Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis |
Assessing the Blame for Iraq: Bush, Obama, McCain, Others; Iraq Sunken Costs Posted: 12 Jun 2014 02:49 PM PDT In response to Iraq Splinters Into Pieces, Thank George Bush and the Neocons, I received emails from Neocon true believers and others who want to whitewash Bush's role in creating this mess. One person said Democrats are "equally" to blame. How laughable. Had Bush not trumped up lies, sucking Colin Powell along for the ride, the war would never have happened. Period. Yes, Democrat nutcases went along for the ride, notably Hillary Clinton. And had she just apologized for her stupidity, she might have won the nomination instead of Obama. Obama's Mistakes Others pointed out that Obama made mistakes. Indeed he did. Giving weapons to Islamic rebels in Syria was one of them. Undoubtedly that mindless action provided weapons that ended up in Iraq, not Syria. Reader Dennis writes .. "The current situation in Iraq didn't have to be this way for 2 reasons: 1. Bush should not have invaded, and 2. The Current Administration should not have provided assistance and weapons to the Al Qaeda linked insurgents in Syria, who intent to create an Islamist state in the region between Syria and Iraq." I agree, 100%. But the first mistake was the most costly. And look who thought Obama did not do enough in Syria. Why it's none other than WWIII proponent, Republican Senator John McCain. Flashback February 16, 2014: Think Progress reports McCain: It's 'Ludicrous' To Say More U.S. Military Aid Will Worsen Syria's Civil War Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) on Sunday dismissed the notion that increasing American military assistance to rebels in Syria could worsen the conflict there.Syria Weapons End Up In Iraq Where did those weapons end up? My bet is the same as reader Dennis. Yet, McCain (and other warmongers) want Obama to send more. McCain also wants missiles in the Czech Republic. Is there any war action McCain doesn't want? Obama Won't Rule Out Airstrikes to Aid Iraq's Army To combat Obama's mindless sending of weapons to Syria (supported 500% by McCain), Bloomberg reports Obama Won't Rule Out Airstrikes to Aid Iraq's Army. "I don't rule out anything," Obama said today when asked whether the U.S. was willing conduct drone strikes or take other action against the jihadists. Iraq "clearly is an emergency situation" and the government there needs more help.Always More! Yep, There you have it. Boehner and McCain, want Obama to do more. Always more! Always forgetting that Bush started this madness. And Republican readers always forget neocons pressure Obama to do the very things that blow up. Maliki' Connection Nouri al-Maliki' is Prime Minister of Iraq. Who is responsible for putting Maliki' in charge? The answer is none other than George Bush. Bloomberg continues ... Levin, of Michigan, told reporters, "We shouldn't knee-jerk anything. We should look at all the options carefully and thoughtfully."Sunken Costs People are tired of war and warmongering. Rightfully so. The Iraq war, begun with the U.S.-led invasion to oust Saddam Hussein in 2003, cost 4,490 Americans their lives, according to Defense Department data. The price for U.S. taxpayers was more than $2 trillion, according to the Costs of War Project by the Watson Institute for International Studies at Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island.I suggest we face the harsh reality: nothing can bring the lives lost or the money spent back. We wasted $2 trillion dollars already. Let's not waste more. McCain, as always wants to press on. And since this is a clear case of "Mission Accomplished", somehow this is all Obama's fault. By the way it should be perfectly clear now why elder Bush did not continue on to Baghdad and why it was a huge mistake for baby Bush to "finish the job". Time for Self Assessment I can and do blame Obama for countless things. But Republicans would be very wise to self-assess on Iraq, on nation building, and on warmongering in general. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com |
Posted: 12 Jun 2014 10:10 AM PDT "They will shower us with flowers." Anyone recall that idiotic line from disgraced Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld? Remember any of these lies...
And with blatant lies and complete ineptitude, the US set about "nation building" in Iraq. It was the neocon's number one wet dream at the time. Today the results are in. A few articles will explain how it turned out. Islamic Militants Take Mosul and Tikrit Please consider Militants Step Up Iraq Attack. Militants from an al-Qaeda splinter group stormed the Turkish consulate in Mosul, Iraq's second city, on Wednesday and took 49 people hostage.Kurds Take Oil City Kirkuk The Financial Times reports Iraq Slides Further Into Turmoil as Kurds Take Oil City Kirkuk. Iraq's Shia-dominated government launched air strikes on Sunni insurgent positions in and around the city of Mosul on Thursday as Islamist forces hurtled toward the capital and Kurdish troops seized control of the key oil city of Kirkuk.Insurgents Surround Iraq's Largest Refinery in Baiji Reuters reports Insurgents Surround Iraq's Largest Refinery in Baiji. Insurgents surrounded Iraq's largest refinery in the northern town of Baiji on Thursday, police and an engineer inside said.ZeroHedge provides still more details in Al Qaeda Insurgents Surround Iraq's Largest Refinery. Iraq Before and After Bush's Nation Building Effort Before: Iraq was a functioning country. After: Iraq is in ruins, much of its infrastructure wiped out Before: Iraq pumped oil After: Iraq doesn't and we have paid for that at the pump ever since Before: Iraq was ruled by a secular leader After: The US installed a Shiite puppet while verbally fighting Shiites in Iran Before: Religious freedom was the norm. Catholics, Sunnis, Shiites all got along, not perfectly but acceptably After: People are killed every day for their religious beliefs. Catholics are persecuted. Before: Women had relative freedom After: Women are likely to be shot in some cities if they do not cover their faces Before: Al Qaeda was not in Iraq. Hussein wanted nothing to do with religious zealots. After. Al Qaeda is in control of several cities Before: Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction. After: Quite possibly they exist in Iraq now. Before: Iraq military was in control. After: Iraq in open civil war, splintered into several pieces, each controlled by a different faction Before: Iraq was no terrorist threat. After: It sure is now. Before: US has no embassy in Iraq. After: US's largest embassy in the world is in Iraq Details on that last point are rather amazing. Please consider Embassy of the United States, Baghdad. At 440,000 square meters, it is the largest and most expensive embassy in the world and is nearly as large as Vatican City. It employs 15,000 people and cost $750 million to build. The Embassy opened in January 2009 following a series of construction delays. It replaced the previous embassy, which opened July 1, 2004 in Baghdad's Green Zone in a former Palace of Saddam Hussein. Idiocy of Nation Building Such is the idiocy of nation building. Hussein was an evil man. But it cost over $1 trillion dollars to get rid of him. And it was none of our business to do so. We have ongoing expenses at the embassy. Oil prices are higher. The US could not afford any of this. Iraq is in ruins. Hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians were killed or injured. Millions more lost their livelihoods. And the US caused it. So where is the apology? Better yet where, are the criminal prosecutions? Are Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld any less of war criminals than Hussein? Addendum: I nearly forgot one of the biggest one-liners of all "Mission Accomplished!" Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com |
You are subscribed to email updates from Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu