Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis |
- It's So Cold ... Polar Bears Taken Inside; Hundreds of Students Arrested Protesting Keystone Pipeline; Global Warming or Global Cooling?
- Blank Check Proposal for More Tax Hikes Heads for Illinois Legislature; Picking-Your-Pocket Numbers: How Much More Will You Pay?
- What Country Should Crimea Be Part Of? Reflections on Nation Building and US Hypocrisy
| Posted: 06 Mar 2014 06:51 PM PST Seriously misguided students are up in arms over the possible revival of the Keystone Pipeline project from Canada to the US. Their concern is greenhouse gas and global warming. The notion that global warming is caused by man-made greenhouse gasses is questionable enough. The globe has gone through periods of glaciation and melting over hundreds of millions of years. Scientists think they can model changes over a period of hundreds or thousands of years when even 100,000 years may be insufficient. Anything that happened in the last 100 or 1,000 years can be nothing more than a random fluctuation given the million-year cycles in play. Trilobite Mass Extinction I have a fossil of a trilobite on my desk. They are now extinct, wiped out in a mass extinction about 250 million years ago. Trilobites flourished for 270 million years before that. Climate change may have been a cause of extinction. Rest assured it was not man-made. Nor could there have been a man-made solution. It's So Cold ... Polar Bears Taken Inside To pretend we can track global warming over the last 100 years and attribute that to man-made global warming is ludicrous. Indeed, scientists are now scrambling to explain why there has been global cooling for the last 17 years. Global warming is nowhere to be found. The mean global temperature has not risen in 17 years and has been slowly falling for approximately the past 10 years. In 2013, there were more record-low temperatures than record-high temperatures in the United States.Global Cooling? I am as skeptical about global cooling as I am about global warming. Both notions are silly given the eons involved in long-term warming and cooling trends. Assume Mish is Wrong Let's assume I am totally wrong. Let's assume man-made global warming is happening. If so, what is the likelihood of politicians doing anything reasonable about it? I propose the odds border on zero. To date, governments generally worsen every problem they have thrown money at. Affordable housing is a key example. I can come up with countless other examples. So even if you do believe in man-made global warming, arguably the best thing to do is leave it alone, waiting for a free market solution, not a government solution. With that lengthy backdrop I received an interesting email this evening from Meltwater Press for which I do not have a link. Progressive Groups Fighting Keystone XL Pledge Strong Resistance San Francisco, CA -- As Friday's deadline nears to submit public comments opposing the Keystone XL pipeline, progressive groups CREDO and Rainforest Action Network have collected more than 169,000 comments to the State Department urging Sec. Kerry to reject the Keystone XL pipeline, while simultaneously preparing to unleash a massive wave of civil disobedience if Sec. Kerry allows the State Department to continue ignoring the facts on Keystone XL, and recommends approval of the toxic tar sands pipeline to President Obama.Climate Change a Weapon of Mass Destruction Please note the misguided lunacy: Climate change is now allegedly a weapon of mass destruction. Hundreds of Students Arrested at White House Protesting Keystone XL Two days ago the Huffington Post reported Hundreds of Students Arrested at White House Protesting Keystone XL. I just came back from the White House, where the police are still arresting the hundreds of students who are taking part in what will likely be the largest act of youth civil disobedience at the White House in a generation.Wow. Forced to make a choice, I side with the polar bears: Stay indoors. Even if man-made global warming is a reality and not a myth, do you really want Al Gore or Obama in charge of doing something about it? Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com |
| Posted: 06 Mar 2014 02:46 PM PST Currently the Illinois state constitution requires a flat tax on income. Even with the flat tax, Democrats have hiked taxes again and again, on individuals and corporations. The results speak for themselves - Illinois population is shrinking. Illinoisans exited the state for Indiana, Wisconsin, and Texas. For details please see Jobs Bowl: Illinois vs. Texas and Indiana. Blank Check Proposal for More Tax Hikes Not content with the damage they have already caused, "Progressives" want even more. Now they want to modify the Illinois constitution to take more out of your pocket. Via email from Kristina Rasmussen at the Illinois Policy Institute ... Legislators are being asked to consider a constitutional amendment that would replace Illinois' flat income tax with a progressive tax, sometimes referred to as "graduated" or "variable rate" tax. Others incorrectly call it a "fair tax" – but it is nothing of the sort.Progressive Picking-Your-Pocket Numbers Rep. Naomi Jakobsson, D-Champaign, is the brainchild of one "Progressive" proposal. Here are the Numbers.  Worse Proposals Recall that Corollary Number Five of the "Law of Bad Ideas" says that no idea is so bad it cannot be made worse. Sure enough: Another progressive tax plan, this one developed by the union-funded Center for Tax and Budget Accountability, increases the tax rate for anyone who earns more than $5,000. Those making $300,000 will have a rate of 10% and those making $1 million will see a rate of 11%. The only beneficiaries of this ludicrous proposal are those who make less than $5,000. Everyone else will see tax rates rise! That's the true meaning of "progressive".  How Much More Will You Pay? How much higher will your taxes be under a progressive tax? Visit Unfair Illinois to find out. The above link has a Facebook feature but you do not have to use it. I didn't, but I did sign the petition. Why Will it Stop There? Here's my question: Whatever this costs now, why would it stop there? Flat out, I will tell you it won't. Anyone being honest knows it won't. The massive "temporary" tax hike Quinn passed will go away, and the Progressives still want more and more and more. Here's corollary number six to the "Law of Bad Ideas": Bad ideas lead to more bad ideas to fix problems caused by previous bad ideas. What's the Real Problem? If you want to understand the real problem, please see Monetarism, Abenomics, QE, and Minimum Wage Proposals: One Bad Idea Leads to Another, and Another. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com |
| What Country Should Crimea Be Part Of? Reflections on Nation Building and US Hypocrisy Posted: 06 Mar 2014 11:40 AM PST An up or down vote on whether Crimea stays with Ukraine or joins Russia is slated for March 16, just 10 days from now. Please consider Crimea Votes to Join Russia, Accelerating Ukraine Crisis. Crimea's parliament voted to join Russia on Thursday and its Moscow-backed government set a referendum on the decision in 10 days' time in a dramatic escalation of the crisis over the Ukrainian Black Sea peninsula.Historical Background Let's take a look at the historical and political references as noted by the Financial Times. "Crimea was, is and will be an integral part of Ukraine," said Arseniy Yatsenyuk, Ukraine prime minister. Speaking in Brussels, he said the referendum had "no legal grounds" and urged the Russian government not to support those advocating separatism in Ukraine.What Country Should Crimea Belong To? Like it or not, it's pretty clear that in recent history Crimea was not part of Ukraine. Rather Crimea became part of Ukraine without a vote. In 1992 it almost left Ukraine, but the Crimea parliament was talked out of a vote. What country should Crimea be part of? Should it be its own country? And should the people decide, or politicians? U.S. Hypocrisy Somehow it's OK for the U.S. to send troops to Iraq and Afghanistan half a world away, supposedly to protect U.S. interests, but it's not OK for Russia to protect its interests at its own doorstep. Two wrongs don't make a right, I simply want to note the hypocritical nature of U.S. statements on the matter. In general, I don't condone military actions. Nor do I condone Russia's military actions now. That said, Russia at least has genuine political interest in its actions. The U.S. had zero business in Iraq and there is certainly no justification for ongoing U.S. troops in Afghanistan for the last 10 years. Rule of Votes Politicians don't want votes unless the vote is going their way. That Crimea's parliament is willing to hold a vote is a strong indication of which way the vote will go. Reflections on Nation Building No matter how the Crimea vote goes, there is going to be a significant number of people who will despise the outcome. This is precisely what is guaranteed to happen when politicians merge regions into countries for political reasons. Iraq was once three distinct countries. Wikipedia offers these notes on Iraq History. Following WWI ... "Britain imposed a Hāshimite monarchy on Iraq and defined the territorial limits of Iraq without taking into account the politics of the different ethnic and religious groups in the country, in particular those of the Kurds and the Assyrians to the north. During the British occupation, the Shi'ites and Kurds fought for independence." Iraq achieved independence in 1932. Then came multiple coups, two US invasions, religious wars, and ethnic battles that continue to this day. The Kurds want their own country. They once had it. Here is a Map of Kurdistan.  Turkey and Iraq are both involved in the Kurdish mess. Kurdistan once overlapped part of Turkey and part of Iraq. The Kurds now want their own independent area of Iraq. Turkey does not want that to happen fearing it will unite Kurdish sentiment in Turkey. Historically speaking, no good ever came from the "nation building" political exercise of forcing together widely different ethnic and religious groups into a single country. Why should it be any different this time? So let me ask again: What country should Crimea belong to and who should decide? Whatever you answer, the U.S. should stay out of this mess. It's not our battle, and sending missiles to the Czech Republic as part of the solution as McCain proposes is decidedly preposterous. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |
Facebook 
Twitter | More Ways to Engage
Postări
