|
Facebook 
Twitter | More Ways to Engage
joi, 23 ianuarie 2014
The President's Chief Speechwriter Took Over Our Instagram
Make Facebook's Algorithm Change Work For You, Not Against You
Make Facebook's Algorithm Change Work For You, Not Against You |
| Make Facebook's Algorithm Change Work For You, Not Against You Posted: 22 Jan 2014 03:16 PM PST Posted by Chad Wittman - Founder @EdgeRank Checker This post was originally in YouMoz, and was promoted to the main blog because it provides great value and interest to our community. The author's views are entirely his or her own and may not reflect the views of Moz, Inc. Recently, many Facebook page admins have experienced a significant decrease in Total Reachâ€"specifically, organic reach. For pages that want to keep their ad budget as low as possible, maximizing organic reach is vital. To best understand how to make a change like this work for you, and not against you, we need to examine what happenedâ€"and what you can do about it. We analyze and monitor this type of data for thousands of pages with a tool called EdgeRank Checker. By monitoring metrics such as reach and engagement over time, we can get a better understanding of how to advise companies to continue to optimize their strategy. We've collected this data over the past few months against roughly 1,000 anonymous Facebook pages. What happened?Facebook page admins most often run into two metrics: reach and engagement. Facebook presents this data when viewing your posts by showing the number of likes, comments, and shares, along with how many people saw the post. What does "1,000 people saw this post" actually mean, though? Facebook adds up everyone who saw the post, whether you paid for people to see it, people shared it with their friends, or Facebook gave you free distribution in the news feed. The people who saw it for free combine with the people who shared it to create "organic reach." When people see your post because you paid for additional exposure, they call it "paid reach."
On December 2, 2013, Facebook announced that they would be placing an emphasis on links while continuing to punish meme content in the news feed. Around this time, we noticed a significant drop in organic reach for many pages. Page admins around the world were reporting a drastic drop in their organic reach. Not all pages were severely impacted by the change, but the majority seemed to be impacted negatively. We've seen changes like this in the past. In fact, every time we've ever studied organic reach (we've been monitoring it closely for ~three years) we've found it has decreased over time. The reason being that the past three years have seen steady growth from Facebook, which means increased competition to get into the news feed. During this time, Facebook has continued to improve its news feed algorithm to focus on quality contentâ€"raising the bar for any page on the platform. Examining the numbersIn the graph below, the first bar represents September 2012 (for a reference point), while the rest of the bars represent months within 2013. Over a year ago, organic reach fared much better than it does today. In the past few months, we've seen a decrease from 12.6% to 7.7%. We specifically examined the 28 days before and after December 2nd: When changes like this have occurred in the past, Facebook has tended to defend its news feed changes by attempting to keep engagement rates roughly equal. How did engagement data fare? In general, engagement levels for pages fluctuated within normal variations. In some cases, engagement actually increased. From Facebook's perspective, this is a good change for their news feed; it provides a better experience for the typical Facebook user, as they are seeing less of the stuff they don't want to engage with. How did different content types fare?All of the content types experienced decreases over the time period analyzed. Status updates continue to outperform videos, photos, and links for organic reach. Status updates have held strongly over the past year as the top-performing content type for organic reach. A look at individual pagesNot all pages were impacted the same. We saw some pages experience drastic decreases, while others were positively impacted by the change. We examined a few of these pages to dig deeper into theories on why they may have been impacted so extremely. Some pages experienced significant, and abrupt, decreases in reach: The page above experienced a significant decrease closer towards December 5th. After the change, not a single post experienced more than 15% organic reach (compared to their previous average around 25%). This page posted mostly status updates and often asked for engagement. Take a look at their status updates when asking for engagement: In the graph above, you can see a clear and abrupt change around December 6th. However, other pages experienced significant improvement: The page above experienced an increase after the change (we found a few of these). This page exclusively posted photos over this time period and did not regularly ask for engagement. Let's take a look at their photo posts: Around December 8th, this page experienced an increased average in organic reach. It benefited from the change. After that point, this page did not have as many low-reaching posts, and had many more high-reaching posts (note: our system maxed them out at 100% impressions / fan). What did these pages do differently?
Interestingly, Facebook did specifically reiterate that they would be focusing on "high quality content" that isn't often using drastic calls to action to attract engagement. This may be the reason behind the difference in organic reach. In an informal poll of Facebook admins, a vast majority of respondents self-reported drastic decreases. Sprinkled throughout the responses were some admins who were able to reduce the impact of the change (or even improve it). In our data, we found ~80% pages experienced a decrease over the time period. 7 tips to gain reach instead of losing itThe pages that were least impacted by the changes tended to focus on avoiding meme content, as well as avoiding frequent use of calls to action. Facebook is attempting to decrease these types of tactics in the news feed. Pages that have heavily used these tactics in the past may be more severely punished. Facebook has said (and always maintained) that it is ideal to structure your content in the most logical way. Stories that include links should be posted as links. Many page admins like to include links within the descriptions of photos, however this is against Facebook's general wishes. We always suggest to deliver your content in the best way for your audience to actually consume it.
How was this data studied?We examined ~100,000 posts over 11/4 -12/30 from approximately 1,000 pages. For any general metrics we averaged each page's metrics and looked at the median of all the pages when examining aggregate data. Any "per-fan" data examined the metric divided by the number of fans for that page on the the day of posting. Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don't have time to hunt down but want to read! |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Moz Blog To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |
PozzitifonShow: "Первый взгляд на игру PrimeWorld" and more videos
|
Seth's Blog : Copyediting, line editing and the other kind
Copyediting, line editing and the other kind
The copyeditor will fix a misstated fact, spot a typo and get your prose clean.
The line editor will rearrange a paragraph and help you organize a thought more clearly.
And the editor who is your partner will tell you that the chapters are in the wrong order, that you must delete a third of what you wrote, or perhaps consider writing for TV instead. This kind of editor is the one who will tell you your time is better spent doing something else entirely.
It's easier (but not easy) to find a good copyeditor than it is to find someone generous and brave enough to help you figure out your strategy, whether you're working on a book, a career or the structure of your next project.
The copyeditor can tell you that you mangled a few facts early in your presentation. The line editor will help you untangle a complicated story near the middle. And your strategic editor will help you see that a one-on-one meeting would have been better than a presentation in the first place.
Sure, fix my typos, thanks a lot, but what's truly precious is someone able to fix your plan.
Worth noting that most critics and journalists are comfortable being metaphorical copy editors, but it's rare you find someone who speaks up with sensible thoughts about your strategy.
Treasure the folks willing and able to develop a point of view about the big picture.
More Recent Articles
- The answer to, "is that the best you can do..."
- Who has a seat at the table?
- The index and the menu
- The humility of the artist
- "Bring us your problems"
[You're getting this note because you subscribed to Seth Godin's blog.]
Don't want to get this email anymore? Click the link below to unsubscribe.
| Your email subscriptions, powered by FeedBlitz, LLC, 9 Thoreau Way, Sudbury, MA 01776, USA. +1.978.776.9498 |
Postări
