Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis |
Tweedle Dum vs. Tweedle Dee; Does Janet Yellen Have What It Takes? Posted: 17 Aug 2013 02:48 PM PDT The battle over the next Fed chairman is on. Will it be Janet Yellen or Larry Summers? The Washington Post comments "Janet Yellen called the housing bust and has been mostly right on jobs", asking Does she have what it takes to lead the Fed? Don't bother reading the article. And don't bother reading any of the equally ridiculous pro-Summers articles you can easily find. For starters, it is highly likely that President Obama has already made up his mind. He is pretending there is a choice to be made when there is really no choice unless some political event forces a change in direction between now and the announcement. The supporters of Yellen cite her focus on jobs. The supporters of Larry Summers cite his crisis management skills. The detractors of Yellen cite her even-more-dovish-than-Bernanke monetary stance. The detractors of Larry Summers question his crisis management skills. I suggest Summers has a proven track record of crisis management due to his proven track record of causing them, hardly a ringing endorsement for Fed chairman. The Detractors Win The detractors win both sides. Neither Yellen nor Summers is qualified. In fact, there is not a single person who would take the job that is qualified. There should not be a Fed at all. The idea that a group of economic wonks can sit down and micromanage the economy to health is preposterous. Central bank clowns have proven time and time again they have no idea what the interest rate should be. A massive bubble in dotcom stocks followed by a massive bubble in housing is proof enough. And this Fed on which Yellen sits has triggered asset bubbles in stocks and bonds and she cannot even see it. Crisis Management Needed Curiously, lots of analysis suggest we do not need Larry Summers because there is not going to be another crisis. Rest assured there will be another crisis, and much sooner than most think. But that does not make Summers qualified. His role is to help create crises, not stop them. Tweedle Dum vs. Tweedle Dee The only candidate that makes sense is the candidate who will set a target date to end the Fed. Unfortunately, no such candidate is on the short list. The choice is between Tweedle-Dee who rates to slosh money around even more than Bernanke in a futile effort to create jobs, and Tweedle-Dum who will do whatever Wall Street wants. Practically speaking, is there really a difference? Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com |
US Car Makers Crank Out Cars Around the Clock; Who is Buying the Cars? Posted: 17 Aug 2013 11:37 AM PDT US car makers are cranking out cars three shifts a day. The goal is to run plants around the clock, 365 days a year, even eliminating breaks. Please consider Open All Night: America's Car Factories. Nearly 40% of car factories in North America now operate on work schedules that push production well past 80 hours a week, compared with 11% in 2008, said Ron Harbour, a senior partner with the Oliver Wyman Inc. management consulting firm.Who is Buying Cars? So who is buying new cars? It's not millennials struggling to find a job, loaded up in student debt and delaying family formation. The Wall Street Journal reports Who's Buying 'Youth' Cars? Seniors. In recent years, auto makers have developed a bevy of pint-size models like the Chevy Sonic, Fiat, Ford Fiesta and Kia Soul, and promoted them using social-media, music festival sponsorships, and in some cases, daredevil stunts. To hype the new Chevy Sonic, General Motors Co. filmed the subcompact parachuting out of a plane for an online campaign aimed squarely at 18-to-30-year-olds.Millennial Generation "Big Prize" As more and more seniors stay employed longer (because they have to), the demand for cars has kept pace. I keep wondering how long that can last. The average age of those working at fast-food restaurants is telling. There is no pent-up demand that I can see, at least in the age group of those buying. Auto makers are targeting the big prize, the millennial generation, and curiously even youth cars are not going to the youth. And I do not think they will. The generation of millennials is nowhere near as big as the boomers, and as a class, the millennials are struggling in low-pay jobs (if they can find work at all), and burdened down in student debt to boot. And look at the pay differential of the car makers: $15 an hour for new workers versus $28 an hour for veteran workers. Most importantly, a secular shift in attitudes towards cars and debt have changed. Millennials are not boomers nor do they have boomer attitudes. Carmakers should enjoy the boom while it lasts. The "big prize" is not around the corner. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com |
You are subscribed to email updates from Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu