Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis

---

• Amazing Arrogance, Gall, Chutzpa, and Unmitigated Effrontery from Berkshire Hathaway
• Good News: The Great Recession is Over; Bad News: It Doesn't Feel Like It
• Response to Nouriel Roubini on "America Needs a Payroll Tax Cut"

Amazing Arrogance, Gall, Chutzpa, and Unmitigated Effrontery from Berkshire Hathaway Posted: 20 Sep 2010 08:07 PM PDT It's hard to know exactly the precise words to describe the arrogance and unmitigated effrontery of Charles Munger, the billionaire vice chairman of Berkshire Hathaway, who today rattled off an insane barrage of insensitive comments regarding the bailouts. Please consider Munger Says 'Thank God' Bailouts Came Before Handouts Charles Munger, the billionaire vice chairman of Berkshire Hathaway Inc., defended the U.S. financial-company rescues of 2008 and told students that people in economic distress should "suck it in and cope." "You should thank God" for bank bailouts, Munger said in a discussion at the University of Michigan on Sept. 14, according to a video posted on the Internet. "Now, if you talk about bailouts for everybody else, there comes a place where if you just start bailing out all the individuals instead of telling them to adapt, the culture dies." "Hit the economy with enough misery and enough disruption, destroy the currency, and God knows what happens," Munger said. "So I think when you have troubles like that you shouldn't be bitching about a little bailout. You should have been thinking it should have been bigger." Germany was unable to stabilize its financial system in the 1920s, and, Munger said, "We ended up with Adolf Hitler." Nauseating Insensitivity If that kind of arrogant insensitivity does not make you nauseous, what will? It's hard to know where to start, but let's start with a blatant lie. This was no "little bailout", this was a multitrillion bailout, not just from the Fed and Congress but from every central bank in the world. One of the beneficiaries of course was billionaire Charles Munger. Middle class America was the loser. Displays of Ignorance The biggest display of ignorance in Munger's rant is his comparison of the current financial mess to Weimar Germany. Forgive me for asking but pray tell in what kind of fairytale fantasyland is the current deflationary credit bust remotely related to the war reparations imposed on Germany after the end of World War I that gave rise to Hitler? Need for a Culture Change The ridiculous Weimar comparison was not the Munger's most galling statement, however. This is: "Now, if you talk about bailouts for everybody else, there comes a place where if you just start bailing out all the individuals instead of telling them to adapt, the culture dies." The one thing we desperately need is a culture change. Instead, we made too big to fail, too bigger to fail. We preserved a culture that benefits billionaires like Munger and greedy CEO's that helped cause this mess. That culture benefits no one else. Yet Munger wants us to "suck it in and cope" and expect to be happy that he did not get wiped out. You know what? It would have been a damn good thing if the culture died and assholes like Munger got wiped out. Munger just proved beyond a shadow of a doubt Wall Street's culture was not worth saving. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List Mike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific.

Good News: The Great Recession is Over; Bad News: It Doesn't Feel Like It Posted: 20 Sep 2010 10:01 AM PDT According to the NBER, at long last the great recession is officially over. Bloomberg reports Worst U.S. Recession Since 1930s Ended in June 2009. The longest and deepest U.S. recession since the Great Depression ended in June 2009, lasting 18 months, the National Bureau of Economic Research said. "The committee decided that any future downturn of the economy would be a new recession and not a continuation of the recession that began in December 2007," the Cambridge, Massachusetts-based bureau's business cycle dating group said today in a statement. "The basis for this decision was the length and strength of the recovery to date." The committee is the accepted arbiter of when recessions start and end. "The economy has begun to move forward, albeit at a slow, disappointing pace," said Bruce Kasman, chief economist at JPMorgan Chase & Co. in New York. "It's a recovery that feels fragile, and still raises questions about the risks to its sustainability." The odds of the economy falling back into another recession are about 25 percent, Kasman said. Over 50 and Never Working Again The New York Times comments on the Fears of Never Working Again Of the 14.9 million unemployed, more than 2.2 million are 55 or older. Nearly half of them have been unemployed six months or longer, according to the Labor Department. The unemployment rate in the group — 7.3 percent — is at a record, more than double what it was at the beginning of the latest recession. According to a Gallup poll in April, more than a third of people not yet retired plan to work beyond age 65, compared with just 12 percent in 1995. Older workers who lose their jobs could pose a policy problem if they lose their ability to be self-sufficient. "That's what we should be worrying about," said Carl E. Van Horn, professor of public policy and director of the John J. Heldrich Center for Workforce Development at Rutgers University, "what it means to this class of the new unemployables, people who have been cast adrift at a very vulnerable part of their career and their life." Older people who lose their jobs take longer to find work. In August, the average time unemployed for those 55 and older was slightly more than 39 weeks, according to the Labor Department, the longest of any age group. That is much worse than in August 1983, also after a deep recession, when someone unemployed in that age group spent an average of 27.5 weeks finding work. At this year's pace of an average of 82,000 new jobs a month, it will take at least eight more years to create the 8 million positions lost during the recession. And that does not even allow for population growth. Assuming it does take 8 more years to create 8 million jobs, of one accounts for population growth, unemployment will be 8% or more all the way to 2020. Indeed America has Lost One Decade - Another One in Progress Now Lost Decade Lowlights Americans living in poverty rose sharply to 14.3% from 13.2% in 2008 Poverty level is the highest since 1994 43.6 million Americans are living below the official poverty threshold Inflation-adjusted income of the median household fell 4.8% between 2000 and 2009 The number of 25-to-34-year-olds living with their parents rose 8.4% to 5.5 million in 2010 from 2008 Child poverty rose to 23.8% for kids under six in 2009, compared to 21.3% a year earlier What America Really Needs Given the structural problems in the US, there is no strong reason to think this decade will be much better than the last. I talked about those structural problems in Response to Nouriel Roubini regarding "America Needs a Payroll Tax Cut" Roubini says "America Need a Payroll Tax Cut". I say what America needs most right now is an honest appraisal of the sorry economic mess we are in, politicians who will work in genuine bipartisan effort to tackle our numerous structural problems, and willpower from everyone to make short-term sacrifices for the long-term benefit of the country. To date, all the Fed and Congress have done is bail out the banks and the bondholders (in other words the wealthy), at the expense of the middle class. Given the problems are numerous and deep, the solutions will undoubtedly require a series of across the board sacrifices. Those sacrifices need to start with public unions, the gigantic military complex, government employees in general (Congress and state legislatures in particular), as well as anyone bailed out or benefiting from the numerous and massive fiscally unsound policies of the Fed and Congress. So far, we do not even have an admission by the President, by Congress, or by most economists as to what the problems are. Instead everyone wants to "stimulate" something, typically by throwing money at problems. This is why the problems are unlikely to be fixed, and this is why we are likely to remain in a stagnant economy that produces few jobs for the remainder of the decade. While the recession is over, it certainly does not feel like it. Moreover, because we fail to address the structural issues, the odds of slipping back into another recession are exceptionally high. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List Mike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific.

Response to Nouriel Roubini on "America Needs a Payroll Tax Cut" Posted: 20 Sep 2010 01:01 AM PDT Nouriel Roubini makes the case What America needs is a payroll tax cut. Nearly three years since the onset of the financial crisis, the continued weakness of the labor and real estate markets, U.S. consumers' unbalanced balance sheets and fading support from policy stimulus have transformed the risk of a double-dip recession from unlikely to about a 40 percent likelihood. The administration knows that it needs to fashion a revenue-neutral fiscal stimulus that increases labor demand and consumption. Its proposal to make permanent a research and development tax credit that dates to the 1980s, and then to enact a temporary investment tax credit allowing firms to write down capital investments at 100 percent of cost, are welcome -- but too modest a cure for what ails the economy. A much better option is for the administration to reduce the payroll tax for two years. The reduced labor costs would lead employers to hire more; for employees, the increased take-home pay would boost much-needed economic consumption and advance the still-crucial process of deleveraging households (paying down credit card debt and other legacies of the easy-credit years). Proportion is critical in designing the payroll tax cuts. Small and medium-size enterprises have had it rough the past three years. They are scrambling for operating capital as banks hold reserves tightly, and they face higher borrowing costs than large corporations when they do find willing lenders. To maximize the incentives for private-sector hiring, there should be sharper reductions to the payroll taxes paid by employers than for those paid by employees. Low-income workers have historically shown a much higher propensity to consume when given extra money, so the payroll tax cut should be designed to provide a larger-percentage break to those on the low end of the income scale compared with the upper middle class. Stimulating Production a Mistake at this Juncture Certainly some of what Roubini says makes sense. For example, it makes little sense to stimulate capital expenditures and production when there is a glut of overcapacity already. Unwarranted stimulating of production is one of the reasons tax credits for news homes fell flat on its face. The last thing we needed to do was encourage homebuilders to build more houses. What Roubini misses is that attempts to stimulate hiring (thus production) won't work because businesses will not hire just to get a tax break. There has to be a legitimate need for businesses to hire. For there to be a legitimate need, there has to be genuine consumer demand. Plight of Small Businesses I have written extensively about the plight of small businesses. Here are some examples. August 03, 2010: Wells Fargo/Gallup Small Business Index Hits Record Low, Future Expectations Dip Below Zero First Time Ever August 20, 2010: Small Businesses are Not Hiring - Why Should They? August 24, 2010: Another Atlas Shrugs - Small Business Owners Chime In September 06: Labor Day Insanity from Clinton's Secretary of Labor For several quarters, the number one problem in every NFIB report is lack of customers. The number two and number three problems are Obama's healthcare "solution" and business uncertainty in general. While business tax reductions will help profits, payroll tax reductions will not address the underlying structural problems, nor will they address the problem of too few customers. A look at the math will show why. Employer Tax Break Math If we completely eliminated the U.S. federal payroll tax employer contribution it would save employers 6.2% for Social Security (for wages up to $106,800 and nothing after that), and precisely 1.45% for Medicare. Will a Pizza Hut, Home Depot, Citigroup, Bank of America, home builder, or specialized small manufacturer hire someone because of tax breaks? Would anyone? I think not. The maximum possible saving, assuming we forgave all employer contributions, is 7.65%. Health care costs have been going up more than that! Unless and until businesses can add employees that will increase the bottom line, they won't hire, tax breaks or not. Perhaps it will make a difference for some marginal businesses sitting on the fence wondering if they should hire one more employee, but that is the practical extent of it. In a sense, the proposal is something like firing a shotgun over a swamp hoping to kill mosquitoes. Arguably, payroll tax reductions will keep some marginal businesses alive, preventing layoffs. Then again, marginal businesses need to go out of business. Keeping them alive is a bad thing. Proposal Helps Wall Street More Than Main Street Lowering employer payroll taxes certainly will help business profits, but that does not mean businesses will hire. In fact, as noted above, they won't. Thus, Roubini's proposal, as weighted, would help Wall Street more than Main Street. It addresses the symptoms and not the disease. Consumer Attitudes Are The Key Let's turn to the consumer side of the proposal. The #1 factor affecting small businesses is lack of customers. Would cutting taxes for the average Joe encourage more spending? Ultimately one can count on it. Initially, many consumers will take every cent and pay down debt. However, paying down debt is a good thing. Over time, as consumer balance sheets are repaired, people will spend. More spending will promote hiring. Philosophically Speaking, I Like Business Tax Cuts Philosophically speaking, I am all in favor of businesses keeping more money and consumers keeping more money. The less money that goes to Washington the better. However, we must look at the proposal as laid out, to see if it meets the stated objective of stimulating the economy and getting businesses to hire. Targeting businesses with payroll tax reductions will not do nearly as much as middle class tax cuts. Complete Economic Overhaul Needed Unfortunately, there is no simple solution to this mess. Structural problems run deep and a complete economic overhaul is in order. Here are a few of the structural problems. The US can no longer afford to be the world's policeman. Military spending has to be reined in. Public unions have bankrupted many cities and states. The complete dismantling of public unions is mandatory for the long-term fiscal health of the country. To stimulate hiring and reduce the cost of government expenditures, we need to scrap Davis-Bacon. We do need to reduce business taxes, but only if we can pay for it. I propose we pay for it by slashing military spending. We need to fix the corporate income tax structure that gives incentives to businesses to move jobs overseas. Because of tax deferments, businesses pay less tax overseas than in the US. To promote hiring in the US we need to reverse that setup. Health care is an abomination. We need to start over from scratch. We need to eliminate too big to fail. We need to abolish the Fed. We desperately need a balanced budget amendment. The public pension mess is nearly beyond belief. Extend-and-pretend not only affects banks, but public pension plans to the tune of $3 trillion. Please see Recently Introduced Actuarially Unsound Methods Hide Pension Mess in Illinois, Texas, Ohio; $3 Trillion Pension Deficit for a discussion. The Goals The goals must be a sound currency, a balanced budget, and less government, not more. We can follow the path of Japan and its two lost decades, or we can make tough choices for the long haul. Sadly, the US has One Lost Decade Already with Another One in Progress Now. There are no short-term fixes, nor are there painless solutions. Unless and until we address our structural issues, the economic crises will not go away. I am all in favor of incremental progress along the way, but a payroll tax cut is certainly not a silver bullet. In the grand scheme of things, a payroll tax credit is no bullet at all, given that it fails to address a single structural problem of any kind and stand to benefit Wall Street more than Main Street. We need to address the disease, not the symptoms. What America Really Needs Roubini says "America Need a Payroll Tax Cut". I say what America needs most right now is an honest appraisal of the sorry economic mess we are in, politicians who will work in genuine bipartisan effort to tackle our numerous structural problems, and willpower from everyone to make short-term sacrifices for the long-term benefit of the country. We need to start with a fresh look at numerous structural problems one-by-one and propose solutions to those problems one-by-one, starting with a breath of fresh air from the administration and Congress as to what those problem are! After all, how can you fix something unless you admit what the problems are? To date, all the Fed and Congress have done is bail out the banks and the bondholders (in other words the wealthy), at the expense of the middle class. Given the problems are numerous and deep, the solutions will undoubtedly require a series of across the board sacrifices. Those sacrifices need to start with public unions, the gigantic military complex, government employees in general (Congress and state legislatures in particular), as well as anyone bailed out or benefiting from the numerous and massive fiscally unsound policies of the Fed and Congress. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List Mike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific.

You are subscribed to email updates from Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.	Email delivery powered by Google
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610

SEOmoz Daily SEO Blog

---

Location-Based Social Networking for Events & Conferences - An Interview with Foursquare Posted: 19 Sep 2010 01:40 PM PDT Posted by Sam Crocker Hi there folks! Today we are going to take a look into Foursquare and, more specifically, we're going to check out how to use it for events and conferences and uncover some of the answers to the questions that aren't as easily avilable through the Foursquare site.   Quick Background on Foursquare So, we're not going to waste too much time on an introduction to Foursquare, because hopefully you've already been focussing on ways to incorporate this into your marketing plan. The implications for any business with a storefront or actual address are fairly straightforward, though the implications for online brands are a bit more difficult to tap into. It's Not just for Stalking! (Image via: Geek and Poke) I had originally prepared a post dedicated to Foursquare and its impact on local and small businesses, however it seems SEO Doctor was one step ahead of me and produced this impressive guide before I was able to get my post out of the drafts folder here on SEOmoz. His post is extremely comprehensive though, so be sure to check it out! I've been hearing loads of people talking about how "they don't get it" in reference to Foursquare and it's worth pointing out how many people were having trouble understanding Twitter as well. I would definitely recommend familiarising yourself with Foursquare now - especially if you work with any local companies. The growth of Foursquare, Gowalla & Facebook Places has been extremely convincing, and the limited number of people making use of the "Specials" available by claiming your local business (for FREE) with Foursquare seems like an obvious missed opportunity - ignore Location-Based social media at your own peril.   Using Foursquare for Conferences and Events At any rate, as you know, Distilled and SEOmoz have been busy over the last several months preparing for the #mozniar and the PRO seminar in London ( for which I would be remiss not to quickly let you know that tickets are still avaialble). In this preparation we have been looking heavily into ways to spice up the event. Given my mild obsession with all ways to earn seemingly meaningless points and my new found hobby of Foursquare Roulette (jump off a tube station and randomly try whatever looks entertaining in the area) I proposed we look into Foursquare and what sort of things we might be able to do with it for the conference. If any of you are as nerdy as I am, then I'm sure you will have noticed how some of the biggest brands as well as some of the largest events in the tech and music industries have been able to get their own Badges you can unlock by checking-in at various locations.   Screen Cap from Tony Felice The first thing you'll notice is that these are not small affairs and there are potentially obvious reasons why these clients were potentially able to strike a deal to get a badge. You might also notice - if you've looked into this previously - that it can be fairly difficult to find any information about how these deals are struck, and it can be equally difficult to get in touch with the folks at Foursquare about striking up a deal.   Getting to the Source - An Interview with Eric F. After enough prodding and digging through my own social networks for any potential "in" I consider myself very fortunate to have been able to get in touch with Eric, who happens to be the Director of Client Services - and was incredibly helpful and happy to speak to us. Rather than be selfish with the responses I thought I would provide some of the answers he provided to my most burning questions about it all. Here are the responses I was able to dig up, I'll include a brief recap of the implications afterwards: What would be your top tip(s) for making the most of Foursquare for conferences and Events? EF: Setting up goals ahead of time is the best way to plan for a conference.  You may have a single-day event and encourage people to check-in early, or you may have an event spread out over a few days or weeks and have people check-in early, in the middle, and at the end.  We look at foursquare as a flexible platform, depending on event planners' needs.  Some folks have found success with contests or tips to visit different booths.  Others use foursquare as a way for attendees to connect and to see who else is at their event.  One recent conference used foursquare to show which events had the most people attendants, and then gave the speakers a chance to connect to their audience via Twitter after the fact. There is a very robust API available as well that give event organizers the ability to show live check-ins and other interesting data about the event in real time. In the past we've have seen badges from events and conferences (e.g. CES, Bonnaroo, SXSW, etc.) in the past- how does that work? Is that a service that people pay for? Is there generally a threshold about how "big" or "cool" an event is? Or is it more just about getting in touch? EF: We're still in the early days of this, and have been testing different approaches around partner and event-related badges. Sometimes, we choose a venue because of a cool use of the platform; other times, it's to reach a new audience In the future we hope to roll out a more structured plan for event planners and conferences - but for now we are inspired by the ideas and implementations we have seen from these events. Is this a market Foursquare has considered? There seem to be loads of conferences and events and it seems like partnerships (with badges and such) could be a real opportunity. EF: We are concentrating on the best user experience possible.  If this comes at events and conferences, we are doing our job right. What things can/should any event organiser do with Foursquare in the short-term? Obviously there is more to be done for a massive festival or conference, but what about one-off events or smaller time affairs? EF: We look at our loyalty offers (in the form of special offers and mayor offers) as a big win for anyone with a physical location.  These reward people that go somewhere for the first time, or are loyal customers.  This also lets merchants track success with redemptions and foot traffic. We know that business accounts are free, but how do your partnerships work with larger brands? Is there a general price range on these? How much does it cost for a brand to get their own badge? What if they want more than one?  EF: All business partnerships with foursquare are totally free.  This includes someone with a single location such as a bar or restaurant, to a national retailer with 10,000 locations.  To be 100% clear, we offer the ability to see analytics, run specials, and interact with new and loyal customers totally right now. Badge programs have either a monthly cost associated with them that is directly tied to promotional consideration and reach, as well as the longevity of the campaign. Who should large brands try to get in touch with if they want to team up with Foursquare? EF: We have a dedicated support area for businesses: http://support.foursquare.com/forums/177952-foursquare-for-business This ensures that the proper person will be able to answer the proper question whether it comes in from a local merchant, large chain, agency representing a brand, event question, or anything else that may arise. What about smaller brands? EF: Same as above - funneling requests through one system ensure that someone on the team gets back to people quickly, correctly, and promptly. Finally, any previews/things in the works for business/marketing uses of Foursquare you're willing to share? EF: Knowing where events are happening, or where people are gathered, is a great metric of discovery. We're all about letting folks know when something is happening, and most importantly where it is happening.  We are looking at ways to empower users and businesses by giving them this knowledge at their fingertips.   Making Sense of it All No surprise that the Foursquare team are keeping some of their cards fairly close to their chests, but there's definitely some key takeaways from this. 1. You don't have to be a global brand to get the hook-up. It seems pretty clear that any creative uses of the API are a definite way to grab attention from the folks at Foursquare, and is potentially a clever way to get your own badge. 2. There is no doubt that Foursquare and other location-based social media platforms are growing and now is the time to make sure that if you work with any local businesses: get on the ball, get your venue registered, and go to town. I would not be the least bit surprised if in some fashion or another this sort of data (rankings, tips, check-ins, etc) becomes quite valuable to the team over at Google when it comes to looking at local ranking factors. 3. If you decide to make location-based social networking part of your plan - let people know! There's no sense building the most incredible API to date to be used at your event, venue, etc. and not letting people know about it. 4. Even if you can't get your event/conference its own badge there is still plenty you can do to engage Foursquare users. Examples for Short Conferences Be sure to set up your venue(s) as locations Create multiple venues for the same location (e.g. "Conference Room 1" "Bar" "Exhibition Hall" etc) Rewards for check-ins (forget about Mayor's - focus on the short term) Make use of Existing Apps. Check out ScreenScape, LocaModa, 2Know and if you're in London tell people to try out FourTap Create a new App Encourage early check-ins and sharing via Twitter Splash some cash and get your event a badge Examples for Longer Conferences As above Have incentives for multiple check-ins Encourage check-ins from multiple venues Offer a prize for the mayor of the conference Where exactly we end up along the spectrum of "things you can do" for London PRO for this year is still a work in progress, but you can bet I'll be championing for meaningless points and our own spin on the thing - and you can be sure we'll let you know what we come up with. A very big thank you to Eric F. and the Foursquare team for taking the time to answer our questions! Please let us know your thoughts below and any successes/hiccups you all have had using location-based social networking in the comments section below. Do you like this post? Yes No

You are subscribed to email updates from SEOmoz Daily SEO Blog To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.	Email delivery powered by Google
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610

Daily Snapshot: Town Hall Discussion on Jobs

Your Daily Snapshot for Monday, September 20, 2010   Photo of the Day President Barack Obama fist bumps Vice President Joe Biden, with Senior Advisor Valerie Jarrett looking on, before a meeting in the Oval Office, Sept. 16, 2010. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza) Today's Schedule In the morning, the President will receive the Presidential Daily Briefing then meet with senior advisors in the Oval Office. In the afternoon, the President will participate in a live CNBC town hall discussion on jobs and the economy. All times are Eastern Daylight Time 9:30 AM: The Vice President delivers remarks at the U.S.-Japan Council’s Annual Conference 10:00 AM: The President receives the Presidential Daily Briefing 10:30 AM: The President meets with senior advisors 12:00 PM: The President participates in CNBC town hall discussion on jobs 12:30 PM: The Vice President attends an event for Governor Ted Strickland 3:00 PM: The President departs the White House 3:20 PM: The President departs Andrews Air Force Base 4:05 PM: The President arrives in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 5:10 PM: The President delivers remarks at a finance reception for Congressman Sestak 5:45 PM: The Vice President delivers remarks at a rally for Governor Ted Strickland 6:05 PM: The President delivers remarks at a dinner reception for Congressman Sestak 7:20 PM: The President delivers remarks at a DNC dinner reception 8:15 PM: The President departs Philadelphia, Pennsylvania en route Andrews Air Force Base 8:55 PM: The President arrives at Andrews Air Force Base 9:05 PM: The President arrives at the White House  Indicates Events that will be livestreamed on WhiteHouse.gov/live. In Case You Missed It Here are some of the top stories from the White House blog.  No Excuse for Holding Middle Class Tax Cuts Hostage Deputy Communications Director Jen Psaki debunks the House Republican's bogus attempt to hide behind small businesses as they pledge to block middle class tax cuts. Hiring More Veterans to Keep Serving America John Berry, Director of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, discusses the Administration's commitment to keep veterans engaged in public service. Weekly Address: The Republican Corporate Power Grab The President explains how the most dire warnings about the Citizens United case have been proven valid. Get Updates Sign up for the Daily Snapshot Stay Connected     Facebook Twitter YouTube Flickr iTunes         This email was sent to e0nstar1.blog@gmail.com Manage Subscriptions for e0nstar1.blog@gmail.com Sign Up for Updates from the White House Unsubscribe e0nstar1.blog@gmail.com | Privacy Policy Please do not reply to this email. Contact the White House The White House • 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW • Washington, DC 20500 • 202-456-1111

Seth's Blog : Questions or answers

[You're getting this note because you subscribed to Seth Godin's blog.]

Questions or answers

You can add value in two ways:

• You can know the answers.
• You can offer the questions.

Relentlessly asking the right questions is a long term career, mostly because no one ever knows the right answer on a regular basis.

  • Email to a friend • •

More Recent Articles

• Are you responsible for what you market?
• The power of buttons and being normal
• Turning the tables on critical trolls
• Beyond crowdsourcing
• Rehearsing is for cowards

Don't want to get this email anymore? Click the link below to unsubscribe.

---

Click here to safely unsubscribe now from "Seth's Blog" or change your subscription or subscribe

---

---

Your requested content delivery powered by FeedBlitz, LLC, 9 Thoreau Way, Sudbury, MA 01776, USA. +1.978.776.9498

 

Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis

---

• Recently Introduced Actuarially Unsound Methods Hide Pension Mess in Illinois, Texas, Ohio; $3 Trillion Pension Deficit in Total
• New IRS Reporting Rules to Hit eBay and Paypal; Government Crackdown on Trinket Sellers; Campaign Bribes and Tax Policy
• Sunday Funnies 2010-09-19 Understanding Taxes
• America's Lost Decade - Another One in Progress Now

Recently Introduced Actuarially Unsound Methods Hide Pension Mess in Illinois, Texas, Ohio; $3 Trillion Pension Deficit in Total Posted: 19 Sep 2010 05:46 PM PDT It's no secret that Illinois, New Jersey, and numerous other states have massively underfunded pension plans. The problem is far worse than it looks because of ridiculous assumptions like 8% or higher returns. Moreover, states like Illinois, Texas, Rhode Island, and Ohio have gone one step further by recently adopting actuarially unsound methods specifically designed to disguise the mess. The New York Times tackles the issue in The Illusion of Pension Savings Earlier this year, Illinois said it had found a way to save billions of dollars. It would slash the pensions of workers it had not yet hired. The real-world savings would not materialize for decades, of course, but thanks to an actuarial trick, the state could start counting the savings this year and use it to help balance its budget. Texas saved millions of dollars this year after raising its retirement age for future hires and barring them from counting unused sick leave in their pensions. More savings will appear in coming years. Rhode Island also raised its retirement age for future retirees last year, after being told it could save $90 million in the first year alone. The technique is fairly innocuous in normal times, allowing governments to smooth out their labor costs over many years. But it becomes much riskier when pension funds have big shortfalls, when they need several decades to pay down their losses and when they are cutting benefits for future workers — precisely the conditions that exist today. "In a plan that is not well funded, I wouldn't recommend it," said Norm Jones, chief actuary for Gabriel Roeder Smith & Company, an actuarial firm that helps Illinois and a number of other states that have adopted the method. He said the firm's actuaries informed officials of the risks and it was the officials' decision to use the technique. Cuts for workers not yet hired do not save much money in the present — but that's where actuaries can work their magic. They capture the future savings for use today by assuming, in essence, that 100 percent of today's work force is already earning tomorrow's skimpier benefits. When used in actuarial calculations, that assumption has a powerful effect. It reduces the amount a government must put into its workers' pension fund every year. "Responsible funding methods do not work this way," said Jeremy Gold, an independent actuary in New York who has been outspoken about the distortions built into pension numbers. He said the technique was much like the mortgages with very low teaser rates that proliferated during the housing bubble. Dubious pension numbers in Illinois are not easily shrugged off after a warning shot fired by the Securities and Exchange Commission in August. The S.E.C. accused New Jersey of securities fraud, saying the state had manipulated its pension numbers to look like a better credit risk, while selling some $26 billion worth of bonds. Problem is Now The problem is now. The only way to have savings now is to reduce benefits now. Three states have acted now, at least in small ways. Colorado, South Dakota, and Minnesota all recently reduced pension benefits. All three states face legal battles. Please see Uncharted Territory" in WA; Calpers Bargains with Schwarzenegger; "Fairy-Tale Promises" in NJ; "No Choice" in NY; Lawsuits in CO, SD, MN over Pensions for a partial list of the big mess we are in, and what a few states are doing about it. Illinois, along with Texas, Ohio, Rhode Island, New Jersey, Arkansas, and for that matter every state but those three, are at best dealing with the current problem by making small changes that will matter 30 years from now. The math does not work. $3 Trillion Deficit According to a report by the American Enterprise Institute, public pensions are underfunded by more than $3 trillion. Please see Interactive Map of Public Pension Plans; How Badly Underfunded are the Plans in Your State? for details. Changing rules for new pension plan participants is a small step in the right direction, but even getting rid of them entirely would not cure the $3 trillion deficit today. As always, Illinois refuses to tackle this massive issue, instead seeking solutions to hide the severity of its problems. Texas, New York, California, and New Jersey are not much better. Hopefully the SEC will have something more to say about never-ending foolishness to mask the huge and growing public pension problems. Whether that stirs any brain waves in Springfield, Illinois or any other state capitols is unfortunately another matter. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List Mike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific.

New IRS Reporting Rules to Hit eBay and Paypal; Government Crackdown on Trinket Sellers; Campaign Bribes and Tax Policy Posted: 19 Sep 2010 03:06 PM PDT Inquiring minds are interested in 2011 tax policy changes that will affect sellers of merchandise on eBay. John R writes .... Starting next year Paypal will have to start reporting to the IRS. The selling limits will be 200 items or $20K before they report. This tax change was part of the '08 stimulus. Reporting on 200 items annually is a real killer. That's a mere 17 items a month. We've already shut our eBay business down. It's simply not worth the effort. Most eBay/auction site margins are extremely low. Thus, I wonder how many people will set up a business, keep the books, pay state and federal taxes, just to make a few bucks. Thanks, John New Form 1099-K will debut for 2011 tax year John is discussing eBay Sellers and Tax Changes Tax time is upon us again, and this year the IRS has a bit of a warning for eBay sellers: next year you'll be on the hook for the taxes you owe. Enter the 2011 Form 1099-K Though sellers won't have to change their filing habits in 2010, a new Form 1099-K for 2011 promises to change income reporting by online sellers. The draft Form 1099-K for 2011 implements payments reporting to the IRS for PayPal and credit card merchants, much as already happens with forms W-2 or 1099-MISC for employees and independent contractors. Starting in 2011, therefore, sellers will be expected to report gross payments via online or credit card payments that coincide with reported 1099-K amounts, then to make adjustments to account for expenses and cash equivalents, fees, chargebacks, refunds, and so on. Details and Caveats As a practical matter, if you're an eBay seller, this will affect you unless your gross sales are under $20,000 for the year or you receive fewer than 200 transactions. Reporting for small sellers at this level is not required. Otherwise, if you exceed this volume, you'll be required to provide tax identification information (SSN or EIN number, for example) to payment processors like PayPal and will be expected by the IRS to account in your return for the amounts reported on your 1099-K form(s). The 1099-K form wasn't introduced for the 2010 tax year, so as you do your taxes this year, enjoy the last year you'll report eBay income as a purely voluntary matter. Government Crackdown on Trinket Sellers How many hobbyists like John will just say the hell with it? If enough do, it could impact eBay's earnings. Imagine selling 20 items a month, earning a few hundred dollars a year or less in profit, and having to spend time and money keeping track of all the costs associated with the effort. I am not trying to justify non-payment of taxes, I am simply looking at this from a practical standpoint. Corporate Earnings Reported to Shareholders vs. Corporate Earnings Reported to the IRS Just for grins, take a look at big corporation earnings reported to shareholders as compared to earnings as reported to the government. Which one is fiction and which one is real? Is either legitimate? I doubt it, and in opposite directions. If I am correct, where should government be spending its time and energy? Loopholes for the Little Guy vs. Loopholes for Large Corporations Every conceivable loophole, no matter how small, is closed for the little guy, while major corporations have tax avoidance loopholes worth hundreds of billions of dollars. For example, multinational corporations get to defer profits on taxes held overseas. Adding insult to injury, there have been semi-regular "tax holidays" where corporations get to repatriate offshore accounts at low rates, to the major advantage of large corporations and huge disadvantage of small US based corporations. Such policies encourage the flight of jobs and money from the US. So, here we go again, cracking down on the little guy in attempts to pick up pennies to balance the budget, ignoring hundreds of billions of dollars over the years to large corporations. Campaign Bribes and Tax Policy Please note that I am in favor of lower corporate taxes as long as it is done fairly (right now multinationals and large corporations have huge advantages) and as long as we can afford it. Instead, we have a system that rewards capital flight, rewards job flight, and punishes small businesses relative to larger corporations. This mess happens because lobbyists for large corporations write our tax code, with politicians taking campaign contributions (bribes) in return for the favor. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List Mike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific.

Sunday Funnies 2010-09-19 Understanding Taxes Posted: 19 Sep 2010 01:18 PM PDT Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List Mike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific.

America's Lost Decade - Another One in Progress Now Posted: 19 Sep 2010 12:48 AM PDT The US used to point the finger at Japan's "Lost Decade" saying "It won't happen here." But it did. Median wages are nearly 5% lower in real terms than in 2000, the poverty rate is at a 15 year high, and the S&P 500 is about 20% lower than it was a decade ago. Pleased consider the Wall Street Journal article Lost Decade for Family Income The downturn that some have dubbed the "Great Recession" has trimmed the typical household's income significantly, new Census data show, following years of stagnant wage growth that made the past decade the worst for American families in at least half a century. The bureau's annual snapshot of American living standards also found that the fraction of Americans living in poverty rose sharply to 14.3% from 13.2% in 2008—the highest since 1994. Some 43.6 million Americans were living below the official poverty threshold, but the measure doesn't fully capture the panoply of government antipoverty measures. The inflation-adjusted income of the median household—smack in the middle of the populace—fell 4.8% between 2000 and 2009, even worse than the 1970s, when median income rose 1.9% despite high unemployment and inflation. Between 2007 and 2009, incomes fell 4.2%. Lost Decade Lowlights Americans living in poverty rose sharply to 14.3% from 13.2% in 2008 Poverty level is the highest since 1994 43.6 million Americans are living below the official poverty threshold Inflation-adjusted income of the median household fell 4.8% between 2000 and 2009 The number of 25-to-34-year-olds living with their parents rose 8.4% to 5.5 million in 2010 from 2008 Child poverty rose to 23.8% for kids under six in 2009, compared to 21.3% a year earlier Census Bureau Charts Here are a few select charts from Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2009, Issued September 2010. click on any chart for sharper image Real Incomes 1967 to 2009 Real income for most groups is back to 1996 levels, a couple years higher for Asians. Poverty Rates 1959 to 2009 In general, the chart shows the "War on Poverty" was a failure regardless of what political party was in office. The odd pair of Clinton and Nixon did the best, while Carter and George W. Bush the worst. Reagan and George H. Bush both had roller coasters ending about where they started, while Ford essentially experienced a flatline. Since the start of the "War on Poverty" in 1964, President Johnson did the best in absolute terms. However, a war on poverty via a "Guns and Butter" policy including an insane War in Vietnam can hardly be considered a success. Ironically, and as is typical of government programs, we made far better progress before the "War on Poverty" started. Since then, some 46 years later, we are just about where we started. Descent Into Poverty The Minneapolis Star Tribune reports on a Descent Into Poverty For Millions Ramsey County human services planner Jim Anderson didn't need Thursday's census report to know that poverty has climbed sharply since the economy collapsed in 2008. Last month he turned away 59 adults with 126 children seeking emergency shelter for families. In a report that confirmed what experts like Anderson have sensed, the U.S. Census Bureau said Thursday that the nation's poverty rate shot to 14.3 percent last year, the highest in 16 years, and that one in five American children were living below the poverty line. With one in seven Americans in poverty, demand for emergency financial help has skyrocketed. Advocates across the Twin Cities say that homeless shelters are overflowing, food shelves are strapped and church basements are filling up. Nikkei Monthly Chart For the Japanese Nikkei Index it has been two lost decades going on three. S&P 500 Monthly Chart For the S&P 500 it has been one lost decade going on two. Given the structural problems in the US, there is no strong reason to think this decade will be much better than the last. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List Mike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific.

You are subscribed to email updates from Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.	Email delivery powered by Google
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610