vineri, 8 iulie 2011

SEOmoz Daily SEO Blog

SEOmoz Daily SEO Blog


Mixing Viral Content With Business Content - Whiteboard Friday

Posted: 07 Jul 2011 02:26 PM PDT

Posted by Aaron Wheeler

 A site can be a lot like a mullet: business in front, party in the back. How do you muss it all up and keep a site in style? Any given website naturally attracts a broad set of visitors, and herding that diverse audience onto the right pages is a huge undertaking (as you know, it's something to consider when doing site infrastructure SEO, etc.). This funneling gets even more difficult when there are some pages of a site that are pure linkbait, completely divorced from relevance to the rest of the site. This week, Rand discusses site infrastructure - how and when to homogenize a site, and when to keep things separated. Let us know your thoughts and strategies in the comments below!

 

Video Transcription

Howdy, SEOmoz fans. Welcome to another edition of Whiteboard Friday. This week we're talking about mixing your viral content with your business content. Now, what we mean by this is really you have some content on your website that is primarily meant for your business, for your customers, for people who are researching your products or your services, and then you have this other content on your website that is often more marketing focused. It is designed to drive new traffic, to get links in, to get social shares, to have all these good things happen around your website. That's a big part of what content marketing and all of organic and inbound marketing is about.

So, I want you to imagine that you are this guy - Mr. Pest Control. Now, Mr. Pest Control has a great variety. He offers services, he has products. You can buy little bug traps from him. You can call him up and he will come to your place of business or residence and help you with your bug problems. Mr. Pest Control is a pretty awesome guy, and he has a great website. But he is trying to decide, boy, you know, I have these two kinds of content. I have this content, in orange here, the Bug Catcher 3X7B, which is a phenomenal bug catcher. I just scratched that bug. Let's just scratch him again. See, we're trying to eliminate bugs. You can see it is a square box with four prongs, so that must do a great job of catching bugs. My illustrations aside, this content is really designed for like, "Oh, I am looking to learn about this product. I want to see how this service works." It is customer focused. It is not the kind of thing that is usually going to generate a lot of links. Yeah, someone might find that page and hopefully he has done a great job of making it a very compelling page. It has good pictures and images, better than the ones I have done here, good content. So, people might link to it.

But what he does have is things like, oh, you know, I am running this blog and I write about things that are interesting to me as a pest control guy, including things like Top 10 Cities with Bad Bug Problems in Hotels. There are hotels, there are some bugs, and they are invading the hotel. It's kind of adorable. My illustrations, you know, they get the point across. These two buildings don't have any windows. That's a little sad. Maybe they're, I don't know, penitentiaries or something.

But, in any case, this type of content and this type of content are really two separate things. So, Mr. Pest Control might think to himself, oh, I know what I am going to do. I am going to have two different websites, or I am going to have a different design. I will just do a WordPress installation and throw them on there. Mixing the two in smart ways is a hard thing to do, and a lot of people get it wrong. That is why this Whiteboard Friday is here to help.

So some less ideal things that you can do, some things that I would really recommend or bias against. Separate subdomains or separate domains. If he goes with blog.MrPest.com, let's say MrPest.com is his domain, eh, not great. I would kind of tell Mr. Pest, "If you can, get it over there to that subfolder." Mr. Pest's blog? No. Just out. One of the things that people do is they think to themselves, well, you know, it is important to get external links. So if I have this separate domain, I will just build up the link authority to Mr. Pest's blog.com, and then all I have to do is link from MrPestBlog to MrPest, and that will pass all my link juice. What they forget is that does not give you a whole lot of domain diversity, right? I don't want to have a situation where I have one domain with lots of other links pointing to it and then that's the only link to my main site. That's a terrible idea. This is not going to earn you rankings. It's not going to get you the traffic you want. All the good metrics and signals are going to exist on this site, not this one. That sucks. You don't want that. Same story with separate design and navigation. If the orange content, which remember is our business content here, has, oh, you know, there is the left side bar and it has this nice bug logo across the top, but then you get to the blog and it's a different logo or a different layout and different navigation style and the blog content sits in here. It is really off putting. The problem is that people will start to feel like, "Oh, I like the blog, but I don't like this business content." When they switch context between the two, either way, business customers would come over and look at the blog or blog people who come over and look at the business content, it is not compelling in a branding sort of style to suggest to them, "Hey, I am in the same place. I am on the same site. It is written with the same voice. It is the same people. I can trust it. If I enjoy the blog, I am going to like the business content. If I like the business content, the blog might be interesting for me." You want to cross-pollinate and really have one site, not these two separate systems.

Finally, obviously manipulative cross-linking. So many times I see this where people are like, "Oh, I've got my blog, so I am just going to pepper in these anchor text rich links here and here, and they are going to point back over to these pages on the business side." No. What are you thinking? And it is always one way, right? It always points from the viral-type of content over to the business content. This (A) it is obvious to Google. It is obvious to users what you are trying to do. People are going to like your blog less, which defeats the purpose of having it in a lot of ways. People are not going to be coming over to the business content from there. Nobody clicks these links and really follows them unless they are hyper relevant and high quality, in which case maybe they should exist for some reason. So, as an example, like, oh, in the Top 10 Cities with Bad Bugs Hotel, I will talk about the fact that the Waldorf Astoria in New York has eliminated their bug problem and maybe in parenthesis note, "Thanks in part at least to our 3X7B," shameless plug. It's sort of cute. It is appropriate. It makes sense. You're recognizing that this nice hotel actually did really use their product. That's cool. That's a fine way to do it. But to have a list of anchor text rich links on every site on every page linking over to the pages, you're trying to push too hard and you're clearly manipulating for SEO purposes, not to help users.

So, let's talk about some good things to do. Do you see how I made that switch, Casey? Are you proud of me? Aw, he's so proud, because normally I might go like this and then I get off the screen, and it is terrible. The mechanics behind Whiteboard Friday are remarkable.

So, more ideal kinds of things. Keep it on the same domain. Use subfolders. MrPest.com/blog. Awesome. Great. Good job. You could go with MrPest.com/articles if they are less frequent. MrPest.com/resources if you've got other content. MrPest.com/marketplace, if you've got some postings that other people can submit content to and there are different participants in that realm. Q&A, right? Whatever kinds of content you've got, it's fine. I would really recommend the subfolder. Same design with a well integrated UI so that when I am going across, I am not getting the sense, as a human being, not just as a search engine, right, we're not just optimizing for search engines. Remember the search engines are trying to achieve what humans want. So we have to make it good for humans, because search engines are getting so sophisticated that it is not enough to just optimize for the crawler.

Same voice. You want that brand consistency. If I feel like, "Man, I really, really enjoyed this article. You know, this content in here was just phenomenal. But I went over here and read the Bug Catcher 3X7B, and where was that humor? Where was that good-natured, friendly openness that I felt when I read this article?" Or on the other side, "Where was that sort of brilliant snarkiness that this article brings? It is nowhere in there. It is like it is completely different." Meld those two voices. This doesn't have to feel exactly like it, but it shouldn't feel like a different company wrote the two pieces of content. That's when you are going to get into branding problems and cross brand issues.

Link across intelligently. By intelligently, I don't just mean the examples I was talking about before where, oh, okay, this hotel mentions the 3X7B, so I am going to link over there. But I mean link both ways. If this article is saying, "Hey this is something used by some of the world's finest hotels," that might be a link that points over to the blog post and gets people out of the pure context out of, like, oh, okay, I am just buying and shopping, but oh, cool, they have this content that kind of engages me, entertains me, and educates me. Building that trust with your audience, my god, that's so much more effective at selling whatever you are trying to sell or capturing an email address or improving the browse rate, getting people to look at more pages. Whatever your goal is, that consistency is going to make a big, big difference.

One of the last recommendations I've got is to not just stick to business content and blog content. Hopefully, you can see down here. So, the business content, these pages in orange and the blog content are great. But if you're going to actually mix it up a little bit and have some of that evergreen content as well, things like a permanent resource on, hey, this is the how to for DIY basement elimination of bugs or how to check for bedbugs in hotel rooms. Here is the step-by-step process with video, pictures, images, graphics, that kind of stuff. Those evergreen resources that sit across that also earn inbound links that show the search engines and show the rest of your audience, hey, it's not just the blog that's good here. They have some legitimate evergreen content, some product content. Hopefully, you have a few things that people are really interested in. Maybe you have some super cool new invention or you have a video where you literally take apart a bug trap and you show people how it works. Fun stuff like this, so that people aren't just collecting and linking to one part of your site. You don't want to create that bias of we have an information site and we have a blog. Even in the sense of where people go and what people link to, not just in the sense of where it is located on the domain.

All right, everyone. I hope you have enjoyed this edition of Whiteboard Friday. I am looking forward to some great comments and questions. If you have sites that have that separation between informational and blog content and you've got questions about how we can help out or how we might optimize those, please feel free to put them in the comments. Look forward to reading them. Take care. We'll see you again next week for another edition of Whiteboard Friday.

Video transcription by Speechpad.com


Do you like this post? Yes No

Google Throws Publishers Under Bus with Prerendering of Pages Graywolf's SEO Blog

Google Throws Publishers Under Bus with Prerendering of Pages Graywolf's SEO Blog


Google Throws Publishers Under Bus with Prerendering of Pages

Posted: 07 Jul 2011 10:26 AM PDT

Post image for Google Throws Publishers Under Bus with Prerendering of Pages

Google recently announced they will start to pre-render pages in Chrome to “improve the user experience.” IMHO this represents nothing more than the latest effort by Google to throw publishers under the bus to gain market share for one of their products and ultimately give them more data about their users to better target their advertising.

Whenever Google says they are only interested in "serving the users" or "improving the user experience," I think of the classic Twilight Zone Episode about the aliens who only wanted "to serve man" …
At the time of this post being published, the exact details and implementation aren’t perfectly defined, but if you are technically minded and curious, you can read about it in Google’s prerender whitepaper. However, the basic concept is that they will preload a certain number of SERP results into the browser when the user does a search. The idea is to make searching/browsing a seamless operation where results appear in the browser instantly because they are already cached in the browser.

For publishers, however, this is an extremely bad situation. Two things which are problematic will occur. First, the Chrome browser will fetch the page, which will cause most analytics and tracking programs to think a user visited the page even though that visit may not have actually occurred. This will throw off stats for advertising and user engagement, in many cases over-inflating the actual numbers. Now Google says this will be a small number (do you really think they would admit to it being a big number?), but it really depends on how many results they preload. If they only preload one result, it will be small, but if they bring it up to two, three, or more, the over-inflation will be much more pronounced. Look at your Webmaster Central reports for queries you rank for that aren’t driving traffic to get an idea about how big this over-inflation could be.

Now I’m sure analytics programs will come up with a way to filter out this traffic. Google may even provide it to them, and supposedly this method would work. However, that still leaves us with the real core of the problem: Google’s prefetching will still be using up server resources by generating pages for visitors that may never visit your website. Using up server resources that are intended for humans, that really aren’t humans is exactly what Google blocks you from doing when you scrape SERP results for ranking reports or other intelligence.

The big question is why is Google doing this? They say it’s to “improve the user experience,” which is just a diversion–I’ll come back to that idea. The real goal is to increase market share for Google’s Chrome browser. Chrome is already an extremely fast browser. In full disclosure, I use it quite frequently and am very happy with it. Saying it’s about speed and user experience is a convenient cover story. The real reason is user data. By getting users onto a Google browser, they aren’t dependent on the Google toolbar for gathering data. This allows them to see behind paywalls and onto systems where they can’t crawl, like Facebook. The more people using Google’s browsers, the better their data is.

Click here to view the embedded video.

Whenever Google says they are only interested in “serving the users” or “improving the user experience,” I think of the classic Twilight Zone Episode about the aliens who only wanted “to serve man.” They did just want to serve man … serve him for dinner … just as Google wants to serve you up to advertisers.

If you ever questions Google’s ability to target you based on your online activities, I urge you to visit this page to see what Google thinks about you and what you like. They may not be perfect and maybe even have a few things wrong, but I bet they have a lot more right than wrong …

photo credit: Creative Commons LicenseSeattle Municipal Archives

tla starter kit

Related posts:

  1. Yahoo Doesn’t Like Web Publishers One of the great things about ging to Pubcon is...
  2. Google Loves Wikipedia – Even the Empty Pages If you’re one of those kooky SEO’s that doesn’t believe...
  3. How Website Owners and Publishers Can Use Foursquare While some people consider Foursquare to be nothing more than...
  4. How to Optimize an eCommerce Category pages Today’s post is in response to a question that came...
  5. Landing Pages Teleseminar So I listened to a teleseminar today from Kowabunga about...

Advertisers:

  1. Text Link Ads - New customers can get $100 in free text links.
  2. BOTW.org - Get a premier listing in the internet's oldest directory.
  3. Ezilon.com Regional Directory - Check to see if your website is listed!
  4. Need an SEO Audit for your website, look at my SEO Consulting Services
  5. Link Building- Backlink Build offers customized link building services
  6. Directory Journal - Get permanent deep links in a search engine friendly directory
  7. LinkWheel SEO - Get Web 2.0 Backlinks
  8. Links From PR9 Sites - Get In Top 3 Google ASAP
  9. RevSEO High PR BackLinks- Private High PageRank Homepage Link Network
  10. TigerTech - Great Web Hosting service at a great price.

This post originally came from Michael Gray who is an SEO Consultant. Be sure not to miss the Thesis Wordpress Theme review.

Google Throws Publishers Under Bus with Prerendering of Pages

Video: West Wing Week - "Ready to Tweet"

The White House Your Daily Snapshot for
Friday, July 8, 2011
 

West Wing Week: "Ready to Tweet" 

Welcome to West Wing Week, your guide to everything that's happening at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. This week, President Obama celebrated Independence day with military families on the South Lawn, hosted a Twitter Town Hall on the economy and jobs and continued to work with leaders from both houses of Congress to find a balanced approach to reducing our long-term deficit.   

Watch the video 

 

In Case You Missed It

Here are some of the top stories from the White House blog.

President Obama on Finding a Balanced Approach to Deficit Reduction
Following a meeting with Congressional leaders on tackling the issue of our debt and our deficit, President Obama gives a statement on the status of the ongoing negotiations.

Doing More with Less: Saving Half a Billion Dollars through IT Reform
The Department of the Interior announces smart changes to IT services that will make IT more cost-effective and customer-friendly while saving taxpayers half a billion dollars over the next decade.

Health Insurance Leads to Healthier Americans
A new  study on the important role Medicaid plays in the lives of American families. 


Today's Schedule 

All times are Eastern Daylight Time (EDT).

10:00 AM: The President meets with Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi

10:35 AM: The President delivers a statement on the monthly jobs report WhiteHouse.gov/live

11:00 AM: Press Briefing by Press Secretary Jay Carney WhiteHouse.gov/live

11:30 AM: The President participates in regional interviews on the economy and the importance of finding a balanced approach to deficit reduction

WhiteHouse.gov/live Indicates events that will be live streamed on WhiteHouse.Gov/Live

Get Updates 

Sign up for the Daily Snapshot 

Stay Connected

  

This email was sent to e0nstar1.blog@gmail.com
Manage Subscriptions for e0nstar1.blog@gmail.com
Sign Up for Updates from the White House

Unsubscribe e0nstar1.blog@gmail.com | Privacy Policy

Please do not reply to this email. Contact the White House

The White House • 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW • Washington, DC 20500 • 202-456-1111 
    

 

     
 

SEOptimise

SEOptimise


Osama Bin Laden, the Royal Wedding and ‘News Tsunami’ SEO

Posted: 11 May 2011 05:01 AM PDT

In  recent weeks we have witnessed two overwhelming waves of news I’d like to call ‘news tsunamis‘. Like real tsunamis you have no choice, you can’t escape the news when you are in the nearby area. For this kind of news the whole planet is nearby.

Maybe some tribes in the Amazon jungle or a few monks in the Himalayas haven’t noticed the death of Osama Bin Laden and the royal wedding, but apart from those lucky few, we have all been drowned in these news waves.

While I was unable to escape the news, no matter how much I tried, I at least tried to reroute the hype induced into something useful: SEO.

My first urge was to catch up quickly and take advantage of the huge waves of traffic.

Instead, I decided to watch the waves of news and to follow the steps of others who have tried to use the energy of these waves to power their websites. Why? It doesn’t make much sense to get huge news traffic without planning what to do with it.

I could have written this a few days later to get some traffic from Google News users; I did it back  when the swine flu craze was all over the Interwebs. That’s a bit short-sighted of course. Back then I wanted to inform people. Today I want to be more practical, in a way. You can’t inform the people in a meaningful way anyway; people want to believe the likes of

  • CNN
  • BBC
  • Reuters

So telling them that the swine flu vaccine might be potentially more harmful than the virus itself is futile in most cases. You can’t tell people that what they believe is wrong. You can only give them what they want to succeed, also financially.

A true SEO is always on the look out for opportunity in the attention economy.

The more attention, the more potential bounty. A huge attention wave propelled by a massive news story is an opportunity you can use.

Many people already monitor Google Hot Trends to react accordingly. In the case of a ‘news tsunami’ you don’t have to. Either you expect it beforehand and are prepared, or you watch where the attention and traffic goes.

I want point out two less obvious examples of recent ‘news tsunamis’, as you can’t rank quickly or at all for [osama bin laden] and [royal wedding] as keyphrases. I’d like to point out two examples of less importance but more opportunity.

 

Pippa Middleton

What you can do is watch out for unexpected aspects and the ensuing demand. In the case of the royal wedding it was Pippa Middleton, the sister and bridesmaid of the royal bride.

Map Abbottabad

When it comes it Osama bin Laden’s death it is the town he was hiding in, and thus the search for [map abbottabad]. It seems that nobody in the West besides the intelligence agencies had ever heard of it prior to this infamous event.

While the first SEO’ed result for [map abbottabad] is like an unintended parody, it shows ”the nearest hotels” being 100 or more kilometers from the actual city, while Pakistan’s capital is just 60 kilometers away. Apparently the site has been there since before the city became famous for 15 minutes.

On the other hand there are four impressive sites for Pippa Middleton which we can learn a lot from.

  1. pippasass.com
  2. pippamiddleton.net
  3. pippa-middleton.co.uk
  4. philippamiddleton.org

 

Surprisingly the first one in this list ranks at #2 in the UK, Ireland and Canada for [pippa middleton], just below Wikipedia and Universal Search results (news and images). The .co.uk and the .net domains rank somewhere in the top 30 right now, but I’ve seen the co.uk in the top 10 at #9 or 10 for a while.

Of course there is fierce competition right now when it comes to search results for her name; mostly mainstream media from all over the world is clogging up the top results. So anybody ranking there fast on a low budget with a new site is worth a look. How did they achieve this? Let’s look at what the sites have in common.

  • All four sites have more or less exact matching domains
  • They all use WordPress
  • They use keywords quite a lot onsite
  • They started blogging in April
  • They have just a few or several posts
  • There is not much user interaction (comments or likes)

All in all, this appears to be proof that the use of old SEO tactics is still working. When I started out in SEO in 2005, I took part in an SEO contest to find out what the best SEO techniques were. Surprise surprise, back then the same strategy worked out best:  using a WordPress blog on a keyword matching domain with just sufficient content to be relevant and quite a few keyword mentions.

Another key component has been neglected in this post until now:  link building. I took a closer look at the winner, pippasass.com, to find out how they did it. The answer is reciprocal links! A blog covering celebrity bums daily linked to it, embedding the actual RSS feed the last 5 posts). After that some press outlets (not only tabloids) linked to, one from the US, one from France and one from the UK: The Independent.

So a healthy mix of reciprocal and authority links has been key to achieving top rankings, as the site wasn’t on top just a few days ago when I first checked. The reciprocal links were enough to get noticed for a more targeted search, where the journalists apparently discovered the site and then linked it up to #2 for the main keyphrase, the actual name.

The WordPress sites get monetised via all kinds of ads, PPC, affiliate or even a shop with T-shirts, so there are always ways to earn money on a traffic wave.

How can you monetise a map? Either you sell maps, get commission from hotels or place ads as well. So even the other example could be profitable. Both examples are not really what you would work at out of sheer interest. These are sites you create for profit. The mainstream media knows as well; thus they have ads below the map. For instance, they sell flights to Pakistan in their ads.

So the business of news is ultimately that of predefined views and for SEO of page views. It’s not about what is most important but what the people want. Once you notice the wave and how to use it, you have to act accordingly and quickly. Don’t fight the current or you drown.

© SEOptimise - Download our free business guide to blogging whitepaper and sign-up for the SEOptimise monthly newsletter. Osama Bin Laden, the Royal Wedding and ‘News Tsunami’ SEO

Related posts:

  1. SERPd Review – The New Search Marketing Social News Community
  2. Keyword Temperature and Other Exotic Metrics
  3. SEOptimise (about)

Seth's Blog : Time for a workflow audit

Time for a workflow audit

Go find a geek. Someone who understands gmail, Outlook, Excel and other basic tools.

Pay her to sit next to you for an hour and watch you work.

Then say, "tell me five ways I can save an hour a day."

Whatever you need to pay for this service, it will pay for itself in a week.

 

More Recent Articles

[You're getting this note because you subscribed to Seth Godin's blog.]

Don't want to get this email anymore? Click the link below to unsubscribe.




Your requested content delivery powered by FeedBlitz, LLC, 9 Thoreau Way, Sudbury, MA 01776, USA. +1.978.776.9498