|
|
"That number is too even... can you make the next one even odder?"
The thing about math is that it's right or wrong, on or off, yes or no. Seven is a prime number, there's no improving it.
The thing about life/business/culture and the things we make and do is that they are not math.
[You're getting this note because you subscribed to Seth Godin's blog.]
Don't want to get this email anymore? Click the link below to unsubscribe.
Your requested content delivery powered by FeedBlitz, LLC, 9 Thoreau Way, Sudbury, MA 01776, USA. +1.978.776.9498 |
Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis |
Sarkozy Breaks Campaign Pledge, Says Treaty Too Complicated For A Vote Posted: 27 Feb 2012 09:53 PM PST French president Nicolas Sarkozy is campaigning on a pledge to consult people directly on "significant issues". However, despite trailing in polls, Sarkozy refuses to agree to referendum on EU fiscal treaty. Mr Sarkozy, who is trailing the socialist François Hollande in opinion polls seven weeks before the presidential election, came under pressure to promise a referendum on the pact after he pledged to consult the people directly on significant issues if re-elected.Too Complicated To Form a Clear Question? Sarkozy says "I can't see how you'd formulate a clear question." Mish Attempt to Formulate Clear Question For Voters
Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List Mike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Posted: 27 Feb 2012 08:49 AM PST Via Email, here is a nice summary of European events from Steen Jakobsen at Saxo Bank in Denmark. Topics include the G20 Summit, Extend-and-Pretend Dogma, Capital Flight , and Geopolitical Risks. Steen Writes ... Two Trillion FantasyMike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List Mike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Posted: 27 Feb 2012 12:33 AM PST There are 2,286 republican delegates. It takes 1,144 delegates to win the Republication nomination. With four candidates remaining, many are wondering about the likelihood of a brokered convention where no candidate wins in the first round. Conventional wisdom suggests there will not be a brokered convention. From where I sit, one is increasingly likely. Following is a table of delegates won so far (totals from Real Clear Politics Delegate Count), plus my projections of all primaries and caucuses through Super-Tuesday on March 6 (based on recent polls).
* States penalized half of their delegates. Thru Super-Tuesday Scenarios Romney 359 Others 423 (Romney wins Idaho) Romney 327 Others 455 (Romney loses Idaho) Notes
Michigan Prediction 30 Delegates Percent: Romney-40% Santorum-35% Gingrich-8% Paul-12% Delegates: Romney-13 Santorum-11 Gingrich-2 Paul-4 Real Clear Politics Michigan Primary Poll Arizona Prediction 29 Delegates Arizona is "Winner Take All" Romney wins all 29 Delegates Real Clear Politics Arizona Primary Poll Washington Prediction 43 Delegates Percent: Romney-30% Santorum-38% Gingrich-12% Paul-17% Delegates: Romney-13 Santorum-17 Gingrich-5 Paul-8 Real Clear Politics Washington Caucus Poll Georgia Prediction 76 Delegates Percent: Romney-24% Santorum-26% Gingrich-33% Paul-10% Delegates: Romney-19 Santorum-22 Gingrich-27 Paul-8 Real Clear Politics Super Tuesday Poll (Georgia, Ohio, Oklahoma, Massachusetts, Vermont) Ohio Prediction 66 Delegates Percent: Romney-26% Santorum-38% Gingrich-19% Paul-10% Delegates: Romney-19 Santorum-27 Gingrich-13 Paul-7 Tennessee Prediction 58 Delegates Percent: Romney-26% Santorum-40% Gingrich-12% Paul-16% Delegates: Romney-16 Santorum-25 Gingrich-7 Paul-10 Vanderbilt University Tennessee Primary Survey Virginia Prediction 49 Delegates Romney wins all 49 Virginia delegates. Virginia has a proportional allocation with a twist. Should any candidate take 50% in a district, the candidate will all votes in the district. In a display of complete ineptitude, Santorum and Gingrich failed to collect and turn in enough signatures on time and are not on the ballot. Romney is currently polling about 53% and Paul 23%, but Paul can only win delegates if he outright wins a district. Oklahoma Prediction 43 Delegates Percent: Romney-23% Santorum-42% Gingrich-20% Paul-9% Delegates: Romney-11 Santorum-18 Gingrich-9 Paul-5 Massachusetts Prediction 41 Delegates Percent: Romney-64% Santorum-16% Gingrich-6% Paul-8% Delegates: Romney-28 Santorum-8 Gingrich-2 Paul-3 Idaho Prediction 32 Delegates Romney wins all 32 Idaho delegates January Straw Poll Results Romney-34% Santorum-10% Gingrich-12% Paul-43% February Straw Poll Results Romney-45.4% Paul 42.7% A third straw poll will be held March 1-3 and my answer may change based on the results of that poll. Ron Paul or Mitt Romney will likely take all of the delegates based on the explanation below. Whether or not Paul or Romney takes all the votes depends entirely on whether or not Gingrich or Santorum can win any counties which at this time looks doubtful. Idaho Caucus Explanation: Voters will go to locations for their county and use ballots or tokens to support a candidate on Tuesday, March 6th. There are five candidates for Idaho voters to choose from and they will keep voting until a winner is selected.I cannot find any recent polls for North Dakota, Alaska, or Vermont. Romney should do extremely well in Vermont and fair at best in North Dakota and Alaska. North Dakota Prediction 28 Delegates Percent: Romney-35% Santorum-40% Gingrich-10% Paul-10% Delegates: Romney-10 Santorum-12 Gingrich-3 Paul-3 Alaska Prediction 27 Delegates Percent: Romney-35% Santorum-40% Gingrich-10% Paul-10% Delegates: Romney-10 Santorum-11 Gingrich-3 Paul-3 Vermont Prediction 17 Delegates Percent: Romney-64% Santorum-16% Gingrich-6% Paul-8% Delegates: Romney-11 Santorum-4 Gingrich-1 Paul-1 How Ron Paul Can Throw a Big Wrench Into Romney's Campaign I purposely bumped up Romney's percentages to see if a brokered convention would still be possible. I also awarded Romney all 32 delegates in Idaho even though that race is a statistical dead-heat with Ron Paul. If Ron Paul wins Idaho, and the rest of my numbers above are close, the odds of a brokered convention are well above 50 percent in my estimation. There may be a brokered convention anyway, provided Santorum, Paul, and Gingrich stay in to the end. Fuzzy Math The New York Times discusses The G.O.P.'s Fuzzy Delegate Math. There are 2,286 delegates to the Republican National Convention, of which 1,144 are required to clinch a majority. The Web site TheGreenPapers.com, which has extensive information on delegate-selection procedures in each state, divides them into two broad categories, what it calls "hard" and "soft." Hard delegates are formally bound to a candidate on at least the first ballot at the convention, while soft delegates are not.Legal Challenges on the Way I did not take any of the bound, unbound, super-delegate counts into consideration. However, I was rather generous to Romney in other ways. Moreover, there are legal challenges pending in Arizona and Florida. Winner-Take-All primaries are a violation of Republican National Committee rules if held before April 1. As it stands, Romney 50 Florida delegates and 29 Arizona delegates that could dramatically change the totals. Should Romney loses those challenges and also lose Idaho, a brokered convention would be all but certain. If Wishes Were Fishes If wishes (mine) were fishes, then Ron Paul would win the nomination outright. A more realistic wish is for a brokered convention because Romney, Santorum, and Gingrich are all likely to lose to Obama. I believe Paul would defeat Obama although polls don't currently support that idea. Republicans Need to Face the Facts Of the four candidates, only Ron Paul balances the budget, only Ron Paul wants to stop the war-mongering, only Ron Paul does not alienate the majority of women, only Ron Paul can ignite a fire in independents, and independents (not the radical right), are the key to this election. Republicans are not going to vote for Obama so appealing to the far right makes little sense in terms of an overall strategy. Moreover, independents are likely horrified by the war-mongering and misguided statements on religious and social issues of all the candidates but Paul. If Republicans lose this election, it will be because they all outdid each other in foolish attempts to appeal to the far right on issues where a huge majority of the population of the US is in the middle. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List Mike "Mish" Shedlock is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com/account_management.html to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific. |
You are subscribed to email updates from Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
Damn Cool Pics |
How Happy is the Meal You’re Paying For [Infographic] Posted: 27 Feb 2012 02:47 PM PST With iconic products, especially food products that are marketed primarily to children, I think it's beneficial to take a moment to investigate how products this recognizable and loved have become so iconic. 37% of children say McDonald's is their fast food chain of choice, and no other company gets more than 10% of their vote. This infographic lays out some of the details of the recent San Francisco Healthy Food Ordinance, and it also explores some of the facts behind how McDonald's has become such a popular chain with children. I didn't know before reading this, for example, that Happy Meal toys have made McDonalds is the world's largest toy distributor. This infographic also lays how some of the backlash has inspired response from McDonald's. I think it will be interesting to see how what they change and adapt to please both the customers that want more nutritious options, as well as the ones that want to be able to order one that may be less healthy. Click on Image to Enlarge. Via: frugaldad More Infographics. |
You are subscribed to email updates from Damn Cool Pictures To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
The Epic Failure of Google+ Graywolf's SEO Blog |
Posted: 27 Feb 2012 10:30 AM PST In the past, I’ve not been shy about hiding my dislike for some of Google’s practices. In fact, I’ve called them everything from an arrogant bully to an incestuous circle jerk, trapped in a filter bubble world . But recently I’ve been reading all of the press and counter press about how Google+ is growing faster than the waistline of your average McDonald’s customer along with the incessant blood sucking social media guru’s top ten posts about how to leverage Google+ for everything from attention, mindshare, links, SEO, and Fritos covered with caviar. It’s all a bunch of BS: Google+ is doomed to fail. The only people too blind to see it are the techno-weenies, social media charlatans, or any other clueless half wits who think getting on the homepage of techmeme is a meaningful goal worth achieving. if you are a Silicon Valley reporter, talking with a Googler on video chat is the equivalent of a 13 year old girl talking to Justin Bieber… Let’s get one thing straight: Google is an amazing company. They have built some amazing top of the line products that I love and use by choice daily because they are top of the line (like Google Apps). Other products (like Google buzz and Google wave) suck worse than a Bethany Getting Married weekend marathon on Bravo. But what makes a Google product work and what doesn’t? It’s really quite similar to way things work in the rest of the world. What works is building products that solve problems for CONSUMERS and are things that “normal people” want to use, not products companies want to ram down the throats of normal consumers for the company’s own best interests. The reason Facebook works is because it allows “regular” people to connect and socialize with their friends. The reason people loathe Facebook ads and Facebook pulled their online stores is because it was like trying to sell things to your friends while they were hanging out at the bar. You were the annoying Amway dude that no one wanted to talk to or be around. So why does Google+ suck despite all the free hippie love from the tech community fan boys? First off the tech community has the attention span of a squirrel on ADD medication. This is the new shiny cat toy of the moment. They all want to play with it. To be honest, they are like political commentators on CNN: they have 24 hours a day to fill with programing (or, in their case, a day’s worth of page view journalism). They will say anything for 15 more seconds of air time time, more attention, or a boost in klout score. You should pretty much ignore 90% of the things that come out of their mouths. Secondly, deep down inside they all want to work for Google. Maybe it’s the peer respect, the pay, the perks, or just maybe it’s the free lunch. Since Google tied all of the Google employee’s benefits to the success of Google’s social network, Google employees are now highly motivated to engage with “the common folk” using all the nifty things on Google+ like video chat. This is all smoke and mirrors to get you to think Google+ is where the cool kids are when they’re really not (its the real world equivalent of paying celebrities to show up at a party). However, if you are a Silicon Valley reporter, talking with a Googler on video chat is the equivalent of a 13 year old girl talking to Justin Bieber. Yea, I went there–but just try and tell me it’s not true. But you can’t build a data collection system and Rube Goldberg it into a social network When Google started out, their goal was to build a great search engine. They did, and it changed everything. Nowadays when Google sets out to build something, they don’t do it to build the best product in its class; they do it to extract more data from/about you, profile you better, and sell you to advertisers as a more targeted and qualified prospect (ad retargeting anyone). Google wallet wasn’t designed to build a great, frictionless commerce system. It was designed to pull you away from PayPal and to extract as much data as possible about your purchasing habits. Google buzz wasn’t designed to help you discover cool fun stuff on the web. It was designed to build a set of trust data about your friends (aka your social graph) and what they read and like. Then it filters out the fake social media spam and SEO BS with social proof so companies can make their SERPS better to charge more to advertisers. They just were too good at it and got busted. Google+ wasn’t designed to create an amazing social network to allow you to connect with your friends. It was built to validate your social graph data, keep you off Facebook and Twitter, keep you in the filter bubble of your “friends likes” and, more importantly, keep you in the Google ecosystem as much as possible. Aside from the naive delusional tech press, who are little more than puppets on strings at this point, regular people “know without knowing exactly why” that Google is being disingenuous and lying to them. But for now, thanks to SPYW being integrated into Google’s SERPS, if you sell anything on the web, you have to play with social media to remain competitive. However, you should never put all your eggs in one basket, especially one you are going to let Facebook, Twitter, or Google+ carry around for you. You’ll never know when they will decide to change or phase out your mission critical business functions or take your data and keep it to themselves, leaving you to swing from the gallows. photo credit: Shutterstock/Akva Related posts:
Advertisers:
Advertisers:
This post originally came from Michael Gray who is an SEO Consultant. Be sure not to miss the Thesis Wordpress Theme review. |
You are subscribed to email updates from Graywolf's SEO Blog To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
|