Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis |
- Truly Inane Bloomberg Analysis On Gold
- "Three Es Suggest Massive Change is Upon Us" Chris Martenson's Accelerated Crash Course
- Diving Into the GDP Report of -2.9% Growth
| Truly Inane Bloomberg Analysis On Gold Posted: 25 Jun 2014 01:41 PM PDT Bad economic analysis abounds. Some of it is so bad you wonder if the authors understand how any markets work, not just the topic of discussion. For example, please consider Gold Euphoria Won't Last With Yellen's Rally Fading, a truly remarkable exercise because it took three Bloomberg writers to produce. Here are some snips, followed by my comments. After the biggest gold slump in three decades left investors heartbroken, they're following Taylor Swift's advice and never, ever getting back together.For starters, there is no euphoria in gold. Arguably, one of the best measures of sentiment on gold is articles like the one above. Here is a look at Yellen's "Fading Rally". Yellen's Rally Fading  Supposedly it makes sense to discuss "gold's fading rally" but not countless other "fading rallies" some of which are actually fading. Apple's Fading Rally  Let's march on. Prices will average $1,250 an ounce next quarter, about 5 percent less than now, according to the median of 15 estimates. The analysts were surveyed before and after the Fed's June 18 outlook, and the forecast was unchanged. Even after a 28 percent plunge in 2013, the bears are emboldened by this year's records in equity markets, and gold assets in exchange-traded products have shrunk to the smallest since 2009.Hmm... As another measure of alleged euphoria, please note "gold assets in exchange-traded products have shrunk to the smallest since 2009". Also note that the median forecast is for another plunge, on top of the reported 28% plunge in 2013! Is that euphoria or extreme pessimism? By the way, since when are median expectations of analysts anything to believe? "The surge in gold can't sustain itself," Donald Selkin, who helps manage about $3 billion of assets as chief market strategist at National Securities Corp. in New York, said June 20. "It was a temporary spike because of a confluence of events: Iraq and Yellen. People will be looking at other areas for excitement. Holdings are down, so people are leaving gold in search of something better."How Markets Work Curiously, Selkin helps manage $3 billion but does not seem to understand how markets work. People are not "leaving gold". It is in fact impossible to leave gold, or any other asset for that matter, short of dumping it in the ocean. With any financial asset, someone always has to hold it. If I sell gold, someone else has to buy it. If I sell shares of Microsoft, someone else has to buy them. The same is true with cash. Every cent the Fed prints has to be held by someone. Selkin does not understand the driving force for gold, the reasons to own it, and apparently how markets work in general. American buying is slowing. Sales of American Eagle gold coins by the U.S. Mint totaled 252,500 ounces this year, 60 percent less than in the first six months of last year and the lowest for the period since 2008, data on its website show.Mint sales are down 60% and hedge funds holding futures holdings are down 52%. Euphoria or pessimism? You make the call. What the Future Hold I do not know the future price of gold, nor does anyone else. But I do know the fundamental drivers as well as the reasons to hold gold. And neither of those has changed. I also know truly inane economic reporting when I see it, and the Bloomberg article quoted above is a perfect example. For further discussion, please see Plague of Gold Bears Now Say "Gold Unsafe at Any Price"; What's the Real Long-Term Driver for Gold? Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com |
| "Three Es Suggest Massive Change is Upon Us" Chris Martenson's Accelerated Crash Course Posted: 25 Jun 2014 12:38 PM PDT Chris Martenson at Peak Prosperity put together a condensed version of his 4.5-hour long Crash Course Video Series. The condensed version is just under an hour long, and it's well worth your time to play it. The video is not about an "economic crash" per se, although Chris and I both think one is highly likely. Rather, Chris analyzes "The Three Es" (Economy, Energy, and Environment) to highlight serious problems in assumed Exponential Growth, an "E" that neither of us believes likely. Here is a link to the Accelerated Crash Course Transcript. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com |
| Diving Into the GDP Report of -2.9% Growth Posted: 25 Jun 2014 11:22 AM PDT The first quarter GDP initial projection was 0.1%. The second estimate came in at -1.0%. Today the third estimate came in at -2.9%. Gosh, first quarter weather was far worse than anyone realized. Let's dive into the First Quarter 2014 Third Estimate from the BEA for some weather-details. Real GDP declined 2.9 percent in the first quarter, after increasing 2.6 percent in the fourth. The downturn reflected a downturn in exports, a larger decrease in private inventory investment, a deceleration in PCE, and downturns in nonresidential fixed investment and in state and local government spending, partly offset by an upturn in federal government spending. Prices The price index for gross domestic purchases, which measures prices paid by U.S. residents, increased 1.3 percent in the first quarter, the same increase as in the second estimate; this index increased 1.5 percent in the fourth quarter. Excluding food and energy prices, the price index for gross domestic purchases increased 1.3 percent in the first quarter, compared with an increase of 1.8 percent in the fourth. Components
Real gross domestic income (GDI), which measures the output of the economy as the costs incurred and the incomes earned in the production of GDP, decreased 2.6 percent in the first quarter, in contrast to an increase of 2.6 percent in the fourth . For a given quarter, the estimates of GDP and GDI may differ for a variety of reasons, including the incorporation of largely independent source data. However, over longer time spans, the estimates of GDP and GDI tend to follow similar patterns of change. Key Item Synopsis
GDP and GDI match over time. GDP was down 2.9% while GDI was down 2.6%. Take your choice. The numbers are awful. Clearly the weather was far worse than anyone imagined. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |
Postări
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu