| |||
marți, 26 august 2014
94 years later, here's where we are:
Today Is Women's Equality Day
|
Facebook 
Twitter | More Ways to EngageNegative SEO: Should You Be Worried? If Attacked, What Should You Do?
Negative SEO: Should You Be Worried? If Attacked, What Should You Do? |
| Negative SEO: Should You Be Worried? If Attacked, What Should You Do? Posted: 25 Aug 2014 05:15 PM PDT Posted by MarieHaynes There has been a lot of talk lately about negative SEO. Does it really happen? If so, should you be worried? How do you know whether someone is attempting to attack you with negative SEO? And what should you do to protect yourself? The purpose of this article is to shed some light on the subject, and hopefully to reduce some of the fear exists in this area. What is negative SEO?Negative SEO occurs when someone makes attempt to lower a site's rankings in the search engines. There are multiple ways that this can be attempted. The most common type of negative SEO that gets discussed is link based negative SEO, but there are many other techniques that unscrupulous people can use to try to reduce your rankings. We'll talk about how to recognize some of these tactics later on in this article . Does negative SEO really work?We know that a site can be penalized or can be suppressed by Google algorithms if they have engaged in manipulative link building. The result can be a manual unnatural links penalty or an unnanouced demotion at the hands of the Penguin algorithm. So, if links that I made can hurt me, then intuitively it makes sense that links that someone else made could have the same negative effect. Or can they? Google is quite adamant that true, effective negative SEO is very rare. In an effort to understand more about Google's stance on negative SEO I decided to research every instance I could find where a Google representative discussed negative SEO. You can read transcriptions of a good number of John Mueller's and Matt Cutt's statements on negative SEO in this article. I'll be quoting from these transcriptions several times in this Moz post as well. Prior to January of 2003, Google had a page on their site that said the following, "There is nothing a competitor can do to harm your ranking or have your site removed from our index. " And then in 2003, they changed the wording to say, "There is almost nothing a competitor can do to harm your ranking…." And really, the change made sense. I don't believe Google was admitting at this point that you could drop a site by pointing links at it. Rather, they were likely conceding that there could be cases where someone could harm your website by, for example, hacking into your server and deleting your site or changing your robots.txt file to tell search engines not to crawl the site any more or other such nefarious things. But what about links? Can a competitor point bad links at you and reduce your rankings? In 2007, Matt Cutts was quoted in a Forbes article on negative SEO: "Matt Cutts, a senior software engineer for Google, says that piling links onto a competitor's site to reduce its search rank isn't impossible, but it's extremely difficult. "We try to be mindful of when a technique can be abused and make our algorithm robust against it," he says. "I won't go out on a limb and say it's impossible. But Google bowling is much more inviting as an idea than it is in practice." So, at that point Google is admitting that negative SEO via linkbuiding is a possibility, albeit quite a remote one. Let's jump forward to 2012. In April of 2012 Google released the first version of the Penguin algorithm which was created to reduce and even penalize for the use of unnatural links. This is when the topic of whether or not you could negatively affect a competitor's site by pointing bad links at them became a very common discussion. Take a look at the Google Trends data for searches for "negative SEO": Shortly after Google refreshed the Penguin algorithm in October of 2012, Matt Cutts announced the creation of a new tool, the disavow tool, which would allow site owners to ask Google not to count links that they felt could damage their site. Matt stated that the vast majority of sites would not need to use the tool and that Google's algorithms were really quite good at making sure that these bad links would not hurt your site. But, he did admit that it could potentially be a concern for people in high money, competitive niches, saying, "For the people who are in maybe super competitive poker, casino, whatever kind of niches and they're worried about, 'OK, what if someone is trying to do some ill will towards my site?' we've just released a new tool called disavow links." If you read through the transcriptions of things that Matt Cutts and John Mueller have said about negative SEO, here are the points that Google seems to be emphasizing:
Examples of things that are NOT negative SEOI can't tell you how many times I have had a client claim that a competitor is attacking them with bad links when in most cases, this probably isn't true. If you start looking at your backlink profile and seeing some odd looking links it's a normal reaction to think, "I didn't make these spammy links! So, if I didn't make them, who did? It must be my competitor!" Here are some examples of situations where negative SEO was suspected, but in reality there is another explanation for what is going on: Example #1: "Weird" links are not necessarily bad linksThere are some websites that link out to almost every site on the web. For example, most sites will have links from sites like:
...and so on. Example #2: Sitewide links are not all bad linksI've seen site owners get really upset when they look at their "Links to your site" section of Webmaster Tools and see something like this: The fear is that Google is going to think that you built tens of thousands of links to your site. Now, in the example that I have given, where the site is a well known one like yellowpages.com, it may be a little more clear that this is not an unnatural link. But, what if a site owner in your niche really liked your content and linked to you in their sidebar? And what if they linked to you with a keyword? Underneath "Links to your site" in Webmaster Tools is a section called, "How your data is linked" that contains your most commonly used anchor text. So, if I got a sitewide link from a site with thousands of pages and they linked with a keyword, I'm going to see that Google thinks that the majority of my links are keyword anchored. Oh no! I've had people think that they've been hit by negative SEO because they have seen a single keyword anchored sitewide link. In my opinion, Google is pretty good at figuring out that a sitewide link is really just one vote from a site. A single sitewide link is not a sign of negative SEO even if it causes thousands of links to appear in Webmaster Tools. Example #3: Your old habits are coming back to haunt youHave you ever in the past purchased a link building package? For example, years ago when I was learning SEO I purchased a citation building package to one of my sites. It was one of those deals where you pay $100 and you get a whole bunch of directory listings. (Yeah...I'm not proud of it, but hey...we all had to start learning somewhere.) I've since cleaned up those links. But, the amazing thing is that they keep replicating. I will often see new links appear that are using the same text that I used when I purchased that package. It would be easy for me to say, "Hey! I haven't built any links in years...and now I'm seeing spammy directory listings appear. This must be a competitor pointing bad links at me!" But really, my own actions were the cause for these unnatural links. Example #4: A well-meaning employee or friend is building you linksYou might laugh at this example, but I've seen it happen. I had a client who contacted me for help with a manual unnatural links penalty. He swore he had never purchased or built a link in his life, but his backlink profile was full of a lot of pretty manipulative stuff. He assumed it had to be a competitor doing this. As we were doing the cleanup for his site we noticed new bad links that were appearing. Agh! We're under attack! Well, it turns out that the site owner's nephew had been doing some reading about SEO. I am not kidding. He thought he was helping his uncle out by SEOing his site for him. Oy vey. Example #5: A previous SEO made these linksSome people are shocked when they find out that their SEO company has been building them unnatural links. I have seen many cases where an SEO company promised they were going to give a site "White hat links" or links that were within the Google guidelines, but in reality it looks like they outsourced the job to a cheap linkbuilding company that created spammy bookmarks, blog comments and forum signatures. If you've got unnatural links and you've ever hired an SEO company, there is a good chance that those bad links were actually made on purpose and that YOU paid for them! Remember, prior to April of 2012, these links used to work well to rank pages and very few websites would get penalized for using them. Example #6: You've been hackedWhile someone could negative SEO your site by hacking into it, not all cases of hacking are negative SEO. A while back, a friend of mine emailed me and said, "Hey! Did you know that one of your sites is ranking highly for Michael Kors handbags?" His suggestion was that I take advantage of that and throw an affiliate page up on the site. :) I had a look at the backlinks and here's what I saw: Crap. This was not a competitor trying to hurt my rankings. In fact, the tens of thousands of spammy links that were pointing at my site were actually helping my rankings at that point. What had happened here is that someone had taken advantage of a vulnerability in a Wordpress plugin that had not been updated. They were able to hack into the site and create a whole bunch of new pages. They then pointed huge numbers of spammy links at these pages and redirected them to their Michael Kors affiliate sites. If you are looking at your backlink profile and you see odd keyword anchors for things like viagra, cialis, casinos, payday loans, ugg boots, etc, then there is a good chance that you have been hacked. In most cases these links can be removed by finding and removing the pages that the hacker created on your site. However, if you have been hacked, it's a good idea to have someone familiar with cleaning up hacks look at your site to figure out how the hacker got in and how you can close that door. In this situation, we removed the offending pages, found and fixed the access point, AND I also disavowed all of those links. According to Google, if you get hacked and have bad links pointing to you, you can probably ignore them because their algorithms are good at picking up and just discounting this sort of thing. However, it concerned me that these bad links actually were helping this site. If Google was just discounting them then they should have had no effect. I am 99% sure that I would have been ok to leave them, especially since the pages they pointed to had been removed (which also removes the link pointing to that page), but just to be absolutely sure that something odd didn't affect me with the next Penguin update, I disavowed them all at the domain level. I now have alerts on Google Alerts and Moz Freshweb Explorer set up to help me determine when someone is hacking my site. To do so for your sites, in each of these tools you can set up alerts for things like:
...and so on. Signs of things that COULD be negative SEOI said at the start of this article that the vast majority of cases of suspected negative SEO that I see really aren't negative SEO after all. But, there are situations where it does indeed happen. Here is the type of link that you can commonly see when someone is trying to attack you with negative links:
There are many other tricky techniques that can be used to attack sites with negative SEO, but most sites will not need to worry about these tactics. (I'll explain more about whether or not you need to worry below, so keep reading!) I'm not about to describe all of the different ways you can do negative SEO, as I don't want to give any evil people any ideas. But, the one tactic that I will mention and that you can keep an eye on is someone redirecting penalized sites to yours. Take a look right now at your site on ahrefs.com. You don't need a membership to see whether you've got redirects pointing to you. Scroll down until you see "backlink types" and then "redirect". Now, not all redirects are bad. If you have affiliates, they may have pages that redirect to your product pages, These are usually okay, and there are many other valid reasons for a site to redirect to yours. But if today you see that you have three sites redirecting to you and next week you've got 30 or even 300 sites redirecting to you, then this could be a sign of a problem. Can these redirects hurt you, though? Can an influx of bad links hurt you? Do you need to worry? Google has given conflicting advice in this regard. In one place, they have said that bad link signals will definitely pass through a 301 redirect, but in another place they have said that attempting to 301 redirect a penalized site to a clean site will not cause a penalty on the clean site. In my opinion, what Google is saying here is that if you are redirecting one of your own sites to another of your own sites, then they'll pass the bad link signals. It's just like you building your own unnatural links. But if you try to 301 to someone else's site then they won't let those links count. How does Google know the difference? That's part of the secret sauce. I do think that they use all sorts of signals to determine whether links are self made or made by a competitor. Should you worry about negative SEO?OK, so let's say you see evidence that someone is attacking your site with unnatural links. Does this mean you are going to lose your rankings? Google really does work hard to algorithmically protect sites from this type of link causing a problem. And, I would say that for the vast majority of you who are reading this post, you DO NOT NEED TO WORRY ABOUT NEGATIVE SEO. Yes, just shouted there. I really want to emphasize that most sites do not need to worry. This is the point in the article where the black hatters start getting upset. I wonder who the first person will be to post a comment saying, "You don't know what you're talking about! Negative SEO works because I've done it on hundreds of sites." Or, "I know negative SEO works because my site got taken down." Here is my opinion on the types of sites that could possibly be adversely affected by a link based negative SEO attack:
In these cases, if it does appear that negative SEO is being targeted at your website, the best tool you have is to do monthly monitoring of your backlinks. How can you protect yourself from negative SEO?If you are in a competitive niche, or if you have a history of being penalized and having to do link cleanup, then you really should be monitoring your backlinks regularly. What we do for our regular link audit clients is a monthly backlink audit. This really should be frequent enough to find and clean up unnatural links. However, if you are under a strong attack where new unnatural links are coming in daily, it may be a good idea to do this cleanup every one-to-two weeks. It's not a bad idea for other sites that are at low risk of succumbing to a negative SEO attack to do a monthly link audit as well. What we have found is that when you monitor your new links monthly, you can easily see the new, good links that your site is attracting. This can give you a lot of ideas on how to get even more links. If you see, for example, that a few people had recommended a particular product of yours via a link from forum posts, then you may want to create more content surrounding that product and engage on an email outreach campaign to get more people to link to that content. But wait….why would I recommend doing a regular link audit if Google says that they can catch negative SEO and discount it? The reason is that you're relying on an algorithm and the algorithm is not going to be 100% accurate. Here are some quotes from John Mueller of Google regarding their accuracy on catching and discounting negative SEO: "It's a tricky situation and not something where I'd say that we can guarantee that we always get it 100% right. But, from the cases I've looked at I think we've done a pretty good job." "We do work very hard to make sure that third party effects like that don't play a role within the search results. It's something we can't absolutely guarantee that we'll always get it right. So, if you're seeing something like this you're welcome to let us know about that. " "If you're looking at the links in Webmaster Tools for example I might go ahead and submit a disavow file for those links. In general though, we do recognize these kind of situations and handle them appropriately. " How to do your backlink auditThere are many different ways to do a backlink audit. Some people will use automated link auditing tools, but if you do choose to do this it is vitally important that you do a manual audit alongside of the automated suggestions. I can't tell you how many failed reconsideration requests I have seen because people have relied solely on these reports. I have also seen these tools recommend disavowing some fantastic natural links as well. In my opinion, you must look at your links manually! If you are working on a site that does not have a history of unnatural linking, you can probably get away with just using the links that you get from Webmaster Tools. Google has said in the past that Webmaster Tools links are "all you need". However, John Mueller and Matt Cutts have clarified that statement saying that they are all you need in order to pick up your patterns of unnatural linking. This is fine if you are lucky enough to have a complete list of all of the links that have been ever made on your behalf, but if you don't have that then you're likely going to have to go looking to other sources to find all of these links. We have come across many unnatural links that are indexed in Google and not reported in Webmaster Tools. And, we've even been given some of these as examples on failed reconsideration requests. The links you see in Webmaster Tools are just a sample of your links. As such, we use links from the following sources:
We then sort the links into a more manageable list so that we only analyze one link from each domain. If you are doing monthly audits, you will want to keep track of which domains you have already audited so that you don't waste time assessing that domain again. You can use a VLOOKUP formula in Excel to highlight which domains you have already audited in previous months. You can use a similar VLOOKUP to highlight domains that are already in your disavow file. It took me a while to understand how VLOOKUP works. There are many tutorials out there, but here is my simple explanation:
I have prepared hundreds of link audit spreadsheets. This summer I dedicated a huge amount of time to creating and programming a system that allows me to keep track of my monthly audit clients and create awesome spreadsheets for manual link audits. The sheet that is produced chooses the best link from each domain to audit, eliminates domains that I have already audited for each client, marks the nofollows, marks which links are keyword anchors, and marks which domains have already been disavowed (and also takes into account subdomains when you have disavowed the full domain.) It also tells me whether or not each domain is my list of tens of thousands of domains that I call my "disavow blacklist" and also my whitelist that contains domains that I know contains links not made for SEO purposes such as sites like alexa.com, aboutus.org, known dmoz scrapers and so on. This system saves me a huge amount of time, especially for those clients for whom we do regular backlink audits. I want to thank Moz for allowing me to mention this system. I am now making it available for others to use (for a fee). You can get more details here. The next step, once you have audited your links and determined which ones are ones that were made to manipulate Google, and are therefore unnatural, is to add these sites to your disavow file. You almost always want to disavow these domains on the domain level. This means including "domain:example.com" rather than "http://www.example.com/page1.html". Once this is done, add these domains to your existing disavow file and upload it to the disavow tool. Don't worry...there is no harm in submitting regular disavows. SummaryI have covered a lot of info in this post and hopefully I haven't confused too many people. The topic of negative SEO really is a tough one to understand. On one hand Google says, "Don't worry about it." But, on the other hand they tell us that although it shouldn't be a problem, it's not a bad idea to disavow any spam links you find pointing to your site even if you didn't make them. Here are the takehome points of this article:
Negative SEO always brings up interesting discussion. Have you been a victim? Do you do monthly audits? Do you feel that Google is good at preventing negative SEO? Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don't have time to hunt down but want to read! |
| 10 Tips to Take the Moz Tools to the Next Level Posted: 25 Aug 2014 04:48 AM PDT Posted by EllieWilkinson
Hey Moz fans! I'm Ellie, and I'm part of the newly formed Customer Success team at Moz. As part of the "S" team, I work to teach customers how to be successful marketers and awesome Moz users. Whether you're an old pro or a newb, we want to help you achieve your marketing goals. That's why the Success Team and the Help Team at Moz decided to put together some tips and tricks to bring your Moz knowledge to the next level. Think of them as "power-ups" for your Moz boss fights! We recorded several videos to provide step-by-step guides to the Moz tools for you. Be sure to watch the videos in the bottom right-hand corner for a laugh, and see how many video game references you can find! 1. Find the best time to tweetLearn how to time your tweets to coincide with your Twitter followers' activity with this Followerwonk walkthrough, which also shows me in action at my side job as PR specialist at the Death Star. Tweet this: Find the best time to tweet: One of 10 video tips to take @Moz tools to the next level 2. Get the web's best SERP analysis reportWatch Nick's guide to gathering intel on a competitor and exporting a detailed SERP report using the Keyword Difficulty tool. Tweet this: Get the web's best SERP analysis report: One of 10 video tips to take @Moz tools to the next level 3. Research local categories and keywordsSam walks you through how to use the Moz Local category research tool to gather local keyword ideas. Tweet this: Research local categories and keywords: One of 10 video tips to take @Moz tools to the next level 4. See your ranking historyLooking for your keyword rankings history? David gives you a step-by-step guide on where to download and export the report in Moz Analytics. Also, discover an automated way to get keyword ranking PDF reports sent directly to your inbox. Tweet this: See your ranking history: One of 10 video tips to take @Moz tools to the next level 5. Gather new keywords to trackRock your keyword list with the keyword opportunities tab in Moz Analytics - Chiaryn and her sweet puppy Lettie Pickles show you how it's done. Tweet this: Gather new keywords to track: One of 10 video tips to take @Moz tools to the next level 6. Explore your SERPs with MozBarAbe demonstrates how to use the MozBar to enhance search results and quickly export reports right from the SERPs. Tweet this: Explore your SERPs with MozBar: One of 10 video tips to take @Moz tools to the next level 7. Discover who to target on TwitterI explain how to build an outreach campaign and gain followers on Twitter using the "Compare users" tab in Followerwonk. Tweet this: Discover who to target on Twitter: One of 10 video tips to take @Moz tools to the next level 8. Uncover your site's broken linksFrom his tiny box in the corner of your screen, Matt shows you how to export and explore a CSV from the Crawl Diagnostics tab in Moz Analytics. Tweet this: Uncover your site's broken links: One of 10 video tips to take @Moz tools to the next level 9. Find your competitor's most popular contentAnalyze your competitor's most successful content to gain ideas for your own strategy using Open Site Explorer, as Rachael demonstrates. Tweet this: Find your competitor's most popular content: One of 10 video tips to take @Moz tools to the next level 10. Scope out your competitor's fresh linksRoger the Mozbot and I show you how to see fresh links pointing to your competitor but not to you (yet!) using Fresh Web Explorer. Tweet this: Scope out your competitor's fresh links: One of 10 video tips to take @Moz tools to the next level Hopefully these tips and tricks give you some ideas of how to take your Moz game to the next level. Maybe you're even ready to do your speed run through Moz Pro! If you have some Moz protips of your own, share them with us in the comments below! Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don't have time to hunt down but want to read! |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Moz Blog To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |
Top Tips for Measuring & Analysing Your Content
Top Tips for Measuring & Analysing Your Content |  |
| Top Tips for Measuring & Analysing Your Content Posted: 26 Aug 2014 02:00 AM PDT Content, content, content – it's all anyone in SEO seems to talk about. We're not just a company, we're a digital publisher! Content is King! Long live content! I'm a content specialist and even I'm getting sick of it. It's not the principle that irritates me – indeed, the principle is excellent and key to me keeping my job! No, it's the execution. Now that content has been universally agreed upon as the way to gain rankings, the world and his dog are churning it out at a rate of knots with little thought as to quality or whether it's actually doing anyone any good. So, I'm here to explain to you how you can measure your content, analyse it, and use it to improve what you're producing, which should benefit both you and your audience. What Should You Measure? First things first, what do you need to measure to understand how well your content is doing? As with everything in SEO, there is a wide range of opinions on the matter. But we need a list, so here are my key data points that you MUST be checking:
Simple stuff, but people still seem to be churning out content without bothering to do any analysis. So I'm going to walk you through these data points, how to collect them, how to analyse them, and how to improve your content off the back of them. Time on Page This one's really basic but still incredibly important. Time on page will let you know at a glance whether people are actually reading your content. If they're only spending a few seconds on the page and then leaving to other areas of your site (or, worse, bouncing back to the SERPs) then your content isn't working. To see if this is an issue for you, the easiest way to find this data is in good old Google Analytics. Just go to Behaviour→Site Content→All Pages and find the relevant URL. If the time spent on the page is worryingly low then it's time to do something about it. Have a look at your page. Does the title/header make it clear what the page is about whilst engaging the reader? Is the content laid out in an easy-to-read format, ensuring people aren't put off by huge blocks of impenetrable text? Do you use subheading and images to break things up, making it more aesthetically pleasing and easy to skim? If not, try making these alterations first. Making your page more user-friendly and engaging should help to get more people to read your content and take in what you're saying. Bounce Rates Closely tied to time on page is the bounce rate. If people are reaching your content and then immediately heading back to the SERPs you know you've got something wrong. To find your bounce rate, follow the same steps as for time on page – it's just a couple of columns over in Google Analytics. If you've got a high bounce rate then you know you need to make some alterations. As a benchmark, anything over 60% is really worth looking at, but if it’s around 40% or lower then feel free to be smug. As with time on page, ensuring that your content is user-friendly should be your first step. However, if these changes don't help then it may be a case of the wrong page being ranked in the SERPs – i.e. your page doesn't contain the information people are searching for. This can happen for multiple reasons – and isn't necessarily your fault. However, there are things you can do to improve the situation. First, take a look at the URL, title tag, meta description and H1 tag for the page. Do they all accurately reflect the content that users can expect to find on that page? If they are inaccurate or misleading then you should make changes to them ASAP. We all want to rank well, but there's no point ranking for irrelevant terms or getting lots of traffic that won't convert. Number of Pageviews Speaking of traffic, the amount of views your pages get is another great way to evaluate how well your content is doing. We all know Google wants to reward great content by making it rank well so, if you're producing great content it should be ranking and thus getting lots of visits. Of course, it doesn't always work like that. If your page is getting lots of views (and has good stats for time spent on page and a low bounce rate) then you're doing brilliantly and don't need to be reading this. However, that's rarely the case. Maybe you're doing well with time on page and have a low bounce rate, but just don't have much traffic coming through (remember to check all of this via Analytics). If this is an issue for you then you need to have a look at your meta data. Are the title tag and meta description exciting and engaging? Would they make you want to click through to the page? If you're not interested or intrigued, then you might want to update it. Have you also linked well to this page? Is it easy to access on your site? Has it, if it's a blog post or content of that ilk, been well-promoted? Basically – do people know this page exists and can they find it? If not, it's time to make some changes! Conversions Obviously, some pages are easier to measure conversions on than others. If the aim of your page is to get people to sign up for a newsletter, buy a product, or make an enquiry, then it's simple to see how well you're doing. You can even set up Goals in Google Analytics to track things for you. If your page is harder to analyse then it's time to do some thinking. Is the page supposed to guide people through to another section of your site? Is it supposed to encourage people to comment and engage with it? Or is it just there to inform? For the first two cases it's quite easy to assess conversions. If you're guiding people through to another area then you want to set up a funnel and look at the drop-off rate. If people are moving through your site as desired then the content is doing well. However, if people are failing to continue along your funnel then you'll want to make some alterations. Perhaps you need to make the call to action clearer, or make it more obvious what the next step to take is. If you're trying to spark conversation then you need to look at how many responses you're getting. Are people liking, commenting or sharing your content? If not, consider whether you're making it easy for them to do so. Are there clear, prominent social sharing buttons? Can they leave a comment without having to undergo a long sign-up or sign-in procedure? Making things simple for your users is essential. You can even use Google Content Experiments (an option within Analytics) to A/B test changes to pages, such as the wording or placement of your call to action. This can be a great way to determine how to encourage more conversions. However, it may be that your content just isn't good enough to be shared. In which case it's time to pull your socks up and start creating something worthwhile and not just for the sake of adding something new to your site. Every page on your site should have a defined purpose. If it doesn’t have one, then it shouldn’t exist. Shares One of the hardest things to analyse is whether your content is being shared successfully. My two favourite tools for figuring out where your content is getting shares from are Open Site Explorer and Social Crawlytics. Both of these will give you an overall figure for share and then a breakdown of where they're from – be it Twitter, Facebook, Google+, Pinterest etc. A quick note – on OSE you'll want to filter to "only external links" to get a clear picture. I like to use both because they give you slightly different pictures. For example, OSE differentiates between Facebook likes and Facebook shares. Social Crawlytics, on the other hand, allows you to see shares broken down by content type and provides some nice graphic representations of the data. Using these tools can quickly help you understand how much your content is being shared and on what platforms this is happening. If your content is aimed to get shares but isn't doing so, then you can now focus on promoting it better and ensuring that it is of a high enough quality that people will want to share it with others. If it's doing well, then give yourself a pat on the back.
So there you go – those are my key data points to keep an eye on when creating content. Using these stats you should easily be able to figure out what is and what isn't working for you – and fix the areas that are failing. Another bonus – clear figures make it much easier to persuade clients that they need to up their game and invest in their site content – happy days for those of us in SEO. What areas do you analyse? What stats do you find useful? And how do you approach improving website content? I'd love to know your methods, so please get in touch! Either leave a comment here or grab me on Twitter @SamanthaKHall
Image from Wikipedia The post Top Tips for Measuring & Analysing Your Content appeared first on White.net. |
| You are subscribed to email updates from White.net To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |
Seth's Blog : The best lesson from Fantasy Football's success
The best lesson from Fantasy Football's success
When people say, "my team," they mean it.
In the top-down world of industrial marketing, the San Francisco 49ers say, "we built this team, buy a ticket if you want to come."
Then, a few years later, it broadened to, "you should buy a jersey so you can be part of it."
In the sideways, modern world of peer-to-peer connection, people say, "my team has this player, that player and this defense." It belongs to them, because they built it. Everyone has their own team.
In neither case is the fan on the field, getting concussed or making the big decisions. It doesn't matter. What matters is that our feeling of ownership, of us-ness, is shifting. We want celebrities and brands and teams that do more than merely put on a show. In addition to the show, people want to believe that they own part of it.
More Recent Articles
- The idea is not the (only) hard part
- You could wreck this (if you want to)
- Why drafting works
- The shortlist
- If you choose to be in the dog food business...
[You're getting this note because you subscribed to Seth Godin's blog.]
Don't want to get this email anymore? Click the link below to unsubscribe.
Postări
