Central Perk

marți, 10 mai 2011

Join the Conversation on Immigration Reform

Your Daily Snapshot for
Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Join the Conversation on Immigration Reform

Today at 3:30 p.m. EDT (1:30 p.m. MDT), President Obama will lay out his vision for an immigration system for America's 21st century economy. Here are a few ways you can get involved:

Watch the speech live at WhiteHouse.gov/live
Join the conversation on Twitter using the hashtag #immigration
Tell us what you think about immigration reform through Advise the Advisor

Photo of the Day

First Lady Michelle Obama participates in the “Pit Crew Challenge” station during an event with the President's Council on Fitness, Sports and Nutrition on the South Lawn of the White House, May 9, 2011. The First Lady visited seven activity stations during the event, which helped promote both the Let's Move! and Joining Forces initiatives. (Official White House Photo by Chuck Kennedy)

SEOptimise

Visit Us at Internet World & Give Us a #highfiveseoptimise to Win a Panda!

Posted: 10 May 2011 03:14 AM PDT

If you’re at Internet World this week (today, Weds and Thurs) make sure you come and drop by our stand (E3056) to say hello! You’ll also have a chance to win a panda by tweeting #highfiveseoptimise to us!

SEOptimise at Internet World

We’re also delighted to announce the winners of our free SMX London ticket giveaway as Hannah Rampton, Dom Hodgson and Rob Nicholson – congrats guys, see you there!

Seth's Blog : Marketing to nobody

Marketing to nobody

Nobody wears a watch any more.

Nobody wears a tie either.

Nobody shops at a bookstore, at least nobody I know.

The market of nobody is big indeed. You can do really well selling to nobody if you do your homework. In fact, most companies selling to nobody outperform those that are trying to sell to everyone.

• Email to a friend •

luni, 9 mai 2011

SEOmoz Daily SEO Blog

More "Panda" Update Information Starting to Come Out

Posted: 08 May 2011 03:38 PM PDT

Posted by MikeCP

On Friday, Google posted an update on its Webmaster Central blog entitled "Providing More Guidance on Building High-Quality Sites". The piece expands on much of what Google has said about the Panda update since its original release on February 24th.

In public statements about the Panda update, Google has referenced a number of questions that they're attempting to answer algorithmically. "Would you feel comfortable giving your credit card information to this site?" and "Would you accept medical advice from this site?" are two that have been around since the beginning. Friday's Webmaster Central post offered up a more substantial list with some of the highlights below:

Does the site have duplicate, overlapping, or redundant articles on the same or similar topics with slightly different keyword variations?
Does this article have spelling, stylistic, or factual errors?
Are the topics driven by genuine interests of readers of the site, or does the site generate content by attempting to guess what might rank well in search engines?
Does the article provide original content or information, original reporting, original research, or original analysis?
Is the site a recognized authority on its topic?
Is the content mass-produced by or outsourced to a large number of creators, or spread across a large network of sites, so that individual pages or sites don’t get as much attention or care?
Is this the sort of page you’d want to bookmark, share with a friend, or recommend?
Does this article have an excessive amount of ads that distract from or interfere with the main content?
Would users complain when they see pages from this site?
Would you be comfortable giving your credit card information to this site?

Along with the set of questions, Google's Amit Singhal also added:

One other specific piece of guidance we've offered is that low-quality content on some parts of a website can impact the whole site’s rankings, and thus removing low quality pages, merging or improving the content of individual shallow pages into more useful pages, or moving low quality pages to a different domain could eventually help the rankings of your higher-quality content.

Answering the "Feeling" Questions

We can deduce how Google can algorithmically answer quite a few of the questions (Richard Baxter did just that in a great post), but what about those "feeling" questions, like the credit card question? It's tough to say, but actually having most of the questions answered about your site might provide some valuable feedback. If you're an in-house SEO for a site that has been punished, perhaps one of the following services can be used to support a claim for a redesign or some other change in site philosophy.

Mechanical Turk/FeedbackArmy

The cheapest and most scalable way to get this feedback would have to be through Mechanical Turk. If you haven't used the service, mturk allows you to break a project down into mini tasks that mturk's users will complete for sometimes as low as one penny.

Let's assume our task is for the user to visit the site in question, then answer one of our "feeling" questions. It would take no more than a minute of a Turkers time, so a fair price would probably be around 10 cents. Set your project to run until you've got 50 answers, and for $5.00 you've got 50 responses to your question. For another $5.00 you can ask Turkers to visit a competing site and ask the same question, allowing you to compare the results between the two sites.

FeedbackArmy is another option that would work. Think of FeedbackArmy as a front-end for Mechanical Turk, as they both use the Turk workforce. You'll end up paying a bit more than if you dealt directly with Mechanical Turk, but the setup process is much simpler.

UserTesting

UserTesting is a higher-end feedback solution. For $39 you'll get a video of a user interacting with your site. UserTesting allows you to ask the user up to 4 questions after they've completed the feedback video, which would be a perfect place to ask some of our Panda questions.

Other Panda Odds and Ends

NPR did a story on Panda's effect on one company's struggle since getting Panda-fied: Google's search tweaks puts a company at risk

Matt Cutts quote from that story:

Think about something like an Apple product, when you buy an Apple product you open it up, the box is beautiful, the packaging is beautiful, the entire experience is really wonderful.

It sounds to me that this statement is really just another way of saying "large amounts of duplicated or poor content on your site can impact the entire domain".

Reversing the Effects of Panda

Tom Critchlow had this exchange with Matt Cutts on Twitter:

@mattcutts assuming a site completely reworks their site/content after panda, how long before they will regain traffic?less than a minute ago via web Favorite Retweet ReplyTom Critchlow
tomcritchlow

@tomcritchlow short version is that it's not data that's updated daily right now. More like when we re-run the algorithms to regen the data.less than a minute ago via web Favorite Retweet ReplyMatt Cutts
mattcutts

Moral of this story: Don't expect rankings to come right back after making changes. This is a little frustrating because webmasters can't make a change, wait to see if the change "worked", then try something else. It also might explain why there have been so few reports of sites regaining their traffic.

A Third Panda Spotted?

Rumors picked up in early May that a third Panda update may have gone live. Users were reporting wild fluctuations in rankings and other oddities in the Google cache and site search commands. Considering what Matt Cutts said above, it makes sense for Panda updates to hit suddenly and all at once, rather than over a period of time. Some are reporting that their exact match domains took a hit.

So our Panda timeline now reads:

Feb 24th, 2011: Panda rollout on Google.com searches
April 11th, 2011: Panda rollout to all English speaking Google sites. Additional tweaks made to original algorithm
May 3-6th, 2011: Third Panda update?

Have you seen any traffic changes during this time frame? Have any of your sites recovered from initially being Panda-fied?

Do you like this post? Yes No

Seth's Blog : Selling vs. inviting

Selling vs. inviting

Selling is often misunderstood, largely by people who would be a lot more comfortable merely inviting.

If I invite you to a wedding, or a party, or to buy a $500,000 TV ad for $500, there's no resistance on your part. Either you jump at the chance and say yes, or you have a conflict and say no. It's not my job to help you overcome your fear of commitment, to help you see the ultimate value and most of all, to work with you as you persuade yourself and others to do something that might just work.

If the marketing and product development team do a great job, selling is a lot easier... so easy it might be called inviting. The guy at the counter of the Apple store selling the iPad2 isn't really selling them at all. Hey, there's a line out the door of people with money in their pockets. I'm inviting you to buy this, if you don't want it, next!

The real estate broker who says that the house would sell if only he could get below market pricing and a pre-approved mortgage is avoiding his job.

The salesperson's job: Help people overcome their fear so they can commit to something they'll end up glad they invested in.

The goal of a marketer ought to be to make it so easy to be a salesperson, you're merely an inviter. The new marketing is largely about this--creating a scenario where you don't even need salespeople. (Until you do.)

Selling is a profession. It's hard work. Ultimately, it's rewarding, because the thing you're selling delivers real value to the purchaser, and your job is to counsel them so they can get the benefit.

But please... don't insist that the hard work be removed from your job to allow you to become an inviter. That's great work if you can get it, but it's not a career.

• Email to a friend •

marți, 10 mai 2011

Join the Conversation on Immigration Reform

SEOptimise

SEOptimise

Seth's Blog : Marketing to nobody

Marketing to nobody

More Recent Articles

luni, 9 mai 2011

SEOmoz Daily SEO Blog

SEOmoz Daily SEO Blog