| |||||||
|
joi, 24 septembrie 2015
All the latest news from people you know
Seth's Blog : Industrializing, professionalizing, scaling...
Industrializing, professionalizing, scaling...
You could make it into a cookie cutter, a scalable, depersonalized, committee-approved ticket to endless growth.
Or you could make it more real, more human and more personal.
What is "it"?
It is the interaction you have with your best customer. It is the way you talk to your employees. It is your safety policy, your go to market strategy, your approach to the board meeting.
If you can't figure out how to talk to one person, it doesn't really pay to scale up your efforts to talk to a thousand.
More Recent Articles
- The banality of the magazine rack
- #WeAreAllWeird (3 contest updates)
- Dreams and fears
- Tires, coffee and people
- Pathfinding
[You're getting this note because you subscribed to Seth Godin's blog.]
Don't want to get this email anymore? Click the link below to unsubscribe.
Click here to safely unsubscribe from "Seth Godin's Blog on marketing, tribes and respect."
Click here to view mailing archives, here to change your preferences, or here to subscribe • Privacy
Click here to view mailing archives, here to change your preferences, or here to subscribe • Privacy
Email subscriptions powered by FeedBlitz, LLC, 365 Boston Post Rd, Suite 123, Sudbury, MA 01776, USA.
miercuri, 23 septembrie 2015
Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis |
- LA Pledges $100 Million to Fight Homelessness: Why Stop There? Why Not $1 billion? Why Not $20 Billion?
- Chicago Tax Collector Hath Arrived With Massive Tax Hike: Emanuel Says "No Stone Unturned ... Not Done Yet"
- Bubble Debate; Equity Allocations vs. Shiller PE; Simple World
| Posted: 23 Sep 2015 02:33 PM PDT Public Emergency In yet another example that proves economic stupidity has no bounds, Los Angeles Puts $100 Million Into Helping Homeless. Flooded with homeless encampments from its freeway underpasses to the chic sidewalks of Venice Beach, municipal officials here declared a public emergency on Tuesday, making Los Angeles the first city in the nation to take such a drastic step in response to its mounting problem with street dwellers.Ding Ding Ding Ding, ding, ding, we have a math winner! I am not quite certain if Blasi is arguing for more or less spending, but he is the first person other than me, that I am aware of, to bring math into the equation. LA vs. EU Question of the day: Other than a sense of scale, is the homelessness crisis in Los Angeles that much different than the refugee crisis in Europe? Unlimited Demand for Free Services In LA, as in the EU, there is a virtually unlimited demand for free food, free shelter, and free services. Offer $100 million and the need will grow overnight to $1 billion. Offer $1 billion and the need will grow overnight to $20 billion. Offering free food, free services, and free shelter cannot possibly cure a problem caused by free services, especially in a desirable temperate climate. Blasi says: "Do the math here — it [$100 Million] doesn't amount to much at all." On Tuesday, in regards to Europe (but it may just as well have been LA), I wrote EU Ministers Ram Through Quota Plan; Mish Does "The Math" . By all means, let's have a math discussion. Mike "Mish" Shedlock |
| Posted: 23 Sep 2015 11:05 AM PDT On May 4th I wrote Beware, the Tax Man Has Eyes on You: Potential Hike for Illinoisans is Staggering. Six months ago, Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel warned that without state legislation to modify the structure of police and fire pensions and implement a "smart funding formula," Chicago property tax bills would "explode" in 2016. Today I report, the tax man hath arrived. Mayor Rahm Emanuel says Now is the Time to Hike Taxes. The "explosion" that Emanuel warned about in mid-March hit Chicago Tuesday as the mayor unveiled his $7.8 billion budget for 2016, and it wasn't pretty — even with the risky assumption that Gov. Bruce Rauner will sign legislation giving Chicago 15 more years to ramp up to 90 percent funding of police and fire pensions.Dire Predictions The Chicago Tribune reports Emanuel Paints Dire Future Without Record Property Tax Hike. Mayor Rahm Emanuel called on the city's 50 aldermen Tuesday to summon the courage to pass the largest property tax increase in modern Chicago history, and told them they could sell it to voters by painting a dire, if not quite dystopian, alternative.Not Done Yet Chicagoans beware! Emanuel explicitly warned he's "not done raising property taxes". Emanuel also pledged "No Stone Unturned". "We are going to address our challenges, and I think when the governor looks at the whole budget he will see that we didn't leave any stone unturned. It is fair, it is equitable. It's progressive," said Emanuel. Not Fair, Not Equitable What are taxes for if not services like garbage pickup, street sweeping, etc? The answer of course is untenable police, fire, and school pensions. Yes, it's "progressive" all right, "progressive idiocy". Emanuel did not do, nor has he ever done anything to fix the structural problems. The proper way to fix the school problem is for the school district to declare bankruptcy, a tactic Emanuel does not want to take. Actually, the school district cannot take that action because Illinois does not allow municipal bankruptcies. However, if the mayor were behind the idea, it would likely pressure the Illinois legislature into action. Emanuel claims he is being courageous. Passing tax hikes immediately after an election is not courageous. Admitting the school system is broke, unions are the reason, and taxpayers should not bear the brunt of the costs would be courageous. Emanuel is both a coward and a pickpocket. With his dire warning about Chicago becoming unlivable, he is also a fear monger. There is one thing you can count on, however. Emanuel is not yet done picking the pockets of Chicagoans. When Emanuel promised, "no stone unturned" you can bet your last tax dime on that. Mike "Mish" Shedlock |
| Bubble Debate; Equity Allocations vs. Shiller PE; Simple World Posted: 23 Sep 2015 01:16 AM PDT Yale University market scholar Robert Shiller entered the bubble debate last week as noted in the Financial Times article Fears Grow Over US Stock Market Bubble. The Nobel economics laureate told the Financial Times that his valuation confidence indices, based on investor surveys, showed greater fear that the market was overvalued than at any time since the peak of the dotcom bubble in 2000.Equity Allocations vs. Shiller PE  Michael Green at Ice Farm Capital emailed the above chart as well as the reference to the Financial Times article. The chart shows equity allocations on the left axis vs. the Case-Shiller smoothed PE ratio on the right. It is based on Ice Farm analysis using Shiller's and Fed Flow of Funds data. Simple World I had seen the Shiller piece before, but something caught my eye when I read it a second time. "You would think that when interest rates are higher people would sell stocks, but the financial world just isn't that simple," said Shiller. I am a big fan of Shiller's model. However, the above statement makes no sense because quite frankly, what Shiller suggests is impossible! Simple Math Here's a simple economic truism: Someone must hold every equity share and every bond 100% of the time. In aggregate, it's impossible for people to sell stocks to buy bonds when interest rates are high (or vice versa). For every buyer of common stock there is a seller. Likewise, for every buyer of bonds there is a seller. Sentiment can change (and pricing with it), but because of simple math, if there was an aggressive sentiment shift towards getting out of stocks in favor of high-yielding bonds, then bond yields would plunge. At an individual level one can make changes, but at an aggregate level it is impossible. Thus, the financial math is indeed simple. It's the timing of sentiment changes that makes it difficult for the individual and impossible for the aggregate investor. Stocks vs. Bonds Individually, one can sell stocks to buy bonds or vice versa. But what about the possibility that neither is the place to be? Seven-Year Asset Class Real Return Projections As of 2015-08-31 (posted on September 15), GMO sees things like this:  Purple highlights mine. I like to repeat GMO's disclaimer so I do not misrepresent the chart. *The chart represents real return forecasts for several asset classes and not for any GMO fund or strategy. These forecasts are forward‐looking statements based upon the reasonable beliefs of GMO and are not a guarantee of future performance. Forward‐looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and GMO assumes no duty to and does not undertake to update forward‐looking statements. Forward‐looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks, and uncertainties, which change over time. Actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in forwardlooking statements. U.S. inflation is assumed to mean revert to long‐term inflation of 2.2% over 15 years.Care to Trade? Care to trade US stocks for US Bonds? If so, be prepared to trade negative 1.1% real returns in equities for negative 0.9% returns in US bonds. If that were for a single year, no one would care. But that is the forecast every year for the next seven years on average. In practice, it will not happen that way. For example, there easily could be a 40% plunge over the next year or so followed by a slow trudge sideways for three years then a rally back to where we are today over the next two years. The possibilities are endless, that's just one example. Note that GMO "real" returns assume mean reversion to 2.2% inflation over the next 15years. Nominal returns could be slightly better or worse, depending on how quickly the 2.2% inflation target is hit. Pension Plan Assumptions In general, pension plans assume 7.5% or so returns every year. Many pension plans, especially those in Illinois will be close to bankrupt if GMO's forecast is in the ballpark. I personally think GMO is somewhat optimistic. I expect negative real returns for about 10 years. Mike "Mish" Shedlock |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States | |
Damn Cool Pics
Damn Cool Pics |
| Madagascar’s Limestone Towers Are Completely Awe Inspiring Posted: 23 Sep 2015 12:37 PM PDT The Tsingy de Bemaraha National Park in Madagascar's Melaky region is one of those places everyone should add to their buckey list. The UNESCO World Heritage Site covers hundreds of kilometers and is best known for the many limestone towers that can be found in the area. It is a place that is truly stunning to look at.          |
| Marvel Actors Get Unbelievably Ripped For Their Roles Posted: 23 Sep 2015 12:16 PM PDT When you show up to the set of a Marvel movie to play a superhero, Marvel expects you to be shredded.        |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Damn Cool Pictures. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States | |
Let Me Work, Please: A Case for Fewer & More Productive Meetings - Moz Blog
Let Me Work, Please: A Case for Fewer & More Productive Meetings
Posted by MTurek
If you feel like your workweek is structured around meetings—like all you're doing is preparing for and attending meetings, talking about and reporting on your work rather than sitting and doing it—then you've reached a point of frustration where you need to regain control of your time.
There are two sides to meetings: not attending them if they're unnecessary, and when running a meeting, ensuring that it's purposeful, on-point, and driving a specific outcome. If the meeting lacks purpose and has no desired outcome, what's the point?
Today's workplace
The current workplace is operated on a model that doesn't promote productivity. Many offices are built around the "open office" concept, which serves as an ideal delivery system for distraction. This open-plan environment may promote camaraderie, but constant noise damages attention spans and workplace productivity. Even the most sophisticated noise-canceling headphones cannot defend workers from inevitable but unpredictable waves of interruption: ringing phones, loud chatter, shouting across the office, and more. People go to work every day, but much of the real work happens before or after business hours, on the weekends, at home, in airplanes, in coffee shops—virtually everywhere except the office.
If we want to start being productive at work, the model needs to change. This requires removing distractions and creating longer and longer periods of uninterrupted time devoted to work. Feeling frustrated because of how little you actually get done is a sign you're feeling resistance against the model in which you must operate.
Creative people require unstructured time to "get into the zone." As a knowledge worker, whether you're a programmer or a digital analyst, being unable to complete your work creates internal friction and frustration. According to an Atlassian study, employees are attending up to 62 meetings per month, half of which are considered a waste of time. In a 20-day work month, that averages to 3.1 meetings per day. Now, imagine that these meetings are spread out across the day. That's a recipe for frustration: a stop-start workday in which you never have the opportunity to take the time to focus on complex work.
To preserve both your sanity and your productivity, you must reclaim your workday.
Finding work/meeting balance
Meetings should be like salt—a spice sprinkled carefully to enhance a dish, not poured recklessly over every forkful. Too much salt destroys a dish. Too many meetings destroy morale and motivation.
– Jason Fried, Basecamp
1. Block out 2–4 hours every day in your calendar for uninterrupted work.
If you're an early riser and your most productive time is in the morning, you have a better chance of setting up several hours of uninterrupted work time during the day. Create blocks of time in your calendar dedicated to your work, and indicate in the title that this time is blocked off for specific, focused tasks. Indicate which project you'll be working on and request that no meetings are booked in that time.
2. Review your existing meeting invitations.
Review your calendar at the start of each week, ensuring that you understand the purpose and desired outcome of every meeting you're invited to. If there's any doubt in your mind as to the purpose of a meeting, speak to the organizer and determine whether your attendance is required.
3. Ensure that every meeting you attend has a clear purpose.
If there's no agenda for a meeting to which you've been invited, request it. Every single meeting should have a clear, unique agenda that's outlined at least 24 hours beforehand.
4. How many meetings actually take an hour?
The reality is that there are few meetings that require a full hour to complete. The challenge is that, if the meeting is set to last an hour, the meeting will likely be stretched out to accommodate that timeframe. Start by scheduling your own meetings for 30 or 45 minutes. For meetings that routinely end early, reach out to the organizer and request that the meeting invite be shortened to reflect the actual time required.
5. No-meeting weekday.
This one's ambitious, but if companies like Asana, with over 100 employees, can successfully manage their workweek with a "No Meeting Day," then surely your company can, too. This is a decision that must be supported by senior management and implemented by the entire organization. If you are in a position where you can make a recommendation for such a policy, begin by having conversations with the right people.
If you're not fortunate enough to work at an organization that implements this type of policy, begin by blocking out a no-meeting day in your own calendar, encouraging team members to book meetings with you another day. Your example may inspire others to implement their own no-meeting days, organically spreading this idea across the organization.
Productive meetings: The rule, not the exception
If 20% of an average day is spent on meetings, expressed as a year, that means a meeting you start on New Year's Day would let out around the middle of March.
– Merlin Mann, 43 Folders
Meetings can be an incredibly effective way for people to share and exchange information, get feedback, plan, collaborate, brainstorm, and make important decisions. To ensure that meetings are adding value to your work rather than detracting from it, hold yourself and others accountable to a higher standard.
1. Avoid over-inviting.
Consider the purpose of the meeting and determine who is actually required to attend. Meetings require employees to drop whatever they're doing and switch tasks. In a service-based business model, time is one of the company's most valuable assets. If you're pulling five people into one meeting, that meeting costs five billable hours. Let's assume that a billable hour is conservatively worth $200. How confidently can you say that your last meeting, where you may have pulled in 5 senior team members, was worth $1,000?
2. Ban cellphones.
When attendees are checking their phones, they aren't focusing on the meeting. If distraction is a problem in your meetings, address it by removing that distraction.
3. Write actionable agendas.
Your agenda should be written with action words, not nouns. Each item should address the desired outcome using an action, with the responsible individual indicated. For example, "Agree on ad copy testing plan next steps – Max" is more descriptive and actionable than "Ad copy testing plan."
4. Send agendas 24 hours in advance.
Ensure that the agenda is updated and sent to attendees 24 hours in advance so that they're able to review it, contribute to it, and prepare for the meeting.
5. Begin on time.
Make sure to start and end every meeting on time.
6. Prepare for meetings.
Simply attending a meeting isn't enough. For a meeting to be productive, you need to prepare for the meeting, understand what your role is at that meeting, and be prepared to contribute to its desired outcome.
Meetings are one of the biggest disruptors of at-work productivity and have come to dominate the workday, when in reality creative work should be the core focus of every day. Our most productive work is done without distraction; wasting workday time means we're working more outside of business hours in order to get things done. Build some quiet time into your day and be vigilant about ensuring that you have at least 2–4 hours dedicated to focused tasks. When you do attend or run your own meetings, ensure that you put in as much effort into making those meetings effective.
Take back your workday and use the skills that you're paid for to work on constructive, creative projects. If you're looking for some additional steps to improve your focus and productivity while on the job, download the PDF of my slide deck Too Busy to Do Good Work from MozCon 2015.
Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don't have time to hunt down but want to read!
| You are subscribed to the Moz Blog newsletter sent from 1100 Second Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101 United States To stop receiving those e-mails, you can unsubscribe now. | Newsletter powered by FeedPress |
Seth's Blog : The banality of the magazine rack
The banality of the magazine rack
Stop for a minute to consider those magazines that stack up like firewood at the doctor's office, or that beckon you from the high-priced newsstand before you get on the airplane. The celebrity/gossip/self-improvement category.
All the airbrushed pretty people, the replaceable celebrities and near celebrities. The mass-market fad diets, the conventional stories, the sameness tailored for a mass audience.
It's pretty seductive. If you can just fit in the way all these magazines are pushing you to fit in, then you'll be okay, alright, and beyond criticism. Boys and girls should act like this, dress like this, talk like this. Even the outliers are outliers in tried and true, conventional ways.
The headlines are interchangeable. So are the photos and the celebrities, the stories and the escapades and the promises.
Magazines believe they have to produce this cultural lighthouse in order to sell ads--there are advertisers that want average readers in order to sell them their average products. But this doesn't have to be you. These aren't cultural norms, they're merely a odd sub-universe, a costume party for people unwilling to find their own voice.
More Recent Articles
- #WeAreAllWeird (3 contest updates)
- Dreams and fears
- Tires, coffee and people
- Pathfinding
- Ad blocking
[You're getting this note because you subscribed to Seth Godin's blog.]
Don't want to get this email anymore? Click the link below to unsubscribe.
Click here to safely unsubscribe from "Seth Godin's Blog on marketing, tribes and respect."
Click here to view mailing archives, here to change your preferences, or here to subscribe • Privacy
Click here to view mailing archives, here to change your preferences, or here to subscribe • Privacy
Email subscriptions powered by FeedBlitz, LLC, 365 Boston Post Rd, Suite 123, Sudbury, MA 01776, USA.
Abonați-vă la:
Postări (Atom)
Postări
