Central Perk

joi, 9 ianuarie 2014

Damn Cool Pics

Hidden Sexual Images In Disney Movies
Siblings Create Awesome Christmas Calendar for Their Mom
Girls Got Stuck

Posted: 09 Jan 2014 11:12 AM PST

"The Little Mermaid." On the original VHS cover there is a large golden penis. The rumor is that the penis was deliberately drawn as a last act of defiance by a disgruntled Disney artist who was being laid off. The truth is, the artist who created the cover did not work for Disney itself, thus was not a disgruntled employee, and claims the penis tower was completely inadvertent.

"The Little Mermaid." In the first wedding scene, the minister appears to have an erection. Disney claims that the bulge, is actually just his knee sticking out. You be the judge.

"The Rescuers." Approximately 38 minutes into the film, as Bianca and Bernard fly through the city in a sardine can, the image of a topless woman can be seen in two different frames. Disney claims the images were not placed in the frame by their animators, but were inserted during the post-production process.

"Who Framed Roger Rabbit." These screen caps come from the scene when Jessica gets thrown from a car after they hit a light post. She spirals out of the vehicle and as she does, her dress flies up and it can be seen that she is not wearing any panties.

"Who Framed Roger Rabbit." Baby Herman walks under the skirt of his "nanny" he is seen extending his middle finger looking up into her skirt. The finger was edited out the the DVD release of the film, as you can see in the bottom half of the image.

"Hercules." After Hercules punches the River Guardian, a horseshoe hits him on the head causing a phallic shaped bump to grow out of his head. It eventually grows into a penis shape including morphing his eyebrows into a set of testicles."

"Hercules." When the Muses are singing the song "Zero to Hero" after one sings "Is he bold." she steps forward and her dress flies up, revealing once again that she is not wearing anything under her robe.

"Toy Story 3." This scene shows the toy characters reacting with wide-eyed shock seeing their now grown up owner, Andy engaging in a grown up sex act. Only the suggestive shadow is view-able. However it has been proven that the image with the shadow did not actually appear in any version of Toy Story 3, it was created as a viral hoax.

"The Lion King." The poster for Disney's 2002 re-release of The Lion King secretly featured the image of a woman only wearing small panties, clearly showing off her ASSets.

"The Lion King." After Simba lays down on the cliff, dust flies up into the sky and forms the word "sex," for a brief moment.

The Hunchback of Notre Dame." Esmerelda's curvy body is highlighted and appears to be naked during her fire dance. In most of the dance she appears clothed but several frames show a naked body with the most detail around her breasts and inner thigh area.

"Mickey Mouse: Bladid." Coming from the wonderful minds working for Euro-Disney, Bladid, has cover art showing Mickey with his hand around a large blue penis aka Minnie's body.

Siblings Create Awesome Christmas Calendar for Their Mom

Posted: 09 Jan 2014 09:41 AM PST

These 3 siblings took photos of themselves in similar outfits and poses, as they were when they were kids. They created a Christmas calendar with the pictures and sent it to their mother as a gift.

Girls Got Stuck

Posted: 09 Jan 2014 09:01 AM PST

It's not girls gone wild whatever. Real girls, real life.

rubodjrmx: "Bobobo - Capitulo 70 - Castellano - Español" and more videos

Mihai, check out the latest videos from your channel subscriptions for Jan 9, 2014. Play all »

Bobobo - Capitulo 70 - Castellano - Español

by rubodjrmx

Assassin's Creed 4 Black Flag: Freedom Cry PC Gameplay Walkthrough ...

+ 4 videos by gamer4ever

Drowsy Sleepy People - Best of Just for Laughs Gags

+ 3 videos by Just For Laughs Gags

African Divas - South Africa - Zahara - Phendula

+ 2 videos by Seka Moke

Someone Special Valentines Day Candy Bar featuring Stampin Up

by stampwithtami.com - Crafting and Card Making from Tami White

С НОВЫМ ГОДОМ :3

+ 1 video by PozzitifonShow

video

Оккупай-гриферяй 2 СЕЗОН

PLAYLIST by PozzitifonShow

High Paid Jobs - Work From Home DMT Video

by John Jones

Introducing Auth Faith- Have Faith Ep.1 | By Auth Flame

by run by admire now.

Partnering With Local Communities: The First Five "Promise Zones"

Featured

Partnering With Local Communities: The First Five "Promise Zones"

Today, President Obama will announce five "Promise Zones" -- partnerships with local communities to work to create jobs, increase economic security, expand educational opportunities, increase access to quality, affordable housing and improve public safety.

These five communities -- in San Antonio, Philadelphia, Los Angeles, Southeastern Kentucky, and the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma -- have committed to use existing resources on proven strategies, and make new investments that reward hard work. Because as the President noted, in a country as great as this one, a child’s zip code should never determine their opportunity.

Learn more about these Promise Zones -- and tune in today at 2:20 p.m. ET.

A student hugs President Barack Obama as he greets students following his second annual Back-to-School Speech at Julia R. Masterman Laboratory and Demonstration School in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania September 14, 2010. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

Google's December Authorship Shake-up

Posted: 08 Jan 2014 03:05 PM PST

Posted by Dr-Pete

Back in mid-December, the newly launched MozCast Feature Graph showed a significant short-term drop in the number of tracked searches displaying authorship mark-up. Here's a 30-day view of the data (from November 22, 2013 to December 21):

The graph shows the percentage of queries that displayed authorship mark-up (to any degree) on page 1 of Google (note: the Y-axis has been constrained to the range of the data). This data ranges from a peak of 23.71% on Nov. 24 to a low of 20.03% on Dec. 19, a relative drop of 15.5%.

Was it foretold at Pubcon?

If you follow the search industry closely, that 15% may sound familiar. Back in October, Matt Cutts took the stage at Pubcon and suggested that a 10-15% reduction in authorship seemed to improve search quality. Many took this as a sign that Google had reduced the amount of authorship mark-up appearing in SERPs or would reduce it soon.

The graph above is a bit cherry-picked, in terms of the timeframe. So, let's expand it to 60 days, including Matt's announcement at Pubcon (which happened on Oct. 23):

Interestingly, authorship actually climbed a bit after Matt's announcement, before eventually dropping. There was a 9.6% relative drop from Oct. 23 to Dec. 19. These numbers all line up pretty well with Matt's predicted 10-15% range, and he confirmed around Dec. 19 that the authorship change had rolled out. Since Dec. 19, authorship presence in our data set has ranged from 19.8% to 20.3%. There has been no substantial recovery.

Did authorship counts drop?

When you think about a reduction in authorship, there are actually two very different possible interpretations. You could see what the graphs above show â€" that, overall, less searches displayed authorship mark-up. These graphs only indicate whether queries had authorship mark-up or didn't, in all-or-none fashion.

The other possible interpretation is that, within the searches that displayed authorship mark-up, fewer results would get that mark-up. So, let's compare the peak date of Nov. 24 to the 60-day low of Dec. 19. The following table breaks down the searches with authorship by the count of results that displayed authorship mark-up (as a percentage of the total searches with authorship):

The vast majority of SERPs, before and after the shake-up, displayed one result with authorship mark-up. There aren't really any major differences until you get down to 5/page, and at that point the number of data points is so small that it's difficult to say the difference is meaningful. The mean number of results displaying authorship mark-up on Nov. 24 was 1.326, which fell slightly to 1.305 on Dec. 19.

There was a slight shift toward searches where only one result showed mark-up, but the general proportions remained roughly the same in our data set. If you're curious, the query that broke the 10/10 mark was "best android phones" (although I'm currently only seeing 8 results with mark-up for that search).

Which searches lost mark-up?

Between Nov. 23 and Dec. 19, 628 searches lost authorship mark-up in our data set. For reference, here's a set of 20 relatively high-volume queries from that list of 628:

vpn
bruce springsteen
tractor supply
nectar
astrology
fisher price
pilates
gadgets
linksys
ie8
acne
hernia
multiple sclerosis
malaria
copd
crohn's disease
tattoo designs
command and conquer
web design
fashion bug

It can be tempting to dive right in and try to find some patterns, but here's where things start to get tricky. If you do the math, you may notice that the drop in percentages only suggests about 370 searches losing authorship mark-up. So, how did we end up with a list of 628 keywords? It turns out that 260 keywords actually gained authorship mark-up during the same period. So, while there was a significant net loss, there were both winners and losers.

It's also worth noting that many of these queries have a news component and probably a QDF (Query Deserves Freshness) aspect to them, so the day-to-day presence of authorship mark-up can vary with the actual results returned. This calculation is almost certainly done in real-time and can be highly dynamic. Google doesn't have a list of domains that either get authorship mark-up or don't â€" they're making a decision on the fly based on the interaction of the query, page, and domain.

What can you do about it?

It's important to realize that, while losing authorship mark-up for some of your search terms may be upsetting, this is not a penalty in the traditional sense. Google has lowered the volume, so to speak â€" they seem to feel that authorship was too prominent and that the quality bar may have been set a little too low.

So, if you lost mark-up, does that mean your site is necessarily low quality? No, at least not in the sense you or I understand the word. It's more likely that Google was awarding authorship mark-up simply based on on-page tags or superficial factors and wasn't looking at how those factors were supported by other ranking signals. So, you may need a bit more corroborating evidence (a solid link profile, social mentions, etc.) to get your authorship to be recognized.

Ultimately, authorship mark-up is a nice-to-have, but don't bet the farm on it. Google+ is only 2-1/2 years old, and Google is just beginning to understand how to measure authorship and individual authority (what some people call "AuthorRank", although that implies a specific metric that may or may not exist yet). Improving your individual authority and building your social profiles makes sense for many reasons, but getting hung up on the micro-details of authorship mark-up and watching it appear and disappear day-by-day is probably only going to drive you crazy.

Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don't have time to hunt down but want to read!

Seth's Blog : How much does it cost you to avoid the feeling of risk?

How much does it cost you to avoid the feeling of risk?

Not actual risk, but the feeling that you're at risk?

How many experiences are you missing out on because the (very unlikely) downsides are too frightening to contemplate?

Are you avoiding leading, connecting or creating because to do so feels risky?

Feeling risk is very different than actually putting yourself at risk. Over time, we've created a cultural taboo about feeling certain kinds of risk, and all that insulation from what the real world requires is getting quite expensive.

It's easy to pretend that indulging in the avoidance of the feeling of risk is free and unavoidable. It's neither.