miercuri, 18 septembrie 2013

Damn Cool Pics

Damn Cool Pics


People Are Awesome Women's Edition 3 HD 2013 [Video]

Posted: 18 Sep 2013 06:28 PM PDT



The most amazing collection of sexy awesome women. Best watched in HD, Full screen, volume up :)

Technology of the Past

Posted: 18 Sep 2013 06:18 PM PDT

You are old if you remember all these things.























The Worst Yugoslavian Album Covers

Posted: 18 Sep 2013 05:43 PM PDT

Hilarious and really bad vintage album covers from Yugoslavia.























6 in 10 Americans -- Are You One of Them?

Here's What's Happening Here at the White House
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Featured

6 in 10 Americans -- Are You One of Them?

Yesterday, the Department of Health and Human Services released a report on Obamacare. HHS estimates that, under the Health Insurance Marketplace launching on October 1st, nearly 6 out of 10 uninsured Americans could get low-cost, high-value health insurance for under $100 per person per month.

Find out if you might be one of them on HealthCare.gov.

Obamacare for six out of ten americans

 
 
  Top Stories

The Progress We've Made

Five years after the financial crisis, hear seven Obama administration officials talk about the crisis and recovery that followed.

READ MORE

America’s Uninsured: Progress and Prospects for 2014

Yesterday, the Census Bureau released estimates of the number of Americans who lacked health insurance in 2012, and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) estimated that nearly 6 out of 10 uninsured Americans could be able to access low-cost, high value health insurance for under $100 per person per month starting in 2014.

READ MORE

President Obama Speaks on the Washington Navy Yard Shooting

On Monday, before delivering remarks on the economy, President Obama gave a brief statement about the tragic events at the Washington Navy Yard.

READ MORE

 
 
  Today's Schedule

All times are Eastern Time (ET)

9:45 AM: The President and the Vice President receive the Presidential Daily Briefing

10:45 AM: The President delivers remarks to members of the Business Roundtable and answer questions

11:30 AM: The Vice President meets with U.S. participants in the U.S.-Mexico High Level Economic Dialogue, incl. Secretary John Kerry, Secretary Penny Pritzker, Secretary Anthony Foxx, Acting Secretary Rand Beers, U.S. Trade Rep. Michael Froman and other officials

12:15 PM: Press Briefing by Press Secretary Jay Carney

3:30 PM: The President and the Vice President meet with Secretary of the Treasury Lew

4:15 PM: The President and the Vice President meet with Secretary of State Kerry

Did Someone Forward This to You? Sign Up for Email Updates

This email was sent to e0nstar1.blog@gmail.com

Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy
Please do not reply to this email. Contact the White House

The White House • 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW • Washington, DC 20500 • 202-456-1111


Using the Correct Hreflang Tag: A New Generator Tool

Using the Correct Hreflang Tag: A New Generator Tool


Using the Correct Hreflang Tag: A New Generator Tool

Posted: 17 Sep 2013 04:27 PM PDT

Posted by Aleyda

One of the challenges that International SEOs face is correctly targeting the right web presence to the appropriate search audience. Let's start with a couple of scenarios with these challenges so you can see clearly what I'm talking about.

If I search from a Mexican IP (using a Proxy service, to simulate being in Mexico) in Google Mexico for "comprar zapatos en linea," which in English means "buy shoes online" I get the following results:

Non Aligned GeoRanking Results

As you can see, Dafiti has a Mexican website version that is ranking no. 1, which is relevant in this case; but also has a Colombian version ranking no. 3 and an Argentinian version ranking no. 7. All of them are using ccTLDs, which should "ideally" give geolocation signals to Google. Additionally, there's a Spain site ranking no. 2 called Sarenza, also using a ccTLD.

Here's another example, this time for a couple of branded searches, first only for the brand, "edreams" in this case, which is a popular travel site with a strong international presence and then for "vuelos edreams," which in English means "edreams flights:"

Branded Results with Non Aligned Georanking Results

In the previous image you can see how:

  1. For its brand name results, despite being searched from Google Mexico with a Mexican IP, the first result is actually the Spain web version and the second is the American one! The Mexican web versionâ€"the relevant one for this locationâ€"is ranked third.
  2. For the "vuelos edreams" branded search, the Mexican web page version ranks first (yay!) but the second result shows a webpage that belongs to their Spain site.
How can you identify that you have an international search results alignment issue like the ones shown above?

The easiest way is to take a look in Google Analytics at which countries your organic search traffic is coming from, by going to the "Audience > Demographics > Location" report (along the appropriate organic search segment) and identifying which landing pages and keywords are bringing those visitors. You can do something similar with the language, with the "Audience > Demographics > Language" report.

You can also verify potential misalignment issues of any website, by checking their top rankings in the different Google international search results (not only your own but any site, which is great if you want to analyze the competition) by using Search Metrics and SEMRush. For example, checking the rankings of the Spain version of eDreams in Google Mexico:

SearchMetrics Domain Results per Country

What can we do to prevent those issues? How can we avoid ranking with the incorrect web version in some international search results, or cannibalizing them with many non-relevant Web versions? How can we provide a relevantly targeted web version to the right international audience?

The rel="alternate" hreflang="x" annotation came to the rescue, initially released at the end of 2011 and updated in April of this year to support the x-default value. It's used by Google (and Yandex too) to correctly identify the language and the country targeting of web pages, that can include them as a link element in the HTML head area, in the HTTP header or XML sitemap.

HrefLang tag specifications by Google

So why can we still see the misalignment issues in international search results, as the ones shown in the previous examples?

From my experience, most of the time Google does a good job in these scenarios when the hreflang annotations are correctly included. You can take a look at:

Nonetheless, many sites are still not making use of the hreflang annotations. Some of the issues I've seen come from the fact that sometimes we don't correctly use the hreflang annotations.

Take a look at the number of questions about hreflang in the Moz Q&A Forum and Google's Internationalization Webmaster Forum; there are still clearly many doubts about how to use it.

One of the error scenarios is the misuse of the hreflang link element by including non-supported values, especially for the region, in the HTML's <head> area. Google specifies in its official documentation that they support the ISO 639-1 format for the language, and optionally the ISO 3166-1 Alpha 2 format for the region.

Let's use the web code search engine Nerdy Data to find sites that, instead of including the "en-gb" value to specify that a page is in English targeting the UK (since the ISO 3166-1 Alpha 2 code for the UK is "GB"), are mistakenly including "en-uk":

HREFLang Error - Country attribute: UK instead of GB

Or, as another example, pages that are including "en-eu" to specify they're in English and targeting to the European Union (the "EU" code in this case is not supported, since regions are limited to countries):

HREFLang Error - EU is not supported

You can see more specifically the case of Hollisterâ€"that was shown in both of the previous cases in the Nerdy Data resultsâ€"how they're targeting the UK with the "en-uk" value and also, for their general English, German, French, Italian, and Spanish versions targeting to the European Union, they add the "eu" value for the region, which is not supported:

HREFLang Error - EU and UK values

As you can see, although we already have a couple of tools that facilitate the hreflang validation and its inclusion in sitemaps (check out the hreflang validator from DejanSEO and the hreflang sitemap tool from the Media Flow) it would be useful to have another, even simpler tool, that would serve to generate the required hreflang tags according to the languages and countries, thus helping us to avoid the previous issues.

To fill this need, I've published the hreflang tags generator tool:

Hreflang tag generator tool

The tool's goal is to assist you in the generation of the correct hreflang annotations for the different language or country versions of a specific page. You will need to place these in the HTML <head> area of each of its URLs, and that will serve as a reference to generate the rest of the hreflang tags for all of your site pages, with the correct syntax and formats.

When you generate the hreflang annotations the tool allows you to copy/paste the results or download them as a CSV file, so it's easier to use than other tools, too:

hreflang tag generator results

This is only the first version of the tool, and I'm already planning to include more functionality to assist with hreflang annotation generation on a massive scale. If you find any issues with it, or any feedback or ideas, please contact me via Twitter or send me an email at aleydasolis at gmail.

I hope the tool, although very simple, can be helpful to clarify the doubts about how to generate the correct hreflang annotations in your specific case. If you have any questions, please let me know in the comments!


Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don't have time to hunt down but want to read!

Seth's Blog : The truth about the war for talent

 

The truth about the war for talent

It's more of a skirmish, actually.

Plenty of recruiters and those in HR like to talk about engaging in a war for talent, but to be truthful, most of it is about finding good enough people at an acceptable rate of pay. Filling slots.

More relevant and urgent, though, is that it's not really a search for talent. It's a search for attitude.

There are a few jobs where straight up skills are all we ask for. Perhaps in the first violinist in a string quartet. But in fact, even there, what actually separates winners from losers isn't talent, it's attitude.

And yes, we ought to be having a war for attitude.

An organization filled with honest, motivated, connected, eager, learning, experimenting, ethical and driven people will always defeat the one that merely has talent. Every time.

The best news is that attitude is a choice, and it's available to all. You can probably win the war for attitude with the people you've already got. And if you're looking for a gig, you'll discover that honing and sharing your attitude goes a lot farther than practicing the violin all day.

       

More Recent Articles

[You're getting this note because you subscribed to Seth Godin's blog.]

Don't want to get this email anymore? Click the link below to unsubscribe.




Your requested content delivery powered by FeedBlitz, LLC, 9 Thoreau Way, Sudbury, MA 01776, USA. +1.978.776.9498

 

marți, 17 septembrie 2013

Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis

Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis


Fiscal Crisis in Chicago: Pensions 31% Funded, Moody's Downgrades Debt 3 Notches, Pension Liability is $61,000 Per Household; Mish's Proposed Solutions

Posted: 17 Sep 2013 01:27 PM PDT

Move over Detroit. The fiscal crisis in Chicago is far bigger.

  • Pensions 31% funded
  • Moody's downgraded Chicago Debt 3 Notches (just 4 steps above junk)
  • City debt on negative watch
  • Pension Liability is $61,000 Per Household ($23,000 Per Capita)

Via email, Ted Dabrowski at the Illinois Policy Center writes ...
While all eyes are focused on a solution for Illinois' state-run pension systems, Chicago's own debt crisis is looming.

Chicago taxpayers are on the hook for more than $63 billion in pension, health insurance and other debt. That's the total debt of the city and its sister governments, as well as Chicagoans' share of Cook County debt.

In total, each Chicago household is on the hook for more than $61,000.

Chicago's pension crisis isn't new, but Detroit's bankruptcy has brought national attention to Chicago's growing crisis. Just a day after Detroit filed for bankruptcy, Moody's Investors Service downgraded Chicago's debt by a rare three notches. Chicago is now just four notches away from junk-bond status — and any further downgrades mean the city could face problems borrowing money.

Without pension reform, Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel will be forced to raise taxes or dramatically cut government services.

Emanuel knows he can't raise taxes. Chicago has lost more than 200,000 residents in the last decade and the city's population is lower now than it was in the 1920s.

To make matters worse, Chicago's services are already faltering. Chicago Public Schools closed nearly 50 schools this year, forcing children and families to travel across gang lines. Nearly 3,000 school employees have been laid off. And the city's crime rate is among the worst in the nation.

Higher taxes, taxpayer flight and an inability to provide core services contributed to Detroit's demise — and it's a trend that Chicago must reverse.

Fixing Chicago's pension crisis will require help from Springfield. Lawmakers need to follow the lead of the private sector and move all workers to 401(k)-style plans for all work going forward — an idea that Emanuel supports as an option for the city's new hires.

Ted Dabrowski
Vice President of Policy
The Hidden Bill

You can view the entire report at The hidden bill: Chicago taxpayers and the looming crisis.

A closer look at the "Hidden Bill" shows the problem is even worse than stated by Dabrowski above.
Pension funds have long assumed unrealistically high investment returns, which make the funds look healthier than they actually are. Moody's Investors Service now calculates unfunded pension liabilities using more appropriate discount rates.

Under new Moody's methodology, Chicago's unfunded pension liabilities are at least $23 billion higher than what's officially reported. Today, the systems have only 31 cents for every dollar
they should have to make necessary pension payouts in the future.

When summing up Chicago's total debt, it's necessary to use the Moody's calculation of unfunded pension liabilities instead of those officially reported by the city. That's because the municipal bond market depends heavily on Moody's ratings when investing in Chicago bonds.

Moody's based its recent triple-notch downgrade of the city's debt on the agency's new methodology for valuing pension shortfalls. The downgrade has led to a collapse in Chicago's bond prices and a significant increase in its borrowing rates.

Chicago's credit rating is now only four notches away from junk-bond status. Many institutional investors are not allowed to invest in junk bonds, meaning the city will face significant
pressure in accessing the bond market going forward if this downward trend continues.

Ignoring the Moody's pension calculation not only understates the severity of Chicago's debt crisis, but also the true burden that Chicago taxpayers may be forced to shoulder.
If you adjust pension obligations for a more realistic rate of return, the problem looks like this.

Chicago Obligations



Chicago Pension Funding



Four Long Term Solutions

  1. Kill defined benefit pension plans
  2. End collective bargaining for public unions
  3. Institute national right-to-work laws
  4. Scrap Davis-Bacon and all prevailing wage laws

The above long-term solutions will stop the problem from growing as well as ensure labor costs are market-priced, not union-priced.

I wish that was enough but it isn't. Those things will slow the rate of growth of the problem, but cannot address 77% pension underfunding.

Two Short Term Solution

  1. Pension cutbacks
  2. Healthcare benefit cutbacks

Pension and benefit cuts are necessary, but how best to do it?

I propose the burden of pension cuts spread out in an equitable manner with those receiving the highest benefits taking the biggest percentage cuts.

All pension income above a certain cap could be taxed at a very high rate. This would protect the smaller pensioners from massive haircuts.

The alternative, as we saw in Central Falls, Rhode Island Bankruptcy, was an across the board 50% pension haircut.

Someone with a $200,000 pension had it cut to $100,000. Someone with a $25,000 pension had it cut to $12,500.

My proposal would cap the top-end rather than applying uniform haircuts. If one picks the cap carefully, a majority of union members would fare better under my plan than bankruptcy.

The Union Choice

Public unions can scream all they want, but the entire defined benefit pension system is insolvent.
There is no choice other than pension haircuts. There is a choice as to how:

  1. Voluntary (via union agreement)
  2. Involuntary (via bankruptcy)

Bankruptcy Here We Come

Unfortunately, unions are highly unlikely to accept my common sense proposal.

Ultimately, Chicago will play around with superficial remedies just like Central Falls, Detroit, and several cities in California (all of which succumbed to the inevitable).

In the meantime, Chicago will probably follow some other major cities into bankruptcy, such as Oakland and Los Angeles.

Investors better pick their municipal bonds carefully, because some major hits are on the way.

Mike "Mish" Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com

Grand Coalition or Grand Discontent, Mistrust and Disrespect? Political Poker Revisited

Posted: 17 Sep 2013 11:44 AM PDT

After saying "nein" to a grand black-red CDU/CSU + SPD coalition led by CDU (Angela Merkel), SPD party candidate Peer Steinbrück changed his mind and said he was willing to form such a coalition.

Political Poker Revisited

I discussed the reasons for the switch in Political Poker in Germany.
Was Steinbrück lying then, or now? Or both? Is this a game to win votes? Or a real change of heart? Or no change of heart, just a lie the entire time?

Quite frankly, I do not know. What I do know is that, in general, politicians will lie cheat and steal to stay in power.

Should the opportunity present itself, would Steinbrück enter a coalition with Die Linke even though he said he wouldn't?

Why not? He said he would not enter one with CDU/CSU and changed his mind. Might not he do so again? Might this all be a game of political poker?
Grand Coalition or Grand Opposition?

Today, Der Spiegel discussed the power play in Possible SPD coalition with Merkel: Gabriel's power issue. The translation is particularly difficult, but this is what I have.
Here Steinbrück, There Steinbrück, Everywhere Steinbrück

In the last days before the election, the SPD chancellor candidate has switched to ubiquity. Radio, market places, and the "Halli Galli circus". The point is to organize as many votes as possible for his party.

Then Steinbrück will be gone. What's next falls on SPD Chairman Sigmar Gabriel.

"We fight for red-green, nothing else," Gabriel says. however, some party members think, recognize a certain sympathy for a black-red alliance with him to.

Not Quite So Simple

Gabriel is facing difficult weeks. After the election, the SPD leader may need to lead his party into a grand coalition. But this variant is hated by many party members.  How will this all go well? 

In many parts of the SPD-Black Red is hated. Gabriel knows this, he has a good feel for the party spirit.

Internally, SPD announced it will involve members in some form on a decision on the next coalition. But how? Gabriel runs the risk that the party makes him a spanner in the works. [Mish note: a spanner is a German instrument for widening springs].

No less complicated is the question of how a new edition of the grand coalition would actually look like four years later. A grand coalition would shift the center of power of the SPD to a cabinet post in Merkel's administration, but the Chancellor outshines everything. How does a puppet role help the party in the next election?

And what talents does Gabriel have? He is not qualified for finance minister and does not find Merkel's stance on many issues appealing in the first place.

So it's foreign minister? In the the Foreign Office, he's out of the domestic political debate. Germans might be able to sleep a little quieter, but the party without him would have more difficulty distinguishing themselves from the Union. No optimal conditions for the next election.

Everything Complicated

In general, a grand coalition would make the next election problematic with a Red-Red-Green (SPD + Greens + Left) coalition even less conceivable than now. Can Gabriel afford that?
Grand Coalition or Grand Discontent, Mistrust and Disrespect?

Reader Bernd, who sent me the above link wrote...
Hello Mish,

An interesting article by "Der Spiegel" about the possible power struggle within SPD regarding a Grand Coalition (CDU/CSU/SPD).

Der Spiegel is usually extremely well informed about SPD and the parties' inner feelings and structure.

Der Spiegel article finds it difficult to fathom a Grand Coalition, because the majority of SPD leaders, members and Parlamentarians dislike the possibilty immensely and dislike Mm Merkel so intensely.

The article does not show a way out, but tells the reader: if a grand coalition comes ahout at all, it will be one of discontent, mistrust and disrespect. Not a good omen for the work that lies ahead in Europe.

Bernd
Grand Coalition More Complicated Than It Looks

Everything is more complicated than it looks. If a "Grand Coalition" is in the works, don't expect it to be very stable.

And this is why CDU/CSU hopes to attain a majority without depending on any alliances.

If AfD and FDP do not make the 5% threshold, CDU/CSU can get an outright majority. But if AfD totals 7% or more it is going to be very difficult if not impossible.

CDU/CSU will then have to form a coalition with someone. What poison will it be?

Mike "Mish" Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com

M1 Money Supply vs. Real GDP

Posted: 17 Sep 2013 02:13 AM PDT

Here are a few interesting charts of M1 money supply vs. Real GDP/10 from reader WendyBG.

Data

M1 consists of: (1) currency outside the U.S. Treasury, Federal reserve Banks, and the vaults of depository institutions; (2) traveler's checks of nonbank issuers; (3) demand deposits; and (4) other checkable deposits (OCDs), which consist primarily of negotiable order of withdrawal (NOW) accounts at depository institutions and credit union share draft accounts.

Click on any chart to see a sharper image.

M1 vs. Real GDP/10 1959-Present




M1 vs. Real GDP/10 2000-Present



M1 vs. Annualized Change in Real GDP



The third chart shows annualized change in GDP vs. M1.

Increases in M1 no longer have the same effect on growth or jobs.

M1 as Percentage of GDP



M1 money supply has increased under Bernanke at a faster pace than ever before relative to GDP.

I will take a look at GDP vs. other money supply measures later this week.

Mike "Mish" Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com