|
|
|
Achievers in traditional organizations often say, "I want more authority." They mean that they want the power to make things happen, the mantle of authority that will allow them to get things done.
This is an industrial-era mindset. Management by authority is top-down, risk-averse, measurable and perfect for the org chart. It's essential in organizations that are stable, asset-based and adverse to risk.
There's a different approach, though, one that's based on responsibility instead of authority. "Anyone who takes responsibility for getting something done is welcome to ask for the authority to do it."
Ah, your bluff is called. And so is your boss's.
[You're getting this note because you subscribed to Seth Godin's blog.]
Don't want to get this email anymore? Click the link below to unsubscribe.
Your requested content delivery powered by FeedBlitz, LLC, 9 Thoreau Way, Sudbury, MA 01776, USA. +1.978.776.9498 |
Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis |
Posted: 31 Jul 2011 07:51 PM PDT After spending a day in the garden weeding and transplanting I arrive at my computer to see S&P futures up 20 points, 1.5% on news a compromise was reached. Quite frankly this is ludicrous given that anyone not brain dead knew a deal would be reached. Let's pick up the action starting with U.S. Stock Futures Advance as Obama, Lawmakers Agree to Raise Debt Limit U.S. stock futures rose, indicating the Standard & Poor's 500 Index may rebound from its worst weekly loss in a year, as President Barack Obama announced an agreement to raise the federal debt limit and avoid a default.Let's stop right there and point out genuine BullSweet starting with a US dollar intraday chart. US$ 15-Mimute Chart Does anyone see a short covering rally in the dollar? I sure don't. Had there been an agreement to reduce the deficit by $4 trillion we might have seem one, but this deal changes nothing. Bear in mind this is coming from someone who is currently bullish on the US dollar. Let's ask another question: Who did not expect a deal? I accuse Frederic Dickson of genuine BullSweet. The article continues ... The framework of the debt agreement would raise the $14.3 trillion debt ceiling through 2012, cut spending by about $1 trillion and call for enactment of a law shaving another $1.5 trillion from long-term debt by 2021 -- or institute punishing reductions across all government areas, including Medicare and defense programs, according to congressional officials.Pathetic Deal This is a pathetic deal. It's no wonder futures are rallying. My dead grandmother could find more cuts than this. The S&P, Moody's, and Fitch should all downgrade US debt on this deal. $1 trillion up front and promises to cut another $1.5 trillion is the wimpiest of wimpy deals. The deficit is 1.4 Trillion. The immediate cut is a back loaded $100 billion. Then there is a possibility of another $150 billion back loaded cuts. Anyone voting for this monstrosity should be ashamed. Is Boehner Balking? Here is something I picked up from Zero Hedge. The Wall Street Journal "Washington Wire" comments on the The U.S. Debt Battle 5:24 pm: House Speaker John Boehner (R., Ohio) appears to be balking at the debt ceiling deal that Senate Democratic Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada has signed. Mr. Boehner is concerned about provisions in the deal that could lead to sharp cuts in military spending, say people familiar with the situation. House aides have warned that just because Mr. Reid has signed off on the deal doesn't mean the deal is done.Ludicrous Deal Solves Nothing This deal is ludicrous because it does not cut enough. Congress should be ashamed. If Boehner is concerned about excessive cuts to military spending in this deal he has truly lost his marbles. If it was up to me, I would pull all our troops out of Iraq, Afghanistan, Japan, Europe, and 140 countries where we have troops. If we did that, we could concentrate on protecting our borders instead of being the world's policeman. The savings would be enormous. By the way, it would be fitting if this futures ramp was the mother of all gap-and-craps. This deal solves nothing. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List Mike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific. |
Posted: 31 Jul 2011 11:26 AM PDT Had enough of the debt ceiling fiasco? If so here are a few interesting weekend diversions courtesy of National Geographic. "Spectacular" Double Meteor Shower This Week One of the best shooting star events of the year is the annual August Perseid meteor shower. However this year's peak, on August 12, happens to coincide with a bright full moon—drastically cutting down the number of meteors visible to the naked eye.Perseid Pictures: Meteor Shower Dazzles Every August One of many images in the link. Space-Time Cloak Possible, Could Make Events Disappear? It's no illusion: Science has found a way to make not just objects but entire events disappear, experts say.New Invisibility Cloak Closer to Working "Magic" It is quite amazing the stuff scientists are working on and the images from National Geographic are spectacular. Inquiring minds will want to give some of those articles a closer look. My weekend diversion is gardening and golf. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List Mike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific. |
You are subscribed to email updates from Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
When the outcome of a conversation is in doubt, don't do it by email. And show up in person if you can.
The synchronicity of face to face conversation gives you the chance to change your tone in midstream. Ask questions. A great question is usually better than a good answer.
And don't forget--the value of a long pause is difficult to overstate.
[You're getting this note because you subscribed to Seth Godin's blog.]
Don't want to get this email anymore? Click the link below to unsubscribe.
Your requested content delivery powered by FeedBlitz, LLC, 9 Thoreau Way, Sudbury, MA 01776, USA. +1.978.776.9498 |
Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis |
Posted: 30 Jul 2011 09:14 PM PDT I was just getting ready to make a post titled After "Angry Exchange" Reid Postpones Senate Vote on His Plan; Majority Leader Conrad Hints at Raising Revenue Measures; Compromise in the Air. Just before I hit enter on posting, word came that a deal was reached. I will continue with my original post (so that you can see sausage in the making) followed by the a description of the alleged yet White House denied deal. Hints Compromise Amid Feud Talk of compromise is in the air. House Majority Leader Conrad is surprisingly hinting at revenue raising measures. Meanwhile Senator Kyle suggests more progress is being made than it seems, even though Senator Reid postpones a vote on his proposal after an "angry exchange" with Republicans. This negotiation smacks of a "don't blame me" effort from both parties that will put off all hard choices until later. Reid Postpones Vote After Angry Exchange The New York Times reports Hint of Deal as Congress Wrangles Over Debt Crisis After a tense day of Congressional floor fights and angry exchanges, Senator Harry Reid, the majority leader, called off a planned showdown vote set for after midnight, but said he would convene the Senate at noon on Sunday for a vote an hour later. He said he wanted to give the new negotiations a chance to produce a plan to raise the federal debt limit in exchange for spending cuts and the creation of a new Congressional committee that would try to assemble a long-range deficit-cutting proposal.That sounds like more feud than compromise so let's take a look at the viewpoint on Bloomberg posted roughly three hours later at 10:41. Majority Leader Conrad Hints at Raising Revenue Measures Bloomberg reports Senate Postpones Vote on Reid Debt Plan as Talks Continue "There are negotiations going on at the White House now," Reid said on the Senate floor, and those involved in the talks wanted more time before a vote was held on whether the Senate moved ahead with his measure.White House, Republicans Strike Tentative Deal To Raise Debt Ceiling What follows now is breaking news of a deal. Please consider White House, Republicans Strike Tentative Deal To Raise Debt Ceiling ABC News' Jonathan Karl reports:Deal or No Deal? Even if there is a deal, it is no bargain to anyone. A vote on a balance budget will not pass so why bother other than for political finger-pointing purposes? $1 trillion in presumably back-loaded spending cuts is a farce. The special committee will not accomplish a thing. Even if by some miracle it achieves another $1.8 trillion in spending cuts, that still only brings the total to a lousy $2.8 trillion, or $280 billion a year in a $1.4 trillion deficit. This is not even a reasonable down payment on what needs to happen. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List Mike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific. |
Posted: 30 Jul 2011 01:59 PM PDT Lost in the US deficit battles and the pathetic US GDP statistics comes yet another surprise: Canada's Economy Shrank 0.3% in May Posting the Largest Drop in Two Years Canada's gross domestic product fell in May by the most in two years due to temporary disruptions in the mining and oil and gas sector, government data showed.Canadian Apologists Be Warned Canadian apologists say weakness is overstated and temporary. I say it's understated because few realize what is happening and how serious this is. Global stimulus has faded. It's gone. Kaput. And that stimulus was the only thing holding this global economy together. Strip out government spending, QE madness in the US, and unsustainable credit growth in China and you have a flatline global economy at best. It's Not Temporary Headline be damned, it's not temporary. Europe is now in austerity-mode, US cities and states are cutting back, the odds of more fiscal stimulus in the US are roughly zero, the US might (and should) lose its AAA rating, Australia is a basket case on the bursting of its property bubble, Canada has the second or third largest property bubble next to China and Australia, the bond market is targeting Italy and Spain, Brazilian defaults are soaring, China is overheating and needs to slow, yet the average economist is looking for a robust second-half. Go figure. In aggregate, economists are the most optimistic group on the planet. For a look at the US GDP situation, please consider US GDP on Verge of Contraction in 1st Quarter, Mere 1.3% Annual Rate 2nd Quarter; Summary of Massive Revisions; Second-Half Recovery Nonsense Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List Mike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific. |
Posted: 30 Jul 2011 11:13 AM PDT The impasse continues. Bloomberg reports Senate Republicans Will Reject Reid's Debt Plan. Senate Republicans will block Majority Leader Harry Reid's debt-limit plan this weekend, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said as a partisan impasse over deficit reduction continued days before a threatened default.Once again, and as recently noted in Great Divide; Boehner Rams Through Bill that Senate Quickly Rejects; Obama's Idle Threats and Fear Mongering the idea of a default is complete silliness. Nonetheless, expect both parties and president Obama to crow when a gaseous plan is passed that will allegedly have "saved the US from default" Fear Mongering Caroline Baum repeated my message on Friday in Obama, Geithner May Regret Threats of Default Instead of dangling the default threat every chance they get, Obama and Geithner should be telling the world that the U.S. has every intention, and the resources, to meet its debt obligations. They should shout it from the rooftops, put a banner on the Treasury Direct website, and use the Sunday talk shows to reassure investors, not frighten them.Toothless Details Senator Scott Brown wants to put "more teeth" in the joint committee plan. One tooth would suffice because the plan is currently toothless. Guaranteed Vote is Meaningless This whole idea of McConnell's about abdicating responsibility to a "powerful" committed with a "guaranteed" vote on proposals is of course ridiculous. Look at the rejection of Reid's plans in the Senate and House, and the Rejection of the Boehner's plan in the Senate. Look at the whining of Nancy Pelosi about cuts to Medicare and Medicaid, and Social Security. So what does the "guaranteed vote" do but put lipstick on a turkey? The "Gang-of-Six" put together a $4 trillion proposal that was a down payment on attacking the deficit and that could not pass. Somehow a "Gang-of-Twelve" is going to do better. Please be serious. The more people you put into a mix, the harder it will be to get an agreement. Even if by some miracle an agreement from the "Gang-of-Twelve" is reached, you still have a hurdle of passing the "guaranteed vote" in the House and Senate. This "Gang-of-Twelve" idea is nothing but a plan to put off doing anything about the deficit until after the election. Republicans and Democrats will both have wimped out if that is the "solution". Exchange with Reader "Grant" Reader "Grant" responded to my post, and we had the following exchange. Grant: Why you take Obama at his word when he says he was willing to make "hard choices" continues to elude me, especially given his track record of reneging on pretty much every campaign promise he made (wars, transparency, civil liberties, indefinite detentions, etc.) still mystifies me. Mish: Nowhere did I say the Democrats would have accepted. Indeed I think and have stated several times before they wouldn't. However, the offer would put Republicans in a No-Lose situation. Would Democrats have gone along? If not, Obama and the Democrats would have been seen as the deal-killers, not Republicans. If the Democrats accepted, it would have been well worth it. Republicans win if the deal was accepted, they win if the deal was rejected. Grant: Except this scenario already played out. Who got the blame? Not Obama. Not the Democrats. Boehner and the GOP did. Mish: And why is that Grant? The answer is Republicans would not accept any tax hikes. My deal allowed them. Some Things Far More Important than Trivial Tax Hikes Some things are far more important than concession on closing a few loopholes to get $1 trillion in tax hikes. President Obama repeatedly said he was willing to make "hard choices". Republicans could easily have put him to the test. My proposal was to challenge Obama to accept the tax hikes he asked for on a 3-1 ratio of cuts-to-to hikes in return for these three things Republicans want.
I would gladly trade $1 trillion in tax hikes for those badly needed measures. Would Democrats have accepted? Probably not but one never knows unless one tries. However, either way the Republicans would have won. Had Obama backed down it would have been his fault. Had he accepted the bargain would have well worth it. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List Mike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific. |
You are subscribed to email updates from Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |