duminică, 29 august 2010

Site review for Google I/O attendees

Site review for Google I/O attendees: "

If you’re attending Google I/O next week then you might enjoy the SEO site review session that we’ll be doing. If you’ll be attending Google I/O, you can now submit your website for review. I’ll also include the form below:


Added 5/20/2010: The site review is today and we’ve already gotten over 500 sites submitted, so I’m removing the form submission.


By the way, if you’re attending Google I/O you’ll probably want to install the very spiff Android app for it. You can search for [Google I/O] in the Android Market. And if you want to know what to expect in the SEO site review session, here’s the video from the panel we did last year:



If you see me at Google I/O, please say hello and tell me what you wish Google would do that we’re not doing. :)


Added: Note that sites and comments submitted to this form may be publicly reviewed in our site review session.


"

Live-blogging (okay live-waving) Day 1 of Google I/O Keynote

Live-blogging (okay live-waving) Day 1 of Google I/O Keynote: "

Okay, I’m going to try live-blogging the keynote of Google I/O, but I’m doing it with a twist. I’m going to try live-blogging in Google Wave with some other folks.


Watch the live-stream video at http://www.youtube.com/user/GoogleDevelopers by the way.


Lots of folks will be live-blogging or waving. Here is a different live wave with Gina Trapani, Kevin Marks, Leo Laporte, and Adam Pash, for example.


Danny Sullivan will be live-blogging the keynote over on Search Engine Land. I believe that Tom Krazit is live-blogging the keynote for CNET too.


Here goes my live-wave:




"

Live-buzzing Day 2 of the Google I/O keynote

Live-buzzing Day 2 of the Google I/O keynote: "

Okay, today I’m going to try something different again. I’m going to try live-buzzing the keynote of Day 2 of Google I/O. You can follow the live-buzz right here.


I’m going to update the buzz as news comes out; if you’re following on the web instead of on Buzz, you might need to hit reload to see updates.


Watch the live-stream video at http://www.youtube.com/user/GoogleDevelopers by the way.


Check out other live-blogging from:

- Engadget

- Search Engine Land

- A live-wave from Lifehacker

- New York Times

- Wall Street Journal


I believe it should be fine to say that I think you’ll like the speed and polish of Froyo. :)


"

A few thoughts on SSL Search

A few thoughts on SSL Search: "

I’m incredibly happy that Google has added the option to search over SSL by going to https://www.google.com/ — note the “s” in “https.” I’m writing this blog post in a hotel right now because I’m in Europe for a week doing a series of tech talks, but I could just as easily be working down at local Dublin cafe with an open WiFi hotspot. In both cases, I might want to do a private search that the hotel or local cafe can’t see. A Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) connection provides an encrypted tunnel between my browser and Google, so other people can’t sniff what I’m searching for.


I believe encrypted search is an important option for Google searchers. The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has asked for secure search in the past (see this post from 2009), and I credit them for helping to put this on Google’s radar. Another inspiration that helped to spark this project was Cory Doctorow’s book “Little Brother.” It was one of my favorite books of 2008 and while I won’t go into the book’s plot here, it’s a quick, fun read. “Little Brother” also makes a compelling case for encrypting HTTP traffic on the web.


Some people don’t yet fully understand how SSL search works. I saw one commenter sayIf they still pass in the search parameters in the URL (Get), what’s the point? People can still see what you queried, if they made them “post” messages it might actually do something.” It’s important to realize that even though you as a surfer can see the query in the url, the sites between your browser and Google can’t. Google OS demonstrated that by sniffing a regular HTTP query and an HTTPS query in Wireshark to show that the query can’t be seen going over the wire.


Thanks to all the people at Google who did the all the hard work and heavy lifting to deliver this. One of the main engineers behind the effort was Evan Roseman, a member of the webspam team who you might have met at previous search conferences. In fact, Evan was originally scheduled to be on our site review session at Google I/O this past Thursday, but we decided that launching SSL search took priority. :) I also wanted to say thanks and congratulations to the other Googlers (for example Andrew Widdowson, Nathan Dabney, and Murali Viswanathan, but also many, many others) who generously gave their time and effort to make the launch happen and happen smoothly. You might think that switching on SSL for websearch is easy, but for a website with the complexity and scale of Google, it’s really not. The launch wouldn’t have happened without a ton of assistance from Googlers from many parts of the company, and I sincerely appreciate it.


I hope you enjoy https://www.google.com and find it useful.


"

Help me pick my new 30 day challenge

Help me pick my new 30 day challenge: "

Okay, I’ve finished roughly a year of 30 day challenges, and now I’d like your help picking new ideas. So far, I’ve done:

- 30 days with no TV (May)

- 30 days of 10,000 steps each day (June)

- 30 days biking into work (July)

- reading 15 books in 30 days (I only made it to 12) (August)

I took September off. I had a bunch of work I had to focus on.

- 30 days with no Microsoft software or operating systems (October)

- 30 days without Robert Scoble (November). I like Robert a lot; this was kind of a no-op/easy 30 day challenge to force me to find additional people that I’m interested in online.

- 30 days with no caffeine (December)

- 30 days with no Twitter or FriendFeed (January)

- 30 days with no iPhone (February)

- 30 days with no sugar (March). That was hard. My wife and I did this one together and it was the roughest.

- 30 days without replying to external email (April). This one was hard and I wasn’t perfect, but I got in much better balance on time spent on email.

- 30 days with no Facebook (May). This one was another easy one for me. I never used Facebook that much in the first place.


So what should I do now? So far I’m playing with two ideas:

- no email after 10 p.m. Email remains the biggest part of my life where I lack balance, and I still need to get it more under control.

- read 50 pages a day. This is one that my wife has been doing, and she’s been enjoying it.


Other possibilities include:

- 30 days as a vegetarian.

- read the Bible (or the Qur’an) in 30 days. I’ve never read either all the way through.

- 30 days of trying to learn to play guitar.

- meditate 10-15 minutes a day for 30 days.

- try one new thing a day for 30 days.

- draw something everyday for 30 days.

- try polyphasic sleep for 30 days.

- go 30 days spending as little money as possible.

- learn as much of a new language as possible in 30 days.

- 30 days to get my finances in order (I haven’t really paid attention to financial stuff as much as I should).

- try to write a novel/book in 30 days.

- write down one thing I’m thankful for each day for 30 days.


Okay, those are a few that I’ve come up with. Tell me your suggestions and then I might put up a poll to let people vote. :)


"

SEO Advice: Make a web page for each store location

SEO Advice: Make a web page for each store location: "

If your company has a bunch of store locations, please don’t hide that information behind a search form or a POST. If you want your store pages to be found, it’s best to have a unique, easily crawlable url for each store. Ideally, you would also create an HTML sitemap that points to the web pages for your stores (and each web page should have a unique url). If you have a relatively small number of stores, you could have a single page that links to all your stores. If you have a lot of stores, you could have a web page for each (say) state that links to all stores in that state.


Here’s a concrete example. I’m a big fan of Pinkberry because I love frozen yogurt: both the delicious treat and the new version of Android. :) But Pinkberry’s store locator page only offers a search form. Pinkberry has a url for each store (for example, here’s their page for a San Jose location). But because Pinkberry doesn’t provide an HTML sitemap on their store locator page, it’s harder for search engines to discover those pages exist. And in fact for the query [pinkberry san jose], Google does find the specific page, but it doesn’t rank as highly as it might; some other search engines don’t return that web page at all.


I was able to find a list of store locations on Pinkberry’s site, but it’s a lot harder to find than it should be. My advice to Pinkberry would be to add a sentence to their store locator page that says “Or see the full list of all Pinkberry store locations.” That would be helpful not only for regular users but also for search engines.


This was one concrete example, but lots of large companies mess this up. If you have a lot of store or franchise locations, consider it a best practice to 1) make a web page for each store that lists the store’s address, phone number, business hours, etc. and 2) make an HTML sitemap to point to those pages with regular HTML links, not a search form or POST requests.


By the way, Google does provide Google Places (formerly Google Local Business Center) where you can tell Google directly about your business, as do other search engines. But that doesn’t change the fact that you should provide a web page for each store–that lets anyone on the web find your store locations more easily.


P.S. If I were doing a full SEO site review on Pinkberry, I’d mention that they have a slight duplicate content issue, because they have a two different urls for their San Jose location. That’s not a huge deal, but employing the rel=canonical tag would allow Pinkberry to select a single, nicer url instead of search engines trying to pick between two identical pages.


"

SEO site review session from Google I/O 2010

SEO site review session from Google I/O 2010: "

A couple weeks or so ago, we did an SEO site review session at Google I/O 2010. The video from that session is now live:



The video is about an hour long, but I hope it’s a pretty good use of your time if you’re interested in search engine optimization. Enjoy!


"