|
|
What Should I Put on the Homepage? - Whiteboard Friday |
What Should I Put on the Homepage? - Whiteboard Friday Posted: 02 Jan 2014 03:08 PM PST Posted by randfish Homepages were once the ultra-authoritative one-stop shops of online brands. As people and search engines have become better at understanding what users are looking for, though, the purpose of homepages has become more targeted. In today's Whiteboard Friday, Rand details several of the changes we've seen, and offers his advice for what to include on a truly effective homepage on the web today.
For reference, here's a still of this week's whiteboard!
Video transcriptionHowdy Moz fans, and welcome to a new edition of Whiteboard Friday, the very first one of 2014. Hope you all had a wonderful happy New Year and a great holiday season, whatever you might celebrate. This week, I think since January's the time when a lot of us revisit our core web marketing and a lot of the times what we're doing on our websites, we should talk about the starting pointâ"the homepage. The homepage is a critically important page for a lot of reasons. Oftentimes it's one of, if not the most, trafficked web page that we have on our websites. It's also the starting point for where people try and understand our brand and our company and what we do. Substantively, its role has changed over the last few years with big shifts like search engines being a little less focused around who gets links and how that influences the keywords that you rank for, a little less about the homepage being the only page that people land on, and whether they're coming just to the homepage, or whether they go into separate sections of the site. What people want and expect from homepages has changed over the years, what they expect to find there, and, thus, what we as marketers need to do to deliver on those expectations. So I thought I'd start by talking about some of the old ways of doing things with homepages and the new ways of doing them. In the old way, we'd promote all of the major sections of the site on the homepage. So you might have a homepage that's like, "Oh, check out our blog, and here's our product, and here's this other thing that we're doing. Oh and this new launch point." Each of these get featured, or they kind of scroll through them. It's really the homepage very much competing for attention. You can think of that Yahoo! homepage model being the discovery point for everything on the site. If you don't get homepage real estate, well, you're not important. This is totally wrong in 2014, because really we can make all of those major sections easy to navigate to and find. We can focus very uniquely on just one section, on just the most important things that the most important customers and visitors are trying to get answers to and what they expect when they get to that homepage. We don't need to say like, "Hey, I have this great feature and this other thing. Oh, we just launched this content. Let me promote everything, and I'll just try and capture a small bit of everyone's attention." This focus is not nearly as good as trying to be a little bit more of a, "Here's how to navigate to these sections. Let me just promote the most important thing and make that homepage more of a focused experience." We've seen tons and tons of examples of folks A/B testing and testing different versions of their homepage, and that focus, really, really critical to driving people through. Old way: focus on lots of keywords. A lot of homepages would focus on a lot different keywords. The reason beingâ"it's not that hard to understandâ"the homepage, in the classic old, old Google, it would be your highest PageRank page and, therefore, could rank the most things. Then, as Google got more sophisticated and less about just PageRank, it was also the page that earned the most links. Often, the anchor text was fairly diversified that would link to that homepage, and so were all these other signals. So the homepage could rank for a lot of stuff that other pages couldn't. So, "You know what? Let's just smack all the keywords that we possibly can onto the homepage." In the current model, we actually don't need to do that, because Google and Bing have both become much more sophisticated about understanding, "Hey, this site is about all of these things, not necessarily just this page. We're much more considerate as engines of the site's authority in different areas and around keyword terms and phrases. So, if that site has a page that specifically focuses on these topics, you know what? We're going push that up there, even if the page itself doesn't have all the signals that it needs to rank, because the site does." You inherit your site's strength and authority into your internal pages. Because of that, I can now focus on a small subset of keywords on my homepage, possibly only one or two, possibly not even any keywords. I can just think about branded-centric keywords, not even unbranded keywords, and I can really have landing pages specific to those unbranded keywords deeper down in the sections. This also means that you don't have to make the focus of the homepage so all over the place. You can get it much more refined and defined to focus on that specific set of people who are coming directly there. Because of this, too, the old style was to put lots of text to help the homepage rank for all those pages. Now, we don't need that, but we really do need to communicate quickly, because web users have become more and more impatient. They're not going to read through paragraph and paragraph and paragraph of text. Therefore, many, many websites have found it valuable to use visual-centric homepages to help communicate and to quickly convey the primary value proposition to those visitors. Sometimes that's a video. Sometimes it's just an image or graphic that explains things really clearly. That can work out great. We also used to have to serve many types of visitors. This was both for SEO reasons, but also because people would come for lots of different reasons and then expect the homepage to guide them to whatever is interesting. Now, people use search engines to find those different things around your brand and then navigate directly to them. Social media is really about referring to specific pieces of content, not just the homepage. Not like, "Hey, the Economist wrote a great article. Go to TheEconomist.com" No, they're going to send you a link right to the correct page. So you have a little bit more of that focus. You can just work on the most critical visitors and their needs and the messaging that you need to convey to them. There also used to be this real concept of, "Keep it above the fold." So, speaking of this sample homepage, I'm going to talk about some things that I, personally, would nudge folks and generally nudge folks to do on their homepages. This is not to say that every single company should go with exactly this type of homepage, but I think that these nudges can help to order your thinking and to possibly give you some ideas about things you might be doing right or wrong on your site, might want to test, might want to talk about as you're kicking off 2014 with your homepage. So first up, (A), right up top here, the logo and the nav. This is just standard 101 stuff. My general bias is to keep this the same logo and nav as other pages. However, the homepage is unique in that it's sometimes okay to be a little different from other pages on the site. I would urge you to have consistency across the rest of the site. If your homepage has to be a little bit varied because of some things you want to do, that's okay. But I like that nav staying consistent throughout the whole site. That's my general bias. (B) Check out this image. I'm going to imagine that I'm Pocket, Pocket app, which I have on my phone and I use on my desktop and laptop computers. It's a great little app. The idea is that I've got an article that I want to read, maybe on a plane, and I want to read it on my phone. But, of course, I don't have a wi-fi signal on especially international flights, but even most of my US flights. Or I want to read it just anytime. I'm sitting in the car on a long drive down to Portland. Great. So I can click and save any article, any web page I see on the Internet, I can save that to Pocket and go fetch it for later, and it automatically caches. So I don't even need a web connection to be able to do that. I love Pocket app. It's great. But explaining it with a bunch of heavy text and having like "read things later" and lots of different keywords stuff, that probably doesn't make sense. What does make sense is, "Let me quickly and easily explain it to you." So here's a guy, he's on his phone, and here's his thought bubble saying, "This is cool, but I wish I could read it later." Oh. "Go to Pocket, and now you can. Read anytime on any device without a web connection." Ah-ha! The value proposition of Pocket app is instantly conveyed in a visual format, which, as we all know, human beings are much better at taking visual cues and interpreting information from visuals rather than text alone. So that's (B). Visually explain, make it visual, to easily explain what the product, company, service does. I want that visual. I would urge you to test a visual to easily explain what that does. Show it to a bunch of people who have no idea what you do. If they grasp it, great. If you offer lots of products, make sure to convey the value proposition of what you do. If you're a clothing brand and you offer lots of different things, "Well, which picture should we use?" Well, quickly convey what your unique value proposition is. What it is about your clothing line that's so great, that's so much better? Is it where it's made and that it's hand crafted? Is it the quality of the material? Is it price? Is it something else? Make sure that you're delivering that unique value proposition. So I've got this (C) section. Does it work for XYZ? Like, "Well, can I use this on my Android? Can I use it on my iPhone? Will it also work on desktop?" Ah-ha! Excellent. I'm going to be empathetic and intuitive. Oftentimes this comes from experience. You know the things that, as soon as someone hears about your product, they instantly have these questions. So just answer them right there. I really like that section existing on the homepage. Then you can go into more detail in product pages as well. (D) I like giving social proof. So lots of websites do this on their homepageâ"showing the logo of news outlets that have covered them or big brands that use them that are very trustworthy or testimonials. I personally have found a lot of value in testimonials. I like them quite a bit, especially when they're people who your audience knows who that person is. So you see an Avinash Kaushik or a Wil Reynolds or a Will Critchlow recommending Moz, you kind of go, "Well, I know who those guys are. They're very impressive, well-known web marketers from across the industry. Let me check that out. That must be good." So that's social proof credibility signals. And the last thing that I really like having on your homepage is a call to action. Last, but certainly not least, a call to action. "How do I install this?" "Well, you do this, you do this, or you do this." So, for Pocket app, it might be, "If you have an Android, go to the Google Play Store. If you have Apple, go to the iPhone store. Want to use it on your desktop? Install the widget right here." Great. Cool, right? There's my call to action just sitting there, ready for me to go and do something. I think guiding someone to that next step is a key part of how successful a homepage operates. Then you can really test the success of your homepage as well, based on whether people engage and go there. So I hope you've got some great ideas for your homepages in 2014. I look forward to hearing from you all. Thanks so much. Video transcription by Speechpad.com Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don't have time to hunt down but want to read! |
You are subscribed to email updates from Moz Blog To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
... three ways to deal with the future.
Accuracy is the most rewarding way to deal with what will happen tomorrow--if you predict correctly. Accuracy rewards those that put all their bets on one possible outcome. The thing is, accuracy requires either a significant investment of time and money, or inside information (or luck, but that's a different game entirely). Without a reason to believe that you've got better information than everyone else, it's hard to see how you can be confident that this is a smart bet.
Resilience is the best strategy for those realistic enough to admit that they can't predict the future with more accuracy than others. Resilience isn't a bet on one outcome, instead, it's an investment across a range of possible outcomes, a way to ensure that regardless of what actually occurs (within the range), you'll do fine.
And denial, of course, is the strategy of assuming that the future will be just like today.
If you enter a winner-take-all competition against many other players, accuracy is generally the only rational play. Consider a cross-country ski race. If 500 people enter and all that matters is first place, then you and your support team have to make a very specific bet on what the weather will be like as you wax your skis. Picking a general purpose wax is the resilient strategy, but you'll lose out to the team that's lucky enough or smart enough to pick precisely the right wax for the eventual temperature.
Of course, and this is the huge of course, most competitions aren't winner take all. Most endeavors we participate in offer long-term, generous entrants plenty of rewards. Playing the game is a form of winning the game. In those competitions, we win by being resilient.
Unfortunately, partly due to our fear of losing as well as our mythologizing of the winner-take-all, we often make two mistakes. The first is to overdo our focus on accuracy, on guessing right, on betting it all on the 'right' answer. We underappreciate just how powerful long-term resilience can be.
And the second mistake is to be so overwhelmed by all the choices and all the apparent risk that instead of choosing the powerful path of resilience, we choose not to play at all. Denial rarely pays.
[You're getting this note because you subscribed to Seth Godin's blog.]
Don't want to get this email anymore? Click the link below to unsubscribe.
Your email subscriptions, powered by FeedBlitz, LLC, 9 Thoreau Way, Sudbury, MA 01776, USA. +1.978.776.9498 |
Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis |
70% of Spanish Citizens Don't Believe Prime Minister Rajoy on the Recovery Posted: 02 Jan 2014 05:56 PM PST In what may be the least shocking economic statistic reported so far this year (albeit it's very early), 70% of Spanish Citizens Don't Believe Prime Minister Rajoy on the Recovery. Via translation from El Economista... In 2013, Prime Minister, Mariano Rajoy, promised the "economic recovery" would begin in 2014.Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com Mike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific. |
Posted: 02 Jan 2014 12:47 PM PST Eurozone manufacturing is at a 31-month high according to Markit. Every country but France and Greece are expanding. French manufacturing is at a seven-month low in an intensified downturn. The seasonally adjusted Markit Eurozone Manufacturing PMI® rose for the third month running to post 52.7 in December, up from 51.6 in November (and unchanged from the earlier flash estimate).Hollande Concedes Taxes 'Too Heavy' Offending Everyone French president François Hollande rang the bell on the new year the same way he rang the bell throughout 2013, with an economic as well as public relations gaffe. His vague promise of lower taxes coupled with an admission on national TV that taxes are too high, infuriated French households facing tax rises now, at the start of the year. The Telegraph explains François Hollande concedes taxes 'too heavy' in admission that annoys all sides in France. A New Year's message from François Hollande backfired as his vague promise that taxes would be lowered some time in the future jarred with French voters facing tax increases that took effect as he was speaking.Vague Promises, Nonsensical Proposal Hollande offers a "possibility" of lower taxes and labor charges IF businesses expand hiring and negotiate more with unions. What business would accept that nonsensical proposal? Given the proposal was accompanied by an admission "taxes are too heavy, much too heavy", it's no wonder everyone was offended. It's also no wonder France is going the opposite of the rest of the eurozone. But the rest of the eurozone is not out of the woods yet. No structural problems have been fixed anywhere. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com Mike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific. |
US Manufacturing PMI Shows Solid Expansion, Led by Large Companies; Expect "Measured Pace" Tapering Posted: 02 Jan 2014 10:09 AM PST Both the ISM Report and the Markit PMI report show strengthening US manufacturing. ISM: The December 2013 Manufacturing ISM Report On Business® shows Economic activity in the manufacturing sector expanded in December for the seventh consecutive month. "The PMI™ registered 57 percent, the second highest reading for the year, just 0.3 percentage point below November's reading of 57.3 percent. The New Orders Index increased in December by 0.6 percentage point to 64.2 percent, which is its highest reading since April 2010 when it registered 65.1 percent. The Employment Index registered 56.9 percent, an increase of 0.4 percentage point compared to November's reading of 56.5 percent. December's employment reading is the highest since June 2011 when the Employment Index registered 59 percent. Comments from the panel generally reflect a solid final month of the year, capping off the second half of 2013, which was characterized by continuous growth and momentum in manufacturing."Markit: Here is a look at the Markit US Manufacturing PMI. Key Points"Measured Pace" Tapering The consensus will start looking for additional Fed tapering, perhaps at an accelerated pace. I expect tapering at a "measured" pace (small) accompanied by dovish statements from the Fed. When the economy slides, tapering will halt. Recall that Alan Greenspan used the term "measured pace" when he started hiking rates after the 2001 recession. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com Mike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific. |
You are subscribed to email updates from Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
|
How to Use the Information Inside Google's Ved Parameter |
How to Use the Information Inside Google's Ved Parameter Posted: 01 Jan 2014 03:29 PM PST Posted by deedpolloffice This post was originally in YouMoz, and was promoted to the main blog because it provides great value and interest to our community. The author's views are entirely his or her own and may not reflect the views of Moz, Inc. It's been two years now since Google announced that they'd be gradually withholding the search terms from In our own Analytics reports, (not provided) keywords now make up 82% of all organic visitors. For paid traffic (coming through AdWords) the keywords are still "provided," which is very helpful, but also very expensive. And of course there's also the Search Queries report in Webmaster Tools. This is also useful, but it's still a disappointing loss of information compared to what we used to have (even if I personally think Google was probably right to go ahead with it). The ved parameter to the rescueBack in May, Tim Resnik wrote about patterns he'd spotted in Google's ved parameter. It turns out that ved codes contain rather useful information about the link that was clicked on in the search engine results page. And as Tim pointed out, this goes some way in replacing what was lost (or rather, killed off) by Google taking away the keyword data. Three months later, Benjamin Schulz worked out that ved codes are actually encoded in Protocol Buffers (or "Protobuf"). So, as they're not actually encrypted, it's not too hard to unencode them (plus we don't have to feel too guilty about it!). Google has even released open-source compilers (in several different languages), which you can use to decode ved codes yourself. However these compilers are probably a bit over-the-top for what online marketers need (and probably a bit hard to put into practice). We've written up a guide to decoding and interpreting ved codesâ"as well as filling in some of the unanswered questions (such as what parameter This article is an actionable guide to getting information out of these ved codes, and incorporating it into Analytics. What is a ved code anyway?I don't want to repeat too much what has already been written about in other posts, but it's a good idea to summarise what veds are, what's inside them, and how you can access them.
When you click on any of the links in Google's search results, the URL (address) of the link contains a "ved" parameter. This "ved" code contains information about the link that you clicked on, and when a user comes to your website through Google's search results, the ved code is (usually) passed to you in the What's inside a ved code?A ved code contains up to five separate parameters, which each tell you something about the link that was clicked on: Link index (parameter 1)All the links on the SERP have a numerical index, which gets passed in the ved code. It only gives you a very rough idea of where the link was in the page (without knowing more about what was on the page), so it's the least useful of the five parameters inside the ved. However, it is rather useful when it's for a ved code coming from an adword, simply because there's no other information about the position. Although the link index only gives a rough idea of the position of the adword, there are two concrete things you can take from it:
Link type (parameter 2)This parameter is a number which corresponds to the type of link that was clicked on. The most common value is
See the complete list, for other (less common) values. We've actually found well over a hundred distinct values, so this is a small fraction of them! Most of them, though, are very unlikely to appear in You'll no doubt have noticed that there are lots of gaps in the values. I don't really know if this is because a lot have been retired, or if Google has left space for future link types (probably a bit of both, but more of the latter). For example, our reports show the link type Start result position (parameter 7)This parameter is the cumulative result position of the first result on the page. On page 2 it will be 10, on page 3 it will be 20, and so on. It's better to think of this as the page number of results (after subtracting 1, and multiplying by 10)â"because it's quite a long time ago now that there were always 10 results on every page. Anyhow, you'll need to interpret it in conjunction with parameter 6. Result position (parameter 6) This is very similar to the
The ved result position is the more reliable of the two. If, for example, the Sub-result position (parameter 5)This parameter is like the result position (parameter 6), except it tells you the position in a list of sub-results, such as breadcrumbs, or one-page sitelinks. How to decode ved codes and pull the information into AnalyticsTo import the ved into Analytics, you'll need to include some Javascript to decode it (and send it to the Analytics servers). To do this, you can modify your Analytics JavaScript "snippet" as follows: 1. Include the ved-decode and base64 librariesYou need to include these libraries in your HTML, somewhere before your Analytics snippet. The ved-decode library is needed to decode the ved and extract the information we want. Each of the two libraries is licensed under a permissive open-source licence (MIT / Apache v2.0)â"which lets you use it in any kind of project. <!-- Include both these scripts or copy them into your main JavaScript file --> <!--[if lt IE 10]> <script type="text/javascript" src="http://veddecode.opensource.dpo.org.uk/js/base64-1.0.min.js"></script> <![endif]--> <script type="text/javascript" src="http://veddecode.opensource.dpo.org.uk/js/ved_analytics-1.0.min.js"></script> 2. Send the ved data to Analytics How you do this depends on whether you're using the old Analytics ( If you're using Analytics ( Add this JavaScript code just before the call to // The custom variable code needs to go *before* you record the pageview // (i.e. the call to _trackPageview) (function(w) { var customVars = [ { slot: 1, name: 'Google link index', v: 'linkIndex' }, { slot: 2, name: 'Google link type', v: 'linkType' }, { slot: 3, name: 'Google result position', v: 'resultPosition' }, { slot: 4, name: 'Google sub-result position', v: 'subResultPosition' }, { slot: 5, name: 'Google page', v: 'page' } ]; if (w._gaq && w.VedDecode && w.VedDecode.ved) { for (var i = 0, val; i < customVars.length; ++i) { val = w.VedDecode[customVars[i].v]; w._gaq.push([ '_setCustomVar', customVars[i].slot, customVars[i].name, val ? val + '' : '(not set)', 2 // session scope ]); } } })(window); If you're using Universal Analytics ( For Universal Analytics you need to set up custom dimensions corresponding to the five parameters:
(These are suggested names, of courseâ"you can call them whatever you like.) Then add this JavaScript code just before the call to // The custom variable code needs to go *before* recording the pageview (function(w) { if (w.ga && w.VedDecode && w.VedDecode.ved) { // Send pageview with custom dimension data ga('set', { dimension1: getVedValue('linkIndex'), dimension2: getVedValue('linkType'), dimension3: getVedValue('resultPosition'), dimension4: getVedValue('subResultPosition'), dimension5: getVedValue('page') }); } function getVedValue(key) { var ret = w.VedDecode[key]; return ret ? ret + '' : '(not set)'; } })(window); Make sure that the index generated for each dimension in your control panel corresponds to the dimension number in the JavaScript code. For example, if the generated index for the Google link index dimension is Using the dataAfter a short while, the ved data should show up in your reports! How you then use the data is up to you. Clearly, though, it's going to be useful for optimizing different routes to your site, and looking at how different routes affect your conversion rates. Personally, I think it's very interestingâ"for AdWords customersâ"to see how adword position (i.e. link index) affects conversion rates. It's very frustrating only having daily averages to work with, because you can't see (in the standard reports) how much your adword position varies during the day. Please let us know what you do with the data in the comments below. But what if no referer header gets passed? This is important, because if there's no The If your site isn't secured by HTTPS If your site uses HTTP, or it uses HTTP for some pages (in particular, any landing pages), then the However, if Google passes them through a secure (HTTPS) click-tracking page, then you won't get the In conclusionâ"if you want to be sure of getting the ved parameter for as many users as possibleâ"use HTTPS for your site. (Of course this isn't the only reason to use HTTPS!) If the user is on a mobile deviceFor mobile devices, Google has started to use hyperlink auditingâ"which should have been called "click tracking", and is better known as the "ping" attributeâ"instead of redirects through a click-tracking page. Hyperlink auditing isn't as reliable as a redirect, though, which is why:
According to Google, the main motivation for using the ping attribute (only) on mobile devices, is to improve speedâ"and I'm inclined to believe them. But it probably also helps that:
Howeverâ"you might askâ"if mobile devices don't go through a redirect, and my site is using HTTPS, shouldn't I get the Yes, that's right, you should get the What Google do, if they use hyperlink auditing, is to set the meta referrer element to <meta name="referrer" content="origin"> This instructs the user's browser to include the document's origin in the Before you think, "How evil!"â"there's a good reason for this. If they didn't do this, then the search terms would also appear in the So, mobile devices are another kettle of fish, and ved code analysis won't work most of the time. But for most sites, mobile devices will still be in the minority, and things change quickly anyway. (For example, if there was a new anti-privacy law requiring hyperlink auditing to be off by default, that would certainly be the death of it.) Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don't have time to hunt down but want to read! |
You are subscribed to email updates from Moz Blog To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
Facebook Twitter | More Ways to Engage