans Prepare to Wave White Flag Again, This Time On Debt Ceiling, proving that neither party is capable of a remotely honest discussion. The sad irony in this mess is youth have gotten nothing out of Obama but a big screw job. And for that screw job, they offer adoring praise. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com |
| Posted: 02 Jan 2013 09:41 AM PST Having totally collapsed on deficit reductions in fiscal cliff non-negotiations (agreeing to a mere $12 billion in cuts down from an Obama offer of $600 billion), Republicans are already offering signs they will once again wave the white flag when it comes to the alleged battle over the debt ceiling. Reuters reports Bigger fights loom after "fiscal cliff" deal. President Barack Obama and congressional Republicans looked ahead on Wednesday toward the next round of even bigger budget fights after reaching a hard-fought "fiscal cliff" deal that narrowly averted potentially devastating tax hikes and spending cuts.Retreat, Retreat, Then Surrender Let's stop right there for a second. What "hard fight" was there? It certainly took a lot of time to reach a deal, but there never was much of a fight. Every day Republicans offered more and more concessions until deficit reductions were whittled down to a mere $12 billion or so from a starting point of $600 billion. Senate Republicans immediately waved the white flag of surrender as only 5 Republicans voted against the deal. Please see Obama Deal Adds $3.97 Trillion to Deficit Over 10 Years; Only 5 Republicans Voted Against; White-Flag Surrender for details. This was a pathetic case of retreat, retreat, then surrender, with every retreat making the president more confident he would get his way. Reuters continues ... [The fiscal cliff agreement] set up political showdowns over the next two months on spending cuts and on raising the nation's limit on borrowing. Republicans, angry the deal did little to curb the federal deficit, promised to use the debt ceiling debate to win deep spending cuts next time.Opportunity to Surrender Again There is no opportunity here. Read the paragraph carefully to see if you can spot the crucial words. In case you missed it, the crucial word is "temporary". More specifically the crucial phrase is "willing to tolerate a temporary, partial government shutdown, which is what that could mean". The word "temporary" is pathetic enough. But Toomey goes even further, adding the word "partial". Temporary, Partial, Non-Threats Who is supposed to fear a "partial, temporary" shutdown? Anyone? Sadly, Republicans are already signaling they are prepared for more temporary threats coupled with more permanent can-kicking exercises. The wimpy language bantered about by Republicans before debt ceiling debate even begins suggests the safe thing to do is prepare for more retreats and more white flags. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com "Wine Country" Economic Conference Hosted By Mish Click on Image to Learn More  |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |
Postări
