Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis |
- Good but Expected News for Republicans: House Democrats Re-Elect Pelosi as Their Leader
- Full Year of Muni Gains Wiped Out in 2 Weeks; California in Shambles, Philadelphia Downgraded; Issuance Soars; Horrid Muni Risk-Reward Setup
- Why It's Hard to Get a Business Off the Ground
- 6 Million Benefit-Paying Jobs Vanish in One Year!
Good but Expected News for Republicans: House Democrats Re-Elect Pelosi as Their Leader Posted: 17 Nov 2010 05:25 PM PST In good, yet expected news for Republicans House Democrats Re-Elect Pelosi as Their Leader The House speaker, Nancy Pelosi of California, was re-elected on Wednesday to lead the Democrats in the next Congress, despite her party's loss of more than 60 seats and its majority control of the House in the midterm elections.Arrogant Nonsense The American people have spoken. The idea that Democrats are "out there listening to the American people" is absurd and the election proves it. Voters have had enough of Obamanamics already (and certainly not a moment too soon). Only an arrogant buffoon could not understand that. The implication of course, is that Nancy Pelosi is an arrogant buffoon. If Pelosi wants to reduce the budget deficit then "Where the hell is the plan?" Proving that I am an equal party basher, I ask the same of the Republicans "Where the hell is the plan?" The difference is Republicans have a huge advantage for two big reasons. 1. Nancy Pelosi's big mouth 2. A devastating election for the Democrats However, it is important to point out that because BOTH Democrats and Republicans resort to tit-for-tat worst of both worlds compromises, we are in this mess. For example, politics at present consists of this idiotic compromise: you grant a bigger budget for the military, I will give you an increase in entitlements. Thus, both parties are guilty. However, at the moment, Republicans have the upper hand because Nancy Pelosi looks like a arrogant, disingenuous fool. The simple reason is that Nancy Pelosi is an arrogant disingenuous fool. That may sound harsh, but it is the truth. Moreover, I point out once again: I am not a Republican. I am an independent. I vote for policies not parties. I am in favor of a balanced budget amendment, and I ask both parties to back that idea. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List |
Posted: 17 Nov 2010 11:30 AM PST A full year of municipal bond gains went up in smoke in the past two weeks. Worse yet, it's highly likely more blood is coming as issuance soars amid decreased demand from investors. A Moody's downgrade of Philadelphia, a complete mess in California, and a looming city bankruptcy in Michigan all weigh on the sector. MUB iShares National Muni Bond Fund click on chart for sharper image Moody's Cuts Philadelphia Bond Rating Bloomberg reports Philadelphia Bond Rating Cut to A2 by Moody's on Fiscal Weakness Philadelphia's credit rating was reduced to A2 from A1 by Moody's Investors Service, which said the sixth most-populous U.S. city is financially weak and has limited budget options.Realistically, Philadelphia is Bankrupt Philadelphia is in the same big mess for the same reasons as Los Angeles, Miami, Houston, and Oakland: pension promises and public union benefits that cannot possibly be met. It is unfair and immoral to keep raising taxes on city residents to support benefit promises that should not have been made, and cannot possibly be kept no matter how high taxes go. Philadelphia should declare bankruptcy. Swaps on Property and Casualty Insurers Jump on Muni Selloff Please consider Swaps on Property and Casualty Insurers Jump on Muni Selloff The selloff in municipal bonds is helping push the cost to protect the debt of property and casualty insurers to the highest in more than a month.Flood of Issuance Amidst Head Winds A flood of issuance from California and other states comes amidst downgrades of Philadelphia, problems in California, and renewed fears of sovereign default in Europe. Please consider the Wall Street Journal article Head Winds Facing Muni Issuers. The tumble in long-term municipal bonds last week comes as a flood of states and municipalities are seeking money in the debt markets, raising the prospect some will have to pay higher yields to lure investors.There much more in the article. Those interested in Munis should give it a look. Bad Timing in California It is quite typical of California to run into problems at exactly the worst possible time. Le Los Angeles Times reports Bad timing: California seeks bond buyers amid rout in muni market Yet another way the California Legislature has stuck it to taxpayers: The long delay on a budget agreement this year also delayed the state's plans to raise cash in the municipal bond market.California Bond Sale Pricing Delayed CNBC reports Institutional Pricing on California's $10 Billion Notes Delayed Institutional pricing of California's $10 billion of revenue anticipation notes, which had been scheduled for Wednesday, has been delayed until Thursday due to litigation over a state building sale, the state treasurer's office said on Wednesday.Build America Bond Program About to Expire Build America Bonds, a brainchild of the Obama Administration, was supposed to be a "temporary emergency" program. The debate now is whether to kill it. David Reilly writing for the Wall Street Journal says Build America Bonds Need Tearing Down Started in early 2009, the program offered state and local governments a subsidy to help issue debt when credit markets were largely frozen. The idea was that government borrowers, who largely sell tax-exempt debt to individual investors, needed help tapping the wider institutional market.I concur with David Reilly. States need to get their fiscal budgets in order. Going into more debt does not work. Muni Risk-Reward Setup is Horrid Regardless of whether the Congressional lame duck session approves a permanent extension to the temporary Build America Bond Program, munis are very richly priced in this backdrop of increasing global uncertainty and likelihood of additional bond downgrades and even defaults. I see no point in investing in munis at all. The sector crashed in October 2008 and there is no reason it can't (or even that it shouldn't) crash again. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List |
Why It's Hard to Get a Business Off the Ground Posted: 17 Nov 2010 09:04 AM PST Why it's hard to get a business off the ground in various cities around the USA including Milwaukee, Los Angeles, Houston, D.C., Chicago, and Philadelphia. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List |
6 Million Benefit-Paying Jobs Vanish in One Year! Posted: 17 Nov 2010 02:05 AM PST Analysis of weekly unemployment data and covered employees shows that 5,977,844 benefit-paying jobs have been lost in the last year. click on chart for sharper image The above chart is from reader Tim Wallace. I added the date and numeric annotations. Thanks Tim! Covered Employment Stats of Merit
What is a Covered Employee? The exact meaning of "covered employee" varies slightly state to state, but not by much. In simple terms it means one is eligible for unemployment insurance benefits. Most states exclude the self-employed, commission based employment such as real estate agents, those in student training programs, academic and hospital internships, employment by churches or religious organizations, and rehabilitation programs. Self-employed individuals must pay into unemployment insurance programs, however, the self-employed are not eligible for benefits anywhere. Nearly 6 Million Jobs Vanish By the above intrepretation, it is safe to conclude that 5,977,844 jobs totally vanished (not just benefit paying jobs). The only way that cannot be true is if there was a sudden shocking increase in the number of real estate agents, church hiring, or close to 6 million people all of a sudden decided to go into business for themselves. All of those possibilities are highly unlikely to say the least. Tim Wallace writes .... The ANNUAL ADDITIVE TREND from 2004 to 2008 of 1.9 million is now a net loss of 8 million the past two yearsDid the stimulus SAVE or CREATE any jobs, or did we lose over 8 million jobs in two years in spite of record amounts of stimulus? Download data including the covered column is found on the US Department of Labor website, Weekly Claims Data. Was there a Massive Surge in Retirees? click on chart for sharper image There was no massive surge in retirees so that cannot account for the loss of benefits-paying jobs. Retiree Data
Information on retirees is from the Social Security Administration. It undercounts retirees not in the system so actual numbers would be somewhat higher. The number of retirees is certainly increasing which suggests the number of jobs needed to keep the unemployment rate steady is dropping. It also helps explain a falling participation rate (although not at the rate that it is falling). That aside, the growth in the number of retirees cannot begin to explain the massive loss of benefits-paying jobs. The increase in retirees from 2008 to 2010 is only 2,240,755 total. Civilian population growth was rose by 1,980,000 just last year. Population Changes I recently discussed population changes in my post In Search of 1.1 Million Jobs Claimed by Obama; Where the Hell are They? Let's take another look at the BLS October Jobs Report.Expected Increase In Workforce In the last year the Civilian Noninstitutional Population rose by 1,980,000. There were 1,096,769 retirees. That mean the labor force should have increased by 883,231 workers. Instead the BLS reports the labor force increased by 50,000 workers (second line in table A above). The rest supposedly dropped out of the workforce. Hard Facts Please remember the numbers in Table A are from phone surveys, seasonally adjusted, and arguably quite error prone. On the other hand, the covered employees chart was produced from actual jobs data from the states. Hard data says the US lost 5,977,844 benefits-paying jobs in a year, and 8,056,810 benefits-paying jobs in 2 years when we should have gained close to a million jobs a year or so based on population growth, even factoring in the number of retirees. 6 Million Benefits-Paying Jobs Vanish and Unemployment Rate Drops! In spite of losing nearly 6 million benefits-paying jobs in the last year (and not gaining another 800,00 to a million more based on population growth minus retirees), the unemployment rate in October of 2009 was 10.1% and it is now supposedly a half-point lower at 9.6%. Is this a crock or what? Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List |
You are subscribed to email updates from Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu