Call it a Day of Reckoning or a Point of No Return. Either way, it has arrived. Cities and states are in forced cutback mode except for Illinois which managed to kick the can down the road with massive increases in taxes. Here is a sampling of some pretty bleak happenings in a number of cities and states.
Texas may Eliminate 8,000 Jobs, Cut Spending on Schools and Social Services by 11 Percent
The two-year budget plan that the Texas House of Representatives will release today may eliminate more than 8,000 jobs and cut spending on schools, universities and social services by 11 percent. It will not tap $9.4 billion set aside for deep economic stress, Republicans say.
The Rainy Day fund will grow 14 percent by Aug. 31, 2013, bolstered by revenue from levies on oil and gas production, State Comptroller Susan Combs estimated this month. The fund has risen sixfold since 2007 as other states drained reserves to balance total deficits likely to top $190 billion during the next two years, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.
While Texas is spending $87 billion of general-fund revenue in its current two-year budget, it won't expend more than $77.3 billion in fiscal 2012 and 2013, Governor Rick Perry said in a Jan. 13 speech. Using the reserve would delay efforts to set the state's fiscal house in order, he said. Texas voters in November supported Republicans who pledged to cut spending and not raise taxes in one of seven U.S. states without a levy on personal income, he said.
"We don't have shortfalls in Texas," Perry told reporters last week. "You prioritize what's important in this state. We will fund those."
Deep Police Firefighter Layoffs in Camden, New Jersey
Public unions in Camden, N.J. will be put to the test on Wednesday when they decide whether to kick fellow officers into the street or accept cutbacks. One way or another, the money is not there to support existing contracts at full worker load.
The mayor of Camden, N.J., says 168 police officers, 67 firefighters and about 100 non-uniformed city employees were laid off Tuesday.
Mayor Dana Redd says about 100 of the police officers and most of the firefighters could be brought back if their unions agree to concessions. She says the biggest police union is scheduled to vote on a plan Wednesday.
The layoffs come as Camden, a crime-ridden city across the Delaware River from Philadelphia, faces a huge budget deficit and declining state aid.
My take is that there is no need to cut a single job. Wages and pension benefits are untenable. It is up to the police force to accept cutbacks, not up to taxpayers to keep funding public union benefits that most will never see. 100% of the blame for every job lost goes to the police and fire union.
How will they vote? It will be interesting. I expect some token effort by the union to save a couple officers. I also expect the union to whine and scream about incredible sacrifices they are making, even though those sacrifices won't amount to a hill of beans.
Thursday's county commission meeting offered plenty of political drama, as the county's leaders set a date for a recall election for the mayor and one of their colleagues.
In the end, the commission voted to set one election for a recall vote for both Mayor Carlos Alvarez and Commissioner Natacha Seijas: March 15.
The inauspicious selection of the ides of March election date -- the day Julius Caesar was killed in the Roman Senate -- quickly echoed through the commission chambers. Seijas added to the Shakespearean atmosphere with her own "Et tu, Brute?" cry of betrayal, warning her colleagues: "Today it's me, tomorrow it might be you." After the vote, she told them: "It could come back to you and haunt you one day."
The recall drives erupted amid a public outcry last fall after commissioners adopted a new budget, proposed by the mayor, that raised the property tax rate while handing pay raises to most county employees.
Miami billionaire businessman Norman Braman took the lead in the campaign to oust the mayor. He hired professional consultants who gathered 95,499 petitions, about 43,000 more than the minimum needed to force a recall election.
Miami Voice, a political action committee headed by Vanessa Brito, is heading the effort to oust Seijas. Brito initially targeted five commissioners, but was able to get the needed signatures only in Seijas' case.
In March 2009 the mayor and a majority of commissioners, including Seijas, voted to spend public dollars to build a new Florida Marlins ballpark in Little Havana. That came on the heels of an unsuccessful legal challenge by Braman aimed at barring the use of public funds.
In August 2009, The Miami Herald reported that Alvarez handed out hefty raises to his top staffers after calling for shared sacrifice in his state of the county speech during the depths of the Great Recession six months earlier.
"Everyone has been complaining about the quality of government in this community," Braman said Thursday. "I believe March 15 is an opportunity to come out -- I hope in large numbers -- to do something about it."
If you live in Miami, send them packing and get rid of any other commissioners who voted for tax hikes in the next election.
A dearth of construction work has triggered a first-of-its-kind bankruptcy involving a trust that provides workers' compensation insurance to Oregon contractors.
The Oregon Contractors Workers' Compensation Trust Inc. filed for Chapter 11 in Oregon Bankruptcy Court on Jan. 3. The move is a first step toward disbanding the trust after it lost too many members to stay in business.
The member-funded trust provided workers' compensation policies to 365 Oregon companies as recently as four years ago. Such policies pay benefits to workers who get injured on the job.
The Obama administration's $78 billion cut to US defense spending is a mere "pin-prick" to a behemoth military-industrial complex that must drastically shrink for the good of the republic, a former Reagan administration budget director recently told Raw Story.
"It amounts to a failed opportunity to recognize that we are now at a historical inflection point at which the time has arrived for a classic post-war demobilization of the entire military establishment," David Stockman said in an exclusive interview.
"The Cold War is long over," he continued. "The wars of occupation are almost over and were complete failures -- Afghanistan and Iraq. The American empire is done. There are no real seriously armed enemies left in the world that can possibly justify an $800 billion national defense and security establishment, including Homeland Security."
Calling today's military spending running at 5.4 percent of GDP "simply an absurd level that begs for radical contraction and surgery," he said that a "reasonable target" to shrink the defense establishment would be 3 percent of GDP by 2015.
What budget cuts?
Republicans, who were elected to a majority in the House of Representatives on promises to cut government spending, promised to cut $100 billion from the budget in their first year. Relatively few have proposed significant decreases in defense spending, and GOP leadership has outright dismissed the possibility.
Some prominent members of the House GOP caucus have even suggested the sum of their austerity measures could fall to only $30 billion, if that.
The 'Ponzi scheme' of 'artificial prosperity'
Stockman, who described himself as a libertarian during a recent interview with Reason.tv, told Raw Story that the economy got into this mess because of the public and private sectors' addiction to "guns and butter Keynesianism," an economic policy that amounts to a Ponzi scheme that has ballooned since 1990.
"If we see what's going on carefully, we've reached the final unmasking of the Keynesian illusion, that Keynesianism is really nothing but borrowing, stealing from the future to induce consumption today," he said. "There are no multipliers. Every one of these programs we've had from 'cash for clunkers' to housing purchase credits have disappeared as soon as they expired and simple shifted activities in time by a few months."
By 2007, before the big collapse and meltdown finally came, $7 of public and private debt was added to the national balance sheet in order to get $1 of GDP growth.
"When you get to the point of $7 of borrowing to get $1 of income, you're obviously on an unsustainable path and pretty close to hitting the wall, which more or less we have," he said. "We've reached a point of no return."
Governor Christie Blasts Illinois in State of State Address
It is my constitutional duty to report to you each year on the State of our State. And today, it is my privilege to report to you that the State of our State is improving— getting better every day.
Why do I say that?
State spending is down 9% in one year.
The budget has been balanced.
State taxes are lower— for the first time in a decade.
The unemployment rate has begun to drop— and today is below, not above, the national average.
Companies are beginning to take a second look at New Jersey.
Some were beginning to write off New Jersey, doubting we could change what the newspapers called our "old, hide-bound ways." Another paper put it simply: "New Jersey must change course."
The Day of Reckoning had arrived— and arrived with a vengeance.
New Jersey is getting recognized for taking on the tough issues that politicians have refused to touch. We are showing other states that sometimes, to create real change, you've got to go all in and show a little Jersey attitude.
And this month, new governors are taking office across the country— Republicans and Democrats— many using New Jersey as the example of how they want to lead.
For example, one state— Illinois— has chosen a very different path. They are in the throes of debating a 75% increase in income tax rates.
Is that what we want for New Jersey?
No. New Jersey intends to remain the leader, not only in turning around the national trend of out-of-control spending and taxes, but in finding the path to growth.
Governor Christie Talks About Pension Reform
Christie says the reform is FOR the teachers and FOR the police officers, otherwise there will be nothing left to pay benefits with.
Here's one quote "Benefits are too rich, contributions too small, and the system is on a path for bankruptcy."
In my opinion he understates the problem and the current liabilities, but he is certainly on target with the need for massive changes.
Illinois Kicks The Can
In Illinois, unlike New Jersey, Governor Quinn and the legislature kicked the can down the road.
In a 2009 segment on Comedy Central's The Daily Show, host Jon Stewart told viewers that many recession-hammered states had turned to unusual methods to raise money. "Are any of these ideas actually stupid?" Stewart wondered. Cut to Daily Show correspondent Jason Jones, who described Arizona's plans to sell its state government buildings for $735 million, lease them back, and keep on using them. Quickly discerning the problem with such a maneuver, Jones confronted Arizona state senator Linda Lopez: "So you've got $735 million for this year. What happens next year, when you don't have that and you've got to pay rent?" Lopez's awkward response: "That's always the problem, but we gotta get through this year."
Since late 2008, therefore, states have faced accumulated budget deficits of some $300 billion. Federal stimulus money helped cover about two-thirds of that yawning gap, but legislators have had to close the rest themselves. Many have resorted to methods that New York State's comptroller calls a "fiscal shell game."
When Arizona claimed to be selling its government buildings, it was engaging in a far more deceptive kind of borrowing—a gimmick known as "tax-exempt certificates of participation" and even more preposterous than the Daily Show correspondent realized. There was no new owner in this so-called sale. Rather, the state floated more than $1 billion of notes, promising to repay bondholders with the "rent" that it would pay to lease the buildings. Since rent, not tax revenues, technically would repay the certificates, Arizona could borrow the money, even though it exceeded the state's constitutional debt limit. Yet Arizona will pay the rent on the buildings with tax revenues, so the impact on taxpayers is exactly the same as more borrowing would have been: in this case, $1.5 billion in future taxes. "The Arizona legislature has done everything it can to pretend that life hasn't changed since the housing market collapsed, and borrowing to close its budget gaps is one good example of that," says Byron Schlomach, a fiscal analyst with the Goldwater Institute in Phoenix.
States are employing an array of other techniques that amount to borrowing without issuing debt. One strategy is simply to stop paying the bills. In Illinois, unpaid bills have reached a jaw-dropping $4.4 billion, according to the state's comptroller. California, meanwhile, famously issued nearly 450,000 IOUs, totaling $2.6 billion, in 2009. Creditors kept waiting for months included staffing firms that supplied the state with temp workers and businesses that provided technology services. Even neighboring Nevada got stuck with an IOU (for $33,383) after sending firefighters to battle California wildfires. Nationwide, states' unpaid bills have soared by nearly $100 billion, or 18 percent, since the end of 2007.
Early-retirement plans have become another vehicle for fiscal trickery. At first, the plans may seem an attractive way to downsize the government workforce. Michigan, for instance, recently passed a retirement plan to provide generous additional benefits for up to 6,400 retirees, who can step down at 59. The plan supposedly will save the state's general fund about $80 million in its first year.
Or will it? Consider some recent experiences with early retirement. Back in 2003, Connecticut embraced an early-retirement plan to reduce the state workforce by several thousand, booking the savings straightaway. But then the state rehired some 1,000 of its early retirees as temporary workers who collected salaries in addition to their pensions. By 2008, some of those "temporary" employees were still working for the state and collecting pensions, a Hartford Courant investigation discovered.
Or look at Illinois, which launched a massive early-retirement plan during the last recession, in 2002. The state originally estimated that it would cost only about $80,000 extra per retiree, but after legislators added all the union-demanded sweeteners, that price tag ballooned to $200,000. Approximately 10,000 employees rushed to take advantage of the plan, further shaking an already tottering pension system. The system's payouts to retirees rocketed in one year from $640 million to an estimated $1.6 billion.
Illinois' dire pension shortfalls didn't occur overnight, but worsened over years of budget tricks that the state never made right. It has been 20 years since New York, to close a budget deficit, bought Attica Prison from itself with money raised from a bond issue; today, the state is still using current tax dollars to pay off the interest.
Reformers should use the current downturn as a starting point to demand new measures that end many of these abuses. Though reforms will differ from state to state, several sensible principles should govern change. One is for states to switch from yearly budgets to balanced multiyear plans, so that legislators won't be able to employ tricks one year and ignore their consequences the next. Another is for states to tighten restrictions on borrowing to include debt issued by quasi-governmental entities and authorities. States can also increase the amount of money that their reserve accounts must hold during good economic times, which would both restrain the growth of government during the good times and provide a cushion against severe revenue falloffs in recessions. Such reforms would represent the next stage in taxpayers' never-ending battle against budget gimmicks.
Curve Watchers Anonymous is watching the spread between 2-year treasuries and 30-year treasuries. Bloomberg reports "The spread between yields on the 30-year bond and the 2-year note marked the steepest slope in the yield curve since at least 1977, when regular offerings of long bonds began and Bloomberg started compiling the data."
Here are a few charts. Click on any chart below for a sharper image.
30-Year Minus 2-Year Treasury Spread
10-Year Minus 2-Year Treasury Spread
10-Year TIPS Minus 10-Year Treasury Spread
Bloomberg notes "Treasury Inflation Protected Securities showed traders' expectations for price increases were near an eight-month high on speculation the Fed's plan to buy bonds in a strategy called quantitative easing will facilitate faster growth."
2-Year Treasury Yield
Yield Curve as of 2011-01-18
click on chart for sharper image
Symbols
$IRX 03-Mo Treasury Yield
$FVX 05-Yr Treasury Yield
$TNX 10-Yr Treasury Yield
$TYX 30-Yr Treasury Yield
The chart depicts monthly CLOSES of treasury yields. Unfortunately E-Signal does not have a symbol for 2-year treasuries. StockCharts does, but it cannot produce that chart.
The curve is artificially steep because Bernanke has the short end of the curve pegged near zero percent.
Bernanke's announced intent for QEII was to lower interest rates.
QEII started at the beginning of November. Since that did not work (yields started spiking the day after the program started), Bernanke has proclaimed a rising stock market is proof of success of QEII.
Ireland central bank counterfeited 51 billion Euros out of thin air. The amount is not backed by government bonds. Nor was it a loan from the ECB or anyone else. The money is counterfeit in every sense of the word.
The Irish Independent learnt last night that the Central Bank of Ireland is financing €51bn of an emergency loan programme by printing its own money.
The figures also provide the latest evidence that responsibility for funding Ireland's broken banks is being pushed increasingly back on to Irish taxpayers. The loans are recorded by the Irish Central Bank under the heading "other assets".
A spokesman for the ECB said the Irish Central Bank is itself creating the money it is lending to banks, not borrowing cash from the ECB to fund the payments. The ECB spokesman said the Irish Central Bank can create its own funds if it deems it appropriate, as long as the ECB is notified.
Other Assets? What Other Assets?
It's OK to print money as long as the ECB is notified?! Excuse me, but this is in direct violation of every EU treaty. Besides, counterfeiting is a crime everywhere.
There are no "other assets" in play. The bookkeeping is fictitious. This printing is not backed by bonds. No one in their right mind would buy such bonds. The Irish Central Bank simply counterfeited 51 Billion Euros out of thin air and distributed the money to Irish banks.
Currently, there is talk about the need to expand the size of the €440bn bail-out fund. This little exercise has me wondering, "why expand anything?" Let's solve the problem by letting Greece print Euros, Italy print Euros, Spain print Euros, Portugal print Euros, and Belgium print Euros.
As long as you are counterfeiting, and as long as the ECB doesn't mind, why not have every country print enough Euros to pay back all European sovereign debt? Every country can be debt free in seconds.
I hope everyone understands the sarcasm. This is an amazingly slippery slope and I am surprised Germany is not screaming bloody murder over it.
Irish banks are running out of collateral they can use to borrow from the European Central Bank, turning instead for emergency support from their own central bank on an unprecedented scale.
The cement mixer which was driven into the gate of Ireland's Parliament Building, in protest at the bailout of Ireland's banks. Photo: AFP
The latest data shows that Anglo Irish Bank and other lenders had borrowed €51bn (£43bn) from the Irish central bank by the end of December, under an obscure progamme listed in the balance sheet as "other assets".
This comes on top of €132bn in loans from the ECB itself, the figure normally tracked by analysts and itself 24pc of all ECB lending.
"This is a horror story: it shows the cataclysmic condition of the Irish banking system," said Tim Congdon from International Monetary Research. "The banks have borrowed €183bn in total, or 110pc of Irish GDP. They have burned through all their capital and a lot of their deposits as well. This is going to end up on the national debt".
The actions of the Irish central bank are authorised by Frankfurt, but fall into a grey area of monetary policy since they appear to involve creation of money outside the normal control of the ECB's governing council.
The use of Ireland's emergency liquidity assistance programme (ELA) raises further questions since the quality of collateral is unacceptable for normal ECB operations. The volume of borrowing has begun to level off after a surge in November.
Separately, the Spanish media reported that a mission from the International Monetary Fund was arriving in Spain this week to analyse the country's debt sustainability and may discuss a `flexible credit line', akin to precautionary overdraft facilities offered to Mexico and Poland.
Grey Area?
Excuse me for asking but what precisely is "grey"? I see no grey here. Ireland has no assets the EU will take as collateral, so the EU allows Ireland to place fictitious asset on the books and counterfeit 51 Billion Euros to give Irish Banks.
No doubt the ECB will claim it's "temporary" as if temporary counterfeiting is OK.
In nature but not size, this is worse than anything the Fed did, and Trichet just looks the other way.
Irish Prime Minister Going Down With The Ship
Irish Prime minister Brian Cowen is toast. If not on January 18 in a vote of confidence measure, then in March, in a general election. He has a shockingly low 14% voter approval rate.
Irish Prime Minister Brian Cowen faces a vote of confidence today by his Fianna Fail party, with one of his most senior ministers seeking to topple him ahead of a general election.
Seventy-one lawmakers will vote at a meeting beginning at 5:30 p.m. in Dublin. Cowen, 51, called for the secret ballot on Jan. 16, saying he expects a "ringing endorsement" even after Foreign Minister Micheal Martin said he'd oppose him.
Support for the party, in power since 1997, has dropped to 14 percent, according to a poll carried out this month. The largest opposition party, Fine Gael, has 35 percent support, according to the poll, carried out by Red C for Paddy Power Plc. The party won 40 percent of the vote in the 2007 election.
Cowen is expected to win the vote, according to odds offered by Paddy Power Plc, Ireland's largest bookmaker. Cowen is 11-4 on to win the vote.
Victory tomorrow may only be a temporary reprieve for Cowen. Based on the polls, the party may lose more than half its seats in the upcoming election. Environment Minister John Gormley of the Green Party, the junior partner in Cowen's coalition government, has said March 25 would be a reasonable date for election.
Note the arrogance of Cowen calling for a "ringing endorsement". I can't wait until they ring the final bell for this guy, hopefully today.
However, Cowen would not have called call for this vote unless he thought it was in the bag. The fact that is is a "secret ballot" instead of a roll call in Parliament makes a victory more likely in my estimation.
Anyone openly endorsing this clown deserves to go down in flames, but no one can prove how they voted. I am hoping for an upset, and without any data or facts to back it up, I think Cowen's removal is closer to a 50-50 shot than 11-4.
Regardless of how this vote turns out, Cowen will be out on his ass in March.
Is that the point of this counterfeiting now, to get as much "on the books" before the opposition takes over?
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu