marți, 8 decembrie 2015

Seth's Blog : Full speed, then stop, gracefully



Full speed, then stop, gracefully

Quitting slowly doesn't serve you well.

At work or in anything else you do, people will remember how you ended things. All in, then out is the responsible way to participate and to end that participation. Too often, we seduce ourselves into gradually backing off, in removing ourselves emotionally and organizationally, as if making ourselves unuseful for a while makes it easier for everyone.

Professionals bring their A game to work. Every time. (Rare sports analogy: this is how good hockey players skate. Full speed, then stop.)

Of course you will need to close things down, quit your job, move on someday. The responsible way to do that, though, is not to act things out while you agonize over a decision. Decide, give notice, make the transition work.

Dropbox fell into the gradual trap with the Mailbox app they published for the Mac. They didn't support it well for nearly a year, and the last iteration of it broke many of its features. It's as if they wanted people to quietly disappear so they would have an easier time shutting it down.

If you want people to believe your promises tomorrow, it helps if you kept them yesterday.

       

More Recent Articles

[You're getting this note because you subscribed to Seth Godin's blog.]

Don't want to get this email anymore? Click the link below to unsubscribe.



Email subscriptions powered by FeedBlitz, LLC, 365 Boston Post Rd, Suite 123, Sudbury, MA 01776, USA.

luni, 7 decembrie 2015

Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis

Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis


Bernanke's "Helicopter Drop" Hits Finland; Prime Minister and 70% of Finnish Support "Free Money"; Dauphin Canada Revisited

Posted: 07 Dec 2015 07:31 PM PST

Bernanke's Helicopter Drop Reality

Contrary to widespread popular belief, with special "thanks" to former Fed chair Ben Bernanke, central banks cannot hand out a "helicopter drop" of "free money".

What central banks do is cheapen the price of money by lowering interest rates to absurd levels, hoping that it will spur bank lending.

Actual results speak for themselves. Central banks have created a series of asset bubbles, one right after the other, with increasing amplitude.

Free Money from Governments

In contrast to central bank methods, governments can and do hand out "free money".

In the US, food stamps (now called SNAP), subsidized housing, earned income credit, disability payouts, and various subsidies such as Medicaid all constitute "free money".

True "Helicopter Drop" Hits Finland

Finland is about to take the "free money" approach to a true "helicopter drop" level.

Please consider Finland Government Officials Propose to Give Tax-Free Payout of $870 to Every Citizen Each Month.
As a way to improve living standards and boosts its economy, the nation of Finland is moving closer towards offering all of its adult citizens a basic permanent income of approximately 800 euros per month.

The monthly allotment would replace other existing social benefits, but is an idea long advocated for by progressive-minded social scientists and economists as a solution—counter-intuitive as it may first appear at first—that actually decreases government expenditures while boosting both productivity, quality of life, and unemployment.

"For me, a basic income means simplifying the social security system," Finland's Prime Minister Juha Sipilä said last week.

Though it would not be implemented until later in 2016, recent polling shows that nearly 70 percent of the Finnish people support the idea.

According to Bloomberg, the basic income proposal, put forth by the Finnish Social Insurance Institution, known as KELA, would see every adult citizen "receive 800 euros ($876) a month, tax free, that would replace existing benefits. Full implementation would be preceded by a pilot stage, during which the basic income payout would be 550 euros and some benefits would remain."
Pilot Stage - Dauphin, Canada

The article cites a ridiculous scheme tried in Dauphin, Canada from 1974 through 1979.

Huffington Post author Zi-Ann Lum proclaims A Canadian City Once Eliminated Poverty And Nearly Everyone Forgot About It.

Read the ridiculous hype and see if you can spot the obvious flaws. Ready?

The problem with superficial analysis by Lum and others is they only focus on half the equation. Yes, citizens of Dauphin benefited, but it was at the direct expense of everyone in all of Manitoba that had to contribute "free money" to residents of Dauphin.

Were the same scheme available to everyone in Manitoba, the money would have had to come from all of Canada.

And for all Canadians, the money would have had to come from Martians.

Nonetheless, in spite of such obvious flaws, economic illiterates have latched on to the free money scheme.

Why Stop at $876?

None of the free money jackasses have bothered to figure out that government programs always cost more and always deliver less than promised. The only reason Dauphin appears to be different is the city was small enough and the program was stopped before a cascade effect kicked in.

In short, such schemes may appear to work for an isolated locality (at the expense of everyone else), but the program cannot feasibly scale to an entire nation.

More, More, More

If this inane proposal gets off the ground, $876 a month ($10,512 a year) will no longer be a living wage (foolishly assuming that it is a living wage in the first places). Every month, the citizens will demand more, and more, and more.

I can hear the cries across the Atlantic ocean already. "It's NOT enough!"

Hyperinflation Events

Government sponsored economic proposals of this kind are precisely what is behind hyperinflation events.

In Finland's case, thanks to being a part of the eurozone, Finland cannot print money. That is the only possible salvation to this preposterous idea. The trial will necessarily implode before it causes damage to the entire eurozone.

Bear in mind that as with Dauphin, Canada, such schemes can appear to work for a while.

However, simple logic and 6th grade math is all one needs to understand the sheer Ponzi-like idiocy of the idea over the long haul.

Mike "Mish" Shedlock

"Various Paths" of UK Subservience to Full EU Integration; Cameron's Brexit Appeasement Bluff

Posted: 07 Dec 2015 03:18 PM PST

Much like a six-year old kid on a playground lot, UK prime minister David Cameron promised to take his marbles away, if he did not get the steelie he wanted.

On December 4, the Telegraph reported the bluff this way: David Cameron May Campaign for Brexit, Allies Say.
David Cameron has privately conceded he will have to campaign to leave the European Union if he continues to be "completely ignored" by Brussels, the Daily Telegraph has learned.

The Prime Minister has made clear to his closest allies that he will lead the "Out" campaign if he considers the result of his renegotiation with Brussels to be unsuccessful.
Definition of "Unsuccessful"

Of course, for Cameron to actually recommend Brexit, all depends on the definition of "unsuccessful". His past actions indicate a high threshold for giving as much as it takes to get a deal done.

On December 3, and as a prelude to what I perceive as a Brexit bluff, the Financial Times reported EU Leaders Balk at New Treaty Demands from Cameron.
One EU diplomat privy to the conversation claims that on Sunday, when Mr Cameron told Mark Rutte, the Dutch prime minister and close ally, of his revised treaty change strategy, Mr Rutte replied: "You cannot be serious, you cannot be serious, you cannot be serious."
It turns out Cameron was indeed "not serious" on his demands.

If Cameron has to give more than British citizens will allow or less than EU leaders expect, then Cameron inevitably plays the "delay card".

And so it was. When EU leaders would have no part of plan to limit British welfare payments to migrant workers, Cameron did the only think he could do: punt.

Cameron Punts on Deal

On the same day, to the relief of the Brussels nannycrats, Cameron Gave Up on 2016 Deal With EU.
At a series of meetings this week the British prime minister told EU leaders he had "changed his mind" and now needed immediate treaty revisions enshrining a four-year benefit ban if he was to campaign to keep Britain in the EU.

But his push for a December deal was abandoned on Thursday during a call with Angela Merkel, the German chancellor. Downing Street said "difficult issues" remained and that it was unrealistic to think they could all be settled before the meeting on December 17-18.

The prime minister is now focused on concluding a deal at a second summit in mid-February, leaving open the possibility of a British referendum in June.

His decision to ease the tempo was greeted with relief in European capitals.
The above set of maneuvering is what led to the above December 4 Telegraph headline "David Cameron May Campaign for Brexit".

Unbelievable Grandstanding

Cameron's Brexit threat reeked so much of unbelievable grandstanding of a purposely manufactured crisis, I did not even comment on it at the time.

Today, the EU is back in action as Tusk Urges Flexibility on Cameron's Welfare Demand.
EU leaders must urgently overcome differences on David Cameron's "difficult" migration demands and set the direction for a compromise deal as quickly as possible, the official brokering Britain's EU reform deal has said.

Donald Tusk, president of the European Council, is teeing up December's summit of EU leaders as a pivotal debate on Britain's "most delicate" request: a four-year ban on benefits for new migrant workers that has divided the union.

In a letter to EU leaders, Mr Tusk described "good progress" made in most areas of the UK package of demands. When it came to British demands on sovereignty, competitiveness and safeguarding the rights of non-eurozone countries in the single market, he said a deal looked within reach in time for a second summit next February.

[Mish Comment: Progress was made because Cameron accepted a bunch of unwritten promises and wishy-washy statements instead of iron-clad treaty changes.]

"I will act as an honest broker but all member states and the [EU] institutions must show readiness for compromise for this process to succeed," Mr Tusk wrote.

Downing Street welcomed Mr Tusk's "ambition to table concrete proposals in February" and said his letter marked "another step forward in the negotiation".

EU diplomats involved in the process say Mr Cameron's position has hardened in recent weeks, with the prime minister pressing for fast-tracked treaty change on benefits rather than accepting a Brussels-brokered compromise that would require substantial reforms to the British welfare system.

This is setting the stage for a clash with eastern European leaders, who have warned they will oppose anything that is discriminatory against EU citizens doing the same job as a British worker. Countries such as Poland, Lithuania and the Czech Republic have urged Mr Cameron to reform the generous UK tax credits system, rather than change EU treaty rules and thus condone discrimination.

Mr Tusk is more positive — albeit in general terms — about the other areas of the UK reform agenda. He notes the final deal will aim to lay down principles to avoid discrimination against non-euro countries, mentioning work on a brake mechanism that would allow countries "to raise concerns, and have them heard, if they feel that these principles are not being followed, without this turning into a veto right".

[Mish Comment: That is precisely what I was talking about above. Cameron accepted a mechanism to allow the UK to "raise concerns". And of course those concerns will be promptly ignored if not laughed at. The UK needs treaty changes not a mechanism to "voice concerns". ]

Addressing Mr Cameron's separate demand that Britain be excluded from the EU's mantra of "ever-closer union", Mr Tusk diplomatically noted that the treaties already allowed for "various paths of integration".

This indicates EU leaders are willing to give Mr Cameron support on this issue, but may squabble over the final wording when the precise texts and legal documents are circulated next year. 
"Various Paths" of UK Subservience to Full EU Integration

It should be perfectly clear precisely what's going on here. Cameron purposely started a fistfight by threatening to take away his marbles. But that was all for show. When push comes to shove, he will accept nothing less than full EU integration.

Matthew Elliott, chief executive of Vote Leave, sees things exactly the same way.

"David Cameron is only asking for trivial things, not the 'fundamental change' he used to say we need. That is why he is now having a manufactured row with the EU to try and make his renegotiation sound more significant than it really is," Elliott correctly commented.

Various Paths Defined

There is a roughly zero percent chance Cameron gets what he says he campaigned for. It will be interesting to see what kind of meaningless phraseology he finally settles for.

Here are the two paths to full subservience.

  1. Fast
  2. Slow

Something will have to blow up really big for Cameron to actually campaign for Brexit. That's possible, just unlikely.

Mike "Mish" Shedlock

Energy Price Deflation: Crude Dips 6% to 7-Year Low; Gasoline Below $1.50; Central Banks to Blame for What's About to Happen

Posted: 07 Dec 2015 11:31 AM PST

Perverse Central Bank Battle

In the perverse central bank battle to defeat price deflation, the central banks are having a rough go of things.

The price of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) light sweet crude is down 6 percent today to lows last seen late 2008 and January 2009.

West Texas Crude Monthly



There has not been a WTI monthly close lower than $38.69 since May of 2004 when it closed at $37.04. A chart of Brent crude looks similar.

Brent Crude Monthly



Saudi Arabia Throws Down Challenge

Last week, oil producers met. Some member states sought production cuts. Saudi Arabia responded with an Output Cut Challenge

Saudi Arabia agreed to output cuts if rivals inside and outside the OPEC cartel agreed to cuts. This was a change in tone from Saudi Arabia, but no agreement was reached.

At an informal meeting ahead of last Friday's official meeting, Russia and Iran Rejected the Saudi Proposal.
Saudi Arabia has long insisted it would cut production only if fellow OPEC members and non-OPEC countries joined in. The report quoted a senior OPEC delegate as saying the Saudis would agree to cuts if Iraq freezes production rises and Iran and non-members such as Russia, Mexico, Oman and Kazakhstan contribute.

But Russia and OPEC members Iran and Iraq quickly rejected the idea. OPEC and non-OPEC producers have not cooperated to tackle low oil prices since they joined forces 15 years ago to help the market recover from the 1998 financial crisis.

"We do not accept any discussion about increases of Iran production after the lifting of sanctions. It is our right and anyone cannot limit us to do it. We will not accept anything in this regard," Iranian oil minister Bijan Zangeneh told reporters in Vienna before the informal meeting.
Oil Price Deflation Factors

  • Increased supply, especially in the US
  • Falling global demand, especially in China

Gas Prices Below $1.50

Gas prices are a function of oil prices, state gasoline taxes, and proximity to refineries. As of November 30, Gas Prices Fell Below $1.50 at some stations.
The price of a gallon of regular now stands at $2.04 nationally, down 14¢ compared to one month ago and 74¢ lower than this time last year. In early 2015, the national average dropped near the $2 mark but never crossed it. But AAA and others anticipate that we'll dip below the $2 threshold within a matter of days.

Many gas stations are already well below that watermark. "Nearly two-thirds of the nation's 130,000 gas stations now are selling that gasoline for under $2/gallon, a remarkable change from a year ago, when 0% of stations were under $2," GasBuddy reported this week.

In some extraordinary cases, the price of a gallon of regular is much lower than that—like under $1.50. Several gas stations in parts of Texas are posting prices of $1.40 to $1.45 per gallon, according to GasBuddy. CNN reported on Monday that the nation's cheapest gas is being pumped out of a Sam's Club gas station in Lafayette, Indiana, where a gallon of regular costs an astonishingly cheap $1.39.
US Rigs Down 60%, Production Down 3%

In the US, despite the fact that oil cannot be economically produced at prices under $50 per barrel, production has dropped off only a small amount.

For details please see Oil Patch Problems: Rigs Down 60%, Production Down 3%, $40-$50 Price Doesn't Work.

Central Banks to Blame

Central bankers brought this mess upon themselves. By cheapening interest rates, financing of rigs became too easy. With expectations oil prices would stay high, rig counts soared. Now the energy sector is in a mess.

And it's not just the energy sector that's a mess. Central bank actions lifted asset prices globally. Home prices there were affordable in 2009 no longer are affordable. Millennials cannot afford houses so they hold off on family formation.

Population Deflation

As a direct result of central bank actions, we see self-reinforcing population deflation coupled with asset price inflation. It's especially pronounced in Europe and Japan.

For additional discussion, please see Population Deflation: Spain Joins Germany with Negative Net Birth Rate; Italy on Threshold; Who's to Blame?

Price Deflation a Good Thing

Falling oil prices are a good thing. In fact, routine deflation is a good thing. Even the BIS agrees.

On Sunday, the BIS blamed central banks for "unthinkable" interest rates: BIS Points Finger at Yellen, Draghi: Warns About "Unthinkably" Low Interest Rates, Bond Market "Dislocations"

Finally, please consider Historical Perspective on CPI Deflations: How Damaging are They?

Price deflation is not damaging at all to banks or anyone else. Asset bubble deflation is.

Yet, here we are on the verge of another asset bubble bust, and the Fed not only doesn't see it coming, the Fed will not admit they caused the bubble when it does burst.

Mike "Mish" Shedlock

Damn Cool Pics

Damn Cool Pics


Fun Film Trivia About Hollywood's Most Iconic Movies

Posted: 07 Dec 2015 01:28 PM PST

Today you're going to learn some fun facts about some of the most popular movies in history.

The Shining (1980) - Director Stanley Kubrick was intentionally rude and unhelpful to Shelley Duvall on set and also directed the cast and crew to do the same. The feeling of frustration and loneliness of Duvall's character really shows throughout the film and results in an amazing performance.



Taxi Driver (1976) - Robert de Niro drove cabs in New York City for a month, mostly working fourteen hour days in order to get ready for the film. He also studied mental illness.



The Shawshank Redemption (1994) - Clint Eastwood, Harrison Ford, Paul Newman and Rober Redford were all in the running to play Red in the film. Red in the novella is a big burly Irishman, however director Frank Darabont wanted Morgan Freeman for his deep voice and a strong presence of screen.



Shaun of the Dead (2004) - When Shaun tells Liz he's going to take her to eat at "the place that does all the fish", you can see when he opens the phonebook that the restaurant is actually called "The Place That Does All the Fish".



Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981) - Steven Speilberg and Melissa Mathison wrote a script while on the set of Raiders. While Mathison was there to visit her husband, Harrison Ford, Speilberg went over an idea he had for a new script, dictating it to Mathison. The script was E.T. the Extra Terrestrial (1982).



Pulp Fiction (1994) - The famous heart stabbing with a syringe scene looks so intense because it was filmed with John Travolta pulling the needle out of Uma Thurman's chest, then the film was run backwards.



Lawrence of Arabia (1962) - Almost all of the movement in the film is shot from left to right, including walking and horse riding scenes. Director David Lean said he shot it this way so the film would look like a journey.



Jaws (1975) - The film was shot at about 25% from water level, so the audience would have the eerie feeling of treading water.



Goodfellas (1990) - The "you think I"m funny, how am I funny?" scene was based on a story Joe Pesci told director Martin Scorsese. As a young man Pesci was working as a waiter and told a mobster at one of his tables that he was "funny", and the mobster became furious. Scorsese let Pesci and Liotta improv the scene and didn't tell the other actors, hence the geniune reactions.



The Godfather (1972) - In 1974, The Godfather premiered on NBC, running from 9p.m. - 11p.m. At 11p.m. the New York Municipal Water Authorities received an urgent overflow report from all toilets flushing at the same time. Talk about being sucked into a movie.



Fight Club (1999) - In the scene in Fight Club where Edward Norton punches Brad Pitt behind the gas station, Norton actually punches Pitt. It was supposed to have been faked however right before the swing scene director David Fincher pulled Norton aside and told him to go for it. You can see Norton smile after the hit.



Ferris Bueller's Day Off (1986) - In order to appear completely drugged out for the film, actor Charline Sheen stayed up for over 48 hours before shooting.



The Exorcist (1973) - Linda Blair who played the possessed teen received so many death threats from extreme religious groups that Warner Bros. Films hired bodyguards to follow her for 6 months after the films release.



The Life Aquatic with Stever Zissou (2004) - The song that plays when Steve is giving the tour of the boat is actually the theme from The Royal Tenenbaums (2001) being played in reverse.



A Clockwork Orange (1971) - When Malcolm McDowell met Gene Kelly at a party years after the film was released, Gene Kelly walked away from McDowell in disgust. He was not happy with the way the song 'Singing in the Rain' was used during the rape scene in A Clockwork Orange. The song was ad-libbed by McDowell.



Citizen Kane (1941) - In the film Orson Welle's character states, "Don't believe everything you hear on the radio!" The statement is a tip of the hat to his radio broadcast of "War of the Worlds" which scared the entire nation and ended up in multiple law-suits.



Blazing Saddles (1974) - Mel Brooks and his writer's were sitting across the table from John Wayne one day at lunch on the production lot. The Duke said he had heard about their new western, the one where they say things like, "blow it out your ass". Mel Brooks replied, "Yes and we'd like you to be in it." John Wayne replied, "Naw, I can't do a picture like that, but I'll be first in line to see it!"



Blade Runner (1982) - The snake-scale scene under the electron microscope was actually a bud of marijuana.



A Christmas Story (1983) - The film was shot in Cleveland and the house that was used in the film was bought in 2005, renovated to the way it looked in the film and is now a fully functional Christmas Story museum.



Edward Scissorhands (1990) - The cookie-cutter houses and neighbors in the film are all based on Burbank, California, hometown of director Tim Burton.

Seth's Blog : The joy of whining



The joy of whining

Before starting, a question: Will it help?

Like holding a grudge, or like panicking, whining rarely helps. If anything, any of the three make it far less likely that you'll make progress solving the problem that has presented itself.

And, like knuckle cracking, it's best enjoyed alone.

       

More Recent Articles

[You're getting this note because you subscribed to Seth Godin's blog.]

Don't want to get this email anymore? Click the link below to unsubscribe.



Email subscriptions powered by FeedBlitz, LLC, 365 Boston Post Rd, Suite 123, Sudbury, MA 01776, USA.

duminică, 6 decembrie 2015

Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis

Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis


Population Deflation: Spain Joins Germany with Negative Net Birth Rate; Italy on Threshold; Who's to Blame?

Posted: 06 Dec 2015 11:27 PM PST

On the demographic front things are not looking so good for the eurozone.

With declining birth rates and the aging of the population, Mario Draghi will struggle to produce inflation in a population deflationary environment.

Spanish Birthrate Plummets

Please consider Spain Dying as its Birthrate Plummets.
Spain's population will fall by more than five million over the next 50 years, according to a forecast that raises the prospect of even more "ghost villages" around the country.

In the first six months of this year, Spain recorded 225,924 deaths and 206,656 births, the national statistics institute reported. The country has not seen deaths exceed births consistently since the civil war, from 1936 to 1939, and before that the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic.
Time for Spain to Address its Plummeting birth rate?

The English version El Pais asks Is it time for Spain to address its plummeting birth rate?
Figures from the National Statistics Institute (INS) show there was a peak in 1944, with 23 births per 1,000 inhabitants. But that number bottomed out in 1998 when only nine births per 1,000 were reported.

"We have seen an incredible decline in the birth rate, which has been cut by half since 1975, and this trend is here to stay," says Andrés, of the University of Palencia.

But for Julio Vinuesa, a demographer at Madrid's Autónoma University, the study doesn't provide any new information, but simply reiterates the fact that there has been "a drop" in Spanish birth rates.

"We are witnessing a rapid decline in births and it seems that nobody cares. In the short term it is a relief because it means less spending for families and for the state, and nobody is complaining because no one stops to think about the future consequences," he says.

British economist Paul Wallace, author of Agequake, which investigates the causes and effects of population aging, has argued that the major investment for any society must be in its own replacement. In this case, Spain has failed.

For the past 10 years, Vinuesa has been pushing for "policies to encourage fertility." But no one has listened to him.

Meanwhile, the plunge continues.
Death of Spain's Interior

In almost half of Spanish provinces, a third of inhabitants are aged 65 or over. Quite literally, it's a case of Spain's Dying Interior.
A new map is emerging of Spain's interior, where a huge swathe of the country is slowly dying as a result of aging populations and migration to the cities. In 22 provinces, a third of inhabitants are already aged 65 or over, while the national average is 16.7 percent. When in 2005 demographer Francisco Zamora was asked to calculate how best the country could retain its population structure in 2050, the only answer he could come up with was for women to have 7.5 children each.

A decade later, he says, "there is nothing to be done other than selective immigration." But Spain has already witnessed rapid immigration – around 6.5 million people have come into the country over the last 20 years – while the birth rate continues to fall, from 1.4 children per woman in 2008 to 1.27 in 2013.

Demographers say the majority of people who work in the countryside live in towns rather than rural communities. The villages will increasingly be a place to visit at the weekend, and will slowly die out as their populations age.
German Population Shrinks

Reuters reports German birth rate grows, but population shrinks.
Germany's birth rate rose last year to its highest level in 12 years, helped by years of economic growth and government support, but not enough to offset the death rate, and its overall population continued to decline.

Births rose by 4.8 percent in 2014 and climbed above the 700,000-threshold for the first time since 2004 to 714,966, the statistics office said.

The declining number of Germans is partly being offset by rising immigration. Some 8.6 percent of its population of 81.8 million are foreigners.

Also, Germany has taken in 40 percent of the refugees arriving in the European Union this year. On Wednesday, the government raised its forecast for an influx of 800,000 people this year fleeing war and poverty in the Middle East, Asia and Africa.

Steady economic growth since 2010 and generous pro-family policies by successive governments in recent years have helped lift the birth rate, the statistics office in Wiesbaden said. Still, "we've got a lot of hard work ahead of us," said Family Minister Manuela Schwesig.

The number of births is likely to start falling again, because economic upheaval cut the birth rate in the former East Germany after unification in 1990, officials said.

"There was a steep fall-off in births after 1990 and that means there are now fewer women in the main child-bearing ages," said Olga Poetzsch, a government statistician.

The number of births plunged from 906,000 in 1990 to 830,000 a year later and tumbled further to 765,000 by 1995, she said. It reached 663,000 in 2011.

Germany's birth rate peaked in 1964 at 1.4 million, Poetzsch said. Deaths have exceed births [since] 1972, by a total of about 5 million fewer births than deaths.
Germany Demographic Profile



The above from Germany Demographics Profile 2014

Italy on Threshold of Population Deflation

The Guardian reports Italy is a 'dying country' says minister as birth rate plummets.
February 12, 2015

Fewer babies were born in Italy in 2014 than in any other year since the modern Italian state was formed in 1861, new data show, highlighting the demographic challenge faced by the country's chronically sluggish economy.

National statistics office ISTAT said on Thursday the number of live births last year was 509,000, or 5,000 fewer than in 2013, rounding off half a century of decline.

The number of babies born to both natives and foreigners living in Italy dropped as immigration, which used to support the overall birth rate, tumbled to its lowest level for five years.

The mortality rate also declined last year, stretching life expectancy for Italian men to 80.2 years, and to 84.9 years for women.

"We are very close to the threshold of non-renewal where the people dying are not replaced by new-borns. That means we are a dying country," Health Minister Beatrice Lorenzin said.

The government of Prime Minister Matteo Renzi is scrambling to give the economy a boost by reforming the sclerotic labour market and persuading the country's youth not to migrate and work abroad.

The demographic picture varies wildly between Italy's regions, with the autonomous northern area of Trentino-Alto Adige enjoying a total fertility rate of 1.65, higher than euro zone peer Germany.

But the population is shrinking in most of the poorer south, where per-capita gross domestic product is about half that in the centre and north.
France Net Positive Birth Rate

In France the birth rate is 12.49/1,000 population whereas the death rate is 9.06/1000 population and immigration is 1.09/1,000 population as per.

The above from France Demographics Profile 2014

Explaining Birthrate Demographics

The largest eurozone country (Germany) and the fourth-largest (Spain) are in population deflation while the third-largest is on the cusp.

Economists are screaming for politicians to "do something". It would help if they figured out the cause first. But that's not the way of either economists or politicians.

The problems are obvious but economists have not figured it out. Forget the studies, here are some key factors:

  1. Youth unemployment
  2. Pension promises that cannot and will not be met
  3. Work rules
  4. Changing attitudes 
  5. Central bank actions

1. Youth Unemployment




The above from Eurostat Statistics - Youth Unemployment

How the hell are you going to get married, buy a house, and start a family when youth unemployment is at record highs above 40% in several countries?

2. Pension Promises

The system  is designed to fail. The youth are supposed to pay for the pensions of the retirees. How is that supposed to work when the youth have no work? Most millennials understand the pension and healthcare obligations they fund for their elders will not be there for them or their kids.

3. Work rules

Order workers and pensioners do not want to change the rules making it easier to fire workers or reduce pensions. If someone cannot be fired, they will not be hired in the first place.

4. Changing attitudes

Without a doubt kids are putting of marriage and family formation longer and longer, even in countries like Germany where jobs are relatively plentiful. Why? Various reasons include: the need to take care of their elders prevents or discourages new household formation, the nannycrat society where the state takes more and more of ones wages, real wages are in decline, and home prices are not affordable.

5. Central banks actions

In the foolish attempt of central banks to beat deflation, asset prices (especially the price of homes), have risen well beyond the affordability range of millennials.  In short, attempts by central bankers to force inflation in a technological and demographically deflationary world is highly counterproductive.

Synopsis

Kids intuitively understand various public pension and social security systems are on their last legs. If the system will not protect them, if will not protect their kids either.

Many millennials saw their parents or friend's parents loser their home in the financial crisis. They do not want to be in the same boat.

The monetary actions of central banks, and the fiscal stimulus and protectionist actions of governments are for the sole benefit of the already wealthy, to the detriment of the shrinking middle class.

Fewer and fewer millennials can afford to bring up kids in this environment.

Mike "Mish" Shedlock

Marine Le Pen's National Front Ahead in 6 of 13 French Regions in First Round of Voting; Shock but Not Surprising; Stop Le Pen Movement Mounts

Posted: 06 Dec 2015 02:51 PM PST

With polls closed but not all votes counted, the Marine Le Pen's Eurosceptic, anti-immigration National Front party is expected to win the first round of voting in six of France's 13 regions.

There will be a second round vote next Sunday in all of the regions because no party captured more than 50% of the vote in any region.

Projections now show the National Front, which has never won a regional election, can win as many as four regions in the final vote.

No Surprise Shock

This was a Historic Result for the National Front but it does need follow-through next week.
France's far-right National Front party appeared on course for a historic victory in the first round of regional elections on Sunday, winning more than 30 per cent of the vote and delivering a stunning blow to the country's traditional parties.

An early, and partial, official count suggested the FN was ahead in six of the country's 13 regions. Projections suggest the result, if confirmed, could be sufficient to win up to four regions in the second round on Sunday.

Ms Le Pen, described the result as "magnificent", adding that it showed that the FN was now "without contest the first party of France".

She was leading as FN candidate in the northern region of France with more than 40 per cent of the vote while Marion Marechal-Le Pen, her niece, was also in the lead with more than 40 per cent of the vote in the south-eastern region of the country.

Victory in even just one of France's 13 regions — definitive results will be known after next Sunday's second-round vote — would be a first for the FN, helping to build momentum as it looks to the 2017 presidential contest, in which Ms Le Pen intends to run.

James Shields, professor of French politics at Aston University said: "These results are a shock but they shouldn't be a surprise.

Former president Nicolas Sarkozy's centre-right Republicans party and allies were leading in four regions and had a national count of 27.4 per cent, according to the partial count.

President François Hollande's Socialists and leftwing allies were ahead in only three regions with just 22.7 per cent of the vote — a crushing result for a political bloc that, at present, holds all but one of the regions.
Stop Le Pen

A "Stop Le Pen" movement is underway in France but as with the "Stop Trump" movement in the US, no one seems to know how best to go about it.

Socialist prime minister Manuel Valls suggested an alliance between the socialists and Sarkozy, but the latter quickly rebuffed the offer. Sarkozy commented "We must hear and understand the profound exasperation of the French people."

The Financial Times commented "In spite of Mr Sarkozy's remarks, uniting may be the only way to damp the electoral chances of Ms Le Pen and her party. Yet there are no guarantees that doing so would work. And it may even play into her hands, furnishing Ms Le Pen's long-held argument that France's left and right are part of the same problem."

Indeed. People are fed up over immigration, jobs, Brussels, and many things of their own foolish doing.

I compared the "Stop Trump" and "Stop Le Pen" movements on December 2 in Triumph of Trumpism and LePenism; Waiting for a Volunteer Mouse.

There are still no volunteer mice in either country. Next week will be interesting.

Mike "Mish" Shedlock

BIS Points Finger at Yellen, Draghi: Warns About "Unthinkably" Low Interest Rates, Bond Market "Dislocations"

Posted: 06 Dec 2015 12:34 PM PST

In it latest quarterly report, the BIS (Bank of International Settlements), pointed a direct finger at Fed chair Janet Yellen with an even bigger point at ECB president Mario Draghi.

Specifically, the BIS cited unthinkably low interest rates, bond market dislocations, and more taper tantrums in its Quarterly Review, December 2015, released today, Uneasy Calm Awaiting Lift-Off.

The BIS is sometimes referred to as the central banker's bank. Inquiring minds may wish to read the "BIS About Page" for details.

Much of the BIS quarterly report is a recap of the volatility earlier this year when the Fed signaled a potential hike in September then backed off.

Here are a few other highlights:
Recent Dislocations in Fixed Income Derivatives Markets

Recent quarters have witnessed unusual price relationships in fixed income markets. US dollar swap spreads (ie the difference between the rate on the fixed leg of a swap and the corresponding Treasury yield) have turned negative, moving in the opposite direction from euro swap spreads. Given that counterparties in derivatives markets, typically banks, are less creditworthy than the government, swap rates are normally higher than Treasury yields because of the additional risk premium. Hence, the negative spreads point to a possible dislocation.

Tightening in the United States May Challenge EMEs

In August 2015 the VIX had reached levels not seen since the onset of the European debt crisis in 2011 and CDS spreads on EME sovereigns had exceeded levels experienced during the worst of the taper tantrum. [Mish Comment: Is that the real reason for the Fed's ultra-dovish September statement since unwound? I think so]

There have also been signs that EM local currency yields are increasingly sensitive to developments in the United States. The post-crisis era has been characterised by strong international spillovers from US bond  yields to emerging markets, even when those countries were at different stages of the business cycle.

And this effect seems to have strengthened over time. A simple rolling regression of an EME bond index on US 10-year Treasury yields suggests that the potential for spillovers is larger now than it was during the taper tantrum.

Debt service ratios will inevitably increase even further when lending rates start to rise. Any further appreciation of the dollar would additionally test the debt servicing capacity of EME corporates, many of which have borrowed heavily in US dollars in recent years.
"Unthinkably" Low Interest Rates

Also consider the Financial Times synopsis of the report BIS Argues for Tighter Monetary Policy in Spite of 'Uneasy Calm'.
Central banks must not let market volatility halt their plans to retreat from crisis-fighting monetary policies, the Bank for International Settlements has warned ahead of the expected first rate rise by the US Federal Reserve in nine years.

While the current "uneasy calm" in financial markets threatened to blow up into bouts of financial turmoil, with clear tensions between markets' behaviour and underlying economic conditions, such a threat should not dissuade monetary policymakers from taking the first steps towards tighter monetary policy, the BIS argued in its latest quarterly review.

"At some point, [the tension] will have to be resolved," said Claudio Borio, head of the BIS's monetary and economic department. "Markets can remain calm for much longer than we think. Until they no longer can."

"Very much in evidence, once more, has been the perennial contrast between the hectic rhythm of markets and the slow motion of the deeper economic forces that really matter," Mr Borio said.

The BIS has long believed that what it describes as "unthinkably" low interest rates are fueling instability in global financial markets.
BIS Points Finger at Yellen, Draghi

I cannot find either of the above Borio quotes in the BIS article. I presume they were comments made specifically to the Financial Times.

I agree with both, especially liking "Markets can remain calm until they can't."

And what else can a comment about "unthinkably" low interest rates be other than a direct finger point at the key central banked involved in this mess: Fed chair Janet Yellen (previously Ben Bernanke), and ECB president Mario Draghi.

Last week, Draghi just made the apparently no longer "unthinkable" move of lowering interest rates to -0.3 percent.

For further comments on Draghi and the ECB please see ...


Damning Indictment

It's pretty clear the BIS knows the FED and ECB have blown major asset bubbles, but for some reason they just did not state things so clearly.

Instead the BIS speaks of "dislocations", "unthinkables", "uneasy calm" and how "low interest rates fuel instability."

Yes, that's a pretty damning indictment of central bank policy.

Mike "Mish" Shedlock