It's almost impossible to persuade someone that he's wrong. Almost impossible to make your argument louder and sharper and have the other person say, "I was wrong and I will change my mind." Far more effective: Help someone make a new decision, based on new alternatives and a new story. Arnold got it right in this passionate invitation to (re) think about our future. [You're getting this note because you subscribed to Seth Godin's blog.] Don't want to get this email anymore? Click the link below to unsubscribe. Email subscriptions powered by FeedBlitz, LLC, 365 Boston Post Rd, Suite 123, Sudbury, MA 01776, USA.
When Does the Demographically-Related Pension Ponzi Scheme Blow Up? Posted: 08 Dec 2015 11:01 PM PST Reader "GM", an actuary student in Malaysia pinged me with an accurate observation on demographics, but missed the boat on a solution. GM writes .... I thought I would point out the reason for this monetary madness, which I believe you had brought up before.
Aging populations consume less, and have different consumption patterns to working populations. Retirees consume less food, autos and real estate compared to young working couples. They use more healthcare instead. Also, aging populations take on less debt. These factors combined make the economic effect of lowering interest rates and printing money less pronounced than they would be in different circumstances.
As a student actuary who is also doing my CFA I believe that demographics has a far greater impact on the economy than current economic models allow for. I live in Malaysia, where civil servants receive pensions based on their basic (not final) pay. But even this is unsustainable - The Edge newspaper earlier this year reported that nearly 40% of government operating expenses goes to pensions and emoluments, hence a need for pension reserving arises.
Perhaps governments and corporations alike may want to encourage higher birth rates to avoid destroying the monetary pinnacles they have built for themselves?
Singapore, for all her freedom, cannot seem to encourage more births. There is an unwritten understanding in Singaporean corporations that a woman joining corporations cannot give birth within 5 years of joining, and later if she does, there are little or no maternity benefits.
They now have a TFR lower than Japan, and are facing a real estate bubble collapse.
Maybe we could investigate this for the sake of asset prices?
Cheers! GM What's the Solution?Demographics are indeed a problem, but what's the solution? To encourage more births when housing prices are sky high, asset bubbles exist everywhere, and education costs in the US are totally insane? Central bankers greatly contributed to this mess by cheapening interest rates to a point the BIS started screaming loudly (See BIS Points Finger at Yellen, Draghi: Warns About "Unthinkably" Low Interest Rates, Bond Market "Dislocations"). The best thing to do is let the free market work, something Bernanke had the chance to do in 2009, but didn't. He called the collapse of Lehman his biggest failure. I propose it was his biggest success. Actually, Bernanke did not "let" Lehman fail as he describes. Lehman had failed and Bernanke let the market pronounce a proper death burial. Now that Bernanke has successfully re-blown the property bubble, millennials cannot afford houses. Demographic Time BombThe solution "GM" proposed (to have the government encourage more kids) cannot work. Government has no idea what the birth rate should be. What if the number of jobs is too low? What if the cost of housing too high? What about food stamps and other handouts for those with no jobs? And what happens down the road (way down the road when someone argues "we need more kids")? Bear in mind by the time the kids born today reach a working age where they can help the elders, many of those elders will already have died! Besides, the only way to encourage more births is to throw money at the problem. But what would that do? It would punish everyone else via taxation and bigger property bubbles. The solution as always, is to let the free market economy decide on its own what the supply of credit should be, what housing prices should be, what the birth rate should be. European Demographics ProblemI discussed the European demographics problem in Population Deflation: Spain Joins Germany with Negative Net Birth Rate; Italy on Threshold; Who's to Blame? So Who's to Blame?- Central banks and their inflationary tactics are at the head of the list.
- Fiscal stimulus, including a myriad of "affordable housing" programs that failed also contributed.
- Corrupt politicians in bed with union leaders handing out untenable pension promises is right at the forefront as well.
How the hell is a policy to encourage more births going to fix those three enormous structural issues? And what about debt? Student loans? Millennials taking care of their aging parents? The bottom line is the monetary actions of central banks, and the fiscal stimulus and protectionist actions of governments are for the sole benefit of the already wealthy, to the detriment of the shrinking middle class. Fewer and fewer millennials can afford to bring up kids in this environment. Economic Madness SpreadsYet, here were are with more economic madness. Finland heads up the fool's parade with a Helicopter Drop Free Money Proposal For Everyone. Last week the ECB Cut Interest Rates to -0.3 Percent. The market expected more. Currently the Bank of Japan is monetizing 100% of new debt issuance. Has it helped? Canada Joins the Negative Interest Rate Watch GroupCanada reacted to its recession just today with an absurd proposal to lower interest rates to -0.5 percent. Negative interest rates did not work in Europe, nor have zero interest rates solved anything in Japan. And even the BIS note the ridiculousness of the idea. But here we are. In regards to negative interest rates, Bank of Canada governor Stephen Poloz commented " should the need arise, we'll be ready. The effectiveness of each tool will depend on the situation, making it more a matter of choosing the right one at the right time". This was my response to Poloz's "right tool at the right time proposal". Right Tool at the Right TimeI have a very simple question for Poloz: If you know the right tool for the right time, why is Canada in or flirting with recession? If the Fed knew how to use tools, why was there a global financial collapse? If the ECB knew how to use tools, why can't the eurozone hit inflation targets? It may be a "matter of choosing the right one at the right time" but don't expect central banks to come close. In practice, central banks pull tools out of their collective asses, making them up as they go along, hoping to cure the messes their policies created. The results speak for themselves: a series of asset bubbles of increasing amplitude over time. There is one and only one tool that will work. It's called the free market. Expecting a bunch of economic illiterates who do not understand the irreplaceable role of the free market is like expecting an idiot to divine the theory of relativity. Proposals for the government to do something about the birth rate are 100% guaranteed to do one thing: make matters worse. Finally, what cannot be put off forever, won't. The demographically-related pension ponzi scheme that expects 8% returns with 0% or negative bonds and fewer contributing workers is one of those things. Mike "Mish" Shedlock | Cheney Calls Trump "Un-American"; Republican Establishment in Chaos; Congressman Asks Trump to Step Down; Reflections on Un-Americanism Posted: 08 Dec 2015 04:43 PM PST The Republican establishment has finally had enough of Donald Trump. Today the collective mice that constitute the Republican party establishment all lined up to attack Trump after Trump called for a ban on all Muslims entering the US. Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton joined the party with a tweet that Trump's idea was "reprehensible, prejudiced and divisive". Criticism also came from Republican presidential hopefuls Chris Christie, the New Jersey governor, Sen Marco Rubio of Florida and Jeb Bush. Trump DisownedThe Guardian reports Donald Trump's Muslim Ban Proposal Throws Republican Party Into Chaos Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump was disowned by his own party's top leadership on Tuesday and faced calls to drop his White House bid as the world reacted with outrage to his plan for a ban on Muslims entering the United States.
The billionaire frontrunner's plan tipped the Republican presidential race into chaos, with party leaders from the chairman of the Republican National Committee to former US vice-president Dick Cheney condemning the idea as "un-American".
Trump toured the US television studios in unrepentant form, unmoved by the gale of criticism that followed his speech aboard an aircraft carrier on Monday evening. Speaking aboard the USS Yorktown, he acknowledged that his proposal was "probably not politically correct", before whipping up a cheering crowd and adding: "But. I. Don't. Care."
"We need a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States while we figure out what the hell is going on," Trump said. "We are out of control."
Horrified Muslims in the United States heard in Trump's rhetoric an echo of Nazism, and they joined the Republican condemnation of Trump as un-American.
"He's trampling on our constitution and packaging it as a snake oil cure for our security concerns," said Kassem Allie, executive administrator of the Islamic Center of America in Dearborn, Michigan, one of the largest mosques in the US. "He's using fear-mongering reminiscent of Nazi Germany and Stalin."
House speaker Paul Ryan said Trump's remarks violated the constitution and were "not who we are as a party".
"This is not conservatism," the Wisconsin representative said, adding: "Some of our best and biggest allies in this struggle and fight against radical Islam terror are Muslims."
There were signs that Trump was not deaf to the Republican insurrection. He appeared to make a veiled threat on Twitter on Tuesday to run as an independent. "A new poll indicates that 68% of my supporters would vote for me if I departed the GOP & ran as an independent," he wrote.
In Congress, a Florida Republican spoke on the floor of the House of Representatives to make a passionate demand for Trump to quit the presidential race.
"It should be heartbreaking to every American that we have a frontrunner in the presidential race that suggests there will be a religious test for anybody who wishes to come to our shores," said Representative David Jolly. "It is an affront to the principles upon which our nation was founded."
Ukip leader Nigel Farage released a statement saying Trump had "gone too far".
Muslim groups around the world expressing outrage at Trump's proposal included Dar al-Ifta, the state religious body in Egypt.
Trump followed up the speech with a media blitz Tuesday morning, in which he claimed the mantle of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, citing the internment of Japanese Americans during the second world war as precedent for his policy.
"This is a president highly respected by all, he did the same thing," Trump said on ABC News. "If you look at what he was doing, it was far worse."
However, Rick Wilson, a Republican strategist who has been a vocal critic of Trump, told the Guardian: "There was a whiff of fascism around this guy. Now there's a reek of fascism". Pot Calls Kettle BlackThat's quite a coordinated attack on Trump. And Dick Cheney is without a doubt correct in his statement that Trump is constitutionally un-American. Yet, this is the biggest case of the pot calling the kettle black since .... forever. If ever there was a case of un-Americanism it was the Bush-Cheney administration's unfounded and illegal war in Iraq. And that war directly led to the formation of ISIS. Dick Cheney belongs in prison if not hell. Hypocrite Paul Ryan The Republican establishment is the biggest collection of un-American warmongers in history. Speaker Paul Ryan said Trump's remarks violated the constitution and were " not who we are as a party". This same hypocrite has a rather amazing Stance on War and Peace. Ryan would engage Iran militarily, in advance. Ryan claims " [Iran] is the world's largest sponsor of terrorism. They've dedicated themselves to wiping an entire country off the map." It's a blatant lie, which Republicans often repeat, that Iran ever threatened to wipe Israel off the Map. For discussion of what Iran really said, please see Peace Must Be Stopped At Any Cost; Lies and Hypocrisy on Iran. Reflections on AlliesNext, please ponder Ryan's statement " Some of our best and biggest allies in this struggle and fight against radical Islam terror are Muslims." Actually, Saudi Arabia, our alleged ally, is a direct sponsor of ISIS. Our alleged enemy, Iran, isn't. And it was Saudi nationals that plotted 911. While on the subject of "allies" please note what retired general Wesley Clark has to say: ISIS Serves Interests Of US Allies Turkey And Saudi Arabia. Reflections on Un-AmericanismUnder Democrat and Republican presidents alike, the US has backed corrupt regimes in Iraq, Iran, Argentina, Chile, Afghanistan, Ukraine, and countless other places while ignoring wholesale slaughter of civilians in many African counties. Is that American? And since when is it constitutionally OK for the US to act as prosecution, judge, and jury in ordering drone strikes? Both Bush and Obama are un-American on this issue. So is Hillary. I like Representative David Jolly's suggestion that Trump should stop his campaign because he is un-American and unfit to be president. Then again, they are all unfit. They should all cease campaigning. Mish for President Mish for President anyone? I am not seriously running for president of course, but I do provide detailed answers on eleven different issues. Such a platform by someone in either political party could conceivably win a presidential election, if only such a candidate could win the nomination. The problem is getting nominated. Donald Trump proves what a joke the nomination process has become. Mike "Mish" Shedlock | When Shipping Overcapacity Meets Falling Demand Posted: 08 Dec 2015 01:37 PM PST The following charts show what happens when an increasing number of ships meets falling demand. Harper Petersen Shipping Rates by Vessel Size - Ten YearsSource: Harper PetersenMore charts below, but first let's explain TEU. TEUTEU stands for twenty-foot-equivalent unit. It's an imprecise term because lengths have a 20-foot long (6.1 meters) standard but heights vary. Heights range from 2 feet three inches to 9 foot six inches. The most common heights are 8 feet 6 inches (2.6 m) and 9 feet 6 inches (2.9 m). Let's hone in on shipping rates for the last two years. Harper Petersen Shipping Rates by Vessel Size - Two YearsHarper Petersen Index - Ten YearsHarper Petersen Index - One YearSomething clearly happened in first quarter of this year in terms of shipping demand. Mike "Mish" Shedlock | Bank of Canada Announces Tools Including -0.5 Interest Rates; Loonie Sinks to 2004 Low; Right Tool at the Right Time Posted: 08 Dec 2015 10:42 AM PST The Canadian dollar, affectionately known as the loonie because of a loon on the one dollar coin, has crashed vs. the US dollar. US Dollar vs. Canadian Dollar MonthlyThe USD vs. the Loonie is back to a high last seen in May of 2004. Tools Needed Isn't a sinking currency supposed to help exports and the economy in general? Well, not in this corner, but that is what central bankers believe. Canada ought to be flying high if the general central bank currency thesis was correct. Instead, the Bank of Canada announced it has Tools Beyond Zero Rate if needed. Policy makers still have firepower to spur growth in the face of another crisis, even with borrowing costs near zero, Bank of Canada Governor Stephen Poloz said.
While the central bank doesn't expect it will need to resort to unconventional policies, a number of tools are still available, Poloz said, including charging banks for deposits, forward guidance and asset purchases. Fiscal stimulus could be even more effective than monetary policy in extreme circumstances, he said.
"I certainly hope we won't ever have to use these tools," Poloz said, according to the text of a speech he's giving Tuesday in Toronto. "However, in an uncertain world, a central bank has to be prepared for all eventualities."
Poloz said the bank's estimate for its real lower bound is negative 0.5 percent, an update from a previous estimate of 0.25 percent, published in a 2009 unconventional monetary policy framework. Poloz also said the central bank is now 'confident' Canada's financial markets could function in a negative rate environment, where banks would be charged for deposits, rather than being paid interest as is conventional.
"In short, should the need arise, we'll be ready. The effectiveness of each tool will depend on the situation, making it more a matter of choosing the right one at the right time," said Poloz. Right Tool at the Right TimeI have a very simple question for Poloz: If you know the right tool for the right time, why is Canada in or flirting with recession? If the Fed knew how to use tools, why was there a global financial collapse? If the ECB knew how to use tools, why can't the eurozone hit inflation targets? It may be a "matter of choosing the right one at the right time" but don't expect central banks to come close. In practice, central banks pull tools out of their collective asses, making them up as they go along, hoping to cure the messes their policies created. The results speak for themselves: a series of asset bubbles of increasing amplitude over time. There is one and only one tool that will work. It's called the free market. Expecting a bunch of economic illiterates who do not understand the irreplaceable role of the free market is like expecting an idiot to divine the theory of relativity. Mike "Mish" Shedlock |
|