Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis |
- Credit Boom in China Could Trigger Bigger Crisis Than 2008; Three Things China Wants, Eight Things China Needs
- Expect Another Leap in Healthcare Costs; New Obamashock Rules: Obamacare Expanded to Cover Mental Health and Addiction
- Establishment Survey: +204K Jobs, Household Survey: -735K Jobs; How Federal Layoffs Distorted the Picture
Posted: 08 Nov 2013 06:17 PM PST In case you think all is well with China and the Yuan will soon replace the dollar as the world's reserve currency, you may wish to reconsider. Credit growth in China is expanding at a massive rate on nonviable projects, and that is the only reason China has been able to meet its growth targets. Marc Faber believes China could spark a bigger crisis than in 2008. An alarming credit boom in China could trigger a global financial crisis that would make the one in 2008 look mild by comparison, says old gloomy eyes, Marc Faber. It Can't Be Done I have been preaching a similar message as Faber for years, most recently on November 6, in It Can't Be Done. Three Things China Wants
Eight Things China Needs To Do
What China wants is impossible. And the longer China waits to do what needs to be done, the bigger the eventual crisis. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com |
Posted: 08 Nov 2013 12:47 PM PST If you are already stunned by rising Obamashock! healthcare costs, you can expect still more shocks thanks to new rules and expanded coverage for mental health and addiction programs. A few snips from the New York Times article Rules to Require Equal Coverage for Mental Ills will explain. The Obama administration on Friday will complete a generation-long effort to require insurers to cover care for mental health and addiction just like physical illnesses when it issues long-awaited regulations defining parity in benefits and treatment.Don't Worry "Experts" Say Costs Won't Rise "Significantly" Note the slant by the NYT.
Supposedly costs won't rise much because few people demand mental health services. Well, watch what happens when you mandate expanded "free" services. And if by some amazing miracle additional free services do not increase costs, it's important to note that a small percentage of people are responsible for huge portions of overall costs. Cumulative Distribution of Personal Healthcare Spending Facts and Figures
Those numbers are from a 2012 study on the Concentration of Healthcare Spending by the National Institute for Health Care Management (NIHCM). Obamashock! Apology Yesterday, the president made a quasi-apology for the holes and gaps in the law. Link if video does not play: Exclusive: Obama personally apologizes for Americans losing health coverage After the Non-Apology CNN discuses Obamacare: After Obama's apology, talk of solutions and -- still -- the website As the president expressed regret in an exclusive interview with NBC News on Thursday, there already were plans being developed in Congress to address the matter as well as steps the administration might take to resolve the issue without reopening the politically charged healthcare law legislatively.More on Obamashock! My Personal Experience - Obamashock! More Obamashock! Glitches Hit Paper, Phone Applications; Obamacare Glitch Great Quotes Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com |
Posted: 08 Nov 2013 10:01 AM PST Initial Reaction The already wide discrepancies between the household survey and the establishment survey took a wild leap today. The establishment survey showed a gain of 204,000 jobs but the household survey showed a drop in employment of -735,000. However, the BLS states that on unadjusted basis 448,000 of the drop in employment was due to temporary federal layoffs during the budget negotiations. Because of the way the BLS calculates overall numbers, one cannot subtract the seasonally unadjusted number of -448,000 from the reported seasonally adjusted number of -735,000 and arrive at any kind of meaningful number. Important Note: I will go through my normal calculations, but they are very distorted by the temporary layoffs. How Federal Layoffs Distorted the Picture The BLS reports "Estimates of the unemployed by reason, such as temporary layoff and job leavers, do not sum to the official seasonally adjusted measure of total unemployed because they are independently seasonally adjusted. Household survey data for federal workers are available only on a not seasonally adjusted basis. As a result, over-the-month changes in federal worker data series cannot be compared with seasonally adjusted over-the-month changes in total employed and unemployed." From the Commissioner's Statement Some federal workers who were not at work during the entire reference week in October were not classified as unemployed on temporary layoff.Revisions This was the fourth straight month of revisions to the establishment survey. The first two revisions were significantly lower. Last month, the revision was slightly higher and I commented "Perhaps the BLS has numbers they are happy with now." So much for that idea. Today, the BLS reports "August revised up by 45,000 (from +193,000 to +238,000), and the employment change for September revised up by 15,000 (from +148,000 to +163,000). The unemployment rate rose 0.1 to 7.3% (but according to the BLS it should have been higher due to estimated nonsampling error as noted in the commissioner's statement above). It's the household survey that determines the unemployment rate, not the establishment survey. So let's take a look at the factors. Explaining the Unemployment Rate
Employment fell more than the labor force, so the unemployment rate rose. October BLS Jobs Statistics at a Glance
Quick Notes About the Unemployment Rate
October 2013 Jobs Report Please consider the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) October 2013 Employment Report. Total nonfarm payroll employment rose by 204,000 in October, and the unemployment rate was little changed at 7.3 percent, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Employment increased in leisure and hospitality, retail trade, professional and technical services, manufacturing, and health care. Click on Any Chart in this Report to See a Sharper Image Unemployment Rate - Seasonally Adjusted Employment History Since January 2009 click on chart for sharper image Change from Previous Month by Job Type Hours and Wages Average weekly hours of all private employees remained at 34.4 hours. Average weekly hours of all private service-providing employees was flat at 33.3 hours. Average hourly earnings of production and non-supervisory private workers rose $0.02 to $20.26. Average hourly earnings of private service-providing employees rose $0.02 to $20.04. Real wages have been declining. Add in increases in state taxes and the average Joe has been hammered pretty badly. For 2013, one needs to factor in the increase in payroll taxes for Social Security. For further discussion of income distribution, please see What's "Really" Behind Gross Inequalities In Income Distribution? BLS Birth-Death Model Black Box The BLS Birth/Death Model is an estimation by the BLS as to how many jobs the economy created that were not picked up in the payroll survey. The Birth-Death numbers are not seasonally adjusted, while the reported headline number is. In the black box the BLS combines the two, coming up with a total. The Birth Death number influences the overall totals, but the math is not as simple as it appears. Moreover, the effect is nowhere near as big as it might logically appear at first glance. Do not add or subtract the Birth-Death numbers from the reported headline totals. It does not work that way. Birth/Death assumptions are supposedly made according to estimates of where the BLS thinks we are in the economic cycle. Theory is one thing. Practice is clearly another as noted by numerous recent revisions. Birth Death Model Adjustments For 2012 Birth Death Model Adjustments For 2013 Birth-Death Notes Once again: Do NOT subtract the Birth-Death number from the reported headline number. That approach is statistically invalid. In general, analysts attribute much more to birth-death numbers than they should. Except at economic turns, BLS Birth/Death errors are reasonably small. For a discussion of how little birth-death numbers affect actual monthly reporting, please see BLS Birth/Death Model Yet Again. Table 15 BLS Alternate Measures of Unemployment click on chart for sharper image Table A-15 is where one can find a better approximation of what the unemployment rate really is. Notice I said "better" approximation not to be confused with "good" approximation. The official unemployment rate is 7.3%. However, if you start counting all the people who want a job but gave up, all the people with part-time jobs that want a full-time job, all the people who dropped off the unemployment rolls because their unemployment benefits ran out, etc., you get a closer picture of what the unemployment rate is. That number is in the last row labeled U-6. U-6 is much higher at 13.8%. Both numbers would be way higher still, were it not for millions dropping out of the labor force over the past few years. Labor Force Factors
Were it not for people dropping out of the labor force, the unemployment rate would be over 9%. In addition, there are 8,050,000 workers who are working part-time but want full-time work. Grossly Distorted Statistics Digging under the surface, much of the drop in the unemployment rate over the past two years is nothing but a statistical mirage coupled with a massive increase in part-time jobs starting in October 2012 as a result of Obamacare legislation. Moreover, as noted above, this month's numbers are extremely distorted due to temporary layoffs. Next month we will have a better understanding of various factors including the unemployment rate. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com |
You are subscribed to email updates from Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
Facebook Twitter | More Ways to Engage