joi, 2 octombrie 2014

Damn Cool Pics

Damn Cool Pics


Homemade Halloween Costumes By Parents

Posted: 02 Oct 2014 05:47 PM PDT

These parents definitely love their kids and tried really hard to make the best Halloween costumes possible. Unfortunately they didn't turn out so well, but I still think they are better than store bought and have their own charm.


























Welcome To Trash Island

Posted: 02 Oct 2014 03:03 PM PDT

Award-winning filmmaker Alison Teal, 27, visited Thilafushi, better known as Trash Island. It's an artificial island created as a municipal landfill situated to the west of Malé. When people think of the Maldives they certainly don't think of shores filled with mountains of trash. But this is the darker side of the Maldives that people rarely see.

















 

50 Worst Book Covers and Titles Ever Made

Posted: 02 Oct 2014 02:52 PM PDT

These book covers are absolutely ridiculous. The only thing worse than the book covers, is the title of the books they belong to.
























 

More Google Answer Boxes, with Bonus Experiment!

More Google Answer Boxes, with Bonus Experiment!


More Google Answer Boxes, with Bonus Experiment!

Posted: 01 Oct 2014 05:10 PM PDT

Posted by Dr-Pete

Last week, drowned out by the Panda 4.1 rollout, the  MozCast Feature Graph detected a significant jump in the presence of answer boxes (+42% day-over-day, up to +44% on September 30th):

This measurement includes all types of "answer" boxes – direct answers, stock quotes, weather forecasts, box scores, and even the new, attributed answer boxes. Digging into the data, it appears that almost the entirety of the jump is in the new style of answer boxes. These are the answers that are extracted from 3rd-party websites, and they look something like this:

The key distinction is that you'll see a search-result-style title and link below the answer. Separating just this data, the same two-week graph looks like this:

The day-over-day increase from September 25-26 in new answer boxes was +98%, almost doubling the total number in our data set. This clearly represents a significant expansion in Google's ability to extract and display answers.

The "Winning" Queries

Over 100 queries picked up the new answer boxes in our data set. Below are 10 examples. Keep in mind that any given query may gain or lose its answer box for any given search, depending on factors such as search history, localization, and personalization:

  1. global warming
  2. mba
  3. steampunk
  4. dsl
  5. triathlon
  6. pollution
  7. firewall
  8. activex
  9. vegan
  10. project management

Many of these are general, informational answers, and quite a few of the new answer boxes in our data set seem to be coming directly from Wikipedia. With this update, Google also may have added a new capability – here's the answer box for #3 above ("steampunk"):

The image on the right is being extracted directly from the article. While we've seen some examples of brand boxes with logos, the ability to directly add general images seems to be new. Other new answer boxes are more traditional, such as "mba":

Many of these new queries seem to be broad, "head" queries, but that could be a result of our data set, which tends to be skewed toward shorter, commercial queries. One four-word query with a new answer box was "girl scout cookies types":

It's interesting to note that the more grammatically correct "girl scout cookie types" doesn't seem to return an answer box. These new answers seem to be very dependent on query structure and how the query matches on-page keywords.

An Experiment in Answers

If Google is pulling more and more answers directly from the index (i.e. our sites), then it stands to reason we could update those answers. A couple of months ago, I noticed that one of my posts was producing an answer box for the search "how much does google make":

Even as the author of this post, I had to admit that was a pretty terrible answer, especially being 3-4 years out of date. I quickly assembled a Twitter mob to deal with this problem (well, basically  Ruth Burr Reedy and David Iwanow), and we unanimously decided something must be done:

I decided to edit the top of the post, adding a user-friendly update for new visitors that gave new numbers for 2013. This went up on July 10th – I posted the update on social, and by later that day the new page was cached.

Two weeks went by, and there was no change to the answer box. Naturally, I assumed this was because the old text was still in place (I had simply added new information). So, on July 24th, I carefully removed the old content (that appears in the answer box) and edited the META description. By the next day, the new page was cached and the new snippet was showing up in Google SERPs.

So, what does that answer box look like today, almost two months later? Look up four paragraphs, because it's exactly the same. Even though the content used in this answer box is now completely gone, Google is still using it in search results.

While this is only one example, it seems to suggest that these answers are not being extracted and created in real-time – they're being stored in some sort of internal Google knowledge base. This may sound familiar, if you've read anything over the last month about Google's theoretical  Knowledge Vault.

Unlike Freebase-based Knowledge panels and answers, this internal vault can't be edited directly. Unlike organic results, where changes to our pages are generally reflected on the next crawl-and-cache, these answer boxes are being updated much less frequently. Since these new answers link directly to pages, they could be connecting to information that's been mismatched for weeks or even months.

At this point, there's very little anyone outside of Google can do but keep their eyes open. If this is truly the Knowledge Vault in action, it's going to grow, impacting more queries and potentially drawing more traffic away from sites. At the same time, Google may be becoming more possessive of that information, and will probably try to remove any kind of direct, third-party editing (which is possible, if difficult, with the current Knowledge Graph).


Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don't have time to hunt down but want to read!

Brand Communications – Finding Your Company’s Voice

Brand Communications – Finding Your Company’s Voice

Link to White.net

Brand Communications – Finding Your Company’s Voice

Posted: 02 Oct 2014 01:03 AM PDT

One of the central focuses of many companies is getting your brand name out there and boosting brand awareness. This comes in many and varied forms, from blog posts, to expert guides, to social media statuses. However, in the flurry to create and publish more and more brand content, it has felt at times that businesses are pushing quantity over quality and, as a result, are forgetting some of the basics of brand communications.

In this post, I want to take you back to the fundamentals of all brand communications, your brand voice. In doing so I hope to help you to improve the quality of the brand content you're sending out and boost your overall brand image.

So, let's get cracking.

1) Decisions, decisions, decisions
Before you start creating any company content you ought to have a very clear idea of what your brand is meant to represent and what its tone of voice is. However, from what I've seen online recently, there is very little awareness of this at the moment.

So, my first piece of advice is to go back to drawing board and figure it out. Dig out your brand guidelines, company vision, or simply grab the director, and nail down what it is your business stands for.

Are you an expert authority on your topic? Are you innovators? Are you "zany" (please don't be zany…)? But, seriously, are you thought leaders or more laid-back and fun? Cutting edge, or reassuringly familiar?

There are two elements to make sure you cover when you're doing this – personality and tone. So basically what you are and how you convey that. Make sure you analyse both of these aspects of your brand voice before you finalise anything, and make sure the two complement each other.

Know your brand and what it stands for. If you don't have a coherent brand voice then now is the time to nail it down. Take a look at your website, company, clients and staff, and try to find something appropriate for what you currently do. Don't try to force something new and counter-intuitive onto the business just because you think it'll make you more interesting online. It's much better to work with what you've got and clarify your current image.

2) Guidelines
By now you should have a clear idea of what your brand is and what it stands for. To help keep things clear for everyone it might well be worth writing up a summary of your brand – its mission and its vision, and get everyone to read it. It'll clarify any alterations and also stop people backtracking or attempting to reinterpret it later on.

Further to this, it's now time to write out some defining brand guidelines for all your communications from now on. This includes everything from your website, to your tweets, to your client communications, to guest blog posts (if you've been invited to write one for a well-respected site – we couldn't possibly condone any other form).

In this document you should outline the tone of voice you're going to use – are you serious, jovial, reassuring, friendly, corporate, or expert? Make a decision and stick with it. You should also decide how will refer to yourselves so that it's consistent throughout all your communications.

Consistency is essential to branding so make sure that whatever your guidelines include you are able to uphold them and apply them to all necessary circumstances.

3) Spring-cleaning
Now that you're armed with your carefully thought out brand guidelines it's time to tackle your company communications head on. The first thing you must do is have a look at everything currently out there – your website, your G+ page, your blog, your document templates – EVERYTHING.

You need to make sure that every single communication your brand has with the public adheres to your new guidelines. For people to trust you, you MUST be consistent – it's essential.

So be brutal – if your website isn't right then you to need to knuckle down and start rewriting pages. The same goes for document templates – you want to ensure that everything you send to your clients from now on needs to strengthen your brand and present a clear image of who you are. Your clients are much more likely to trust you and your professionalism if everything you send them consistently reinforces this image of you.

The same goes for social media accounts. These can be particularly difficult to manage as, often, more than one person can access them and send out messages. We've all seen enough cases of errant tweets from big brands sent by misguided staff members to know the damage that inappropriate use of social media can cause.

So from now on, make it clear exactly what will and what won't be considered acceptable on your company's social media. Bear in mind you can normally be a little more light-hearted than on your website for example, but you remember that you're aiming for consistency, so don't stray too far from your norm. A few photos of team events can be a great way to show personality, just make sure nobody decides to live tweet the Christmas party after one too many drinks.

It might even be wise, whilst the new guidelines are being implemented, to limit the number of people who can access these accounts. Then, once everyone has a better understanding of what is expected, you can open them up again. It may seem a bit harsh, but it's better than having to run damage control on people's mistakes.

 

So there you go – three simple steps to helping you find your company's voice. Follow them and implement them in a consistent manner and you should have no difficulty getting people to trust in your brand. Even better, the more people who trust in you, the more likely they are to recommend you to others. Then, when these people search for you, you can rest assured that everything they read online will only further support all the wonderful things they've already been told. Job done!

 

(Image from Wikipedia)

The post Brand Communications – Finding Your Company's Voice appeared first on White.net.

Seth's Blog : "But why aren't you hysterical?"

 

"But why aren't you hysterical?"

I wonder if this has always been true: When things start to go awry, we get frustrated at leaders (or employees or co-workers) who seem to be calmly considering the options and doing their best work instead of hyperventilating. 

The amount of hysteria one demonstrates isn't at all related to how much work is being done (or how much we care).

       

 

More Recent Articles

[You're getting this note because you subscribed to Seth Godin's blog.]

Don't want to get this email anymore? Click the link below to unsubscribe.



Email subscriptions powered by FeedBlitz, LLC, 365 Boston Post Rd, Suite 123, Sudbury, MA 01776, USA.