Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis |
- Fed-Bashing Three Ways; Night of the Living Fed (A 2008 Claim)
- Geithner's Four-Point Plan for the G-20 is Nothing but a Wish-List
- Reflections on Social Paradigm Changes; Victimized by the Fed; The Biggest Bubble
Fed-Bashing Three Ways; Night of the Living Fed (A 2008 Claim) Posted: 10 Nov 2010 07:43 PM PST Beating up on the Fed used to make you an oddball. Does it still? That is the question Slate asks in Fed-Bashing Three Ways. According to a pre-election Bloomberg poll, 60 percent of likely voters who self-identified as Tea Party members said they want to see the Federal Reserve either reined in or abolished. Rand Paul, the Republican senator-elect from Kentucky, campaigned in part on an anti-Fed platform. Fed-bashing is often shrugged off as something that oddballs do whenever the country hits hard economic times. But if that's the case, then why is Jeremy Grantham railing against the Fed too?Night of the Living Fed (A 2008 Claim) I have been talking about these ideas for years, also in length. Indeed, I can even stake claim to the exact title Night of the Living Fed as of Tuesday, March 11, 2008. What I said then, still holds true today. Please check it out. Moreover, Grantham's statement regarding the Fed's "complete refusal to learn from experience", is rather generic but that just happens to be Fed Uncertainty Principle (April 3, 2008), Corollary Number Three. Uncertainty Principle Corollary Number Three: Don't expect the Fed to learn from past mistakes. Instead, expect the Fed to repeat them with bigger and bigger doses of exactly what created the initial problem.That aside, I certainly do not mind the company of Grantham at all. In fact I am quite pleased we are on the same page. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List |
Geithner's Four-Point Plan for the G-20 is Nothing but a Wish-List Posted: 10 Nov 2010 02:49 PM PST Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner along with Wayne Swan the treasurer of Australia, and Tharman Shanmugaratnam, the finance minister of Singapore have put together a "plan" for the G-20 in an op-ed piece in the Wall Street Journal. Please consider A Four-Point Plan for the G-20 The deep economic challenges left by the crisis in the established economies and the prospect of rapid expansion in emerging economies necessitate a new agenda for international economic cooperation. We are past the point where public policy around the world was directed exclusively to averting an economic depression. We now face diverse transitions to a sustainable path of growth led by the private sector.Was that a Plan or a Wish-List? A statement praising motherhood and apple pies is not the same as a plan to bake pies. In my admittedly old-fashioned way of thinking, a plan involves putting together details on how to get from point A to point B. Pray tell what is the plan here? Geithner, Swan, and Shanmugaratnam did not put together a "plan". They put together a no-details "wish-list" that relies on miracles from an "Economic Fairy Godmother". I hate to break this stunning news but there is no "plan", and there is no "Economic Fairy Godmother" that will grant Geithner his wishes. The G-20 would have been far more successful had it blown sky high in a series of disputes than to put out garbage like this and call it a plan. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List |
Reflections on Social Paradigm Changes; Victimized by the Fed; The Biggest Bubble Posted: 10 Nov 2010 09:19 AM PST Here is an email from a reader regarding social paradigm changes that I would like to share. It is in response to Telling Signs-of-the-Times: Layaways, Off-Brands, Goodwill Stores, Consignment Sales, Frugality, all Thrive in Middle-Class Suburbia Susan writes ... Hi Mish,Reflections on Social Paradigm Changes Thanks Susan. I have talked about these kind of changes on many occasions. Perhaps it will have more meaning coming from a reader. Right now, so many are living in denial, blaming banks or mortgage companies or whoever for their own personal problems and lack of prudence. In acts of greed or stupidity, millions bought houses knew they could not afford the payments. In additional acts of greed or stupidity, millions more took out home equity loans and spent it on remodeling, on boats, cars, or trips. Now that the money is spent. Collectively, they whine about being victims and want some sort of relief. Victimized by the Fed Yes these people are victims, but not in the manner that most think. They are victims of Fed policies that encouraged speculation, not saving. They are victims of a Fed that slashed interest rates to bail out bankers in the wake of the dot-com crash. As a direct result its policies, the Fed spawned the biggest speculative bubble in housing the world has ever seen, not just in the US but worldwide. Outside the US, bubbles in Australia, Canada, China, and the UK are still in full swing. The bubbles in the US, Spain, and Ireland have crashed. Amazingly people down under and up-North still believe "It's different here". Literally every day someone writes me with a cockamamie plan that allegedly "save homes" and prevent foreclosures. None of these people ever look at the costs of what they propose. None of them ever address the question of why these people are in trouble. Yes, they were suckered in by the Fed, yet they had to know their salary did not support what they were doing. Willing Victims People are in trouble for reasons Susan writes about: They lived beyond their means for years, with no savings, and they piled up debt upon debt. That makes them "willing victims". Neither the banks nor the "willing victims" deserved to be bailed out. It is certainly unfortunate we bailed out the banks, but two wrongs do not make a right. In the vast majority of cases, principal reductions are ripe for abuse and fraud. Principal reductions would encourage others to stop paying mortgages to get relief. Where is the justice in that? Where is the justice in bailing out speculators just because we bailed out the banks. For thoughts on restoring justice, please see Foreclosure Case May Set Anti-Bank Precedent; Restoring Equity vs. Penalization By the way, many banks are still in trouble, and Bank of America is right at the top of the list. Hopefully it will not get bailed out next time if and when the proverbial stuff hits the fan. Here is the simple truth of the matter: Except in extremely rare, highly publicized cases, these people did not pay their bills. The remedy is foreclosure. Instead, nearly the whole of blog-o-sphere wants delays in foreclosures, principal reductions that invite more writedowns and more fraud, or more bank bailouts. It is time for people and banks to be held accountable for their actions. With that, robo-fraud and other mortgage fraud should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. However, the remedy for failing to pay ones mortgage is and should be foreclosure, the sooner the better. Attitudes the Key The key to understanding what the future hold is found in attitude changes. Far too late, people have learned their house is not their retirement. Kids see the parents arguing over money and vow not to get in debt the same way. It's these attitudes towards spending and debt that guarantee to make Bernanke's life miserable. Yet, every day someone points out the Fed's monetization efforts, claiming it will span massive inflation or hyperinflation. No it won't. $600 billion is peanuts compared to $50 trillion in credit and debt, a nice chunk of which will never be paid back. Bernanke has not changed consumer attitudes towards spending (that top link is proof), nor has he changed bank attitudes towards lending. Overall credit is still contracting, and another downturn in the markets will have credit-marked-to-market crashing as well. Certainly the Fed's efforts over the last two months have not been deflationary. Short-term, Bernanke has fueled speculative bubbles in junk bonds, in equity markets, and in some commodities. Gold is reacting sensibly in this regard. The other bubbles will pop as they always do by definition. Belief in Fed is Biggest Bubble Given that attitudes regarding credit and debt are the key to understanding the path we take, I see no reason to change my forecast that I have held for years: "We will move in and out of deflation over a number of years as the credit bubble continues to unwind, just as happened in Japan." The inflation everyone is screaming about now, has done nothing for the real economy. It certainly has not helped small businesses, and most importantly has not changed consumer attitudes. Given that attitudes have not changed, all the Fed has really accomplished was to provide the fuel for the next collapse. The biggest bubble is belief in the Fed's ability to inflate. If the Fed could do so, we would not be in this mess in the first place. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List |
You are subscribed to email updates from Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu