marți, 1 iulie 2014

One Content Metric to Rule Them All

One Content Metric to Rule Them All

One Content Metric to Rule Them All

Posted: 30 Jun 2014 05:01 PM PDT

Posted by Trevor-Klein

Let's face it: Measuring, analyzing, and reporting the success of content marketing is hard.

Not only that, but we're all busy. In its latest report on B2B trends, the Content Marketing Institute quantified some of the greatest challenges faced by today's content marketers, and a whopping 69% of companies cited a lack of time. We spend enough of our time sourcing, editing, and publishing the content, and anyone who has ever managed an editorial calendar knows that fires are constantly in need of dousing. With so little extra time on our hands, the last thing content marketers want to do is sift through a heaping pile of data that looks something like this:

Sometimes we want to dig into granular data. If a post does exceptionally well on Twitter, but just so-so everywhere else, that's noteworthy. But when we look at individual metrics, it's far too easy to read into them in all the wrong ways.

Here at Moz, it's quite easy to think that a post isn't doing well when it doesn't have a bunch of thumbs up, or to think that we've made a horrible mistake when a post gets several thumbs down. The truth is, though, that we can't simply equate metrics like thumbs to success. In fact, our most thumbed-down post in the last two years was one in which Carson Ward essentially predicted the recent demise of spammy guest blogging.

We need a solution. We need something that's easy to track at a glance, but doesn't lose the forest for the trees. We need a way to quickly sift through the noise and figure out which pieces of content were really successful, and which didn't go over nearly as well. We need something that looks more like this:

This post walks through how we combined our content metrics for the Moz Blog into a single, easy-to-digest score, and better yet, almost completely automated it.

What it is not

It is not an absolute score. Creating an absolute score, while the math would be equally easy, simply wouldn't be worthwhile. Companies that are just beginning their content marketing efforts would consistently score in the single digits, and it isn't fair to compare a multi-million dollar push from a giant corporation to a best effort from a very small company. This metric isn't meant to compare one organization's efforts with any other; it's meant to be used inside of a single organization.

What it is and what it measures

The One Metric is a single score that tells you how successful a piece of content was by comparing it to the average performance of the content that came before it. We made it by combining several other metrics, or "ingredients," that fall into three equally weighted categories:

  1. Google Analytics
  2. On-page (in-house) metrics
  3. Social metrics

It would never do to simply smash all these metrics together, as the larger numbers would inherently carry more weight. In other words, we cannot simply take the average of 10,000 visits and 200 Facebook likes, as Facebook would be weighted far more heavily—moving from 200 to 201 likes would be an increase of 0.5%, and moving from 10,000 to 10,001 visits would be an increase of 0.01%. To ensure every one of the ingredients is weighted equally, we compare them to our expectations of them individually.

Let's take a simple example using only one ingredient. If we wanted to get a sense for how well a particular post did on Twitter, we could obviously look at the number of tweets that link to it. But what does that number actually mean? How successful is a post that earns 100 tweets? 500? 2,000? In order to make sense of it, we use past performance. We take everything we've posted over the last two months, and find the average number of tweets each of those posts got. (We chose two months; you can use more or less if that works better for you.) That's our benchmark—our expectation for how many tweets our future posts will get. Then, if our next post gets more than that expected number, we can safely say that it did well by our own standards. The actual number of tweets doesn't really matter in this sense—it's about moving up and to the right, striving to continually improve our work.

Here's a more visual representation of how that looks:

Knowing a post did better or worse than expectations is quite valuable, but how much better or worse did it actually do? Did it barely miss the mark, or did it completely tank? It's time to quantify.

It's that percentage of the average (92% and 73% in the examples above) that we use to seed our One Metric. For any given ingredient, if we have 200% of the average, we have a post that did twice as well as normal. If we have 50%, we have a post that did half as well.

From there, we do the exact same thing for all the other ingredients we'd like to use, and then combine them:

This gives us a single metric that offers a quick overview of a post's performance. In the above example, our overall performance came out to 113% of what we'd expect based on our average performance. We can say it outperformed expectations by 13%.

We don't stop there, though. This percent of the average is quite useful... but we wanted this metric to be useful outside of our own minds. We wanted it to make sense to just about anyone who looked at it, so we needed a different scale. To that end, we took it one step farther and applied that percentage to a logarithmic scale, giving us a single two-digit score much like you see for Domain Authority and Page Authority.

If you're curious, we used the following equation for our scale (though you should feel free to adjust that equation to create a scale more suitable for your needs):

Where y is the One Metric score, and x is the percent of a post's expected performance it actually received. Essentially, a post that exactly meets expectations receives a score of 50.

For the above example, an overall percentage of expectations that comes out to 113% translates as follows:

Of course, you won't need to calculate the value by hand; that'll be done automatically in a spreadsheet. Which is actually a great segue...

The whole goal here is to make things easy, so what we're going for is a spreadsheet where all you have to do is "fill down" for each new piece of content as it's created. About 10-15 seconds of work for each piece. Unfortunately, I can't simply give you a ready-to-go template, as I don't have access to your Google Analytics, and have no clue how your on-page metrics might be set up. 

As a result, this might look a little daunting at first.

Once you get things working once, though, all it takes is copying the formulas into new rows for new pieces of content; the metrics will be filled automatically. It's well worth the initial effort.

Ready? Start here:

Make a copy of that document so you can make edits (File > Make a Copy), then follow the steps below to adjust that spreadsheet based on your own preferences.

  1. You'll want to add or remove columns from that sheet to match the ingredients you'll be using. Do you not have any on-page metrics like thumbs or comments? No problem—just delete them. Do you want to add Pinterest repins as an ingredient? Toss it in there. It's your metric, so make it a combination of the things that matter to you.
  2. Get some content in there. Since the performance of each new piece of content is based on the performance of what came before it, you need to add the "what came before it." If you've got access to a database for your organization (or know someone who does), that might be easiest. You can also create a new tab in that spreadsheet, then use the =IMPORTFEED function to automatically pull a list of content from your RSS feed.
  3. Populate the first row. You'll use a variety of functionality within Google Spreadsheets to pull the data you need in from various places on the web, and I go through many of them below. This is the most time-consuming part of setting this up; don't give up!
  4. Got your data successfully imported for the first row? Fill down. Make sure it's importing the right data for the rest of your initial content.
  5. Calculate the percentage of expectations. Depending on how many ingredients you're using, this equation can look mighty intimidating, but that's really just a product of the spreadsheet smooshing it all onto one line. Here's a prettier version:
    All this is doing (remember Step 2 above, where we combined the ingredients) is comparing each individual metric to past performance, and then weighting them appropriately.

    And, here's what that looks like in plain text for our metric (yours may vary):
      =((1/3)*(E48/(average(E2:E47))))+((1/3)*((F48/(average(F2:F47)))+(G48/(average(G2:G47))))/2)+((1/3)*((H48/(average(H2:H47)))+(I48/(average(I2:I47)))+(J48/(average(J2:J47)))/3))

    Note that this equation goes from row 2 through row 47 because we had 46 pieces of content that served to create our "expectation."

  6. Convert it to the One Metric score. This is a piece of cake. You can certainly use our logarithmic equation (referenced above): y = 27*ln(x) +50, where x is the percent of expectations you just finished calculating. Or, if you feel comfortable adjusting that to suit your own needs, feel free to do that as well.
  7. You're all set! Add more content, fill down, and repeat!

Update: A word of caution
After some great discussion in the comments below, I thought it prudent to include a word of caution about how this metric is used. For one thing, be smart about what the numbers actually mean, and keep the following points in mind:

  1. Make sure you have a sufficiently ample benchmark. If you only have three posts with which to set the "expected" values, then your performance against that expectation isn't going to mean much. I'd recommend having at least 10-15 posts from which you calculate that expectation before you apply the One Metric score to any subsequent posts.
  2. Be smart about averages, and know that this doesn't mean you can discard all the rest of your metrics. By smooshing all of these metrics together, we effectively soften the impact of any outliers. Thanks to Pete Wailes for this XKCD reference; while you shouldn't lose the forest for the trees, sometimes individual trees are quite important.
  3. As with any metric, knowing what to do with the One Metric takes a keen awareness of why a certain piece of content performed the way it did, and checking any intended actions against your organization's goals. There's a reason marketers haven't been replaced by algorithms: It's up to you and your brain to turn these metrics into actual insights.

</caution>

Here are more detailed instructions for pulling various types of data into the spreadsheet:

Adding new rows with IFTTT

If This Then That (IFTTT) makes it brilliantly easy to have your new posts automatically added to the spreadsheet where you track your One Metric. The one catch is that your posts need to have an RSS feed set up (more on that from FeedBurner). Sign up for a free IFTTT account if you don't already have one, and then set up a recipe that adds a row to a Google Spreadsheet for every new post in the RSS feed.

When creating that recipe, make sure you include "Entry URL" as one of the fields that's recorded in the spreadsheet; that'll be necessary for pulling in the rest of the metrics for each post.

Also, IFTTT shortens URLs by default, which you'll want to turn off, since the shortened URLs won't mean anything to the APIs we're using later. You can find that setting in your account preferences.

Pulling Google Analytics

One of the beautiful things about using a Google Spreadsheet for tracking this metric is the easy integration with Google Analytics. There's an add-on for Google Spreadsheets that makes pulling in just about any metric a simple process. The only downside is that even after setting things up correctly, you'll still need to manually refresh the data.

To get started,  install the add-on. You'll want to do so while using an account that has access to your Google Analytics.

Then, create a new report; you'll find the option under "Add-ons > Google Analytics:"

Select the GA account info that contains the metrics you want to see, and choose the metrics you'd like to track. Put "Page" in the field for "Dimensions;" that'll allow you to reference the resulting report by URL.

You can change the report's configuration later on, and if you'd like extra help figuring out how to fiddle with it, check out Google's documentation.

This will create (at least) two new tabs on your spreadsheet; one for Report Configuration, and one for each of the metrics you included when creating the report. On the Report Configuration tab, you'll want to be sure you set the date range appropriately (I'd recommend setting the end date fairly far in the future, so you don't have to go back and change it later). To make things run a bit quicker, I'd also recommend setting a filter for the section(s) of your site you'd like to evaluate. Last but not least, the default value for "Max Results" is 1,000, so if you have more pages than that, I'd change that, as well (the max value is 10,000).

Got it all set up? Run that puppy! Head to Add-ons > Google Analytics > Run Reports. Each time you return to this spreadsheet to update your info, you'll want to click "Run Reports" again, to get the most up-to-date stats.

There's one more step. Your data is now in a table on the wrong worksheet, so we need to pull it over using the VLOOKUP formula. Essentially, you're telling Excel, "See that URL over there? Find it in the table on that report tab, and tell me what the number is next to it." If you haven't used VLOOKUP before, it's well worth learning. There's a fantastic  explanation over at Search Engine Watch if you could use a primer (or a refresher).

Pulling in social metrics with scripts

This is a little trickier, as Google Spreadsheets doesn't include a way to pull in social metrics, and that info ins't included in GA. The solution? We create our own functions for the spreadsheet to use.

Relax; it's not as hard as you'd think. =)

I'll go over Facebook, Twitter, and Google Plus here, though the process would undoubtedly be similar for any other social network you'd like to measure.

We start in the script editor, which you'll find under the tools menu:

If you've been there before, you'll see a list of scripts you've already made; just click "Create a New Project." If you're new to Google Scripts, it'll plop you into a blank project—you can just dismiss the popup window that tries to get you started.

Google Scripts organizes what you create into "projects," and each project can contain multiple scripts. You'll only need one project here—just call it something like "Social Metrics Scripts"—and then create a new script within that project for each of the social networks you'd like to include as an ingredient in your One Metric.

Once you have a blank script ready for each network, go through one by one, and paste the respective code below into the large box in the script editor (make sure to replace the default "myFunction" code). 

  function fbshares(url) {  var jsondata = UrlFetchApp.fetch("http://api.facebook.com/restserver.php?method=links.getStats&format=json&urls="+url);  var object = Utilities.jsonParse(jsondata.getContentText());  return object[0].total_count;  Utilities.sleep(1000)  }  
  function tweets(url) {  var jsondata = UrlFetchApp.fetch("http://urls.api.twitter.com/1/urls/count.json?url="+url);  var object = Utilities.jsonParse(jsondata.getContentText());  Utilities.sleep(1000)  return object.count;  }  
  function plusones(url) {  var options =  {  "method" : "post",  "contentType" : "application/json",  "payload" :  '{"method":"pos.plusones.get","id":"p","params":{"nolog":true,"id":"'+url+'","source":"widget","userId":"@viewer","groupId":"@self"},"jsonrpc":"2.0","key":"p","apiVersion":"v1"}'  };  var response = UrlFetchApp.fetch("https://clients6.google.com/rpc?key=AIzaSyCKSbrvQasunBoV16zDH9R33D88CeLr9gQ", options);  var results = JSON.parse(response.getContentText());  if (results.result != undefined)  return results.result.metadata.globalCounts.count;  return "Error";  }

Make sure you save these scripts—that isn't automatic like it is with most Google applications. Done? You've now got the following functions at your disposal in Google Spreadsheets:

  • =fbshares(url)
  • =tweets(url)
  • =plusones(url)

The (url) in each of those cases is where you'll point to the URL of the post you're trying to analyze, which should be pulled in automatically by IFTTT. Voila! Social metrics.

Pulling on-page metrics

You may also have metrics built into your site that you'd like to use. For example, Moz has thumbs up on each post, and we also frequently see great discussions in our comments section, so we use both of those as success metrics for our blog. Those can usually be pulled in through one of the following two methods.

But first, obligatory note: Both of these methods involve scraping a page for information, which is obviously fine if you're scraping your own site, but it's against the ToS for many services out there (such as Google's properties and Twitter), so be careful with how you use these.

=IMPORTXML

While getting it set up correctly can be a little tricky, this is an incredibly handy function, as it allows you to scrape a piece of information from a page using an XPath. As long as your metric is displayed somewhere on the URL for your piece of content, you can use this function to pull it into your spreadsheet.

Here's how you format the function:

If you'd like a full tutorial on XPaths (they're quite useful), our friends at Distilled put together a really fantastic guide to using them for things just like this.  It's well worth a look. You can skip that for now, if you'd rather, as you can find the XPath for any given element pretty quickly with a tool built into Chrome.

Right-click on the metric you'd like to pull, and click on "Inspect element."

That'll pull up the developer tools console at the bottom of the window, and will highlight the line of code that corresponds to what you clicked. Right-click on that line of code, and you'll have the option to "Copy XPath." Have at it.

That'll copy the XPath to your clipboard, which you can then paste into the function in Google Spreadsheets.

Richard Baxter of BuiltVisible created a wonderful  guide to the IMPORTXML function a few years ago; it's worth a look if you'd like more info.

Combining =INDEX with =IMPORTHTML

If your ingredient is housed in a <table> or a list (ordered or unordered) on your pages, this method might work just as well.

=IMPORTHTML simply plucks the information from a list or table on a given URL, and =INDEX pulls the value from a cell you specify within that table. Combining them creates a function something like this:

Note that without the INDEX function, the IMPORTHTML function will pull in the entire piece of content it's given. So, if you have a 15-line table on your page and you import that using IMPORTHTML, you'll get the entire table in 15 rows in your spreadsheet. INDEX is what restricts it to a single cell in that table. For more on this function, check out this quick tutorial.

Taking it to the next level

I've got a few ideas in the works for how to make this metric even better. 

Automatically check for outlier ingredients and flag them

One of the downsides of smooshing all of these ingredients together is missing out on the insights that individual metrics can offer. If one post did fantastically well on Facebook, for example, but ended up with a non-remarkable One Metric score, you might still want to know that it did really well on Facebook.

In the next iteration of the metric, my plan is to have the spreadsheet automatically calculate not only the average performance of past content, but also the standard deviation. Then, whenever a single piece differs by more than a couple of standard deviations (in either direction), that ingredient will get called out as an outlier for further review.

Break out the categories of ingredients

In the graphic above that combines the ingredients into categories in order to calculate an overall average, it might help to monitor those individual categories, too. You might, then, have a spreadsheet that looked something like this:

Make the weight of each category adjustable based on current goals

As it stands, each of those three categories is given equal weight in coming up with our One Metric scores. If we broke the categories out, though, they could be weighted differently to reflect our company's changing goals. For example, if increased brand awareness was a goal, we could apply a heavier weight to social metrics. If retention became more important, on-page metrics from the existing community could be weighted more heavily. That weighting would adapt the metric to be a truer representation of the content's performance against current company goals.

I hope this comes in as handy for everyone else's analysis as it has for my own. If you have any questions and/or feedback, or any other interesting ways you think this metric could be used, I'd love to hear from you in the comments!


Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don't have time to hunt down but want to read!
Publicat de 1 la 09:25 0 comentarii

3 tools to ‘suggest’ your way to better content ideas

3 tools to ‘suggest’ your way to better content ideas

Link to White.net

3 tools to ‘suggest’ your way to better content ideas

Posted: 01 Jul 2014 01:30 AM PDT

Have you ever found yourself scrabbling for fresh content ideas relevant to your main topic of interest?

Perhaps you want to provide some insight into common issues facing your audience to build helpful resource articles?

Or maybe you've started working with a new client and need to generate a list of potential ideas for marketable content that will drive brand awareness? Right now?

Whatever content you're looking to create, it's common to find ourselves seeking fresh inspiration. Well, why not let Google do some of the heavy lifting for you? With a starting list of topic terms and a nice dash of automation thanks to some clever tools, I like to let Google's Suggest feature help me dig up a list of highly relevant, targeted long-tail variations, including terms that are either regularly searched for or that are being used right now.

Officially known as Autocomplete, Google Suggest helps by displaying "search predictions that might be similar to the search terms you're typing". For example, if I start typing in content marketing, Google thinks 'here's what other people have been searching for when they type this in'

Google Suggest in action

Autocomplete offers a range of popular options for when users start their search with ‘content marketing’

The results you get from Autocomplete are not purely based on volume of searches, but are "a reflection of the search activity of users and the content of web pages". In other words, they are partly based on volume, but also on searches that Google thinks it has strong answers for.

Despite this, Autocomplete is a powerful research resource, as how often past searchers have used a term is an important consideration, as well as factors such as your personal search history, location, topicality and more. Of course, finding search topics based on what's popular right now is no bad thing either. Whether you need blog post ideas, new supporting content for your main offering or are generating ideas for marketable content to bring your site to new eyeballs, Google Suggest can help to reveal a host of potential opportunities through long-tail, semantically related, key phrases.

Now, to manually check Google Suggest for your main topic and all the possible variations is possible, but it would take time, and no doubt you're in a hurry. Fortunately, the online marketing community is highly inventive. So, here are three easy-to-use tools to quickly mine for great content ideas, all based on real insights into the needs of your potential readers.

I love these tools. They've given me many an idea, and helped kick-start a variety of content projects. Hopefully they can do the same for you!

Übersuggest

One of the first Google Suggest tools around, Ubersuggest is one of the best long-tail keyword finding tools available. It calls itself Suggest on steroids, and that's pretty apt. By entering your main topic and selecting your country location, you can mine Google Suggest for tens of great variations that can lead to content ideas. What's more, it's really quick to do. Let's run through how to use the tool, keeping our content marketing topic.

So, I load up ubersuggest.org and enter my key phrase, content marketing, choose my country and which vertical I'm interested in (web, images, news etc.) and fill out the reCAPTCHA field.

Starting the Übersuggest process

Übersuggest lets you choose from a large range of Google domains, and along 6 different verticals

A quick note, using different verticals might not seem obvious, but can be useful for certain topics to find truly helpful keyphrases. For example, using the News vertical can help you find what news angles are of interest to your potential audience right now – perfect for blog posts when you want to be seen as commenting on the latest events.

Ubersuggest works by scraping the Autocomplete results for your term, and the Autocomplete that occurs when you add another character. It does this for the entire alphabet, each numeric character and even for just adding a space. So, having completed my search, Ubersuggest has found 324 suggestions for me to browse. Now, if you click on one of the keywords it adds more suggestions based on that keyphrase (1) – yep, more choices! Click on the green plus symbol to add that keyword to your bucket (2).

Übersuggest offering a range of suggestions

Übersuggest can deliver hundreds of potential new keywords, and lets you drill down further to uncover more

Once done, scroll back to the top and you'll find your bucket on the right-hand side. Click Get and you're presented with a plain-text version for you to copy and add to your seed list.

Grabbing the keyword data from Übersuggest

As you can see, if you add a broad topic you can quickly generate hundreds of variations on your topic. Sadly, Ubersuggest can sometimes be a little unreliable; occasionally it is unavailable, and it can be a little slow to load. However, generally it works very well, and the keywords it brings you, and the functionality to select individual terms and find further suggestions, means it can help you create a big bucket of potential ideas.

SEOChat's Suggestion Keyword Finder

One of the limitations of Ubersuggest is that you have to manually select each important keyword variation to find the suggestions for that term. The Suggestion Keyword Finder from SEOChat neatly solves this problem by approaching finding Google Suggest results in a different way.

You can start by entering your topic keyword and hitting the submit button to get the top suggestions based on your term, much like the first level Ubersuggest gives you. However, the real fun comes when you select Level 2 as an option before submitting.

Select Level 2 to start having some real fun

Select Level 2 to start having some real fun

Now the tool gives you the initial list of suggestions, and then the top suggestions for each of the initial options presented. So, for content marketing the top suggestion was content marketing institute, so the first level 2 list is the suggestions for that keyphrase.

SEOChat 2

Suddenly, I'm able to see the top suggestions for each of the most popular or relevant variations of my main topic – very nice! What's better than this list? Even more data, that's what, and this tool delivers. If you select the option of Level 3 you get the next layer of granularity, the top suggestions for each variation of the most popular options (phew!). The Related Keywords Tool handily puts each suggestion and its breakdown together so you can see the whole topic niche.

SEOChat 3

What's fantastic about this arrangement is that the tool immediately drills down into each niche for you. This means that whether you find a topic to create content on at level 1 or level 2, you've got a breakdown of elements your content should touch on. Perhaps use them for sub-headings or even to create a series of related posts.

As this method of keyphrase mining is different to Ubersuggest's, you can use both in conjunction to build a list of potential content ideas in only a few minutes. Once you've found a set of helpful data, you can export it to a handy Excel format spreadsheet for further analysis and manipulation. One disadvantage of this tool is the lack of international support (US only results from what I can tell), so you have to bear this in mind when considering both the data gained, and entering topics with different spellings internationally and so on.

Note: SEOChat have another option, the Keyword Suggest Tool, which pulls the top suggestions from Google, Bing, Amazon and YouTube, which used to provide some interesting ideas as well, but sadly I haven’t been able to get it to generate results for a while now.

KeywordTool.io

A third option for you to try is the new kid on the block – KeywordTool.io. This little beauty is an excellent addition to any content marketer's/SEO's toolkit. It again scrapes Google's Autocomplete function to deliver impressive numbers of long-tail keyword variations, all in only a few moments.

This simple tool makes it easy to find hordes of keywords (up to 750 a time) based on Google Suggest's data. To get going, you enter your keyword, we'll be sticking with content marketing of course, and choose the Google domain and language you would like results for. This is not small detail – Keyword Tool has 194 domains and 83 languages to choose from.

Keyword Tool 1

Keyword Tool then appends your keyphrase with the entire alphabet and all numeric characters, much like Ubersuggest. However, it also prepends all characters as well, offering potential further insight, which is extremely helpful. Remember, not everyone uses your topic at the beginning of their search.

Keyword Tool 2

As you can see here, by prepending a to content marketing, Keyword Tool has given me a range of potential topics such as creating a content marketing plan, developing a content marketing strategy and example of a content marketing plan. Long-tail keywords like this will no doubt start your mind racing with possible content. When you're ready, simply click on the copy all button at the top of the page to grab all the keywords. These can then be pasted into a spreadsheet.

Keyword Tool 3

Keyword Tool is a very nice option, and one I'm sure many will love using. It doesn't give you the same deep dive into one variation as SEO Chat's Suggestion Keyword Finder, but can offer a more broad spectrum of possibilities, the strongest of which could then be re-put through of course. It is reliable, but does conflict sometimes Chrome, perhaps conflicting with another of my (many) extensions

No matter, I heartily recommend you give it a whirl next time you need some fresh content or keyword ideas.

After you have your words

Once you have your potential topic long-tail variations, you can pull data from some other popular tools to filter for the finest opportunities. Putting your options through the Google Keyword Planner will give you the search volumes each keyphrase currently projects and can be a great way to find the most popular.

Also beneficial is to run the phrases through SEMRush to uncover phrase-match and related keywords. It may be that the search volume for your first choice isn't fantastic, but there's another slight variation or a synonym that is much more popular. You can then rinse and repeat; take those further keyword variations and re-run through your suggest tool of choice, then the Keyword Planner to find volume and SEMRush to find further variations.

On a similar note, we've already touched upon the notion that much marketable content should be built with the intention of appearing as a resource for a whole variety of search-phrase variations on a topic. By finding all the related terms on the topic we've been suggested via Google, we can compile a much larger potential search volume and reach for our content, rather than focusing on just one keyword or phrase.

The final piece of the puzzle is to take a look at the competition. Within SEMRush's overview dashboard for each term is a handy interface that shows what's ranking for those phrases, making it easy to see which phrases either have results that can be improved upon with your expertise or are simply lacking relevant, helpful answers.

Now we can take a look at the difficulty of the keyword to see how hard it would be to rank. SEMRush comes with a keyword difficulty option, which is handy, and for a more detailed look Moz's Keyword Difficulty Tool and serpIQ both offer excellent analysis.

Between search volume, available keyphrase variations plus synonyms, and relative difficulty, we can quickly turn our Google Suggest options into a list of relevant content ideas that we know people are searching for. Not bad for a relatively quick and painless piece of work, and without having to struggle for new topics. Now there's just the simple matter of devising the content to blow the competition away!

The post 3 tools to 'suggest' your way to better content ideas appeared first on White.net.
Publicat de 1 la 05:02 0 comentarii

Seth's Blog : How will you choose your next project?

 

How will you choose your next project?

After you make a list, after you've exhaustively chronicled your options, will you choose: easy, cheap, proven, brave, certain, big payoff, fun, convenient, known, unknown, important, urgent, challenging...

There is no perfect answer, but knowing which way your compass points (and saying it out loud) is the best way to move forward.

       

 

More Recent Articles

[You're getting this note because you subscribed to Seth Godin's blog.]

Don't want to get this email anymore? Click the link below to unsubscribe.

Email subscriptions powered by FeedBlitz, LLC, 365 Boston Post Rd, Suite 123, Sudbury, MA 01776, USA.

 
Publicat de 1 la 03:23 0 comentarii

luni, 30 iunie 2014

Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis

Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis

French Bank BNP Paribas Pleads Guilty Criminal Conspiracy Charges, Fined Record $9 Billion; Anyone Headed to Prison?

Posted: 30 Jun 2014 05:30 PM PDT

Today, French bank BNP Paribas plead guilty Monday to criminal money-laundering laws by helping clients dodge sanctions on Iran, Sudan and other countries.

As part of the settlement, BNP will pay a record penalty of close to $9 billion.

Former ECB president Jean-Claude Trichet said the fine was neither fair, just, nor proportionate and carries risks for the global financial system.

CCN Money has the synopsis in BNP Paribas to Pay Nearly $9 Billion Penalty.
On Monday in an agreement with the Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance the bank pleaded guilty to falsifying business records and conspiracy in Manhattan Supreme Court. On Tuesday it is expected to plead guilty for violating money laundering laws in federal court with U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara.

The bank also agreed to a sanction by the New York department of financial services. It will suspend certain U.S. dollar clearing transaction services through its New York branch for one year.

About 30 employees will leave BNP Paribas as a result of the investigation, including several who have gone already, according to the U.S. official. 

The fine dwarfs HSBC (HSBC)'s $1.9 billion penalty in 2012 for similar offenses, and the $2.6 billion Credit Suisse (CS) paid in May to settle tax evasion claims.

The Wall Street Journal said BNP Paribas would have to slash its dividend and raise billions of euros by issuing bonds.

Standard and Poor's has warned it could cut the bank's long term credit rating once it reviewed the size of the fine and the nature of any additional penalties.
Curious Thing

Curiously, no one goes to prison for money laundering, falsifying business records, or conspiracy charges.

But New York Times Deal Book reports Prosecutors Ask at Least 8 Years for Martoma in Insider Trading Case.
Federal prosecutors are recommending that Mathew Martoma, a former trader who worked for the billionaire investor Steven A. Cohen, be sentenced next month to at least eight years in prison for insider trading, if not significantly more.

That would be at the upper end of prison sentences for hedge fund traders convicted of insider trading in recent years, but by no means the stiffest punishment handed down during the long-running investigation.

In February, a federal jury in Manhattan convicted the former SAC portfolio manager of helping the hedge fund generate profits and avoid losses totaling $275 million in 2008.

To date, the 11 years given to Raj Rajaratnam, the co-founder of the Galleon Group hedge fund, is the longest sentence anyone in the investigation has received. Mr. Rajaratnam was convicted by a jury in May 2011 on 14 counts of insider trading — more than Mr. Martoma's three criminal charges. But the illicit trading by Mr. Rajartnam generated about $63 million, compared with the $275 million in illegal profits and avoided losses for Mr. Martoma.
Questions of the Day

Rajartnam was sentenced to prison for 11 years based on illicit profits of $63 million.

Here's the question of the day: Did BNP Paribas make more than $63 million in money laundering and other conspiracies?

Bonus question: Is insider trading worse than falsifying records?

Answer: Apparently, insider trading is worse than money laundering, falsifying business records, and various other conspiracies. Martha Stewart knows this as well, via obstruction of justice charges related to insider trading.

Addendum:

The CATO institute has the absurd details in Martha Stewart in Prison?

Meanwhile, insider trading by Congress is perfectly legal, even when Congressmen know who a big defense contract will be awarded to (and act on it in advance).

Mike "Mish" Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com
Mike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific.

Last Minute Concessions and Unreasonable Demands

Posted: 30 Jun 2014 01:28 PM PDT

The EU threatens more sanctions on Russia unless Russia meets three verifiable demands. One of the demands is reasonable, the other two aren't.

For starters, the EU wants Russia to halt the flow of weapons into Eastern Ukraine, and it wants that process verified. That appears to be a reasonable demand.

Secondly, the EU demands pro-Russia militants return control of Izvarino, Dolzhanskiy and Krasnopartizansk (three border checkpoints) to Ukraine. The militants refuse to surrender, arguing that theirs is now a sovereign state.

Returning control of three Ukrainian checkpoints is an unreasonable, if not idiotic demand on Russia. Short of invading Ukraine and taking over the checkpoints, there is absolutely no way for Russia to comply with the resolution.

Finally, the EU demands "launch of substantial negotiations on the implementation of President Poroshenko's peace plan". Once again, Russia is not in control of militants who may or may not wish to negotiate anything.

Of the three demands, the Financial Times reports the first has been met as Moscow Makes Last-Minute Concession to Ukraine on Border Controls.
"President Vladimir Putin has proposed that Ukrainian border guards be granted access to those crossing points from the Russian side as observers for joint control of the border, and that observers from the [Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe] also be admitted to those crossing points from the Russian side," said Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov.

"We hope that this initiative of the Russian president will allow all responsible parties to take a decision to extend the ceasefire, to extend the truce," Mr Lavrov said.
Russia agreed to the first demand after "Vladimir Putin discussed the crisis by telephone with Germany's Chancellor Angela Merkel and President François Hollande of France and Petro Poroshenko, their Ukrainian counterpart."

At this point, there is little else Russia can do, and it would be very unreasonable to impose more sanctions on Russia for a situation in Ukraine that Russia has no fundamental control over.

Anyone but a bureaucrat under heavy influence of US meddling would rapidly come to that conclusion, but don't count on it.

In politics, stupidity frequently trumps common sense.

Mike "Mish" Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com
Mike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific.

Kurds Deputy PM Calls for Decentralized Iraq and Removal of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki

Posted: 30 Jun 2014 12:22 PM PDT

The Kurds played their cards in the Iraqi mess exceptionally well. They never threatened independence until Baghdad was too unstable to do anything about it.

Even now, the Kurds offer one last olive branch of sorts, an offer for a "decentralized" Iraq as opposed to independent nations, but only on condition that Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki steps down, and Sunnis get more control.

Please consider Kurds' Deputy PM Talabani Calls for Decentralized Iraq
Iraq and its foreign backers must abandon a centralised system of governance if the country is to survive, Iraqi Kurdistan's deputy prime minister has said, warning that his semi-autonomous region would gain de facto independence if the slide into chaos continues.

"We have to get our minds off of this notion that a strong central government can govern this country, because it can't," he [Qubad Talabani] told the Financial Times in an interview. "We're past that. We tried that. We had some competent Sunni ministers in the government . . . it didn't provide adequate representation to the people in those [Sunni] territories."

KRG president and head of the region's dominant Kurdistan Democratic party, Masoud Barzani, openly stated last week that Kirkuk would remain under Kurdish control and that independence could be near, hinting it may be time for a referendum on the issue.

Mr Talabani, who is from the rival Patriotic Union of Kurdistan party, was more circumspect, saying the Kurds still hoped to make a deal in Baghdad.

The two main parties in Kurdistan have a power-sharing agreement where they alternate between the premiership and deputy posts.

Kurds and Sunni are adamant that their participation depends on an end to Mr Maliki's eight-year rule, and the appointment of a new premier who will negotiate. It is not yet clear if majority Shia politicians will agree on an alternative candidate.
Even if Maliki goes along, Masoud Barzani, the Kurds president favors independence. Expect a referendum on independence soon if  Maliki does not step down, and perhaps even if he does.

Mike "Mish" Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com
Mike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific.
Publicat de 1 la 23:15 0 comentarii
Abonați-vă la: Postări (Atom)