marți, 26 iulie 2011

How to Tweet From Your Archives Without Pissing People Off Graywolf's SEO Blog

How to Tweet From Your Archives Without Pissing People Off Graywolf's SEO Blog


How to Tweet From Your Archives Without Pissing People Off

Posted: 26 Jul 2011 10:30 AM PDT

Post image for How to Tweet From Your Archives Without Pissing People Off

The following is part of a series on automation. In this post, we will look at using the tweet old posts plugin. To be honest, this is an extremely effective tool for automating your Twitter stream; that said, it is also one of the most controversial.

Most people are content to simply turn this plugin on and let it run. They’re making a mistake. IMHO you need to either curate your blog to create a group of your best posts to retweet or you need to exclude the posts that aren’t evergreen from your archive tweets.

Step one. During your yearly content audit,  decide if you will use a “best of” category or create a category to exclude. On this blog, I have multiple exclusion categories: one of posts not to tweet, one of posts not to appear in the carousels,  and one of posts not to be included in the popular posts page  or sidebar display. Sometime it’s because they are date sensitive and won’t be important in a few months, sometimes it’s because the posts rank for non SEO centric topics, and sometimes it’s just an editorial decision.

Next visit the plugin settings page and check/uncheck the categories you want to tweet or not tweet.

screen shot of categories to not retweet

Look at your total number of posts, subtract the excluded posts, and you’ll know how many posts are eligible for “archive tweets.”

Count of how many posts are excluded

Depending on how many posts you have, determine a frequency for retweeting your archives. If you only have 300 posts and tweet three a day, you will repeat your tweets 3+ times a year. IMHO that’s a mistake. You should really have enough posts and determine a frequency that doesn’t tweet them more than twice a year. There are exceptions to this rule that I talk about in how to use hootsuite and bufferapp together.

If you are unsure about how often and when to tweet, I suggest you look at tweriod  (see What is the Best Time of Day to Tweet). Additionally, take a look at some information on social scheduling. Basically speaking, you want to tweet when the most people will see your tweet, click on the link, read it, and hopefully retweet it. Retweeting it at 2 AM, when most people are asleep or at when it’s likely to only be seen by bots, isn’t doing you any good or driving any traffic or attention to your website.

The last part of making the most out of tweeting old posts is fine tuning. You may have to adjust your frequency or remove the odd post that is in the retweet pool. If I see a bad “archive” tweet, I kill it on the spot and flag it not to retweet. Other than that, I review my archive tweets once a week to make sure the quality is as high as I can make it.

Since I work in the internet marketing space, my followers have a lot of overlap with social media fans, experts, and consultants. To be honest, many of them are not fans of the archive tweets. First off, let me say that social media experts are like locusts cross bred with an ADHD adult gone off their meds. They will consume content like a plague of locusts consumes a crop, and they expect to be entertained with fresh new content the way a three year old hopped up on too much soda and birthday cake  expects to be entertained during a birthday party. They are a mutant aberration and, unless they are your audience, you can largely ignore them … Or at least ask if they want some cheese with their whine … :-)

That said, there is a fine line between being whiney and offering up constructive criticism. It’s often hard to tell them apart. Look for the nuggets that ring true, are really problematic, or present an opportunity for you to improve. Don’t pander to the great unwashed masses or allow them to dictate what should or shouldn’t be in your stream. It’s your stream, and they are free to unfollow whenever they want to. While I have made adjustments based on some suggestions, I think they are just jealous that my robo-tweets get more attention than their lovingly hand crafted ones … but you know what they say.  Haters gonna’  hate …

So what are the takeaways from this post:

  • Set up a “best of” or “exclusion” category so that you only retweet your highest quality posts.
  • Study your followers’ behaviors to find the optimal time to retweet old posts.
  • Find an interval and frequency that keeps you from being too repetitive.
  • Fine tune your “best of” or “exclusion” list regularly.
  • Isolate the constructive criticism from whiners and haters. Adjust your strategy as needed.

Epilogue
This post itself was conceived in response to a tweet that Scott Straten (aka Unmarketing) made about how how archive tweets are bad.

Scott Stratten Doesn't Like Archive Tweets

I like Scott. I’ve met him at pubcon, he’s a great guy and, if you ever have the opportunity to see him speak, you absolutely should. He’s very inspirational. Additionally, his Ted talk is amazingly heartfelt.

Click here to view the embedded video.

That said, I disagree with him about automated tweets. He falls onto the “social media is a conversation” line of things, and I simply disagree. I don’t think most people or companies need to spend all day on Twitter. In fact, I think that’s a horrible idea, with very little ROI. However, I understand my strategy is not the strategy for everyone or every situation, so my objective here is to provide balance with a different opinion and implementation.

photo credit: Shutterstock

tla starter kit

Related posts:

  1. What is the Best Time of Day to Tweet Once you have gotten past the hurdle of getting followers...
  2. Why It’s OK to Offend People in Social Media Recently, Kenneth Cole took a bit of criticism in the...
  3. How to Use Twitter as a Marketing Tool with Tweet Pro So my friend Cesar Serna launched his new site this...
  4. People like Remixed Blogs! So I’ve mentioned before I’ve had people subscribe to feed...
  5. How to Create a Local Twitter Account Most of the the tutorials on the web dealing with...
  6. Advertisers:

    1. Text Link Ads - New customers can get $100 in free text links.
    2. BOTW.org - Get a premier listing in the internet's oldest directory.
    3. Ezilon.com Regional Directory - Check to see if your website is listed!
    4. Need an SEO Audit for your website, look at my SEO Consulting Services
    5. Link Building- Backlink Build offers customized link building services
    6. Directory Journal - Get permanent deep links in a search engine friendly directory
    7. LinkWheel SEO - Get Web 2.0 Backlinks
    8. Links From PR9 Sites - Get In Top 3 Google ASAP
    9. RevSEO High PR BackLinks- Private High PageRank Homepage Link Network
    10. Limited time offer! World's #1 SEO toolbox at 63% off: Get Your Copy Now
    11. TigerTech - Great Web Hosting service at a great price.

    This post originally came from Michael Gray who is an SEO Consultant. Be sure not to miss the Thesis Wordpress Theme review.

    How to Tweet From Your Archives Without Pissing People Off

President Obama: 'The entire world is watching"

The White House Your Daily Snapshot for
Tuesday, July 26, 2011
 

President Obama: "The entire world is watching"

Yesterday, the President addressed the nation on the consequences the stalemate in Congress could have on the stability of our economy. He impressed upon the country the urgency of the negotiations, and also remarked on the best approach to avoid default and cut the deficit.

Watch the video, and read some of the remarks.




In Case You Missed It

Here are some of the top stories from the White House blog.

President Obama Welcomes the World Series Champion San Francisco Giants
President Obama met with the 2010 World Series champs, the San Francisco Giants, at the White House

Congressional Inaction Halts Aviation Projects Across US
Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood emphasizes the large number of American jobs at stake in the Nation's aviation infrastructure, and urges Congress to revisit and pass a Federal Aviation Administration bill.

Introducing the Joining Forces Community Challenge
First Lady Michelle Obama and Dr Jill Biden announce a new initiative to recognize and celebrate Americans who make a difference in the lives of military families.

Today's Schedule

All times are Eastern Daylight Time (EDT).

10:00 AM: The President and the Vice President receive the Presidential Daily Briefing

10:30 AM: The President meets with senior advisors

12:30 PM: Press Briefing by Press Secretary Jay Carney WhiteHouse.gov/live

3:15 PM: The President and the Vice President meet with Secretary of Defense Panetta

Get Updates 

Sign Up for the Daily Snapshot 

Stay Connected

  

This email was sent to e0nstar1.blog@gmail.com
Manage Subscriptions for e0nstar1.blog@gmail.com
Sign Up for Updates from the White House

Unsubscribe e0nstar1.blog@gmail.com | Privacy Policy

Please do not reply to this email. Contact the White House

The White House • 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW • Washington, DC 20500 • 202-456-1111 
    

 

Seth's Blog : Defining quality

Defining quality

Given how much we talk about it, it's surprising that there's a lot of confusion about what quality is.

What's a higher quality car: a one-year old Honda Civic or a brand new top of the line Bentley?

It turns out that there are at least two useful ways to describe quality, and the conflict between them leads to the confusion...

Quality of design: Thoughtfulness and processes that lead to user delight, that make it likely that someone will seek out a product, pay extra for it or tell a friend.

Quality of manufacture: Removing any variation in tolerances that a user will notice or care about.

In the case of the Civic, the quality of manufacture is clearly higher by any measure. The manufacturing is more exact, the likelihood that the car will perform (or not perform) in a way you don't expect is tiny.

On the other hand, we can probably agree that the design of the Bentley is more bespoke, luxurious and worthy of comment.

Let's think about manufacturing variation for a second: Fedex promises overnight delivery. 10:20 vs 10:15 is not something the recipient cares about. Tomorrow vs. Thursday, they care about a lot. The goal of the manufacturing process isn't to reach the perfection of infinity. It's to drive tolerances so hard that the consumer doesn't care about the variation. Spending an extra million dollars to get five minutes faster isn't as important to the Fedex brand as spending a million dollars to make the website delightful.

Dropbox is a company that got both right. The design of the service is so useful it now seems obvious. At the same time, though, and most critically, the manufacture of the service is to a very high tolerance. Great design in a backup service would be useless if one in a thousand files were corrupted.

Microsoft struggles (when they struggle) because sometimes they get both wrong. Software that has a user interface that's a pain to use rarely leads to delight, and bugs represent significant manufacturing defects, because sometimes (usually just before a presentation), the software doesn't work as expected--a noticed variation.

The Shake Shack, many New York burger fans would argue, is a higher quality fast food experience than McDonald's, as evidenced by lines out the door and higher prices. Except from a production point of view. The factory that is McDonald's far outperforms the small chain in terms of efficient production of the designed goods within certain tolerances. It's faster and more reliable. And yet, many people choose to pay extra to eat at Shake Shack. Because it's "better." Faster doesn't matter as much to the Shake Shack customer.

The balance, then, is to understand that marketers want both. A short-sighted CFO might want neither.

Deming defined quality as: (result of work effort)/(total costs). Unless you understand both parts of that fraction, you'll have a hard time allocating your resources.

Consider what Phillip Crosby realized a generation ago: Quality is free.

It's cheaper to design marketing quality into the product than it is to advertise the product.

It's cheaper to design manufacturing quality into a factory than it is to inspect it in after the product has already been built.

These go hand in hand. Don't tell me about server uptime if your interface is lame or the attitude of the people answering the phone is obnoxious. Don't promise me a brilliant new service if you're unable to show up for the meeting. Don't show me a boring manuscript with no typos in it, and don't try to sell me a brilliant book so filled with errors that I'm too distracted to finish it.

There are two reasons that quality of manufacture is diminishing in importance as a competitive tool:

a. incremental advances in this sort of quality get increasingly more expensive. Going from one defect in a thousand to one in a million is relatively cheap. Going from one in a million to one in a billion, though, costs a fortune.

b. As manufacturing skills increase (and information about them is exchanged) it means that your competition has as much ability to manufacture with quality as you do.

On the other hand, quality of design remains a fast-moving, judgment-based process where supremacy is hard to reach and harder to maintain.

And yet organizations often focus obsessively on manufacturing quality. Easier to describe, easier to measure, easier to take on as a group. It's essential, it's just not as important as it used to be.

 

More Recent Articles

[You're getting this note because you subscribed to Seth Godin's blog.]

Don't want to get this email anymore? Click the link below to unsubscribe.




Your requested content delivery powered by FeedBlitz, LLC, 9 Thoreau Way, Sudbury, MA 01776, USA. +1.978.776.9498

 

luni, 25 iulie 2011

Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis

Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis


Dollar Plunges as Obama, Boehner Speak on Deficit; Finger-Pointing Text

Posted: 25 Jul 2011 09:06 PM PDT

Tonight president Obama and speaker Boehner gave back-to-back speeches pointing the finger at each other as to who is to blame for the debt crisis. I did not think much of either speech, neither did the Forex markets.

MarketWatch reports Dollar plunges after Obama, Boehner speak on debt
Speaking from the White House Monday evening, Obama urged congressional leaders to give him a "fair compromise" about cutting the deficit and raising the U.S. debt ceiling in "the next few days."

The dollar initially fell against the yen as Obama spoke, to ¥77.96 from ¥78.24 before the speech, but it pared losses as he finished his remarks.

The greenback resumed against the yen its fall as U.S. House Speaker John Boehner spoke, supporting a Republican plan to end the debt stand-off.
Text of Finger-Pointing Speeches



US Dollar Index



click on chart for sharper image

Mike "Mish" Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com
Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List


Fiat Money Produces Endless Sea of Wars, Debt, Social Inequality, Economic Bubbles, Rampant Consumerism, Environmental Rape; Why Gold is the Answer

Posted: 25 Jul 2011 12:07 PM PDT

My friend Dominic Frisby put together an interesting video on the rationale for a gold standard.



link if above video does not play: Gold: Independent Money

A gold standard will not cure every social ill in the world, nor will it stop all senseless wars. Nothing will. However, by now it should be clear to everyone that the current fiat system is good only for bankers, brokers, politicians, war mongers, and the already wealthy. Everyone else loses as inflation eventually eats away at what's left of the rapidly shrinking "middle class".

All fiat currencies including the US dollar are doomed. The only debate is the path it takes to get there.

For further discussion please consider



Mike "Mish" Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com
Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List


Spanish Government Bonds Hit 6% Again; Yields Climb in Italy

Posted: 25 Jul 2011 09:54 AM PDT

With most eyes focused on the smoke and mirrors debt ceiling fiasco in the US, inquiring minds note that sovereign debt yields in Europe are once again climbing with 10-Year Spanish government bonds touching 6% once again.

Spain 10-Year Government Bonds



Bloomberg Quote: Spain

Italy 10-Year Government Bonds



Bloomberg Quote: Italy

Note that Bloomberg's charts do not match the quotes, so go by the quotes, not the charts.

Lower yields on Greece, Portugal, and Ireland are meaningless if they head higher on Spain and Italy. That Spain is back above 6% already and Italy headed there is significant.

Mike "Mish" Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com
Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List


Boehner, Cantor Attack Obama's $2.4 Trillion "Blank Check" Plan; Both Sides Digging In; It's a Four Player Scenario, Pelosi is Irrelevant

Posted: 25 Jul 2011 08:43 AM PDT

Four players must agree to do a debt ceiling resolution or nothing gets done. Those players are House Speaker John Boehner, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, and President Obama.

Many have House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi in that group. However, Pelosi is irrelevant. The house passed the "Cut, Cap, & Balance" without Pelosi so the House can pass something without her support again.

The problem is the Senate and President Obama.

Debate Getting More Rancorous, Both Sides Digging In

Both sides are digging in, and if anything the verbal attacks are getting more rancorous.

Boehner and House Majority Leader Cantor both laid into Obama's proposal as noted in Boehner's Blog Common-Sense GOP Effort Will Prevent Job-Crushing Default & Deny President Obama a $2.4 Trillion Blank Check.

Highlights from Boehner's Blog

  • Today, House Republican leaders will discuss with lawmakers a new framework designed to prevent a national default while ensuring any debt limit increase granted to President Obama includes spending reforms and cuts that exceed the debt limit hike. This common-sense plan is aimed at stopping President Obama's indefensible quest for a debt limit increase that would run past the next election without a process in place to ensure spending is being cut as the debt ceiling is being raised.

  • I know the president's worried about his next election. But my God, shouldn't we be worried about the country?

  • President Obama desperately wants a large debt limit increase that will take him past the next presidential election. Granting the president's request would amount to giving the president a $2.4 trillion blank check he can use to continue the spending binge that has driven our nation to the brink of a job-destroying downgrade and default.

  • The president has made it pretty clear he sees this debate as inconvenient compared to his desire to create more 'stimulus' programs. "I'd rather be talking about stuff that everybody welcomes – like new programs," he said at a recent press conference.

  • He is trying to set up a no-win situation for taxpayers: either he gets his $2.4 trillion blank check, or America defaults.

  • Congress can deny President Obama a blank check and protect the American people by passing legislation to prevent a default that is consistent with the principles of the Cut, Cap, & Balance plan that passed the House with bipartisan support.

  • The American people are still asking the question: 'where are the jobs?' And they know Washington's spending binge is part of the problem.

  • For the sake of our economy and our future, we need to stop spending money we don't have and start creating a better environment for long-term job growth.

Smoke and Mirrors

Over the weekend several people asked what was in the various plans and how much would really be cut. Unfortunately details are scant and the plans keep changing. However, anything short of the "grand bargain" has no real substance. It is debatable if the "grand bargain" has substance.

There will be an agreement. The question is what that agreement will look like. No one knows exactly but the short answer is "smoke and mirrors".

Mike "Mish" Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com
Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List


Sea of Red in Asia, China Down Nearly 3 Percent; New Record High for Gold; "Super Committee" is Super Idiocy

Posted: 25 Jul 2011 01:19 AM PDT

In the wake of a budget ceiling impasse, markets in Asia are down sharply with China leading the way, down nearly 3 percent.



Seriously, does anyone think Congress will not pass something?

The US is not going to default and everyone knows it. Of course there are plenty of reasons for the global markets to sink, so it's remotely possible the markets picked this time to worry about the slowing global economy.

New Record High for Gold

One thing does make sense this evening and that is a new high for gold in spite a firm US dollar.

The US is not going to do much about the deficit, nor is the crisis in Europe over. Add in an overheating Chinese economy and a potential downgrade of US debt and gold ought to be headed higher and it is.

Super Committee Nonsense

I thought it was Tim Geithner who came up with the "Super Committee" idea but he was merely silly enough to latch on to it. The latest hare-brained scheme comes from Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and Majority Leader Harry Reid.

Please consider 'Super Congress': Debt Ceiling Negotiators Aim To Create New Legislative Body
Debt ceiling negotiators think they've hit on a solution to address the debt ceiling impasse and the public's unwillingness to let go of benefits such as Medicare and Social Security that have been earned over a lifetime of work: Create a new Congress.

This "Super Congress," composed of members of both chambers and both parties, isn't mentioned anywhere in the Constitution, but would be granted extraordinary new powers. Under a plan put forth by Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and his counterpart Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), legislation to lift the debt ceiling would be accompanied by the creation of a 12-member panel made up of 12 lawmakers -- six from each chamber and six from each party.

Legislation approved by the Super Congress -- which some on Capitol Hill are calling the "super committee" -- would then be fast-tracked through both chambers, where it couldn't be amended by simple, regular lawmakers, who'd have the ability only to cast an up or down vote. With the weight of both leaderships behind it, a product originated by the Super Congress would have a strong chance of moving through the little Congress and quickly becoming law. A Super Congress would be less accountable than the system that exists today, and would find it easier to strip the public of popular benefits. Negotiators are currently considering cutting the mortgage deduction and tax credits for retirement savings, for instance, extremely popular policies that would be difficult to slice up using the traditional legislative process.

House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) has made a Super Congress a central part of his last-minute proposal, multiple news reports and people familiar with his plan say. A picture of Boehner's proposal began to come into focus Saturday evening: The debt ceiling would be raised for a short-term period and coupled with an equal dollar figure of cuts, somewhere in the vicinity of a trillion dollars over ten years. A second increase in the debt ceiling would be tied to the creation of a Super Congress that would be required to find a minimum amount of spending cuts. Because the elevated panel would need at least one Democratic vote, its plan would presumably include at least some revenue, though if it's anything like the deals on the table today, it would likely be heavily slanted toward spending cuts. Or, as Obama said of the deal he was offering Republicans before Boehner walked out, "If it was unbalanced, it was unbalanced in the direction of not enough revenue."
Constitutional concerns aside, abdicating legislative responsibility to a super committee with super powers is idiotic. Besides didn't the Gang-of-Six just attempt to do something similar? And where did that plan go after a year of wrangling?

Is a 12 man committee more likely to agree to something than a 6 man committee? Anyone who thinks so has mush for brains.

Of course the whole idea might be to save face for both parties so that no one has to do anything but point fingers and blame the other side for lack of sensible action.

Each passing day delivers more reasons to be disgusted with leaders of both parties.

Mike "Mish" Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com
Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List