luni, 20 aprilie 2015

Damn Cool Pics

Damn Cool Pics


Meet Rosie Mac The Body Double For Daenerys On Game Of Thrones

Posted: 20 Apr 2015 03:13 PM PDT

Emilia Clarke is famous for playing Daenerys on "Game of Thrones" but she couldn't have done it in season 5 without a little help from model Rosie Mac. Rosie played Emilia's stunt double but she also happens to have a lot of fans herself and it's not hard to see why.




















Childhood Pictures Of Famous Celebrities From Back In The Day

Posted: 20 Apr 2015 02:49 PM PDT

These world famous celebrities look very different today but these pictures are just proof that big things come from humble beginnings.

Marilyn Monroe, 19. [1945]



Cher, 13. [1959]



Teddy Roosevelt, 18. [1876]



Barack Obama, 4, riding a tricycle. [1965]



Bryan Cranston, 14, with his dog Lady. [1970]



Fidel Castro, 17, playing basketball at High School. [1943]



Muhammad Ali, then Cassius Clay, 12. [1954]



George Clooney, 7, would grow up to look exactly like his dad. [1968]



The Notorious B.I.G., 6. [1978]



John Wayne, 19. [1926]



Tiger Woods, 14, playing Zelda. [1989]



Frank Sinatra, 10, looking as suave as you would expect. [1925]



Paul McCartney, 8, with his father on a day trip. [1950]



Stevie Wonder, 13, messing around with Muhammad Ali, 21. [1963]



Robin Williams, 18, as a senior at Redwood High School. [1969]



Audrey Hepburn, 13. [1942]



Paul Newman, 18, having his mugshot taken while joining the Navy. [1943]



Andre the Giant, 19, during a Paris Fashion Show. [1966]



Ben Stiller, 13, on a trip to New York with his father Jerry. [1978]



Andy Warhol, 8. [1936]



Tommy Lee Jones, 19. [1965]



Winston Churchill, 14, in his school uniform. [1889]



Dwayne Johnson, 15. [1987]



Kurt Cobain, 19. [1986]



Robert De Niro, 7. [1950]



Stephen Hawking, 12. [1954]



Bill Clinton, 12, with his saxophone. [1958]



John Lennon, 17, with his then-girlfriend and future wife Cynthia. [1957]

Nonsmoking Room vs Smoking Room

Posted: 20 Apr 2015 10:58 AM PDT

Smoking room at Washington Dulles International Airport in Virginia. See the stark contrast between the ceilings in the nonsmoking room and smoking room.























Your website on Google (ranking changes)

View Web Version | Unsubscribe from this list


Better rankings lead to more customers!

Your website can have much better Google rankings:
Try this new tool and see what you've been missing out on:

Try this before your competitors do.


splogo

Get top rankings on Google
SEOprofiler is the proven solution that helps you to get your website on top of Google's search results. You get tools for link building, keywords, social media, website analytics ( + a lot more).

splogo

Track your results
Find the keywords that deliver the best results. SEOprofiler offers ranking checks on city level. See how your website is ranked for your keywords on Google, Bing and Yahoo in 68 countries and in particular cities. Integrates with Google Analytics.

splogo

Impress your boss and your clients
Create beautiful reports in your company design for your boss and your clients. Fully customizable with your own logo, colors, etc.

splogo

Remove bad links, monitor social media mentions
Find harmful links that point to your website and eliminate bad links. Monitor social networks for mentions of your company.

splogo

Trusted by 50,000 companies
More than 50,000 businesses use SEOprofiler to get high rankings on Google. If you haven't tested SEOprofiler yet, create a free trial account or order the full version risk-free.

SEOprofiler will help you to get much better results. Try it now risk-free and see for yourself. Benefit from SEOprofiler before your competitors do.

You receive this email since you have used our services at http://www.submitstart.com/

View Web Version | Unsubscribe from this list

Google Told Me I'm Pregnant: From Strings to Diagnosis - Moz Blog


Google Told Me I'm Pregnant: From Strings to Diagnosis

Posted on: Monday 20 April 2015 — 02:15

Posted by CraigBradford

pregnancy diagnosis google

In the near future, I think Google Now could tell you are pregnant or diagnose you with a medical condition before your doctor ever could. Humans are great at recognising patterns but only if we know we are creating them or where to look. Remember the Target story of how they knew a young girl was pregnant before she or her father did? Increases in technology like smart watches and the trend of "the quantified self" mean messages like being told you are pregnant aren't impossible in the near future. So how do we go from weather reports and traffic updates to a medical diagnosis?

Strings-to-things, things-to-actions

When Google, Yahoo and Bing announced Schema.org in 2011, search engines were still in the strings-to-things phase. In my opinion, Google, in particular, are already moving on from that goal. The most recent addition to the Schema.org vocabulary is actions. See, the Schema site for more details or my SMX Munich deck for more details. 

In my presentation, I made the point that the future of structured data isn't about understanding what a thing is, it's about understanding what a thing can do. If search engines can understand what your website, app or other interfaces can do, and they can understand user intent, they can match queries to the best place to do that action. How does Google know what we want to do?

Actions-to-anticipation

Many people have said that Google wants to become the ultimate personal assistant. Things like Google Now and conversational search reinforce this standpoint. However, a prerequisite for that position is the concept of time. For a computerised personal assistant to be truly as useful as the real thing, they need to be aware of the past, the present and more importantly the future. 

Historically, Google and other search engines have dealt with things from the past. Webpages by their nature are in the past, or at best, live. This makes the anticipation and initiative that you would expect from great personal assistant difficult for Google. They have very little data to predict what you might want to do or are going to do in the future. Gmail and Google calendar are the two most obvious ones that come to mind (if you use them). 

Forgetting privacy or intellectual property for a second, imagine Google had access to every app on your phone and the data within it. What might they be able to know about you?

app array for phone

Just the apps above could give Google access to:

  • What music I've listened to in the past
  • What movies I've watched
  • What I've been eating and drinking recently
  • How much exercise I do
  • What articles I might read in the near future
  • Flights I have booked
  • Houses I might want to buy

Google Now - An IFTTT for your life

While I was in Munich, I saw an announcement that Google had opened the Google Now API to a selection of hand-picked, third-party apps.

This got me thinking. I do not know what the relationship will be or what data Google would have access to but one of the apps that have been accepted to work with Google Now is Lyft. The example Google gave in the article was a generic prompt to order a cab. For example, you arrive at an airport and Google Now might push you a notification to get a cab:

reactive push notification

Some more examples

personalized recommendations from apps

See more examples here.

While the Lyft example above is interesting, it made me realise that allowing apps to talk to each other via Google Now would essentially turn your smartphone into an IFTTT for your life. So rather than a generic Lyft alert, what if they combined a few apps? They could use my British Airways app to see I have an upcoming flight, Google maps to know when I've arrived in Munich, and my Gmail account to see where I am staying. There are probably specific hotel apps they could use too. Using this, rather than getting a generic get a car card, I get one that's already personalised the quote to where I'm going.

ifttt for your life with apps

Anticipation to diagnosis

The ultimate personal assistant would not only tell us what we expect, they would tell us things we never thought to consider. This would only be made possible by advanced pattern recognition, anticipation, and initiative beyond the possibility of a human. 

What patterns do you already create but don't currently correlate? If you feel sluggish or tired on a Thursday, we do not necessarily correlate that to something that you may be allergic to that you ate on Monday. Many people spend years with conditions such as gluten or lactose intolerance but never make the connection between what they eat and how they feel. Humans cannot easily track and analyse lots of data like that, computers can. 

So how can Google tell you are pregnant? I am not a doctor but I suspect like the Target example, there may be early signs of pregnancy that we do not think about at the moment (biological or otherwise). For a start, there could be a process of first increasing the priority that a particular pattern receives. For example, there may be lots of small things that people change before trying to get pregnant. If you're using a lot of different apps combined with hardware like heart rate monitors and blood pressure monitors, it wouldn't be too difficult for Google to take an educated guess. Just using the information in the Target article we know people do things like:

  • Change their diet - This would be easy to see through apps like MyFitnessPal
  • Change their buying habits - Amazon app or other store apps
  • They may do more exercise - Several places they could get this

After all of the above, let's not forget Google knows everything you've searched for online and your browsing history if you use Chrome. I do not think it would take much to guess someone is thinking about having a family based on his or her search history alone. 

Let's assume that based on the above, Google lowers the "pregnancy card" trigger threshold. This means they look closer at changes that might suggest your pregnant. I am not a doctor, so bear with me while I think out loud. Other than urine or blood samples, what other quantitative data is there that you might be pregnant? 

For context, I recently learned that eating something that you have an intolerance to can show an elevated heart rate for two hours after eating. One test to check for allergies is to track your heart rate throughout the day. This was where this idea came from in the first place. Using a smartwatch with a heart rate monitor, plus My Fitness Pal, Google could make suggestions that you are allergic to foods you never thought of due to recognising patterns in elevated heart rate after your meals. This made me wonder what else could be possible. There's a ton of tech for tracking:

Could Google make a guess from this data alone? I cannot stress enough about my lack of medical qualifications, but I wonder if pregnancy impacts things like REM and deep sleep changes, significant blood pressure or heart rate changes at certain times of the day. Who knows, and maybe one of these things alone wouldn't be enough to know for sure, but combined, I think it will not be long before pregnancy prediction or similar could be done.

Enough about pregnancy, (Google probably thinks I am looking to start a family) what else? What things using heart rate alone could Google diagnose or push to us in Google Now? Could they push notifications to people who are diabetic to remember to take insulin? Could they diagnose diabetes? Could they flag heart problems before it is too late? I have no idea, but I'm excited to see where things go in the next few years.


Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don't have time to hunt down but want to read!

You are subscribed to the newsletter of Moz Blog sent from 1100 Second Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101 United States
To stop receiving those e-mails, you can unsubscribe now.
Newsletter powered by FeedPress
FeedPress is a service edited by Beta&Cie, www.betacie.com

Seth's Blog : The difference between mass and banality

The difference between mass and banality

Something doesn't have to be trite and dreadful to be popular, but often, popular things get this way.

In the 1980s, most of the cars made by General Motors were mediocre, unmemorable and poorly designed. They were also quite popular. By racing to the bottom, GM defended market share but ended up crippling themselves for generations.

Hot Wheels, Spaldinis and the original Monopoly game are classic toys, Platonic ideals of good design and idiosyncratic thought. On the other hand, the hyped toys of the moment fade away fast, because they're designed to shortcut straight to the lowest common denominator of the moment, not to earn their way up the ladder of mass.

Just because bad design and popularity sometimes go hand in hand doesn't mean they're inextricably linked.

The culture of compromise is often accepted as the price of mass. But in fact, this is the crowded road to popular acceptance, and it works far less often than the compromisers believe it will.

       

More Recent Articles

[You're getting this note because you subscribed to Seth Godin's blog.]

Don't want to get this email anymore? Click the link below to unsubscribe.



Email subscriptions powered by FeedBlitz, LLC, 365 Boston Post Rd, Suite 123, Sudbury, MA 01776, USA.