Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis |
- ProtonMail - Easy to Use Email So Secure NSA Cannot Break It; What About NSA Other Attacks?
- Maximum Overweight High Yield?
- World's Unsold Cars Piling Up Everywhere: Fact or Fiction?
ProtonMail - Easy to Use Email So Secure NSA Cannot Break It; What About NSA Other Attacks? Posted: 19 May 2014 10:26 PM PDT With the NSA snooping around anywhere and everywhere, violating the constitution in the process, the following development was inevitable: Harvard & MIT Students Have Created an Email So Secure Even the NSA Can't Crack It. Nearly a year ago, former CIA technical assistant Edward Snowden stepped forward to say he was responsible for one of the most explosive leaks in history. The National Security Agency was exposed, and Andy Yen, a Harvard PhD candidate, was appalled.Supposedly, if you can understand Gmail, you can understand ProtonMail. If it's as good as advertized, will it be banned? This is what it had to come down to. Government nonsensically spying on everyone led to a more-secure service that freedom lovers and criminals alike will embrace. By the way, the encryption might be secure, but that will not stop the NSA from hijacking entire computers. Cisco CEO Complains About NSA Allegations Please consider In Letter to Obama, Cisco CEO Complains About NSA Allegations Warning of an erosion of confidence in the products of the U.S. technology industry, John Chambers, the CEO of networking giant Cisco Systems, has asked President Obama to intervene to curtail the surveillance activities of the National Security Agency.If your computer and your router are not safe, is ProtonMail safe? Is anything really safe? Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com |
Maximum Overweight High Yield? Posted: 19 May 2014 01:37 PM PDT On May 13, the BCA came out with this recommendation U.S. High-Yield: Maximum Overweight. No Cause For Concern - Yet I doubt we see default rates spike as high as they did in 2009, not because corporations are really flush with cash, but rather because corporations are holding cash-substitutes (backed by debt). Those cash-substitutes can be used as cash in a credit crunch emergency. Nonetheless, there are numerous problems with the "Don't Worry Yet" philosophy. What follows is a discussion from a risk-reward standpoint, starting with reward. Potential Reward Using the SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond (JNK) as a general proxy for high yield bonds, the reward prior to writeoffs is approximately 5.85%. To calculate actual net return, start with 5.85%, subtract BCA's expected default rate of 3.0%, then subtract another 2.0% or so for inflation. Assume a recovery rate of 40-60% on defaults and you are overweight "junk" for a final net return 2%+-. Potential Risks What about the risks? Could BCA's model be wrong? Might default rates be much higher? Might the market start pricing in an expectation of higher defaults even if defaults themselves do not soar? What about rising rates? What about liquidity risks if the market turns on junk bonds? What about the fact that complacency is at an extreme (see Big Appetite for Risk) and risky assets are typically the first to suffer in a downturn? Do you really want to be overweight junk when the expected reward is so tiny? Obviously many people do, or junk bond yields would not be as low as they are right now. The Fed created a junk bond bubble by holding the short-term rate to near-zero, fueled by round after round of QE and things like Operation Twist (selling the short end of the curve and buying the long end) a maneuver designed to bring down long-term rates. I say "no thanks" to speculating in bubbles. Worse yet, the potential reward is tiny, and the model requires extreme complacency to continue for a year, something I think is highly unlikely. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com |
World's Unsold Cars Piling Up Everywhere: Fact or Fiction? Posted: 19 May 2014 11:11 AM PDT A few days ago a reader sent me a link about unsold cars piling up around the world. I did not touch the story because I had already seen it, years earlier in fact. Flashback January 19, 2009 Unsold Car Images From Around The World. Nonetheless, the story was recently picked up as "new" in so many places that Bloomberg's Barry Ritholtz felt the need to set the story straight in The Truth About Auto Sales. This week, an e-mail landed in my inbox with the header "Unsold Cars."Moral of the Story It's best to fact check, especially if you don't have a good memory. As with Barry, I did not bother posting the story last week because I knew I had seen those images before. Barry only posted the story because so many places incorrectly posted the story as new. Note: The Silver Bear reference is incorrect. It is an undated duplicate of my 2009 post. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com |
You are subscribed to email updates from Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |