Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis |
- Morley the Robot Master Chef; Cognitive Cooking
- LA to Gradually Hike Minimum Wage to $15 by 2020; Already Weak Growth Prospects Just Got Worse
- CNBC's Santelli and Mish Discuss Municipal Bonds; Egan-Jones on Chicago; S&P Blames Moody's; Message to Bondholders
Morley the Robot Master Chef; Cognitive Cooking Posted: 20 May 2015 01:22 PM PDT Want Lobster bisque? Morley, the robot master chef can cook that up for you in about 30 minutes. Please consider Robot Master Chef Cooks 2,000 Recipes, Cleans Up, Does the Dishes. A California company, Morley Robotics, has teamed with the UK's Shadow Robot Company, to develop a smartphone-controlled robot master chef capable of cooking world-class fare just as Chef Watson. The robot was unveiled at a recent event at Hanover Messe Robotic Technology Fair in Germany. The Robot Chef created a "lobster bisque" for the event in about 30 minutes. Morley Video Want New Recipes? If you want new recipes, just team up Morley with IBM's Watson, the computer that trounced everyone at the game of Jeopardy. IndustryTap reports IBM's Watson Has A New Gig: World Class Chef Earlier this year, IBM's Watson computer teamed with New York's Institute of Culinary Education. Watson and his handlers are now creating recipes that combine ingredients available to humans the world over in novel ways, raising eyebrows in the process. One of Watson's creations was the Austrian Chocolate Burrito.Cognitive Cooking Watson on the Road To show the creative cooking power of Watson, IBM took the show on the road. Cognitive Cooking - IBM Watson (Image Courtesy www.satelliteoffice.tv) Chefs? Who needs em? Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LA to Gradually Hike Minimum Wage to $15 by 2020; Already Weak Growth Prospects Just Got Worse Posted: 20 May 2015 10:58 AM PDT In yet another triumph of stupidity over common sense, a triumph that is sure to cost jobs, slow growth, and encourage more robotic replacement of workers, Los Angeles' Minimum Wage on Track to go up to $15 by 2020 The Los Angeles City Council on Tuesday backed a plan to raise the city's minimum wage to $15 per hour, joining a trend sweeping cities across the country as elected leaders seek to boost stagnating pay for workers on the lowest rungs of the socio-economic ladder.Simple Math I side with Gonzalez on the "simple math" and Englander on competitive disadvantages. This move is 100% guaranteed to cost jobs. Proponents of such measures inevitably say things like "studies show that hikes in minimum wages don't hurt employment." Such studies only look at the "seen". Population trends and productivity have kept growth intact. Employment rose in spite of hikes in minimum wages, not because of those hikes. The obvious fact is many struggling businesses will go under. That effect will be seen, but perhaps small. What we won't see is how many stores, businesses, and franchises will not open because of labor costs. And it's hard now to estimate the push on businesses to further automate, but wage and benefit hikes pressure businesses in that direction. Experiment Guaranteed to Fail Councilman Paul Koretz said "This is an experiment. If anyone tells you they know exactly how this is going to go … they're not being honest with you." Well, I don't pretend to know "exactly" how this is going to go. But I do know the consequences will be slower growth, fewer stores, and higher unemployment than there otherwise would be. San Francisco Chronicles San Francisco recently hiked the minimum wage to $15. In immediate response, Borderlands Books announced it would close. A second bookstore owner, Brian Hibbs, owner and operator of Comix Experience, an iconic comic-book and graphic-novel shop on San Francisco's Divisadero Street and supporter of the wage hike had second thoughts once he saw the math. Hibbs calculated that the $15-an-hour minimum wage will require a staggering $80,000 in extra revenue annually. The amusing thing is Hibbs describes himself "progressive capitalist". "We're for a living wage, for a minimum wage, in principle. But I think any law that doesn't look at whether people can pay may not be the best way to go," says Hibbs. For icing on the hypocrite's cake, Hibbs asks "Why can't two consenting people make arrangements for less than x dollars per hour?" Progressive Capitalism? I wrote about Hibbs in Capitalism for Me, Socialism for Thee; Progressive Capitalism? There is no such thing as "progressive capitalism". The idea is as ridiculous as being a Jewish Christian Atheist. In response to Capitalism for Me, Socialism for Thee, several readers said businesses can just raise prices. For books that have a set price, it's not that easy. But even in cases where stores can raise prices, what about the decline in traffic? Already Weak Growth Prospects Just Got Worse Fast food dining and retail shopping is not price inelastic. The cost of fast food is already prohibitive. So hiking prices is 100% guaranteed to cost some traffic. The bigger unseen is store expansion. Rising labor costs will have every business cutting expansion plans over what they would have done in the absence of these wage hikes. Economic common sense is all it takes to realize that already weak growth prospects just got a lot worse. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Posted: 19 May 2015 11:07 PM PDT I was back on CNBC with Rick Santelli on Tuesday May 19. The topic once again was municipal bonds with a spotlight on Chicago. Here are a pair of videos. Live Santelli Exchange CNBC's Rick Santelli discusses Chicago's credit downgrade and municipal bond crisis, with Mike Shedlock, Sitka Pacific Capital Management. Link if video does not play: Santelli Exchange: Illinois' unfunded pension liabilities What's next for Chicago's debt crisis? In an extended segment, CNBC's Rick Santelli discusses Chicago's municipal bond crisis with Mike Shedlock, Sitka Pacific Capital Management. Link if video does not play: What's next for Chicago's debt crisis The slides in the videos are courtesy of the Illinois Policy Institute. Santelli drew an amusing schematic of the 2011 tax hike showing where the money went. Here is the original chart. John Cullerton: "Tax increase helped state pay bills and debt." October 28, 2014. In the second segment, I mentioned Mike Madigan, Speaker of the Illinois House. I know full well Madigan is Speaker, but the words "House Speaker" did not come out of my mouth. I was thinking of mentioning John Cullerton, "Senate President", and those were the words that came out of my mouth. In Illinois, Madigan and Cullerton are the two guys that control every bit of legislation. Beware, the Tax Man Has Eyes on You In case you missed it, please consider my May 4, article Beware, the Tax Man Has Eyes on You: Potential Hike for Illinoisans is Staggering. Nuveen estimates that property taxes in Chicago will need to rise by 50% to bail out Chicago pensions. I believe the required tax hike would be much higher. When Nuveen came up with the 50% property tax hike, it did not include tax hikes to bail out other Illinois pension plans. Nor did it address the $9 billion budget deficit for the state. Nor did it consider the possibility (I believe likelihood) of negative stock market returns for years to come. For further discussion please see my April 23, article Seven Year Negative Returns in Stocks and Bonds; Fraudulent Promises. Egan-Jones Chimes In On Monday, I gave Sean Egan of the rating agency Egan-Jones a ring. I asked him how he would rate Chicago General Obligation bonds. Egan replied "deep in junk territory". Here is a table I put together of various rating agencies, incorporating Sean Egan's response.
S&P Blames Moody's Here's an amusing take on passing the buck courtesy of Pensions & Investments on the Debt Downgrades. Chicago's problem now is that it faces "short-term interference," S&P said. "That said, we recognize that the city has a diverse tax base and a management team that has good policies in place. These are an important foundation for any city that needs to address the challenges that this city is facing."Rate Shop Whores For a discussion of how the SEC is to blame for the current environment of Fantsayland bond ratings please see Rate Shopping Whores and Chicago's Bond Rating. In that link I explain in detail how it is that one rating agency has Chicago "deep in junk" while others have Chicago rated "A-". 99% Haircut The Bond Buyer reports San Bernardino Chapter 9 Plan Gives Bondholders Worst Cut of All. San Bernardino, Calif. is now planning to give bondholders significantly worse treatment than they have received in any municipal bankruptcy to date, Moody's Investors Service said in a comment piece Monday.Bondholders and Taxpayers Screwed San Bernardino city officials made a purposeful decision to screw bondholders and taxpayers. "By leaving pensions untouched, however, the city's financial operations will remain strained by rising pension costs. Under the city's projections, pension costs will nearly double over 10 years to nearly 19% of expenditures," says Moody's. Moody's dramatically understates the problem because it did not factor in the likelihood of negative returns on stocks and bonds. Conflict of Interest Federal bankruptcy courts ruled four times that cities can cut pensions. So far, cuts have been token. In the case of San Bernardino, nonexistent. Why? The answer is "conflict of interest". City officials wanted to preserve their own ill-gotten and undeserved pensions. On that basis, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Meredith Jury may have made a very bad ruling. Message to Bondholders The decisions in Detroit, Stockton, San Bernardino, and Vallejo send a clear message to bondholders: Don't buy or hold municipal bonds in any municipality plagued by pension woes because you will be screwed if you do. That is why I agree with a Chicago Tribune editorial by Henry J. Feinberg, says Pass a Bankruptcy Law, Give Taxpayers a Chance. Pending Illinois legislation, Bill 298 will allow Illinois municipalities to go bankrupt, a badly needed measure. Feinberg's editorial seeks to amend House Bill 298 so people who hold Illinois bonds have a "secured first lien," the fancy words needed in the law to make sure bondholders are first in line to get their money back. My concern is not for bondholders, rather it's for the taxpayers. In the great financial crisis bailing out the banks at taxpayer risk was precisely the wrong thing to do. In this case, taxpayers are punished once again. They will have to pony up for inevitably higher borrowing costs. And the sorry situation is that none of the cities really solved any long-term problems. In bankruptcy, the city could have at least done something to protect taxpayers down the road. Instead, corrupt and greedy city officials protected their own interests. When the stock market takes another dive, and it will, San Bernardino pensions will again be deeply underfunded. Another Crisis Coming Since no long-term issues have been solved anywhere, expect another pension crisis down the road in a number of already bankrupt California cities. Meanwhile, I repeat my warning: Don't buy or hold municipal bonds in any municipality plagued by pension woes because you will be screwed if you do. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com |
You are subscribed to email updates from Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |