Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis |
- Another Yuan Devaluation Already?
- Hooray! Huge Rent Hikes Coming; How Will It Affect Price Inflation?
- Dutch Report Concludes MH17 Shot Down by Ground-to-Air BUK Missile; Puzzle Still Missing Pieces
Another Yuan Devaluation Already? Posted: 13 Oct 2015 08:37 PM PDT I was intrigued by a Zerhedge post this evening entitled Gold Jumps As China Devalues Yuan By Most In 2 Months, "Boosts Reforms" Of Corporate Bond Bubble. OK - Gold is up a bit, but I cannot find any reference to China devaluing the Yuan again. ZH made this claim "The Yuan has been fixed stronger for 8 straight days... but tonight PBOC devalues Yuan by 177pips - the most in 2 months," accompanied with this chart. I cannot find a reference to "China weakens yuan most since August 13" other than ZH. I assume Bloomberg made that statement as ZH claims "Charts: Bloomberg". Here is a bit of perspective on the "devaluation" claim. USD vs Yuan Is that a devaluation, or is that a reversal of a correction to a previous devaluation? The answer of course is the latter. Mike "Mish" Shedlock | ||||||||||||||||
Hooray! Huge Rent Hikes Coming; How Will It Affect Price Inflation? Posted: 13 Oct 2015 10:54 AM PDT In news that is bound to make the inflationists at the Fed as well as property owners happy, Landlords Will Hike Rents by 8% this Year. Some 88% of property managers raised their rent in the last 12 months and 68% predict that rental rates will continue to rise in the next year by an average of 8%, according to a survey of more than 500 of Rent.com's property management customers, which the site says represents thousands of rental properties and hundreds of thousands of rental units. That's nearly three times the wage increase that most employees can expect this year.Yardi Survey Reader "BJ" is retired but works part-time a number of hours each week, surveying apartments for rent. He reports ... Hi MishMeasuring Housing Inflation The Fed wants inflation. But how do they measure it? The Fed's preferred measure is PCE (personal Consumption Expenditures) price changes, not the CPI. The housing components are quite dissimilar. Sam Ro writing for Business Insider explains the Difference Between PCE And CPI. Why does the Fed prefer PCE over CPI? Societe Generale's Aneta Markowska explained in a June 19 research note:PCE vs CPI Doug Short at Advisor perspectives Deconstructs the CPI as follows. That pie chart was produced from the December 2014 BLS PDF on the Relative Importance of Components in the Consumer Price Index But housing contains shelter, insurance, fuel, rents, and other items. Here is a breakdown of shelter.
Please note that home prices are nowhere to be found. The Fed believes homes are a capital expense. The BLS also ignores home prices, and neither accurately count rents. Of the 32.711% weighing to CPI "shelter" only 7.159 percentage points are assigned to rent. The largest single item is Owners' Equivalent Rent (OER) accounting for a whopping 24.339% of the CPI. Owners' Equivalent Rent The BLS Explains How the CPI Measures Price Change of Owners' Equivalent Rent. The expenditure weight in the CPI market basket for Owners' equivalent rent of primary residence (OER) is based on the following question that the Consumer Expenditure Survey asks of consumers who own their primary residence: "If someone were to rent your home today, how much do you think it would rent for monthly, unfurnished and without utilities?"Essentially the BLS asks home owners how much rent they would pay if they rented their own homes from themselves. And that is the single largest component in the entire CPI. Not only does the Fed and BLS miss housing bubbles, they do not even accurately measure "rent". But hip, hip, hooray! This will have at least some impact on the CPI and PCE so the inflationist fools will be cheering as the average renter gets crushed. Mike "Mish" Shedlock | ||||||||||||||||
Dutch Report Concludes MH17 Shot Down by Ground-to-Air BUK Missile; Puzzle Still Missing Pieces Posted: 13 Oct 2015 08:21 AM PDT The Dutch investigation into flight MH17, a shot down over Ukraine officially concluded today. The Official Report Confirms MH17 Shot Down by Missile. Dutch officials have confirmed that Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 was brought down by a missile and criticised Ukraine for not closing its airspace over its eastern regions despite the conflict, in the first official investigation findings into the crash that killed 298 people in July last year.BUK-Type The type of BUK cannot determine whether the rebels or the Ukrainian troops fired the missile, but it does seem to rule out Russia directly. The Guardian provides this interesting snip from the report: "The damage observed on the wreckage is not consistent with the damage caused by the warhead of an air-to-air missile in use in the region in amount of damage, type of damage and type of fragments. The high-energy object damage on the wreckage of flight MH17 is therefore not caused by an air-to-air missile."The idea that Russia itself was responsible always seemed silly, at least to me. And evidence was clearly doctored to point the finger at the rebels. But that still does not mean the rebels did not launch the BUK. Flight Path Russia could have and should have closed down that airspace. But so could have Ukraine. And countries may also have wisely decided on their own accord it does not make sense to fly over a war zone. Tribunals Mistakes are not grounds for a tribunal. The US never faced tribunals when it accidentally shot down planes. On the other hand, if Kiev purposely directed MH17 into an area where rebels might make a mistake, that would be another indeed. We are one step closer to understanding what happened. But where are all the recordings in the black box that show why MH17 was at an altitude that could be hit by a BUK? It was Kiev that would have benefited from a purposeful rebel mistake, not the rebels. Lots of questions remain, even if the Rebels fired the BUK. Mike "Mish" Shedlock |
You are subscribed to email updates from Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |