joi, 8 mai 2014

The Great Content Cull: The What, Why and How?

The Great Content Cull: The What, Why and How?

Link to White.net

The Great Content Cull: The What, Why and How?

Posted: 08 May 2014 12:30 AM PDT

Over the past 15 years, content published on the web has drastically changed. From content creation, right through to the way that we consume pieces of content, and the devices that we consume them on. Content is changing, and quickly!

This drastic change means that we constantly need to be reviewing, editing, and deleting the content that we once thought was up to scratch. Over the past few months, I have been conducting a number of content reviews and wanted to let you in on what I have been doing.

Before we get started on that, I guess the question you are already asking is why? Why do I need to review my content? There are many ways to answer this question, and from many different angles. One reason is to ensure that you provide the very best information to your users, and those that come across the website. If you provide out of date information, or a post that is statistically incorrect then you are going to lose the trust of the user, and they may not return in the future.

From a search perspective, you want to ensure that your content targets keyword topics based on user intent. You also want to ensure that any content that you have produced in the past will not be deemed as useless, and more importantly spammy by the search engines. As I am sure you are aware with the well publicised algorithm updates by Google, they are now looking even more at the content that is provided as a ranking factor, and if you don’t comply then you are likely to be either given a penalty or fall considerable behind your competition.

Now you know, the next step is to understand what you have.

What does your content landscape look like?

Many of us don’t know what content we have on our websites, let alone what different types, and that is where the trouble begins.

If you are not aware what content you have on your website, then how do you know what is working, what needs to be improved, and what is no longer required?

If you are aware of what content you have then you are in better shape than most. If you are not, then this is the first place to start.

Understanding the content you have

The first step to understanding what content has been published on your website is to create a content inventory. This can be as simple or as detailed as you like, but there are certain elements that it must include:

  • URL
  • Page Title
  • Media Type (list multiple if required – PDF, Video, Slideshow, etc)
  • Content category (product, blog post, category page, etc)

These basic elements provide you with the initial structure of what content is currently available on you site. A large part of gathering this information can be automated using crawlers. In a previous post I talked about finding all the URLs to your website, so this may help.

Before you get started, if you are not sure what a content inventory should look like or include, go and have a read of Andrew Kaufman’s post Discovery: Content Audits, Inventories and Interviews Oh My! This will provide you with a good background to content inventories.

Gathering the data

Now that you have the basics of the content published on your website, you need to start gathering the data that will help you make decisions.

The metrics that you need will be determined by the type of website that you are reviewing, but they are likely to include the following:

  • Visits (include Uniques) – Min of 12months.
  • Conversion Data – Min of 12months.
  • Bounce Rate – Min of 12months.
  • Social Interactions (Use SocialCrawlytics)
  • Reviews
  • Comments
  • Content Length
  • Linking Root Domains

As I said, there are many more that you are likely to need, but these are some of the main ones.

If you think there are others that should be included in this list then let me know in the comments below.

Now, your spreadsheet should be starting to fill out nicely with data, but there is still a very important step missing!

Brains over algorithms every day!

So, you now have all the data required to make a decision on what content looks like it is working, and what isn’t, but we still need to conduct a manual check. Data gives us some great insight, but it is no substitute for a human looking at each page.

This task is likely to take a considerable amount of time, so you may want to break it down into smaller, more manageable chunks.

For the manual check, you will need to go through each and every URL individually, asking yourself a number of questions that could include:

  • What is the objective of the page?
  • Does the page provide me with the information that I require?
  • Has this page been created for a user or for a search engine?
  • Is the information supplied still valid or does it require updating?
  • Are the comments/reviews useful?
  • Would this page make me buy the product/service?
  • Would I share this page to my social community?

Whilst asking yourself these questions, you need to be taking notes and entering them into the spreadsheet. I see this as one of the most important stages of the content review. Data gives you a lot of information, but it won’t answer all the questions that a user is looking for.

Take your time! Getting this right is essential, as you will be making some big decisions based on these comments.

The decision!

Whilst you are making your way through the content inventory, you will also need to be thinking about what you feel is the best possible outcome for the page.

If it was your content, would you keep it, edit it, or completely remove it? This is an important step, and the data you've gathered should help determine your decision.

For me, I look at a range of metrics depending on the page type, but the most important aspect is the content itself.

If the content doesn’t answer the questions that I have mentioned above, or others that come out of reviewing the content, then it is going to require some work no matter what the data tells me. First and foremost, the content should always be about providing the best information to the user.

Below are a couple of examples that require a different analysis.

Product Pages

What I am looking for from a product page is persuasion. How will the product change/improve my life? This may sound dramatic, but if the copy is written in a way that I can see it improving my life then I am more likely to purchase it. See the example below.

“The oven's innovative MoisturePlus feature will inject a fine burst of steam into the oven cavity during cooking to prevent food from drying out, with delicious results. Rapid heat-up times mean there's no hanging around waiting for it to heat up, while even temperature distribution throughout the interior helps you achieve professional-level cooking in your own home.”

I am much more likely to purchase the above compared to:

“The freestanding Zanussi ZCV661MXC Electric Cooker has been equipped with a double oven, four highly responsive ceramic hobs and an easy-clean interior.”

Combining that insight with how many people converted on the page, reviewed the product, and shared it with their social community will allow you to determine the required action.

Blog Post

If it’s a blog post, you will be looking at different types of analysis compared to the product pages above.

You very quickly need to understand whether the post is giving the user value, and whether it is up-to-date and relevant. As blogging has changed over the years, there are still many pages that have been used for micro-blogging – pages that provide a paragraph of information, but nothing in-depth. These are pages that may have provided relevance in the past but with the new world of content creation and those pesky Pandas, this is the type of content that is likely to require an update.

Other content that is covered on a regular basis, especially when products or tools are updated, may require redirecting to the latest versions. A perfect example for our industry would be blog posts on “Tips to pass the GA Exam”. As the exam gets updated on a regular basis, so will these posts. They will either require rewriting or redirecting, the choice will be yours.

I could go on and on here, but I hope that you will now be able to go and make a decision based on the data that you have gathered and the manual analysis that you have conducted. It will always be a scary decision to make, but you need to trust your instincts and make an educated decision.

So there you have it, some of the steps I take to reviewing content. How do you go about reviewing your content? How often to do you conduct an inventory of your website? I would love to hear your comments below or on twitter @danielbianchini.

Flickr Image – https://www.flickr.com/photos/derricksphotos/194446108/sizes/o/

The post The Great Content Cull: The What, Why and How? appeared first on White.net.

Seth's Blog : Good at the beginning

 

Good at the beginning

...is another word for lucky. Someone needs to get lucky, and it might even be you, but luck is not a strategy.

Becoming good in the long run, that's the result of effort and tenacity and smart practice.

Not just the individual, the kid who doesn't learn to walk the first day, or the violinist who doesn't win a competition at the age of eight, but organizations and their projects as well.

The people who are good in the long run fail a lot, especially at the beginning. So, when you fail early, it might be worth realizing that this is part of the deal, the price you pay for being good in the long run.

Every rejection is a gift. A chance to learn and to do it better next time. An opportunity to figure out how to bounce, not break. Don't waste them.

Sometimes, getting lucky at the start means that you fail to learn resilience and tenacity, and you lack the tools to get better. The long run is a lot longer than the start is.

       

 

More Recent Articles

[You're getting this note because you subscribed to Seth Godin's blog.]

Don't want to get this email anymore? Click the link below to unsubscribe.




Email subscriptions powered by FeedBlitz, LLC, 9 Thoreau Way, Sudbury, MA 01776, USA.

 

miercuri, 7 mai 2014

Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis

Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis


Does Economic Patriotism Work?

Posted: 07 May 2014 05:54 PM PDT

A recent poll in France shows 59% of those surveyed for "Les Echos" consider economic patriotism "effective redress for the French economy." Only 38% disagree.

This no doubt will please Arnaud Montebourg, the Minister of Economy and Productive Recovery and singer of "Made in France".

I have commented on Montebourg numerous times before.

Here's a notable image from Made in France: Montebourg Ridiculed in Text and Pictures; France Goes After "Red Bull" Energy Drinks to Finance Social Security.





Above: Montebourg advertises "Made in France" while holding Moulinex blenders and wearing classical "marinière" shirts.

Economic Patriotism Cannot Succeed

Economic patriotism as championed by Montebourg cannot possibly work.

Every country wants to increase exports. But how can every country do that if they all engage in economic patriotism?

On an individual basis, does it make sense to buy crappy cars just because they are "made in America"?

Of course it doesn't. And in that regard, US cars finally got better for two reasons:

  1. Unions made concessions and as a result US cars became more cost competitive.
  2. Consumers buying foreign-made cars forced GM and Ford to build better cars if they wanted to improve sales.

If you really want to do something to increase the quality of goods and services, then buy the best-value "whatever".

Competition, not phony patriotism, provides the desired result. In the long run, individuals making the most cost-effective solutions for themselves will ultimately do what is best for the country as a whole.

If governments correctly acted the same way, Davis-Bacon, forced collective bargaining, and other idiotic measures would be scrapped in a second.

Given that public unions increase costs while adding negative value and effectively robbing taxpayers, one could easily argue that the true patriotic thing would be to get rid of them.  

For further discussion, scroll past the ads and consider what I have written about Davis Bacon.

Also consider the Message from FDR in BART Holds San Francisco Hostage; Best Way to Deal With Public Unions.

Mike "Mish" Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com

China and Vietnam Engage in Ship-Ramming and Water-Cannon Fighting in South China Sea

Posted: 07 May 2014 12:34 PM PDT

With most eyes on Ukraine-Russia and China-Japan battles, let's shift the spotlight to the new global hotspot, an intensifying feud between China, Vietnam, and the Philippines in the South China Sea.

The Financial Times reports Chinese and Vietnamese Vessels Face Off in South China Sea.
Tensions in the South China Sea escalated dramatically on Wednesday after Vietnam said Chinese ships rammed its vessels near the Paracel Islands and the Philippines detained a Chinese fishing boat and crew.

China and Vietnam have traded rhetoric in recent days after China moved an oil rig near the disputed islands. But the situation turned into a confrontation on Wednesday when the Chinese vessels fired water cannons at Vietnamese ships.

Vietnam's foreign ministry accused China of deliberating ramming its ships and said several sailors were injured in the clash.

China has territorial disputes with many neighbours, but particularly with Vietnam and the Philippines who have been the most willing to push back. On Wednesday, the Philippines detained a Chinese fishing vessel and crew that were reportedly fishing for endangered sea turtles.

The incidents come just weeks after US President Barack Obama toured Asia as part of his "pivot" to the region aimed at countering the rise of China. The US on Tuesday called the decision to move the oil rig "provocative and unhelpful".

Earlier this week, Vietnam told China to stop the "illegal" drilling. But Yang Jiechi, China's top foreign policy official, told his counterpart in Hanoi on Tuesday that "Vietnamese harassment . . . has severely violated China's sovereignty".

The clashes on Wednesday appear to be the most serious between the countries in years. In 1974, China went to war with the Republic of Vietnam over the Paracels – called the Xisha in Chinese – and regained control over the islands. China is also embroiled in disputes with Manila over the Spratly Islands – which it calls the Nansha – and with Tokyo over contested islands in the East China Sea.
US Response

OK so what is the US going to do about this? Defend Vietnam? Give warships to Manila or the Philippines? Start WWIII by attacking China and Russia?

If your answer is to do something (other than have Obama yap his head off about red lines in the sand),  then be prepared to answer two more questions: At what expense? How are we going to pay for it?

The US public is tired of war actions and associated expenses, as it should be. We have too many problems at home to be engaged in virtually every dispute on the planet.

Isn't it time to have a rational discussion on what it means to be the world's policeman, including the true associated costs?

Addendum:

Reader Michael commented "The US hasn't proposed ANY actions to stop the conflict between China, Vietnam, the Philippines or Japan (all of which have maritime territorial disputes) other than make vacuous comments to the effect of let's all calm down now. There is no need to get in a big huff about US actions or policy when the US hasn't actually done anything."

Michael is wrong. The Guardian reports "Obama says US will defend Japan in island dispute with China"

Here is a pertinent snip: "Our commitment to Japan's security is absolute and article five [of the security treaty] covers all territories under Japan's administration, including the Senkaku islands," Obama said during a joint press conference with Abe.

The US is willing to make an "absolute commitment" to defend the Senkaku islands!? At what cost? Sure seems like a reasonable question.

Mike "Mish" Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com

US Dollar Action, Treasuries, and Other Curious Things; Motto to Live By

Posted: 07 May 2014 10:31 AM PDT

Has anyone noticed the slow decay in the US dollar? If not, here it is in pictures.

US Dollar Index Weekly Chart



click on chart for sharper image

As shown above, the US dollar slid from 85 to 79 since July 2013. Looking back a bit further, the US dollar has been range-bound between 89 and 72 since April of 2010

A monthly chart shows the dollar has been range-bound between 71 and 89 since 2008. Going back even further, the dollar has been range-bound between 92 and 71 since 2004.

Thus, there is nothing unusual about the dollar index at 79 where it sits now, except for the silence and other peculiarities.

Silence is Telling

Typically, every time the dollar declines, dollar bears and hyperinflationists come out of the woodwork chanting the death of the dollar.

Today I hear curious silence. And that's not all.

Consensus opinion says the Fed will continue tapering then start hiking. In theory, that should be dollar supportive. But it hasn't been.

Market reaction to the jobs report last Friday was also curious. +288,000 jobs should have been dollar supportive. It wasn't. Of course, the internals of the jobs report were horrific (see Nonfarm Payrolls +288,000, Unemployment Rate Drops to 6.3%; Household Survey Employment -73,000, Labor Force -806,000) but there was not even an initial reaction.

Mario Draghi and the ECB have been talking about QE and negative interest rates in Europe. In theory, that should be euro negative, thus dollar positive. It hasn't been.

Why? Perhaps the market thinks the ECB is all talk and no action.

Here is a chart that I commented on at the Wine Country Conference.

Yield Curve Since 2000



Consensus opinion says the economy is getting stronger. The Fed relays that message as well.

But if the economy was getting stronger, then why is the yield on the long bond sinking?

The 30-year long bond yield is currently 3.38% down from 3.95% at the beginning of the year.

Reflections on Beliefs

A friend of mine who is no longer with us, had a saying that crossed my mind while contemplating the above charts: "If the market doesn't believe it, why should I?"

  1. In this case, the treasury market acts more like a recession is on the way than the recovery will strengthen. 
  2. The dollar acts as if the Fed will not hike as quickly as people think. 

I believe the treasury and currency markets have this correct. In other words, those markets do not not believe consensus opinions. And if consensus opinion is wrong, treasury bears (at the long end), and dollar bulls in general may wish to reconsider the implications.

Motto to Live By?

Does that make "If the market doesn't believe it, why should I?" a motto to live by?

Careful!

The answer is "it depends". Do you really want to buy the S&P here just because it looks like it will not go down?

If you are a day-trader (and my friend was), your only concern is what the market thinks at the present. Nothing else matters.

However, it's not a good motto to live by for a value investor with a long-term horizon. Value investors living by that rule would eventually be doing some rather curious things like buying into market tops.

The big problem for value investors is "value mirage" in down markets. What appears to be a "value" may not be, for reasons not yet visible. This happened to numerous financial stocks in the 2008 downturn.

If the market is not acting like one thinks it should, it's useful to ask "why?"

Know and Trade Your Time Horizon

Day traders get into serious trouble when trades become investments.

Conversely, value investors get into trouble when they start mo-mo trading because everyone else is buying the dip and winning.

Recent capitulation of prior permabears-turned-bulls shows some investors have thrown in the towel. History suggests it's not likely to end well for those changing styles or major beliefs now.

By the way, Pater Tenebrarum at Acting Man pinged me with this thought yesterday: "There was an 84% bullish consensus on the dollar in the Merrill fund manager survey in July. Such extremes in currency sentiment tend to lead to moves in the opposite direction that can last up to a decade."

Fundamentally, I see no reason to be bullish on the dollar now, unless one really believes the Fed will taper-to-zero then hike. Since I don't, the fundamentals and the technical action in the dollar are in alignment.

Mike "Mish" Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com

Damn Cool Pics

Damn Cool Pics


This Guy Became A Real Life Ken Doll

Posted: 07 May 2014 11:11 AM PDT

This guy had over 20 surgeries and spent almost $200,000 to become a real life Ken Doll. The results are terrifying.























This Selfie Has More Net Worth Than You Ever Will

Posted: 07 May 2014 10:41 AM PDT

This selfie contains some of the world's richest people ever. No matter how hard you try you will never be this rich. Find out who's in the pic.























These Celebs Were Once Rich But Now They're Broke

Posted: 07 May 2014 10:03 AM PDT

Oh how the mighty have fallen. These celebrities were once some of the richest people in the world. Now they're barely getting by. Find out why. 

Pamela Anderson 

Every year, the state of California releases this famous list of the state's top 500 delinquent taxpayers. It surprised everybody to see Playboy Model Pamela Anderson make the list in 2009. Pamela owed nearly $500,000 in state taxes and was rumored to owe another $1.7 Million in federal taxes. Pamela was known to have expensive tastes but didn't have the deep pockets to back up the lavish expenditures. In 2013 Pamela put her Malibu beach house on the market to settle her debt (pics here). If you're not interested in buying the home outright for $7.7 Million, you can rent it for a paltry $40,000 a month.



Aaron Carter, the younger brother of Backstreet Boy Nick Carter, is flat broke. Aaron didn't think paying his taxes was necessary and owes $1,370,000 to the IRS. When Aaron filed for Chapter 7, his only assets listed were: … a 61″ flat screen worth $500. 2 MacBooks, 2 Headset Mics, a Mini Keyboard, Portable Beats, a speaker, a guitar, $60 in cash, Louis Vuitton backpack, a duffle bag and a printer worth a total of $2,500, and a Brietling watch worth $3,750. Aaron even listed his dog, with a monetary value of zero. Aaron is now "living with a family member."



Randy Quaid 
After a stellar run of hits in the 80s and early 90s, Randy Quaid filed for bankruptcy in 2000. The next decade, he worked very little and was arrested in 2012 on felony vandalism charges. Somehow, he coughed up with $500,000 to post bond and get out of jail, but Randy never showed up in court, forfeiting all the bail money and digging himself even deeper into debt.



Dan Marino 
You all remember the famous hologram of Tupac Shakur at Coachella last year? The company behind the hologram was called Digital Domain. Dan Marino sank an estimated $14 Million into the company just in time for Digital Domain to file for bankruptcy, sinking all Dan's investment with it. Dan still has some change laying around. He made millions over his NFL career, but that one stings.



R&B Singer Toni Braxton loves to spend money. So much so she actually went bankrupt TWICE. The first time in 1993 at the height of her fame. Songs like "Unbreak My Heart" and "You're Makin' Me High" earned her a pretty penny but Toni was notorious for having "extremely lofty spending habits." After digging herself out of debt, she fell back into her bad spending habits and filed for bankruptcy again in 2010. Apparently, if you know it's fire, you do let it burn your hand.



When Burt Reynolds famously filed for bankruptcy in 1996, he had a whopping $10 Million in debt. Burt's mortgage lender foreclosed on his dinner theater and took his ranch. That same year, Burt won the Golden Globe for Best Supporting Actor in "Boogie Nights." How bittersweet it is.



Flashy NFL wide receiver Andre Rison is open about just how bad things got before he went flat broke. He would spend millions on jewelry and cars, he bought a couple lavish homes – one of which was burned down by TLC's Lisa "Left Eye" Lopez. Andre never really knew how much money he was spending until he cut a $20,000 check to a friend for a new music studio and it bounced. For a guy that earned $19 Million over his career, that's a long way to fall. Andre now gives guest lectures to athletes on how to avoid the mistakes he made.



In 2010, three-time MLB all star and World Series Champion Lenny Dykstra was so far in debt he was forced to auction off his World Series ring. Lenny started "Player's Club," a high-end jet charter and luxury magazine that went belly up. He went on to purchase Wayne Gretzky's home for $17.5 Million, which was highly overvalued and the downward spiral was on. Lenny was beyond broke and turned to a life of crime. In 2012, Lenny was convicted of fraud on top of pleading no contest to exposing himself to women he met on Craigslist. Classy.



Mark Twain filed for Bankruptcy??? In 1895 it was called 'insolvency' but basically the same thing. Mark sank his fortune into a new typesetting machine that didn't really work. His publishing company also collapsed. Mark was able to erase his debt with a global speaking tour and several new books.



Vince Young is perhaps one of the most cautionary tales in the history of the NFL, which is saying a lot. His story is an example for many young athletes on what never to do. Vince signed a 5 year, $56 Million contract with $25.7 Million guaranteed. First, Vince trusted his uncle, a grade school teacher, with his finances. It was normal for Vince to blow through $30,000 at a time at the clubs. Alarms were raised when, after three years in the league, Vince was found unconscious in a club after chugging Tequila. Even in 2011 when Vince knew the end was near, he insisted on throwing himself a $300,000 birthday party. It all ended when he took out a high interest $1.8 Million dollar loan that he never repaid. The interest grew to $2.5 Million quickly and a judge finally ordered his assets seized. They took everything, leaving Vince with $60,000 to live on. To make supplemental income Vince often signs autographs… for $59 a pop. He still owes over $1M dollars.

Get Gorgeous Now: Six Amazing Beauty Hacks [Infographic]

Posted: 07 May 2014 09:38 AM PDT

It's no surprise that beauty has fast grown into a multi-billion-dollar industry over the decades. As most women know, the range of hair products, skin potions, and cosmetics available at any drugstore or mall is enormous.

Click on Image to Enlarge.
Get Gorgeous with these Amazing Beauty Hacks
Get Gorgeous with these Amazing Beauty Hacks