Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis |
- France Calls for "New Deal" with "Real Money" Not Fake EU Promises
- Added To My Basket of Miners Yesterday; "I Am My Own Central Banker"
- Abe Makes "Grave Grave" Decision to Delay Tax Hike, Gambles on Snap Elections, Seeks "Better Ideas"
France Calls for "New Deal" with "Real Money" Not Fake EU Promises Posted: 18 Nov 2014 10:18 PM PST Juncker's €300 Billion Plan is "Funny Money" I was rather amused yesterday with a post by Pater Tenebrarum on the Acting Man blog: EU Planning to Spend Money It Doesn't Have. Pater is of course correct, and we will return to his article in a moment. First, consider this headline from El Economista: France calls for a New Deal with 'real' investment: 300 Billion plan is "funny money". €80 Billion in "Real Money" Requested There is no need to translate excerpts from El Economista because the Financial Times has essentially the same story in France warns EU investment fund will flop without 'real money'. France says the EU must inject up to €80bn of "real money" into the flagging European economy, warning that a big investment plan being drawn up in Brussels risks flopping if enough hard cash is not used to stimulate demand."New Deal" With Overseer It's important to note that everyone now recognizes Jean-Claude Juncker as a liar and charlatan. They just cannot say so in such a harsh manner. It would not be politically correct. Yet, the notion that an overseer would do anything other than waste more money is preposterous. In fact the entire "New Deal" thesis is preposterous. Instead of taking money and redistributing it, complete with overseers, I have a better idea. Don't collect the taxes in the first place! Let people spend it on what they want, not wasteful government projects where some bureaucrat picks an inane pet project with zero economic merit (except to his buddy who gets the contract) and an overseer (and his staff) that takes a cut of the graft. Pater said essentially the same thing in his conclusion ... In reality, these spending programs are simply slightly more elaborate and sophisticated versions of Keynesian ditch digging. They make precisely as much sense. If European politicians really want to help to spur economic growth, they must bid adieu to the notion that economies can be "jump-started" by spending on undertakings that are mainly characterized by their inability to produce a return. What is instead needed is a repeal of the ubiquitous red tape hampering entrepreneurs, lower taxes and less government involvement in the market economy.Multiplier Effect There is no "overseer" on the planet who won't get in bed with politicians wanting to waste money on pet projects. An overseer will not "multiply" a damn thing except waste! Nothing Times Nothing is Nothing "Real Money" has to come from somewhere, via taxes. Overseers don't add "firepower" they take a piece of the pie, even IF they are well-intentioned. The Financial Times described Macron, as France's new "youthful" economy minister, and "a relentlessly cheerful figure". Macron replaced the "fiery leftist Arnaud Montebourg". Will Macron provide as much reporting comedy as Montebourg? I highly doubt it, but he is off to a good start. And in his honor, I offer a musical tribute. Nothing From Nothing Link if video does not play: Billy Preston - Nothing From Nothing. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com |
Added To My Basket of Miners Yesterday; "I Am My Own Central Banker" Posted: 18 Nov 2014 12:59 PM PST In the wake of plunging gold, people constantly asked when I would throw in the towel. I was somewhat puzzled by these repeated questions as I said initially, and repeated along the way, my play was for the long term, and that I was holding for the duration. During the most recent plunge, I responded "My only concern is when to add". I did so, yesterday. "I Am My Own Central Banker" I am not the only one who sees things this way. Marc Faber made similar comments in a recent video interview with Gold Broker. Link if video does not play: Marc Faber, US dollar, & the Swiss Gold Initiative Partial Transcript Marc Faber: Everyone always says, I want to buy low and I want to sell high. So I think for me, of course I own a lot of gold, and I need to buy more to keep asset allocation between 25% in Real Estate, 25% in equities, 25% cash and bonds, and 25% gold. I need to buy more. So for me this is a very happy event. I don't like to buy gold at $1,900 like in 2011. I like to buy it here or lower. Gold Broker: Do you think it will break under $1,000 like some people say? Marc Faber: Look. The forecasting record of people is horrible, in particular, the forecasting record of the Federal Reserve. So, I don't know, maybe it will go below $1,000 but my sense is that it will not stay below $1,000. .... I would use the current weakness as a buying opportunity. ... I'm telling everybody, you as an investor, and me as an investor, we cannot trust the government. ... I am my own central banker. I keep my own physical gold. I do not trust anyone of these FCKs. Gold Broker: [Asked Faber about the possibility of a stronger US$] Marc Faber: [Laughed then replied] ... Of all the currencies I see in the world, there are only four that I like: Gold, Silver, Platinum, Palladium. Nothing else. Gold Broker: How do you see the Swiss Gold Initiative? How does that affect the gold market? Marc Faber: I do not think it will affect the gold market. I am in favor of the gold initiative. ... And I would suggest they [the Swiss National Bank] should hold their foreign reserves 100% in gold, not just 20%. But equally, I am saying to myself I am my own central banker. I own my own reserves, in gold. Swiss Initiative in Perspective For my take on the Swiss Initiative, please see Swiss Gold Referendum in Perspective. Addendum Marc Faber is author of one of the best investment books ever written: Tomorrow's Gold. In spite of the title, the book is not really about "gold" but rather investment opportunities. It's my number 1 pick in investment reading. If you haven't yet read it, please do yourself a favor and pick up a copy. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com |
Abe Makes "Grave Grave" Decision to Delay Tax Hike, Gambles on Snap Elections, Seeks "Better Ideas" Posted: 18 Nov 2014 10:37 AM PST In the wake of a completely "unexpected" Japanese return to recession, Shinzo Abe Delays Tax Rise and Gambles on Snap Election. Rumours had been building in recent days that Mr Abe was preparing to dissolve parliament as he sought a new mandate to delay a second increase in consumption taxes, due next October. On Tuesday evening Mr Abe confirmed in a rousing 15-minute speech that he would go to the polls, challenging detractors to come up with better ideas to put Japan on a stronger growth trajectory.Not Improved or Gotten Worse? With inflation-adjusted wages down 2.6%, and taxes up 3 percentage points from 5% to 8%, "lives of the public have not improved" is the understatement of the year for those in Japan not invested in the stock market. In fact, those lives are 5.6% worse. Better Ideas Abe, the man who made lives 5.6% worse, challenges others to come up with "better ideas". Here are two of Abe's ideas.
Abe's Deal Abe plans to implement the same disastrous tax hike that just plunged Japan into recession. And whether or not Japan has improved by 2017, Abe will hike taxes again anyway. Secondly, Japan's national debt, approaching 250% of GDP, will rise further until 2020. Indeed it will keep growing after that, because the promise to balance books excludes debt-payment service (interest on the national debt). It seems to me it would be easy to come up with "better ideas", but one should always fear "better ideas" from any politician. My take: Any genuinely better ideas won't be implemented. In the meantime, the Bank of Japan is buying over 100% of all Japan's debt issuance, so the debt (and interest on the debt) keeps piling up, while a demographically aging Japan requires more health-care services every year. Expect the Unexpected Each announcement like this strengthens the odds Japan is going to face a full-blown currency crisis within a couple years or less. Rest assured, when the crisis does occur, it will be "unexpected" by nearly every economist on the planet. For further discussion of how the "unexpected" happens, please see "Mystery of the Unexpected" Explained; Japan Slides Into Recession Yet Again; Blue Ribbon Panel in Review. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com |
You are subscribed to email updates from Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |