Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis |
- Eurozone Downturn Deepens, PMI at 40-Month Low; Manufacturing Weakness in Germany; Considerable Service and Manufacturing Contraction in France
- Draghi Defends Bond Purchases With Warning of Deflation; Lies From Draghi on ECB Mandate and Mopping Up Liquidity
- Romney Way to Left of Paul Krugman, Erza Klein, and President Obama on Trade Issues; An Idea Whose Time Never Was; Half-Right Better Than All-Wrong
Posted: 24 Oct 2012 12:19 PM PDT This morning Markit released Eurozone, France, and Germany preliminary PMI reports. All show further deterioration. Germany Markit Flash Germany PMI® shows Manufacturing weakness behind moderate drop in German private sector output during October. SummaryFrance Markit Flash France PMI® shows further marked contraction of French private sector output at start of Q4. SummaryEurozone Downturn Deepens, PMI at 40-Month Low Markit Flash Eurozone PMI® shows the Eurozone downturn deepens at start of fourth quarter as PMI hits 40-month low. Key PointsAgreement with Markit For a change, I am in 100% agreement with Chris Williamson. European GDP has been resilient but do not expect it to last. Germany has been resilient and do not expect that to last either. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com |
Posted: 24 Oct 2012 08:52 AM PDT If you are going to tell a lie, make it as big and credible as you can by wrapping the lies with a platitude of half-truths. ECB president Mario Draghi did just that today with a spirited defense of bond purchases, coupled with a warning about deflation. Paragraphs in italics below are from the above Bloomberg link. My comments follow immediately. The ECB's so-called Outright Monetary Transactions "will not lead to inflation," Draghi told lawmakers in Berlin in a closed-door session, according to a text provided by the ECB. "In our assessment, the greater risk to price stability is currently falling prices in some euro-area countries," he said. "In this sense, OMTs are not in contradiction to our mandate: in fact, they are essential for ensuring we can continue to achieve it." The problem with such nonsense is you cannot break the law while screaming you are upholding it. Draghi now sounds and acts like hypocrite US presidents of both political parties. Both president Bush and president Obama (as well as the treasury departments under each administration) have shown little concern for the law. Increasingly presidents are of the mind "we have to destroy capitalism to save it" or as President Bush stated (and Obama practices)"I've abandoned free-market principles to save the free-market system." For further elaboration, please see The Most Redeeming Feature of Capitalism is Failure. "OMTs will not lead to disguised financing of governments," Draghi said. "All this is fully consistent with the Treaty's prohibition on monetary financing. Moreover, they will focus on shorter maturities and leave room for market discipline." Translation: The OMT is disguised financing of governments. Moreover, should "market discipline" get out of line with what the ECB wants, rest assured maturities will be extended on the "whatever it takes" mandate. Draghi explained that the ECB's intervention is necessary "because confidence in the euro has been disturbed," said Priska Hinz, the Green party's budget spokeswoman. Confidence is disturbed because the euro is fundamentally flawed and it's too late to fix it. Certainly one huge nanny-state led by Brussels is not going to fix anything. The nanny-state will only make things worse. Draghi said the program won't compromise the ECB's independence because it requires governments to agree to conditions. The program doesn't create "excessive risks" for euro-area taxpayers, he added, according to the ECB text. "Such risks would only materialize if a country were to run unsound policies," Draghi said. Unsound policies, like the ones they are running now? Bond purchases won't fuel inflation because the ECB will absorb the liquidity created by those interventions, Draghi said. That is a direct lie as is his opening gambit of claiming that breaking the treaty is within mandate. Yes, the ECB sterilizes the bonds it buys. However, the ECB will also accept those bonds right back as collateral for cash, thereby pumping up base money supply. The ECB has no intention of absorbing liquidity in actual practice. Real Problem is Not Deflation By the way, I would be remiss if I failed to point out the problem is not "deflation". Rather, deflation only seems bad because of the excess leverage that the Fed and the ECB allowed to build up. The real problem is unsound money and fractional reserve lending coupled with misguided policies of central banks and out of control budgets everywhere one looks. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com |
Posted: 24 Oct 2012 12:52 AM PDT As amazing as it may seem, alleged conservative Mitt Romney's position on trade with China is now way to the left of that taken by leading liberal Democrats including Erza Klein who writes for the Washington Post, and Paul Krugman and his New York Times "Conscience of a Liberal" blog Paul Krugman comments on An Issue Whose Time Has Passed written just prior to the debate on foreign policy between Romney and Obama. Chinese currency manipulation may come up in tonight's debate — and as someone who wanted the US to take a tougher line back in 2010, I guess I should weigh in.Odd Times Indeed The conclusion of Krugman's article is most amusing. Krugman stakes out a claim that Romney's position is based on politics: "This is an odd time to be making confrontation over China's currency a centerpiece of your economic policy — unless, of course, it's just bluster aimed at making voters think you're tough." On that score, Krugman may very well be correct. I can even spell out the politics in four simple characters "OHIO". However, it is also possible Romney is not the economic wizard most Republicans think he is. Certainly, when it comes to trade, Romney is no conservative or even a moderate. Rather Romney has staked out a claim that has union "progressives" cheering. Either he is a free-trade dunce or he is playing politics. I leave it to the reader to decide. Amusingly, this seems to be an equally "odd time" for Krugman and Klein to come out of the blue to be more tolerant of free trade. Had Obama been threatening to label China a currency manipulator and Romney supportive of free trade, would Krugman and Klein have chimed in? An Idea Whose Time Never Was I seldom agree with anything Klein writes but his Washington Post article Five Facts You Need to Know About China's Currency Manipulation is well written and basically but not entirely correct. My problem with this debate is simple: free trade is always a good idea. It was a good idea in 2000, 2004, 2008, and now. There was never a good time to start a trade war with China. Also note that Klein and Krugman are merely way more tolerant of free trade, not exactly free trade advocates. In Praise of Cheap Labor In Fair Trade is Unfair; In Praise of Cheap Labor; Are Bad Jobs at Bad Wages Better than No Jobs at All? I laid out a claim why free trade is always good. Please read the article if you haven't already, it contains a nice surprise in regards to my stated position. In that article, I also asked another question "Are Paul Krugman and Mitt Romney On the Same Page?" On that score I erroneously concluded they were. Apologies offered to Paul Krugman. Half-Right Better Than All-Wrong Even though free trade is always good, at least Krugman and Klein see no compelling reason to start a trade war with China now. Romney on the other hand does. Thus, (politics or not) the current positions of Krugman and Klein are far more reasonable than the pro-union position of Romney. Whether Romney hopes to appease Ohio union voters or he is a free-trade dunce, the essential point is Romney is simply "all wrong" when it comes to China. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com "Wine Country" Economic Conference Hosted By Mish Click on Image to Learn More |
You are subscribed to email updates from Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |